How do people not understand the 4 month thing? It seems pretty clear to me
show more
ty
An observation: a lot of people seem to only be active starting in the second half of 2009. Is there some reason for that? I'll continue on my journey through dusty archives later, for now I'll try to lay low for a bit. I think someone is tailing me, but rest assured I'll get back to you saf
Edit: Added most of them, only, Mogsy does not qualify for 2019 and power for 2009
also, I swear I had seen the azure_kite/james profile during my research, but I did not include it in my documents for some weird reason? idk exactly why
What this system does achieve better is recording and preserving a historical landscape of OT, you get a better grasp of people who were posting in the past, you can see people fading away or suddenly popping and disappearing. The overlap of users is especially good, because once you get the denizenship, that's it, you get tied to a specific generation even if you were active for entire generations.
I'm sure if you mention this to abraker and lock him inside his lab for a couple hours he'll write some script to scour OT for each poster's posts per month and then come up with some ultrawack visualization until someone bugs him enough to make the data public read-only and presents it better.
Although perhaps interesting to see, that kind of distinction lacks a human component and it lacks what makes this subforum OT - subjectivity, chaos, drama.
And finally I think everyone here is still being molded by their "generation". Simply due to the fact that OT becomes stale over time and the same random shit isn't always funny for no reason again with new people.
Also due to the changes to the denizen system over the years, it's really nto even useful to see impact either, the only way ot really have a pure impact of influence would be to remake it again with that intention all over again
also added the new ones kobold sent
edit: added the newest kobold findings
also thanks you kobold, will add
also old ephemeral posts are insane
Uh... thanks ig.
But it's going away soon, should archive profiles ASAP. I would say pre-2018 eras should have old-style userpages.
[First portal]
(Click on the special portal below to initiate the parallel posting sequence.)
[/First portal]
added
show more
okPatatitta wrote:
4 months, the rules are explained in the threadlostsilver wrote:
so how many more months do i have to waitPatatitta wrote:
you need at least 4 months of threads in ot in a single year, you created your account in november 2022, even if you posted day 1 of your account creation, that would not make 4 monthslostsilver wrote:
???Patatitta wrote:
your osu account creation date is too latelostsilver wrote:
me maybe
whats that mean
ty
im just denseKarmine wrote:
How do people not understand the 4 month thing? It seems pretty clear to me
Oh wait did I have to be active 4 months within 2021 to be considered for it (I'm pretty sure I might have been, idk)-Remi wrote:
I started in 2021
Topic Starter
you have less than a page of posts in 2021-Remi wrote:
Oh wait did I have to be active 4 months within 2021 to be considered for it (I'm pretty sure I might have been, idk)-Remi wrote:
I started in 2021
Ohhh okaeiPatatitta wrote:
you have less than a page of posts in 2021-Remi wrote:
Oh wait did I have to be active 4 months within 2021 to be considered for it (I'm pretty sure I might have been, idk)-Remi wrote:
I started in 2021
I started posting in OT in September 2022 (Dang it's already been a year). So I would've been here for only 3 months by the start of 2023.
Wait no, that was in forum games. I didn't start talking in OT until October 2022.
Wait no, that was in forum games. I didn't start talking in OT until October 2022.
oops i have caused the confusion me amigosPatatitta wrote:
-In order to be added to an era, you must have at least 5 pages of posts/threads in OT (250 posts!), and be present for over 4 months of the year. Mafia/forum games does not count
nowScyla wrote:
Gay era where
Topic Starter
just remember to not just post because you want the post number, then it just ends up like GD or whatever, try actually contributing to the conversation and only responding to threads you actually care aboutheipizhu wrote:
I need to farm more posts...
