p/5617596 same map as above ^
seems like there was not an appropriate response to mods, plus some newly added concerns
seems like there was not an appropriate response to mods, plus some newly added concerns
forum
Report a Qualified beatmap here!
posted
Total Posts
2,851
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/517598 (concern was brought up previously but brushed off at t/509002/start=105 )
missing a difficulty labeled as "Hard". i know star rating is not the be all end all say to a map's actual difficulty, but the ranking criteria explicitly states that you have to have a difficulty spread that does not skip any difficulties (barring either Easy or Normal). i've seen maps get unqualified for doing something similar to this in the past, so i'm just posting here to see what others think
missing a difficulty labeled as "Hard". i know star rating is not the be all end all say to a map's actual difficulty, but the ranking criteria explicitly states that you have to have a difficulty spread that does not skip any difficulties (barring either Easy or Normal). i've seen maps get unqualified for doing something similar to this in the past, so i'm just posting here to see what others think
Star rating is a poor metric, and one that does not accurately respect the actually difficulty spread applied in that map. Advanced itself contains many 1/2s, but is underweighted due to the usage of sliders and lack of spacing variance. Hard has minor variance in spacing and slightly more 1/2 clicks in a row. In fact, Hard specifically had the more strenuous strings of 1/2 circles changed to include sliders at detriment to the rhythmic consistency specifically to make it easier to play (A technique that does not, in fact, lower star rating much, if at all).
Plus, Logic's diff is literally 0.01 away from having the Hard icon. What's the problem with that? Don't degrade yourself by only looking at the icons shown and just assuming they're perfect representations of the difficulty spread.
Try looking at the map as well. That's a good start.
I "brushed off" the comment as Stjpa had already summarized my feelings, and the feelings of any rational mapper or modder, on the matter, in the post before mine - Advanced has plenty of 1/2 already, Hard isn't that much of a logical step up, but star rating is catapulted forward simply due to the spacing variances used.
It's also considered good form to post your concerns in the beatmap thread so they can be addressed there without appearing to be uncalled for, since you didn't do so I'm replying here.
Plus, Logic's diff is literally 0.01 away from having the Hard icon. What's the problem with that? Don't degrade yourself by only looking at the icons shown and just assuming they're perfect representations of the difficulty spread.
Try looking at the map as well. That's a good start.
I "brushed off" the comment as Stjpa had already summarized my feelings, and the feelings of any rational mapper or modder, on the matter, in the post before mine - Advanced has plenty of 1/2 already, Hard isn't that much of a logical step up, but star rating is catapulted forward simply due to the spacing variances used.
It's also considered good form to post your concerns in the beatmap thread so they can be addressed there without appearing to be uncalled for, since you didn't do so I'm replying here.
i haven't looked at the map due to not being able to access a computer at the moment, so i can't be sure about the spread from my perspective. either way, even if i had seen the map, i still would have made this post regardless of the playable spread. i am merely pointing out the technically unrankable aspect of the set, that being a difficulty labeled "H" is missing, and there is a jump from N to I. i have seen a mapset previously get unqualified for an issue similar to this even though the spread was fine enough by playing standards, so i just wanted to see what others (specifically more QATs) thought about this.
i didn't post in the thread about it because it appeared to have already been brought up recently, so i figured posting again about it would be redundant even though i wanted to bring up the issue again. duly noted for the next time, i suppose.
sorry for using the term "brushed off" as well. definitely not the connotation i intended to convey; i just couldn't think of a better term in the moment
i didn't post in the thread about it because it appeared to have already been brought up recently, so i figured posting again about it would be redundant even though i wanted to bring up the issue again. duly noted for the next time, i suppose.
