00:05:011, 00:06:886, 00:12:511 - Intended to miss double here? There's a chord playing, the same as all the other doubles. Even if it's a little weaker I think it's still worth emphasizing in my opinion.

(It's emphasized at 00:14:386 - too)

00:39:569 - Missing triple? The snares usually get emphasized as such like at 00:36:700 - for example

00:58:573 (58573|1,58692|1,58812|1,58872|0,58931|1,58991|0) - Quite awkward to play with this anchor, feels intrusive. Consider moving 00:58:931 (58931|1) - to col 3

01:03:354 - The gameplay could improve, it is very straining on the left hand especially with 01:03:712 (63712|1,63832|1,63951|1,64071|1,64190|1,64310|1) - this long anchor.

Consider switching 01:03:533 (63533|1,63593|2) - and move 01:03:832 (63832|1) - to col 3. This plays a lot better for me

01:16:979 - Single, no melody here (same as 01:15:067 - )

01:24:270 - same? It's like 01:22:358 -

01:25:645 (85645|2) - If the 1/4 notes are for the piano, think this should be removed. The piano stops here

01:29:290 (89290|1) - Col 3? I think the long bias on the left does not fit the music here in my opinion

01:40:406 - Very straining on the left hand here, mainly most of your anchors fall on col 2 and 1 which makes the transition to 01:41:362 - a lot more rough

Consider moving 01:40:525 (100525|1,100645|0) - one col to the right

01:42:677, 01:44:589, 01:46:501, 01:50:326, 01:52:238, 01:54:151, 01:54:390, 01:55:585 - From what I understand, the doubles are for the violin(?) in this section. I think these should be singles as they don't play here, and it makes the other doubles representing the violin not stand out that well.

01:58:692, 01:59:410, 02:00:605, 02:03:473 - Single? The melody doesn't play here, and you do have singles when it's not followed at 02:02:039 -

02:08:613 - should be like 02:09:330 - ? Same rhythm yet uses different doubles.

02:21:700 (141700|0) - intended? There's no sound here, so I feel it's better to remove since there's the 1/4 kicks after

02:52:238 (172238|1) - col 1? It's a different key from 02:52:119 (172119|2,172358|2,172477|1) - so putting it in this trill doesn't feel fitting

02:56:780 - should be a single since no key?

03:19:131 (199131|0,199131|1) - More fitting to move this to the other hand, to make it like a mirrored variant of 03:17:696 -

04:07:975 - Single? You don't usually emphasize the piano alone with a double in this section, it's been only for percussion

04:10:206 - intended to ignore snare? You don't ignore at 04:12:119 -

04:18:971 (258971|1,259051|1,259210|1,259290|1,259449|1,259529|1,259688|1,259768|1) - oh goodness x.x I really think the doubles need to be rearranged here, there's way too much strain on one column here over the others which makes this very poor to play

05:10:406 (310406|2,310525|2,310645|2,310764|2,310884|2,311003|2,311123|2) - Think this anchor really gets in the way of how this pattern overall plays out, very awkward to hit for the right hand.

Consider 05:11:003 (311003|2,311063|3,311123|2,311182|3) - switching these around (ctrl+G) and move 05:11:302 (311302|2) - to col 4

00:48:155, 00:55:684 - Add a note here? You follow it later on i.e. 00:51:920 - so rn it's inconsistent

Also 00:48:273, 00:55:802 - should have a double? 00:52:037 - is a double for the same thing

01:25:567 (85567|2) - Should be removed to keep consistent with your 1/2 rhythms. See 01:17:920 - for example

01:22:037 (82037|2,82273|2,82508|2) - this anchor is uglyyyyyy can you move 01:22:273 (82273|2) - to col 4? more satisfying to play imo

01:42:625 (102625|2) - No vocal here, should be removed for consistency

[!] Hard diff has a bunch of misnaps of 1/3 that should be 1/2 or 1/4

00:06:076 (6076|1,6312|0) - This is not 1/3, put it in 1/2

00:06:939 (6939|0,7018|2) - same. I'm not sure if this is intended but this is a hard diff, you can definitely use some 1/4 here.