What would you know, I did an independent (lesson learned, never trust the government) research and found names that are missing. Some are more preeminent, others are more mysterious. Perhaps, some names were simply erased as time went by or it could be an intentional cover-up… Whichever it is, we must find the truth together.Patatitta wrote:
I took from the denizen list, the denizen requirement were low so I expect abraker calculations to hold up, also, I dqed a lot of people that were once considered denizen because they did not meet in standardKobold84 wrote:
Were there really not that many people posting during early OT years? I have to do some investigation on that…
should meet the post count requirement for 2007-08, if you consider Other subforums to count.
users/5728 JAMES
users/1079 LUIGI
2007 2008 2010 side note: 2009 is barely passing, maybe you should recount the amount of posts in 2009 as I could be wrong
users/4018 MOGSY
2009
users/42635 SKULL
users/10028 VYTALIBUS
users/14931 SUBURU
2009 2010 2011
users/8358 ADAM
users/179449 POWER
2009 2011
users/42460 SLEEP
2010
users/37224 PRIEST
2010 2012 2013 2014
users/23326 GLADI
2012
users/66296 AZURE
users/5728 JAMES
users/1079 LUIGI
2007 2008 2010 side note: 2009 is barely passing, maybe you should recount the amount of posts in 2009 as I could be wrong
users/4018 MOGSY
2009
users/42635 SKULL
users/10028 VYTALIBUS
users/14931 SUBURU
2009 2010 2011
users/8358 ADAM
users/179449 POWER
2009 2011
users/42460 SLEEP
2010
users/37224 PRIEST
2010 2012 2013 2014
users/23326 GLADI
2012
users/66296 AZURE
An observation: a lot of people seem to only be active starting in the second half of 2009. Is there some reason for that? I'll continue on my journey through dusty archives later, for now I'll try to lay low for a bit. I think someone is tailing me, but rest assured I'll get back to you saf
Topic Starter
thank your for your work, will fact-check those profiles and add them to the listKobold84 wrote:
What would you know, I did an independent (lesson learned, never trust the government) research and found names that are missing. Some are more preeminent, others are more mysterious. Perhaps, some names were simply erased as time went by or it could be an intentional cover-up… Whichever it is, we must find the truth together.Patatitta wrote:
I took from the denizen list, the denizen requirement were low so I expect abraker calculations to hold up, also, I dqed a lot of people that were once considered denizen because they did not meet in standardKobold84 wrote:
Were there really not that many people posting during early OT years? I have to do some investigation on that…should meet the post count requirement for 2007-08, if you consider Other subforums to count.
users/5728 JAMES
users/1079 LUIGI
2007 2008 2010 side note: 2009 is barely passing, maybe you should recount the amount of posts in 2009 as I could be wrong
users/4018 MOGSY
2009
users/42635 SKULL
users/10028 VYTALIBUS
users/14931 SUBURU
2009 2010 2011
users/8358 ADAM
users/179449 POWER
2009 2011
users/42460 SLEEP
2010
users/37224 PRIEST
2010 2012 2013 2014
users/23326 GLADI
2012
users/66296 AZURE
An observation: a lot of people seem to only be active starting in the second half of 2009. Is there some reason for that? I'll continue on my journey through dusty archives later, for now I'll try to lay low for a bit. I think someone is tailing me, but rest assured I'll get back to you saf
Edit: Added most of them, only, Mogsy does not qualify for 2019 and power for 2009
also, I swear I had seen the azure_kite/james profile during my research, but I did not include it in my documents for some weird reason? idk exactly why
can you not use my old username please? i genuinely feel embarrassed
Topic Starter
oh yeah my bad, I thought I changed all the usernames to their most recent version but I did not check your profile as I did recognise your previous username and forgot that you changed it[ Rynn ] wrote:
can you not use my old username please? i genuinely feel embarrassed
lmao its okayPatatitta wrote:
oh yeah my bad, I thought I changed all the usernames to their most recent version but I did not check your profile as I did recognise your previous username and forgot that you changed it[ Rynn ] wrote:
can you not use my old username please? i genuinely feel embarrassed
Make OT great again!
Free yourself off of the denizen rule!
Glory to OT!
Heil Patatitta!
Free yourself off of the denizen rule!
Glory to OT!
Heil Patatitta!
