p/5495433 Need to change a few things such as inherited points and some sound
EDIT: Already done, hyperion took care
EDIT: Already done, hyperion took care
forum
Report a Qualified beatmap here!
posted
Total Posts
2,851
Pentori wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5552347
really questionable direct qualify and hitsounds/combo's could use work
I second this
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/478289
00:31:161 (3,4) - DS Problem on normal diff
00:31:161 (3,4) - DS Problem on normal diff
I don't think 0.1x is a DS problem. It's literally 1 pixel difference that it's barely noticeable at this difficulty.
okayYuii- wrote:
I don't think 0.1x is a DS problem. It's literally 1 pixel difference that it's barely noticeable at this difficulty.
p/5567598 spinner's end wrong snapped on Hard Diff
p/5575535
5 slider's ends not snapped
5 slider's ends not snapped
p/5582301#p5582301
Need opinion on questionable matter
Need opinion on questionable matter
Hardest two diffs
( Insane + StaR's Insane )
Have rhythm issues, and overspaced jumps. Where the song is less intense there is big spacing, where the song is really intense there is less spacing. Overall the hardest diff's last 10 seconds need a remap in rhythm, because it completely is just 1/2 spam, more in the modpost.
Link: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/505627/start=90 (scroll down to my post)
( Insane + StaR's Insane )
Have rhythm issues, and overspaced jumps. Where the song is less intense there is big spacing, where the song is really intense there is less spacing. Overall the hardest diff's last 10 seconds need a remap in rhythm, because it completely is just 1/2 spam, more in the modpost.
Link: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/505627/start=90 (scroll down to my post)
t/505627
This map has too many issues! As mentioned in the post above me, there are lots of spacing emphasis errors, and the cutting of the mp3/video is also suboptimal. Insane, StaR's Insane, and Light Insane all have these issues to different degrees.
Not only does this not conform to any of the standards of quality that have grown to be respected in the ranking process, but it even holds unrankable elements that have been repeatedly overlooked.
This map has too many issues! As mentioned in the post above me, there are lots of spacing emphasis errors, and the cutting of the mp3/video is also suboptimal. Insane, StaR's Insane, and Light Insane all have these issues to different degrees.
Not only does this not conform to any of the standards of quality that have grown to be respected in the ranking process, but it even holds unrankable elements that have been repeatedly overlooked.
p/5594559 unrecognizable difficulty naming, difficulty naming provides no sense of linear progression as to what difficulty each word represents.
^same map, I suspect that BPM is half time
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/522660 metadata error
p/5585411 no further discussion on a valid spread issue that i raised before it got ranked. Normal feels too easy for the spread.
.
posted wrong place most likely, disregard.
posted wrong place most likely, disregard.
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5607600#p5607600
artist metadata issues (post right above me)
also hardest diff has spacing inconsistencies and one hitsound seems weird.
artist metadata issues (post right above me)
also hardest diff has spacing inconsistencies and one hitsound seems weird.
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/400300
blue dragons mod from the previous dq was not properly responded to. https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5489214
Hulas mod also wasnt properly adressed. "ok add"
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5524971
blue dragons mod from the previous dq was not properly responded to. https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5489214
Hulas mod also wasnt properly adressed. "ok add"
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5524971
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/517598 (concern was brought up previously but brushed off at t/509002/start=105 )
missing a difficulty labeled as "Hard". i know star rating is not the be all end all say to a map's actual difficulty, but the ranking criteria explicitly states that you have to have a difficulty spread that does not skip any difficulties (barring either Easy or Normal). i've seen maps get unqualified for doing something similar to this in the past, so i'm just posting here to see what others think
missing a difficulty labeled as "Hard". i know star rating is not the be all end all say to a map's actual difficulty, but the ranking criteria explicitly states that you have to have a difficulty spread that does not skip any difficulties (barring either Easy or Normal). i've seen maps get unqualified for doing something similar to this in the past, so i'm just posting here to see what others think
Star rating is a poor metric, and one that does not accurately respect the actually difficulty spread applied in that map. Advanced itself contains many 1/2s, but is underweighted due to the usage of sliders and lack of spacing variance. Hard has minor variance in spacing and slightly more 1/2 clicks in a row. In fact, Hard specifically had the more strenuous strings of 1/2 circles changed to include sliders at detriment to the rhythmic consistency specifically to make it easier to play (A technique that does not, in fact, lower star rating much, if at all).