00:11:488 (11488|3) - this is 100% misnapped and should be in 1/2

00:13:606 (13606|3,13841|1,14076|2) -

00:29:606 (29606|3) -

00:33:763 (33763|3) -

00:37:057 (37057|0,37135|2), 00:44:586 (44586|1,44665|0) -

00:41:292 (41292|0) -

01:19:174 (79174|0,79253|3) -

01:22:939 (82939|0,83018|3) -

01:26:704 (86704|0,86782|3) -

01:29:998 (89998|3,90076|0,90469|2,90547|0) -

01:45:527 (105527|0,105606|3) -

Replace with 1/4 patterns or just 1/2

00:09:449 (9449|3,9684|3,9920|3,10155|3,10390|3) - Long anchor here seems unnecessary, move 00:09:920 (9920|3) - to col 3?

00:19:331 (19331|2) - Move to col 2 to avoid 4 note anchor here
00:23:096 (23096|0) - same to col 2
00:29:684 (29684|0) - to col 2

00:17:684, 00:25:214 - why the triple here? The vocal nor instrumental gets stronger here

00:31:155 (31155|2,31214|1) - one col to right? I think the streams here get a bit heavy on the inner columns and for the left side, would spread it out a bit

00:38:684 (38684|2,38743|1) - same

01:18:978 (78978|1) - Think it'd be cool to put this in col 1 so the jacks go back and forth for the vocal (a followup on 01:18:390 (78390|3,78508|3) -

01:17:390 (77390|2) - would move this to col 4 the transition from this to the next notes get a bit awkward since it's straining on col 3
01:19:273 (79273|2) - same

01:21:155 (81155|1), 01:24:920 (84920|1), 01:26:802 (86802|1) - same here but to col 1

00:08:861 (8861|3,8920|2,9096|2,9155|3,9331|3,9390|2) - The 1/4 streams here don't fit what's going on with the 1/4 hihats, the 1/4 should be where the doubles start, not leading to the doubles (similar to the diff above)

00:12:625 (12625|3,12684|2,12861|2,12920|3,13096|0,13155|1) - same

01:19:920 - should be a single? No vocal here

01:28:508 - should just be a regular double and not a 1/4 stream

01:44:625 - not sure what this double is for, no strong sound here

00:01:331 (1331|1,1331|3), 00:03:214 (3214|2,3214|0), 00:05:096 (5096|0,5096|1), 00:08:861, 00:10:743, 00:12:625 - should just be a single? No vocal here so not sure what these doubles are emphasizing

also 00:13:214 - missing a triple

00:32:978 (32978|2) - would be better in col 4 imo, a bit awkward in the inner columns with the streams

00:36:273,00:36:743, 00:43:802, 00:44:273 - should be a double

00:46:508, 00:50:273, 00:54:037 - should be a single
00:55:684, 00:57:567 - should be a double

Also 00:46:390 - this part in general is a bit biased on the left hand I'd probably rearrange this a bit so it's not all left trills like 00:46:508 (46508|0,46625|1,46743|0,46861|1,46978|0,47096|1,47214|0,47331|1) -

01:18:508 (78508|1) - Would be better in col 1 imo, 01:18:390 (78390|1,78508|1,78743|1,78861|1) - this is a little eh

01:19:096 (79096|0,79214|0,79331|0,79449|0) - this anchor is really awkward especially with the burst, move 01:19:214 (79214|0) - to col 4

01:20:390 (80390|0,80390|2,80861|0,80861|2), 01:22:743 - thhis should be a single, no vocal

01:34:508 (94508|2) - Move to col 4? You repeat the col 1 to col 3 jack a lot here it'd be nice to change it up a bit

01:42:037 (102037|1) - same but to col 1

01:37:449 - should be a double + avoid 3-note anchor here

00:07:802 (7802|0,7920|0) - Doesn't fit well to use the jack pattern here when you already use up col 1 for the long anchor right before it, so it doesn't stand out as a different rhythm. Would rearrange this a bit to avoid being grouped with the anchor.