Greeteings My True Name Is skyNEKOCRAZY3000 And Im Very Kawaii >_< uwu :3 I Like Watchign Anime~
Best Regards,
skyNEKOCRAZY3000
Best Regards,
skyNEKOCRAZY3000
Edit: Double Posted By Acciodent Sorry =_= XD
Topic Starter
updated your name!Serraionga wrote:
Greeteings My True Name Is skyNEKOCRAZY3000 And Im Very Kawaii >_< uwu :3 I Like Watchign Anime~
Best Regards,
skyNEKOCRAZY3000
×
I've been active since mid 2015. Ctrl+F for my name in the chronicles dudePatatitta wrote:
-Abraker has more post history than the one that the osu website allows me to browse (200 pages), which means, their placing is probably inaccurate. If you know for certain which years they were active, please, let me know
Back with more gifts. This is the new list with the names they don't want you to know about, keep it safe. I must say, having years and not generations gets you a better perspective on how OT was changing. Some people shine brighty and burn out fast, others start meekly and then bloom into robust denizens. Then there're people like abraker, who epitomize the best of both worlds. Fascinating, really…
ancient fossil
2009 2010
users/58197 LILAC
2009
users/10466 WIZARD
2010 2011 2012
users/19048 MISMAGIUS
2010 2011
users/157177 NATTEKE
users/100037 KITSUNE
users/394439 FIRO
users/422242 CLAUDIA
users/299559 LIZZ
2010
users/91332 LUM
users/71096 XANEK
users/162159 NOTSHIN
2011 2012 2013
users/517151 VEXT
2011 2012
users/433384 RANTAI
2011
users/465153 OZZY
2011
users/378377 VERDI
2012 2014
users/597796 VISH
2013 2014
users/444868 KYONKO
2013
users/357456 APEX
users/58197 LILAC
2009
users/10466 WIZARD
2010 2011 2012
users/19048 MISMAGIUS
2010 2011
users/157177 NATTEKE
users/100037 KITSUNE
users/394439 FIRO
users/422242 CLAUDIA
users/299559 LIZZ
2010
users/91332 LUM
users/71096 XANEK
users/162159 NOTSHIN
2011 2012 2013
users/517151 VEXT
2011 2012
users/433384 RANTAI
2011
users/465153 OZZY
2011
users/378377 VERDI
2012 2014
users/597796 VISH
2013 2014
users/444868 KYONKO
2013
users/357456 APEX
I dislike this in the sense that postcount doesn't reflect impact.
There have been some individuals that were memorable if only for the fact that their ratio of quality posts was wildly exceeding that of other denizens while still showing a modicum of activity to be considered part of the landscape.
As an example of that I would like to call out schism.
Although few in posts and partially lost to the currents of time as their expressive image usage can no longer be witnessed due to dead links, he's one of the posters of my "era" I will never forget.
Every single time I saw a new thread by them I was immediately excited because there was no doubt it was going to be good before even clicking on it. In that sense, schism is much more memorable to me than many shitposters from "my time" and due to their strong and consistent roleplaying my impression of them is much more clear than that of some other posters of my time.
While I won't bother to argue against acceptance through quantity to cater to those uninspired and lacking in creativity, this should never lead to quality posters not being recognized.
None should ever feel forced to vomit a load of garbage into this subforum to gain some accolade of questionable value and be accepted by those rolling around in the mud and racking up their postcount with head-keyboard-smashes. Get good.
Ultimately, just be aware that that denizen list never followed any criteria but was basically just a subjective "people that were memorable part of the landscape" impression by abraker. None cared at the time and it was just a funny thing in hindsight. faiswusuf didn't have nearly enough posts to qualify according to your new criteria originally but they became a central part of subforum culture in a flash, overshadowing poor plotter.
There have been some individuals that were memorable if only for the fact that their ratio of quality posts was wildly exceeding that of other denizens while still showing a modicum of activity to be considered part of the landscape.
As an example of that I would like to call out schism.
Although few in posts and partially lost to the currents of time as their expressive image usage can no longer be witnessed due to dead links, he's one of the posters of my "era" I will never forget.
Every single time I saw a new thread by them I was immediately excited because there was no doubt it was going to be good before even clicking on it. In that sense, schism is much more memorable to me than many shitposters from "my time" and due to their strong and consistent roleplaying my impression of them is much more clear than that of some other posters of my time.
