1. Hard (2.51 stars, 193 notes)
2. Insane (3.51 stars, 300 notes)
3. na na na na! (4.22 stars, 338 notes)
4. Normal (1.34 stars, 101 notes)

1. 01:02:699 (1) - sacale el nc
2. 01:30:525 (4,5) - podrias hacer un blanket en lugar de ese overlap

1. 00:16:850 (2) - podrias moverlo a 352|38 para que quede alineado con el slider siguiente
2. 00:28:351 (2) - hitnormal en la cabeza
3. 00:28:786 (3) - clap en la cola

1. 00:33:134 (6) - nc
   necesita ser de 3.75 como minimo para ser insane

BOUYAAA wrote:

Hard :

00:17:176 (3) - my brain sais this is confusing but maybe that's because usually when you see these patterns they are symmetrical, maybe it's just better to ctrl+G that object. I'm not sure how beginners read those patterns though idk i think it'd look like a multi reverse if i do that, not sure either xd

idk

i n s a n e :

00:29:439 (4) - i think it'd be better if sliders where emphasizing that "naaaaa >////<" sound here. Apart from here every naaa is mapped with a slider so not having that feels a bit out of place i think. I'd do this http://puu.sh/sViCE/a531c7b223.jpg offset slider sounds so weird to me ;(

01:06:612 (3,4) - i think it'd be better to ctrlg both so player has a bit of movement between them. Or space them so that they don't touch idk. Kinda works how they are now though so up to you i just copy pasted 01:06:177 (1,2) - and ctrl g, like 01:07:047 (1,2,3,4) - xd

double bpm extra! :

I'm bad at the game issues :
- unreadable : 00:43:351 (8,9,1) - 01:44:221 (7,8,1) - Mostly due to them looking exactly like the previous triple

pishifat wrote:

01:44:221 (7,8,1) - 00:43:351 (8,9,1) - these are cute

1. 00:40:960 - normal-whistle
2. 00:42:916 (5,6,7,8,9) - flow is a bit weird， should change the angle after 00:43:134 (7) - this slider i think, try something else like http://puu.sh/sWfw8/66407afb50.jpg
3. 01:25:525 - normal-whistle
4. 01:26:395 - ^ dunno if it's on purpose
5. 01:43:134 - hitsound

1. lower od please
2. 00:17:373 (6,1) - why ds change

1. 00:44:003 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - nc spam looks unnecessary and it sounds like stacking 00:43:568 (1,1) - 00:44:438 (1,1) - 00:45:308 (1,1) - fits much better
2. 01:25:199 (5,1) - make the circle stack perfectly :s

1. 00:29:221 (3,4) - ds error

Karen wrote:

na na na nal

1. 00:40:960 - normal-whistle
2. 00:42:916 (5,6,7,8,9) - flow is a bit weird， should change the angle after 00:43:134 (7) - this slider i think, try something else like http://puu.sh/sWfw8/66407afb50.jpg tried moving 00:42:916 (5,6,7) - using a similar angle to the picture
3. 01:25:525 - normal-whistle used clap on these instead
4. 01:26:395 - ^ dunno if it's on purpose
5. 01:43:134 - hitsound

Insane

1. lower od please
2. 00:17:373 (6,1) - why ds change

Hard

1. 00:44:003 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - nc spam looks unnecessary and it sounds like stacking 00:43:568 (1,1) - 00:44:438 (1,1) - 00:45:308 (1,1) - fits much better didnt stack the first one cuz may be annoying to read for how easy the diff is, rest didtho
2. 01:25:199 (5,1) - make the circle stack perfectly :s it's meant to be a curved stack xd curved a bit more

Normal

1. 00:29:221 (3,4) - ds error

metadata please

appleeaterx wrote:

cute

appleeaterx wrote:

cute

Pho wrote:

-himei, the concerns you've raised are based on nothing but your beliefs of what is right or wrong - have you ever thought about the reasons behind your arguments? Always try to understand what the mapper tries to achieve with each pattern before jumping at conclusions and ask for clarification if you are unsure. Based on the depth of your mod on this set, Milan's answer should be more than appropriate. There are many different ways to make a good map to a song, don't get stuck in your ideals of mapping only. Also, 00:16:829 (2) - there's a difference between being off the play-field and being off the grid. While the first is unrankable, the latter certainly is not.

It's good that you check out maps in qualification, it's bad if you start insulting people while doing so. So please, stop putting words into people's mouths and acting in such an arrogant and provocative manner. Here's a nice reference for you.

I hope you can improve your attitude in the future. Until then, have a good day sir!

-himei wrote:

Dude, I can dig even more in this map, and find even more inconsistent flaws. Its just up to mapper and BN who doesnt care about the fact that the map will be untouched for years, and many ppl (including mapper himself) will be getting triggered by it in,. lets say, 5 years.
Maybe Milan will be checking it in few years and say to himself "damn, i could make this better".
But well, as you could see, this map got qualified in 6 days after submission, which is clearly not enough to polish all things.

But my main point is, map should be perfect in every single aspect mapper could find. And as you could see, Ive found tons of questionable stuff there.

uh at the end of the day, its up to mapper's conscience.
you will be living with that, Milan. you will be living knowing that you could do this thing better, but you were too lazy and afraid to dq it and fix things yourself.

well, thats your mindset, I cant change it unfortunately!

-himei wrote:

Alright I gave up, this "intended inconsistency" argument has no counter at all.

It basically means ... "this thing is garbage, and I wanted it to be garbage. its my style, you dont understand"

ok then, i have nothing against it. i dont want to scroll through tons of guides/rc which all tells you that map is something that should be consistent and well polished to be able to be ranked.

its an axiom that can not be proven. if you are against it, then i have nothing to say.

and yes, if you think that i just showed you only aesthetic flaws, you are wrong. im 100% confident that theres tons of hitsounds/object or angle placement flaws in every diff that wasnt checked.

but all you guys are fighting for is just to keep that pure image of qualified maps, and that just random people cant just come and dq it with some minor mods.
I guess if Doyak or Sonnyc would check this, they wont even mod it for sure.

it just makes me sad seeing that the purpose of that icons isnt to show how good this map could be, but rather to rank it faster instead.