00:10:625 - 00:14:390 -> This entire part is just heavy on left trills or something, I feel a lot of effort being put on the left compared to the right. Maybe rearrange some notes here a bit so it's more balanced

00:18:978, 00:26:508 - Maybe more fitting as a single since there isn't really a strong sound here?

00:24:743 - this should be a double for consistency

00:33:155 (33155|3) - I think it'd be better to remove this and move 00:33:096 (33096|0) - to col 4, not only does the pattern currently feel a bit too biased on the left hand but saving the 1/4 notes for the more audible vocal would be more fitting imo
00:40:684 (40684|0) - same but 00:40:625 (40625|3) - to col 1

remove 00:35:625 (35625|3) and 00:43:155 (43155|0) - as well since too subtle? or nothing at all

00:34:625, 00:42:155 - double

00:37:684 (37684|2) - I'd move this to col 4 imo there's no reason to have all the streams stuck on the first three columns

00:46:508 (46508|1) - col 1? 00:46:155 (46155|1,46273|1,46508|1,46625|1) - this transition kinda dookie
00:54:037 (54037|1) - same

00:50:273 (50273|2), 00:57:802 (57802|2) - same but to col 4

00:52:743 (52743|0,52861|1,52861|0,52978|0,53096|1,53214|0,53214|1,53331|0) - ewwww rough left hand transition

maybe move both 00:52:861 (52861|0,53214|1) - of these notes to col 3?

01:21:331 (81331|0) - Plays better in col 2

01:22:743 (82743|1) - to col 4 for same reason

01:23:802 (83802|0) - to col 3

01:28:978 (88978|1) - to col 1

01:26:508 (86508|1,86625|1,86773|1,86861|1,86978|1) - noooo this is ugly anchor to play

move 01:26:625 (86625|1) - to col 3 and 01:26:978 (86978|1) - to col 1 maybe

01:31:449 - Would be better as double, you don't really use triples back to back in this diff so this will catch the player off guard (also the vocal is very weak here)

01:34:037, 01:34:273, 01:35:449, 01:40:861, 01:41:567, 01:41:802 - should be a single? No vocal. Not sure why these are doubles

01:36:508 - you killed the double

01:44:978 - should be a triple and 01:45:096 - a single

01:43:802 - why does the structure change here? There should be triples for every 1/1 beat with a vocal and doubles for vocal, and anything else a single like you did this entire section

00:05:684 - can def afford a triple here, in col 1?

00:08:508 (8508|1,8625|1,8743|1) - Why the sudden 3-note anchor here? Only time it happens for this rhythm

00:13:684 - the chordjack pattern here is really heavy on the left hand which makes the transition to 00:14:625 - really awkward, i'd rearrange the notes a bit so it's more balanced on both hands

00:24:273 - the double died put it back

And 00:24:331 (24331|0) - should be removed for consistency

00:30:743, 00:33:567, 00:34:508, 00:38:273, 00:41:096, 00:42:037 - what is this triple for

00:32:684 (32684|2) - should be removed, no 1/4 vocal (and again the streams here are really left handed)

00:40:684 (40684|2) - remove

00:33:684 (33684|1,33684|0,33743|3,33743|2,33802|0,33802|1,33861|2,33920|1,33920|3,33978|0,33978|2,34037|1,34037|3,34096|2) - this is a really big diff spike, I'd highly recommend removing the single notes in between if you want to keep the doubles or nerf the doubles to regular 1/2 jumpstream

00:41:214 - same

00:35:273 (35273|1,35331|3) - switch these so it's not super biased on the left hand
00:42:802 (42802|2,42861|0) - same

move 00:36:273 (36273|2,36390|0) - to col 4 and 3 respectively
00:36:743 (36743|1,36861|3) - to 1 and 2 respectively and switch 00:36:920 (36920|1,36978|3) -
Apply this same logic but mirrored for 00:43:802 - this part as well