While I won't bother to argue against acceptance through quantity to cater to those uninspired and lacking in creativity, this should never lead to quality posters not being recognized.
None should ever feel forced to vomit a load of garbage into this subforum to gain some accolade of questionable value and be accepted by those rolling around in the mud and racking up their postcount with head-keyboard-smashes. Get good.
Ultimately, just be aware that that denizen list never followed any criteria but was basically just a subjective "people that were memorable part of the landscape" impression by abraker. None cared at the time and it was just a funny thing in hindsight. faiswusuf didn't have nearly enough posts to qualify according to your new criteria originally but they became a central part of subforum culture in a flash, overshadowing poor plotter.
I agree, at some years the post count is especially useless, for example at the height of "ITT: neither funny nor interesting" threads it mostly consisted of low-effort posting, however the impact of eras is not the same as getting the denizen status, since you don't really need to be recognized by anyone, the minimum requirement is simple to achieve for anyone really, there's no real need to even post useless messages.Endaris wrote:
I dislike this in the sense that postcount doesn't reflect impact.
There have been some individuals that were memorable if only for the fact that their ratio of quality posts was wildly exceeding that of other denizens while still showing a modicum of activity to be considered part of the landscape.
As an example of that I would like to call out schism.
Although few in posts and partially lost to the currents of time as their expressive image usage can no longer be witnessed due to dead links, he's one of the posters of my "era" I will never forget.
Every single time I saw a new thread by them I was immediately excited because there was no doubt it was going to be good before even clicking on it. In that sense, schism is much more memorable to me than many shitposters from "my time" and due to their strong and consistent roleplaying my impression of them is much more clear than that of some other posters of my time.
While I won't bother to argue against acceptance through quantity to cater to those uninspired and lacking in creativity, this should never lead to quality posters not being recognized.
None should ever feel forced to vomit a load of garbage into this subforum to gain some accolade of questionable value and be accepted by those rolling around in the mud and racking up their postcount with head-keyboard-smashes. Get good.
What this system does achieve better is recording and preserving a historical landscape of OT, you get a better grasp of people who were posting in the past, you can see people fading away or suddenly popping and disappearing. The overlap of users is especially good, because once you get the denizenship, that's it, you get tied to a specific generation even if you were active for entire generations.
That's just an activity chart though.Kobold84 wrote:
What this system does achieve better is recording and preserving a historical landscape of OT, you get a better grasp of people who were posting in the past, you can see people fading away or suddenly popping and disappearing. The overlap of users is especially good, because once you get the denizenship, that's it, you get tied to a specific generation even if you were active for entire generations.
I'm sure if you mention this to abraker and lock him inside his lab for a couple hours he'll write some script to scour OT for each poster's posts per month and then come up with some ultrawack visualization until someone bugs him enough to make the data public read-only and presents it better.
Although perhaps interesting to see, that kind of distinction lacks a human component and it lacks what makes this subforum OT - subjectivity, chaos, drama.
And finally I think everyone here is still being molded by their "generation". Simply due to the fact that OT becomes stale over time and the same random shit isn't always funny for no reason again with new people.
Tbh, next people will yell for their threads to be added to OT chronicles - which are just as subjective as the denizen crap. Both are different variants of randomly recording history.
Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.
lazy ass mfApraxye wrote:
Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.
Oh, crikey. It’s the rozzer.Cerno wrote:
lazy ass mfApraxye wrote:
Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.
puck youApraxye wrote:
Oh crikey it’s the rozzer.Cerno wrote:
lazy ass mfApraxye wrote:
Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.
Topic Starter
Anaxii wrote:
×
read my previous post, it's linked on this thread. This is not supposed to reflect impact, this is just an objective messurement of who was active at which time, nothing more, nothing else, also the osu!chronicles is really akward to use for this same reasons.Endaris wrote:
I dislike this in the sense that postcount doesn't reflect impact.
There have been some individuals that were memorable if only for the fact that their ratio of quality posts was wildly exceeding that of other denizens while still showing a modicum of activity to be considered part of the landscape.