sorry for using the term "brushed off" as well. definitely not the connotation i intended to convey; i just couldn't think of a better term in the moment
I'll explain this further, since there's not enough place in the previous post.Low wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/517598 (concern was brought up previously but brushed off at t/509002/start=105 )
missing a difficulty labeled as "Hard". i know star rating is not the be all end all say to a map's actual difficulty, but the ranking criteria explicitly states that you have to have a difficulty spread that does not skip any difficulties (barring either Easy or Normal). i've seen maps get unqualified for doing something similar to this in the past, so i'm just posting here to see what others think
The report is totally invalid. We're talking about a far-from-being-perfect SR system. The current rule says:
There is no part where it says that "ENHIX icons must appear consecutively in your mapset". Advanced doesn't get a H icon by 0.02 stars and Hard is just slightly over it by 0.01 stars. As long as the beatmap has an appropriated spread (and in this case, it's a balanced one) there is no need to DQ by such a minimal difference to please everyone's OCD.Ranking Criteria wrote:
The difficulties in the mapset must be in a consecutive order. Easy or Normal can be skipped if the gap in the star rating spread allows it. The order can be seen in the chart below. If your mapset has two difficulties, one of them cannot be an Insane or Expert. The lowest difficulty must be below 2.0 stars. The difficulty level of Taiko-specific and osu!mania-specific difficulties must also follow a well-designed spread and might contain a Hard and Insane only, if there are standard difficulties present. In CtB, the spread evaluation is upon the BNs discretion. The difficulty spread is determined by the map's star rating.
You should've have posted in the thread about this issue and more importantly you should've tested the beatmap in before to avoid jumping into such conclusions. This is not the place to discuss this so contact me via Discord/in-game if you have further questions about this matter.
Let's keep the reports rolling /o/
w_tre respect for AT&HU - Schur's Theorem
t/279201/start=0
Incorrect snap at 00:14:316 (14316|3,14356|4,14397|5) - and 00:55:829 (55829|3,55870|4,55910|5) - on Another. Should be 1/6
p/5661260 Here's Kawawa's post pointing it out
EDIT: DQed, thanks Blocko
t/279201/start=0
Incorrect snap at 00:14:316 (14316|3,14356|4,14397|5) - and 00:55:829 (55829|3,55870|4,55910|5) - on Another. Should be 1/6
p/5661260 Here's Kawawa's post pointing it out
EDIT: DQed, thanks Blocko
p/5664590/
Not really asking for a DQ here, but I just want someone to explain to me how it's acceptable to only map the chorus/climax of a song and try to let it qualify as a worthy map. The original is only 1:19 which is short already so I don't really understand this.
Not really asking for a DQ here, but I just want someone to explain to me how it's acceptable to only map the chorus/climax of a song and try to let it qualify as a worthy map. The original is only 1:19 which is short already so I don't really understand this.
I could only find the 32 second version though.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N6hC5d6ETmo
There is another 1:19 version?
I should have replied in the map thread lol
Anyways, move to the map thread to discuss if you want to continue.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N6hC5d6ETmo
There is another 1:19 version?
I should have replied in the map thread lol
Anyways, move to the map thread to discuss if you want to continue.
Mugiwara sent the link to the original version in the thread, but it's fine, lol. No need to discuss further. This just made me frown and that doesn't usually happen.IamKwaN wrote:
I could only find the 32 second version though.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N6hC5d6ETmo
There is another 1:19 version?
I should have replied in the map thread lol
Anyways, move to the map thread to discuss if you want to continue.
Some issues with the drain with HR were brought up in t/390176/start=90 but never actually addressed. Drain with HR and being impossible to pass has already been brought up to dq maps (aspire and state of the union)
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/516907
Multiple concerns have been voiced, in addition the mapper has been rude towards a concerned community member.
Multiple concerns have been voiced, in addition the mapper has been rude towards a concerned community member.
Mapper is being quite rude about this also, probably some behavior / code of conduct issues in the threadNozhomi wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5680597 Inappropriate diffname with the extension "Miniature" who is justified only by CS size for FCL's diff.
p/5680279
discussion about the map + a gd'r wants to update his fix with 1/8
discussion about the map + a gd'r wants to update his fix with 1/8
Strange difficulty name https://osu.ppy.sh/s/510958
p/5689630#p5689630 metadata stuff
p/5695712#p5695712 offset is off and couple other odd parts in the highest difficulty, wanting someone to confirm.
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/546679
unpolished map, can be improved in different things, i just pinpointed out some obvious aesthetic things.
p/5701871
unpolished map, can be improved in different things, i just pinpointed out some obvious aesthetic things.
p/5701871
p/5703820/ Questionable density issues in the last diff