Plus, Logic's diff is literally 0.01 away from having the Hard icon. What's the problem with that? Don't degrade yourself by only looking at the icons shown and just assuming they're perfect representations of the difficulty spread.
Try looking at the map as well. That's a good start.
I "brushed off" the comment as Stjpa had already summarized my feelings, and the feelings of any rational mapper or modder, on the matter, in the post before mine - Advanced has plenty of 1/2 already, Hard isn't that much of a logical step up, but star rating is catapulted forward simply due to the spacing variances used.
It's also considered good form to post your concerns in the beatmap thread so they can be addressed there without appearing to be uncalled for, since you didn't do so I'm replying here.
Plus, Logic's diff is literally 0.01 away from having the Hard icon. What's the problem with that? Don't degrade yourself by only looking at the icons shown and just assuming they're perfect representations of the difficulty spread.
Try looking at the map as well. That's a good start.
I "brushed off" the comment as Stjpa had already summarized my feelings, and the feelings of any rational mapper or modder, on the matter, in the post before mine - Advanced has plenty of 1/2 already, Hard isn't that much of a logical step up, but star rating is catapulted forward simply due to the spacing variances used.
It's also considered good form to post your concerns in the beatmap thread so they can be addressed there without appearing to be uncalled for, since you didn't do so I'm replying here.
i haven't looked at the map due to not being able to access a computer at the moment, so i can't be sure about the spread from my perspective. either way, even if i had seen the map, i still would have made this post regardless of the playable spread. i am merely pointing out the technically unrankable aspect of the set, that being a difficulty labeled "H" is missing, and there is a jump from N to I. i have seen a mapset previously get unqualified for an issue similar to this even though the spread was fine enough by playing standards, so i just wanted to see what others (specifically more QATs) thought about this.
i didn't post in the thread about it because it appeared to have already been brought up recently, so i figured posting again about it would be redundant even though i wanted to bring up the issue again. duly noted for the next time, i suppose.
sorry for using the term "brushed off" as well. definitely not the connotation i intended to convey; i just couldn't think of a better term in the moment
i didn't post in the thread about it because it appeared to have already been brought up recently, so i figured posting again about it would be redundant even though i wanted to bring up the issue again. duly noted for the next time, i suppose.
sorry for using the term "brushed off" as well. definitely not the connotation i intended to convey; i just couldn't think of a better term in the moment
I'll explain this further, since there's not enough place in the previous post.Low wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/517598 (concern was brought up previously but brushed off at t/509002/start=105 )
missing a difficulty labeled as "Hard". i know star rating is not the be all end all say to a map's actual difficulty, but the ranking criteria explicitly states that you have to have a difficulty spread that does not skip any difficulties (barring either Easy or Normal). i've seen maps get unqualified for doing something similar to this in the past, so i'm just posting here to see what others think
The report is totally invalid. We're talking about a far-from-being-perfect SR system. The current rule says:
There is no part where it says that "ENHIX icons must appear consecutively in your mapset". Advanced doesn't get a H icon by 0.02 stars and Hard is just slightly over it by 0.01 stars. As long as the beatmap has an appropriated spread (and in this case, it's a balanced one) there is no need to DQ by such a minimal difference to please everyone's OCD.Ranking Criteria wrote:
The difficulties in the mapset must be in a consecutive order. Easy or Normal can be skipped if the gap in the star rating spread allows it. The order can be seen in the chart below. If your mapset has two difficulties, one of them cannot be an Insane or Expert. The lowest difficulty must be below 2.0 stars. The difficulty level of Taiko-specific and osu!mania-specific difficulties must also follow a well-designed spread and might contain a Hard and Insane only, if there are standard difficulties present. In CtB, the spread evaluation is upon the BNs discretion. The difficulty spread is determined by the map's star rating.
You should've have posted in the thread about this issue and more importantly you should've tested the beatmap in before to avoid jumping into such conclusions. This is not the place to discuss this so contact me via Discord/in-game if you have further questions about this matter.