As an example of that I would like to call out schism.
Although few in posts and partially lost to the currents of time as their expressive image usage can no longer be witnessed due to dead links, he's one of the posters of my "era" I will never forget.
Every single time I saw a new thread by them I was immediately excited because there was no doubt it was going to be good before even clicking on it. In that sense, schism is much more memorable to me than many shitposters from "my time" and due to their strong and consistent roleplaying my impression of them is much more clear than that of some other posters of my time.
While I won't bother to argue against acceptance through quantity to cater to those uninspired and lacking in creativity, this should never lead to quality posters not being recognized.
None should ever feel forced to vomit a load of garbage into this subforum to gain some accolade of questionable value and be accepted by those rolling around in the mud and racking up their postcount with head-keyboard-smashes. Get good.
Ultimately, just be aware that that denizen list never followed any criteria but was basically just a subjective "people that were memorable part of the landscape" impression by abraker. None cared at the time and it was just a funny thing in hindsight. faiswusuf didn't have nearly enough posts to qualify according to your new criteria originally but they became a central part of subforum culture in a flash, overshadowing poor plotter.
Also due to the changes to the denizen system over the years, it's really nto even useful to see impact either, the only way ot really have a pure impact of influence would be to remake it again with that intention all over again
Topic Starter
You only have 4 pages of posts on 2022, not 5Jangsoodlor wrote:
where me
Exactly this, and since people who would know who was impactful in the past are long gone it's basically impossible, even if you read everything in OT you don't have the context of being there when it happened/being part of itPatatitta wrote:
Also due to the changes to the denizen system over the years, it's really nto even useful to see impact either, the only way ot really have a pure impact of influence would be to remake it again with that intention all over again
Topic Starter
yeah got it right initially, was just fact-checkingabraker wrote:
I've been active since mid 2015. Ctrl+F for my name in the chronicles dudePatatitta wrote:
-Abraker has more post history than the one that the osu website allows me to browse (200 pages), which means, their placing is probably inaccurate. If you know for certain which years they were active, please, let me know
also added the new ones kobold sent
Jangsoodlor
No, you.ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
puck youApraxye wrote:
Oh crikey it’s the rozzer.Cerno wrote:
lazy ass mfApraxye wrote:
Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.
Stop insulting plsApraxye wrote:
No youClevelandsMyBro wrote:
puck youApraxye wrote:
Oh crikey it’s the rozzer.Cerno wrote:
lazy ass mfApraxye wrote:
Thanks for adding me despite my low activity in recent times.
I looked through my posts and discovered I made 23 and a half pages worth of posts in 2022!
Crazy considering I only started posting in October of that year.
Crazy considering I only started posting in October of that year.
Yes... it is in fact crazy...[ Sebastian ] wrote:
I looked through my posts and discovered I made 23 and a half pages worth of posts in 2022!
Crazy considering I only started posting in October of that year.
More stuff from the good old times, going to reconnoiter through archives again. Reading through ancient threads is fun, you should try it too! Side note: HUGE shift must've happened in late 2012, a lot of the posts were made by new people, all oldies from before either left or were barely active.
Mission Success!
2011
users/196073 FISHIE
users/263110 BACK
2012
users/39658 MIANKI
users/806921 SYNC
users/918773 VALENTI
users/917117 ATHENA
users/136982 AGNES
users/390003 LAPORT
users/308902 AQO
users/479399 REVENGER
2013
users/791387 D33D
users/404448 LUNA
2010 2012
users/2650 AWP
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
users/277415 HIKA
2012 2013
users/740396 MATH
2011 2012 2013
users/276074 BOAT
2016 2017
users/626907 STEFAN
users/196073 FISHIE
users/263110 BACK
2012
users/39658 MIANKI
users/806921 SYNC
users/918773 VALENTI
users/917117 ATHENA
users/136982 AGNES
users/390003 LAPORT
users/308902 AQO
users/479399 REVENGER
2013
users/791387 D33D
users/404448 LUNA
2010 2012
users/2650 AWP
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
users/277415 HIKA
2012 2013
users/740396 MATH
2011 2012 2013
users/276074 BOAT
2016 2017
users/626907 STEFAN
luminar wrote:
add a 2023
Patatitta wrote:
This thread is updated at the end of each year
wow, didn't know i was active for the last 9 years
Goodbye everyone.