00:39:214 - missing a double

00:47:096, 00:50:861 - doesn't need to be a triple

00:51:920 - should be a double

00:57:567 (57567|3) - col 1 would be better to play

01:11:331 (71331|1) - col 4, this is really biased on the left hand unnecessarily

01:19:920, 01:20:390, 01:27:684, 01:34:978, 01:35:449, 01:38:978, 01:40:861, 01:42:743 - there's no vocal here, double

00:18:096 - Not sure if double is intended, can't hear anything stronger here and it's the only double in this section

00:16:074 (16074|3) - This can be under the LN in col 2? Because the vocal is the same pitch as 00:16:411 (16411|1) -

01:05:119 (65119|3,65287|0) - Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think there's only one vocal here so 01:05:119 (65119|3) - this LN should be longer and the other LN should be removed. Similar to 01:06:130 (66130|2) - for example

Similarly, 01:15:062 (75062|2,75231|3) - only one vocal here?

If you agree, don't forget later kiais like 01:15:062 (75062|2,75231|3,108265|0,108433|3) and 01:58:208 (118208|1,118377|0) - and the last kiai

02:56:185 (176185|1) - Think this should be a 1/1 LN for vocal and 02:56:354 (176354|2) - a regular note?

01:30:568 - Missing double? It's emphasized later on like 01:31:579 and 01:33:265 - for example

Also wondering if 01:33:433 and 01:36:130 - is missing LN for vocal as well

02:07:984 - Missing note for vocal?

00:24:753 (24753|2) - Correct me if I'm wrong, but I do not hear a sound at all, so I believe it's a ghost note and should be removed

00:57:871 (57871|1,57871|0,58377|2,58461|3,58546|1,58630|2,58714|3) - I do not understand the structure here

For example, 00:56:523 (56523|2,56523|0,56523|3,57029|1,57113|0,57197|2,57282|1,57366|0) - is following the vocal and its changes, but when it happens again at 00:57:534, the LNs are not there, but instead at 00:57:871 - where it does not align with the vocal changes, it feels "late" in a sense.

I think the LN placement should change a bit to reflect the vocal more clearly, unless there is something I'm missing.

If you agree, apply any changes to all similar patterns like 01:02:928 - and so on, including the later kiais.

01:05:119 (65119|2) - Extend as 1/1 LN to emphasize the longer vocal here?

00:43:377 (43377|1,43377|3) - I think it makes more sense to have the double LN at 00:43:714 - instead, because the vocal is higher there. It's weaker here.

00:54:501 (54501|0) - Just making sure if this is intended? It's the only instance of a staggered release that isn't a grace, seems like it would work fine as a 1/4 release. It's fine if intended.

01:08:742 (68742|2), etc..seems intended since I see it happen later on, but I'm not sure what these notes are for. Some clarification would be nice, otherwise right now I think these are better off removed since the vocal just repeats here

01:13:040 (73040|3,73208|0) - Should be stacked for consistency? Look at 01:10:343 (70343|0,70512|0) - for example

01:56:186 (116186|0,116355|3), 02:52:477 (172477|3,172646|0) - same

01:20:456 - Could just be me but I think the patterns here are a bit too focused on right hand here for a few seconds, move 01:21:467 (81467|3) - to col 1?

01:26:186 - should be a double? No snare here

02:16:579 (136579|1) - Remove? No vocal here

02:40:511 - Single? no kick here compared to previous kiais

01:02:085 (62085|2,62253|2,62422|2,62590|2,62759|2) - This is a bit awkward on the right hand, long anchor here with many trill transitions. Move 01:02:422 (62422|2) - to col 2?

01:45:568 (105568|1) - same but to col 3

00:26:406 (26406|1) - Col 4? 00:26:406 (26406|2,26406|1,26506|2,26606|1) - this is a bit eh to play in the inner columns

Would also move 00:27:006 (27006|1,27106|2) - one col to right for cleaner gameplay as well

00:39:206 (39206|1) - col 4 as well

00:28:706 (28706|3,28806|3,28806|2) - I can see the intention but I think this is a bit iffy for a hard diff, consider moving 00:28:706 (28706|3) - to col 1 and 00:28:606 (28606|2) - to col 4 for a trill instead

This applies to all similar jacks after, but if you want to keep the jack like that I'd at least suggest making it so the double is two-handed and not on one hand so it's easier to hit.