Let's keep the reports rolling /o/
w_tre respect for AT&HU - Schur's Theorem
t/279201/start=0
Incorrect snap at 00:14:316 (14316|3,14356|4,14397|5) - and 00:55:829 (55829|3,55870|4,55910|5) - on Another. Should be 1/6
p/5661260 Here's Kawawa's post pointing it out
EDIT: DQed, thanks Blocko
t/279201/start=0
Incorrect snap at 00:14:316 (14316|3,14356|4,14397|5) - and 00:55:829 (55829|3,55870|4,55910|5) - on Another. Should be 1/6
p/5661260 Here's Kawawa's post pointing it out
EDIT: DQed, thanks Blocko
p/5664590/
Not really asking for a DQ here, but I just want someone to explain to me how it's acceptable to only map the chorus/climax of a song and try to let it qualify as a worthy map. The original is only 1:19 which is short already so I don't really understand this.
Not really asking for a DQ here, but I just want someone to explain to me how it's acceptable to only map the chorus/climax of a song and try to let it qualify as a worthy map. The original is only 1:19 which is short already so I don't really understand this.
I could only find the 32 second version though.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N6hC5d6ETmo
There is another 1:19 version?
I should have replied in the map thread lol
Anyways, move to the map thread to discuss if you want to continue.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N6hC5d6ETmo
There is another 1:19 version?
I should have replied in the map thread lol
Anyways, move to the map thread to discuss if you want to continue.
Mugiwara sent the link to the original version in the thread, but it's fine, lol. No need to discuss further. This just made me frown and that doesn't usually happen.IamKwaN wrote:
I could only find the 32 second version though.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N6hC5d6ETmo
There is another 1:19 version?
I should have replied in the map thread lol
Anyways, move to the map thread to discuss if you want to continue.
Some issues with the drain with HR were brought up in t/390176/start=90 but never actually addressed. Drain with HR and being impossible to pass has already been brought up to dq maps (aspire and state of the union)
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/516907
Multiple concerns have been voiced, in addition the mapper has been rude towards a concerned community member.
Multiple concerns have been voiced, in addition the mapper has been rude towards a concerned community member.
Mapper is being quite rude about this also, probably some behavior / code of conduct issues in the threadNozhomi wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5680597 Inappropriate diffname with the extension "Miniature" who is justified only by CS size for FCL's diff.
p/5680279
discussion about the map + a gd'r wants to update his fix with 1/8
discussion about the map + a gd'r wants to update his fix with 1/8
Strange difficulty name https://osu.ppy.sh/s/510958
p/5689630#p5689630 metadata stuff
p/5695712#p5695712 offset is off and couple other odd parts in the highest difficulty, wanting someone to confirm.
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/546679
unpolished map, can be improved in different things, i just pinpointed out some obvious aesthetic things.
p/5701871
unpolished map, can be improved in different things, i just pinpointed out some obvious aesthetic things.
p/5701871
p/5703820/ Questionable density issues in the last diff
p/5707127#p5707127
unsnapped ends of sliders
unsnapped ends of sliders
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/514145
qualified in less than 24 hours.
qualified in less than 24 hours.
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/548999
problem with beats and wrong timing.
problem with beats and wrong timing.
Kuron-kun
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5733433/
I have a few concerns regarding quality I think should be addressed
I have a few concerns regarding quality I think should be addressed
p/5738542 nsfw concerns
^ concerns about the same mapset with the ctb diff as well as potentially altered storyboard code p/5738856
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/472589 tags are conflict with IN diff
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/532827 Panties in background, clear if you zoom in by how the thighs get thicc
p/5802514/
Yooh - Dynasty -da capo- by 10nya
Mapper agreed with some points I made and some of his explanations do not make sense.
e,g
01:01:732 - shouldn't slider end here? Having 80% volume 01:01:493 - is really too loud. ending it on the blue tick doesnt seem to be my preferable but i was thinking like "rather than finish this on blue tick i think finish it as 1/1 to next note is noticeable" _:3
04:52:206 (3) - 04:54:111 (3,5) - etc i think they are ghost notes. my bad, but i was intended to make some rhythm variation to make some "energetic" opening which lead to the kiai part
I hope someone can take a closer look xd
Yooh - Dynasty -da capo- by 10nya
Mapper agreed with some points I made and some of his explanations do not make sense.
e,g
01:01:732 - shouldn't slider end here? Having 80% volume 01:01:493 - is really too loud. ending it on the blue tick doesnt seem to be my preferable but i was thinking like "rather than finish this on blue tick i think finish it as 1/1 to next note is noticeable" _:3
04:52:206 (3) - 04:54:111 (3,5) - etc i think they are ghost notes. my bad, but i was intended to make some rhythm variation to make some "energetic" opening which lead to the kiai part
I hope someone can take a closer look xd