Goodbye everyone.
See you in 2024.ColdTooth wrote:
wow, didn't know i was active for the last 9 years
Goodbye everyone.
Topic Starter
no need, everyone is in by defaultloserotaku wrote:
i would like to sign up
edit: added the newest kobold findings
2013 was insane, like 200 different people were in charge of making threads, half of them were locked and most of these people left OT shortly after. You encounter someone new once and then never see them ever again in OT. You can feel a massive, drastic drop in quality, it was devastating. I'm tearing up just watching the awful state of OT during that time. Is it because of everyone migrating to ITT2?
By the power bestowed in me by me I hereby name this era the "Dark Ages". This will be on the test, so prepare accordingly.
Then there's Eph.
Okay well, back to the topic (also there are two Hikas in 2013 and the name of Trash Boat is incorrectly written in 2014/15).
By the power bestowed in me by me I hereby name this era the "Dark Ages". This will be on the test, so prepare accordingly.
Then there's Eph.
Okay well, back to the topic (also there are two Hikas in 2013 and the name of Trash Boat is incorrectly written in 2014/15).
2013
users/2619160 JOYCE
users/467540 KAONA
users/492699 YARISSA
2014
users/743006 JAZZ
users/602604 TANZ
2014 2015
users/1576986 NEDM
2015
users/2468915 SAIGON
2013 2014
users/1924642 ZERAPH
users/2619160 JOYCE
users/467540 KAONA
users/492699 YARISSA
2014
users/743006 JAZZ
users/602604 TANZ
2014 2015
users/1576986 NEDM
2015
users/2468915 SAIGON
2013 2014
users/1924642 ZERAPH
Topic Starter
you dont qualify for 2022, but you do for 2023, so wait a couple months that I add everyone from 2023Aya_f wrote:
adding me?
also thanks you kobold, will add
also old ephemeral posts are insane
my first post in OT was on the 1st of january 2016 at 2AM in UTC+1, so in the US it was still 2015.
Put me in 2015.
Put me in 2015.
Topic Starter
you would have needed to start posting 1st of september 2015, 4 months and 5 pages of posts to be included, rules are explained in the threadZain Sugieres wrote:
my first post in OT was on the 1st of january 2016 at 2AM in UTC+1, so in the US it was still 2015.
Put me in 2015.
i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015
I feel like the 2023 list will be larger than the 2022 list because of how many people like me who only started posting in late 2022.
Topic Starter
after recounting, I updated the list with everyone kobold said
also, I love how you're just seeing the ITT 2 thread and catching absolutely everyone
also, I love how you're just seeing the ITT 2 thread and catching absolutely everyone
There are still two Hikas in 2013 and Trash Boat is misspelled (it's not Thrash).
bump
bump
Would be surprising if anyone met the requirements without having ever posted in ITT 2, at least since it was startedPatatitta wrote:
after recounting, I updated the list with everyone kobold said
also, I love how you're just seeing the ITT 2 thread and catching absolutely everyone
Topic Starter
ah sorry I missed that text, fixingKobold84 wrote:
There are still two Hikas in 2013 and Trash Boat is misspelled (it's not Thrash).
bump
Patatitta, do you have a list of denizens who did not make it? I just had an idea that they could qualify if we take into account wastelanded threads. Might not work for everyone, but some really fringe cases could be resolved with this.
Topic Starter
yes, this was my listKobold84 wrote:
Patatitta, do you have a list of denizens who did not make it? I just had an idea that they could qualify if we take into account wastelanded threads. Might not work for everyone, but some really fringe cases could be resolved with this.
Strager ban
Ippe ban
dkun has been DQed from denizen
flanter is weird
Broken arrow DQ
Jazz DQ
Jesse1412 DQ
sakura only plays mafia??????????