00:31:506 (31506|3) - Consider reducing by 1/8 for progression with the sound fading out?

00:42:006 (42006|0) - Reduce by 1/4? There's a clear fade out at 00:42:206, or add another LN there

00:45:706 (45706|1,45806|2) - Consider switching these and move 00:45:606 (45606|1) - to col 4, the current jack pattern is a bit rough for this diff

01:16:906 (76906|0,77006|1) - This and every LN like this after should be moved down 1/8 lower, this is very late with what you're following

This applies to ALL diffs above up to 01:22:806 -

01:23:206 (83206|1) - This and every LN after I think it's better to make these 1/2 LNs, more cleaner to release with the overall structure and this difficulty

01:28:806 (88806|2) - for this one in particular reduce the release by 1/8
01:29:106 (89106|1,89106|0) - same with these tbh ^

01:30:406 (90406|1,90406|0,90506|0,90606|1,90806|0,90806|1,90906|1) - Pretty rough transition to play mainly due to the col 2 strain, I'd move 01:30:606 (90606|1) - to col 3

01:31:906 (91906|3) - to col2 to avoid col 4 strain as well

01:33:406 (93406|2) - col 2
01:34:706 (94706|0) - col 2

01:40:406 - Missing double

01:41:406 (101406|2,101506|1,101606|2) - Would flip these, 01:41:006 (101006|2,101206|2,101406|2,101606|2) - this anchor is a bit ugly to play

02:00:006 - The trills here would make more sense like this given the rhythm

01:59:006 (119006|2) - I'd move this to col 4, 01:59:006 (119006|2,119406|1) - to col 1 and 01:59:806 (119806|2) - to col 4 to use one hand trills for progression, since 02:02:006 - sounds more higher I think it'd be a nice detail to start off with less jacks then building up to this part where it's all jacks.

02:08:606 (128606|1,128706|1) - Would be better to move this to col 3 imo cuz this left hand bias with 02:08:406 (128406|0,128506|0,128606|1,128706|1,128806|0,129006|0,129106|0) - is a bit rough for this diff

02:09:706 (129706|3,129806|2) - How about switching these to emphasize the wub change with a one hand trill?

00:29:206 (29206|3) - Could just be me but I think extending this to 1/4 with the other LN would be cleaner visually and in gameplay
Applies to every similar LN after like 00:32:406 (32406|1) -

Would also move 00:29:606 (29606|2) - to col 4 cuz 00:29:606 (29606|2,29806|2,29906|2,30206|2,30306|2) - is a bit eh

00:44:406 (44406|1,44506|0) - Would be a lot better to play if these were switched imo, fits the rhythm better as well

00:49:006 (49006|3,49006|0) - should be a single

01:33:006 (93006|3,93206|3,93306|3) - this transition kinda dookie cuz of the release gap, could you move the col 4 LN to col 2?

01:42:806 (102806|0,102856|1,103006|2,103056|3) - Feel like these would fit better if you extend them 1/8 longer

02:01:606 (121606|0,121706|0,121806|0,121806|3,121906|3,122006|3) - I see the intention but this was kind of a small diff spike imo, did not expect this the first time playing.

Consider moving 02:01:606 (121606|1) - to col 4, move 02:01:706 (121706|0,121806|0,121906|3) - all these to col 2 for a triple jack and remove the double in between

02:06:506 (126506|1,126606|2,126706|0) - Doesn't reflect the rhythm change that well imo, consider moving 02:06:506 (126506|1,126606|2) - to col 3 and 1 respectively

02:09:706 (129706|0) - Col 4 would be better, 02:09:506 (129506|0,129706|0,129806|0,130006|0,130106|0) - this plays pretty dookie

00:28:706 - I think this could be a double as well for the small vocal emphasis?