The gambler DQ
GSG95 DQ
Green Platinum DQ
jaaakb DQ
Momi DQ
Dawnsday DQ
Roseus jager ban
Fourth dq
ashton Ban
Flannel DQ
Schism DQ
Nanachii DQ
Alexkuzi DQ
Wolfette ban
Zozimoto DQ
Saturnalize DQ
Kittyneko DQ
Puzzle DQ
Eblf too long
abraker too long
Ippe ban
dkun has been DQed from denizen
flanter is weird
Broken arrow DQ
Jazz DQ
Jesse1412 DQ
sakura only plays mafia??????????
The gambler DQ
GSG95 DQ
Green Platinum DQ
jaaakb DQ
Momi DQ
Dawnsday DQ
Roseus jager ban
Fourth dq
ashton Ban
Flannel DQ
Schism DQ
Nanachii DQ
Alexkuzi DQ
Wolfette ban
Zozimoto DQ
Saturnalize DQ
Kittyneko DQ
Puzzle DQ
Eblf too long
abraker too long
I... am... WHAT?Patatitta wrote:
yes, this was my listKobold84 wrote:
Patatitta, do you have a list of denizens who did not make it? I just had an idea that they could qualify if we take into account wastelanded threads. Might not work for everyone, but some really fringe cases could be resolved with this.Strager ban
Ippe ban
dkun has been DQed from denizen
flanter is weird
Broken arrow DQ
Jazz DQ
Jesse1412 DQ
sakura only plays mafia??????????
The gambler DQ
GSG95 DQ
Green Platinum DQ
jaaakb DQ
Momi DQ
Dawnsday DQ
Roseus jager ban
Fourth dq
ashton Ban
Flannel DQ
Schism DQ
Nanachii DQ
Alexkuzi DQ
Wolfette ban
Zozimoto DQ
Saturnalize DQ
Kittyneko DQ
Puzzle DQ
Eblf too long
abraker too long
Uh... thanks ig.
Not many names this time. I don't think my methodology is wrong, it's just that… there wasn't a lot of people posting at a constant rate in 2013-2015, everyone was mostly isolated in ITT2. If you ever think current threads are bad, look into 2014-2015 threads and be amazed how good you have it.
SHOULD BE FIXED: there is Vext and Vext_old in both 2011 and 2012, my bad.
SHOULD BE FIXED: there is Vext and Vext_old in both 2011 and 2012, my bad.
2012
users/804584 FRIZZ
2014
users/4124962 SPARKY
2014 2015
users/3496632 PIRU
2015
users/4265273 KIRUE
users/4314006 FRIEND
users/3260726 GAMBLER
2016
users/5126159 GSG
users/804584 FRIZZ
2014
users/4124962 SPARKY
2014 2015
users/3496632 PIRU
2015
users/4265273 KIRUE
users/4314006 FRIEND
users/3260726 GAMBLER
2016
users/5126159 GSG
That’s a very nice concept. I could do the pfps on every ot user if u want to (including the banned users if possible)
The new osu web layout would make more sense due to the old forum website being nonexistent right now
The new osu web layout would make more sense due to the old forum website being nonexistent right now
https://old.ppy.sh/u/27597380Aireunaeus wrote:
That’s a very nice concept. I could do the pfps on every ot user if u want to (including the banned users if possible)
The new osu web layout would make more sense due to the old forum website being nonexistent right now
But it's going away soon, should archive profiles ASAP. I would say pre-2018 eras should have old-style userpages.
Topic Starter
idk, if I added images it would probably just be regular current page screnshots to make it easier, tho the idea of using wayback to screenshot the user when they used OT is interestingKobold84 wrote:
https://old.ppy.sh/u/27597380Aireunaeus wrote:
That’s a very nice concept. I could do the pfps on every ot user if u want to (including the banned users if possible)
The new osu web layout would make more sense due to the old forum website being nonexistent right now
But it's going away soon, should archive profiles ASAP. I would say pre-2018 eras should have old-style userpages.