Same with 00:35:106 -

00:30:006 (30006|0,30006|1,30106|0,30206|1,30206|2,30306|0,30306|2,30406|0,30406|1) - Don't like how this plays out for the left hand, consider this?

You could probably do a similar pattern at 00:36:406 -

00:39:406, 00:42:606 - Missing a double?

01:30:006 (90006|3) - Better to have this release in 1/6 imo, don't like the tight release gap from the LN to the note right above it

01:31:006, 01:31:806, 01:33:806, 01:34:606 - Why no double here? It's the same repeating rhythm

01:44:556 (104556|3) - Don't think the 1/8 makes sense here, no sound warrants it that I can hear

02:08:406 - 02:11:206 -> Really don't like this density increase. I see the intention but it's quite a diff spike from everything else in this chart, I'd highly recommend just keeping it the same way how you did the earlier chordjack patterns

00:27:106 (27106|3,27206|3,27306|3) - This 3-jack anchor can be avoided, feels unnecessary. Just switch 00:26:906 (26906|3,27006|2,27106|3) -

00:33:406 (33406|2,33506|3) - same

00:31:106 - Missing a double here? You can add a note in col 4

00:37:506 - same

00:28:206 (28206|0,28406|2) - Consider moving these to col 2 and 1 respectively, the patterns here are super biased on the right hand

00:34:606 (34606|0,34806|2) - same here

00:34:106 (34106|3,34206|0) - Would move these to col 3 and 4 respectively, the patterns here are way too heavy on the left columns

00:47:406 (47406|0) - Col 4 would play better, still straining on the left hand

00:51:206 - This applies to every quad except for 01:04:006 but the sound isn't strong enough to warrant a quad here imo, a triple fits better

01:05:806 (65806|1) - should be 1/4 higher

01:10:506 (70506|3) - What's this note for? No sound here

01:36:406 (96406|0,96456|2,96506|0,96556|2,96606|0,96656|2,96706|0,96756|2) - very harsh at this speed and a small diff spike, I would suggest moving 01:36:456 (96456|2,96556|2,96606|0,96706|0) - one col to right

01:36:806 - I love longjacks but unfortunately this is a big diffspike considering the entire chart does not even have jacks remotely this long, and I lose a lot of acc here. Please nerf them to 4-note jacks

01:42:306 (102306|0,102306|1) - I would recommend reducing these to 1/8 releases, the tight gap here is awkward

01:43:206 - This pattern is so awkward to play, I think it's mainly how the inner columns work in gameplay.
How about something like this?

Can alternate with this just fine and consistently use 3-note jacks for the repetition

On a side note maybe 01:43:606 - can change to be a short dumpstream to emphasize the music change here instead of chordjack? Feels odd to ignore it

01:46:006 - I think something like this would work instead as how this currently plays is super awkward with the doubles in between the longjacks

Would also move 01:45:006 (105006|3) - to col 3 and 01:45:406 (105406|1) - to col 4 for same reason

01:52:406 - From here, the coordination with 01:52:606 (112606|0,112606|2,113006|1,113006|3) - these doubles and so on are very awkward to properly play with the surrounding patterns.

It would be a lot better if, instead, you moved notes like 01:52:606 (112606|0,113006|3) - to the inner columns and not the outer ones. I find that this plays better while keeping your intentions.

Applies to all the later notes

The same issue happens with 01:55:806 (115806|1,116206|2) - but this time move them to the outer columns, apply to all similar notes after

01:58:806 (118806|1) - Better in col 4 imo, little bit loaded on the left hand

02:01:306 (121306|1) - Remove? The sounds get a bit weaker here so using mostly doubles doesn't feel as fitting

02:04:306 - Missing a double? Could pout a note in col 4

And could make 02:06:506 - a single since there's a pause with the repeating melody here

02:08:806 - 02:10:806 -> The chordjacks from here are super biased on the right hand, most of the jacks/trills are on the right columns, some rebalancing would be beneficial here.

02:14:401 - Thoughts on making the LNs end in 1/6 instead? Imo 1/8 here makes this annoying to repeatedly hold and release with such short gaps.