Old manZain Sugieres wrote:
i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015
stfu kidAnaxii wrote:
Old manZain Sugieres wrote:
i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015
OLD MANZain Sugieres wrote:
stfu kidAnaxii wrote:
Old manZain Sugieres wrote:
i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015
stfu kidAnaxii wrote:
Old manZain Sugieres wrote:
i ain't reading the rules put me in 2015
bumpKobold84 wrote:
Not many names this time. I don't think my methodology is wrong, it's just that… there wasn't a lot of people posting at a constant rate in 2013-2015, everyone was mostly isolated in ITT2. If you ever think current threads are bad, look into 2014-2015 threads and be amazed how good you have it.
SHOULD BE FIXED: there is Vext and Vext_old in both 2011 and 2012, my bad.2012
users/804584 FRIZZ
2014
users/4124962 SPARKY
2014 2015
users/3496632 PIRU
2015
users/4265273 KIRUE
users/4314006 FRIEND
users/3260726 GAMBLER
2016
users/5126159 GSG
Topic Starter
missed it sorry, will make it later
welcome backZekks wrote:
omg thats me!!Patatitta wrote:
[ - Zekks - ]
Topic Starter
updated, sorry for delay
Vext and Vext_old are still fighting for the spot in 2011 and 2012 (only one shall be left standing).Patatitta wrote:
updated, sorry for delay
Topic Starter
okay so it happens that I read the post, and then, after a while, I do the changes, and when I do the changes, I only read the big [notice] block so I keep missing this, will keep in mind to also re-read the rest of the things for the futureKobold84 wrote:
Vext and Vext_old are still fighting for the spot in 2011 and 2012 (only one shall be left standing).Patatitta wrote:
updated, sorry for delay
2 week bump ^^
Why not ^^Karmine wrote:
Why?Aireunaeus wrote:
2 week bump ^^
Aireunaeus wrote:
2 week bump ^^
WARNING: PARALLEL POSTING SEQUENCE DETECTED!Aireunaeus wrote:
Why not ^^
[First portal]
(Click on the special portal below to initiate the parallel posting sequence.)
[/First portal]
maybe i'll be added when this year ends :>
Serraionga wrote:
Aireunaeus wrote:
2 week bump ^^WARNING: PARALLEL POSTING SEQUENCE DETECTED!Aireunaeus wrote:
Why not ^^
[First portal]
(Click on the special portal below to initiate the parallel posting sequence.)
[/First portal]
lostsilver wrote:
maybe i'll be added when this year ends :>
Oh right, I did forget to link some other stuff before I stopped browsing old threads and succumbed to laziness. But to be fair, most of the stuff is well-documented past the 2016 mark thanks to abraker. Maybe some lesser known names are missing still. I wonder… is this thread going to survive its first real challenge (that being the end of this year)?
2017
users/4639477 DAWNS
2015 2016
users/4320098 RILENE
2016
users/7520443 EPIPH
2017
users/4639477 DAWNS
2015 2016
users/4320098 RILENE
2016
users/7520443 EPIPH
pls add me to 2016-17. LOL i don't remember the other years i posted but those were...the highlights
Topic Starter
Kobold84 wrote:
Oh right, I did forget to link some other stuff before I stopped browsing old threads and succumbed to laziness. But to be fair, most of the stuff is well-documented past the 2016 mark thanks to abraker. Maybe some lesser known names are missing still. I wonder… is this thread going to survive its first real challenge (that being the end of this year)?
2017
users/4639477 DAWNS
2015 2016
users/4320098 RILENE
2016
users/7520443 EPIPH
added
you dont quite meet the criteria, missing a lot of post-countDyllion wrote:
pls add me to 2016-17. LOL i don't remember the other years i posted but those were...the highlights
Add me 🥺
Topic Starter
Bump, i'm starting to work on making this thread pretty, I have thought of a compact way to include images for all users, however, i'm afraid that the uneven position may trigger some people, as I don't know how to make the exact same crop each time and opening photoshop for EVERY image would take forever
Do anyone know how to make it even each time?, or another way I could do it?
I've also tried using the portraits, however, this is also uneven, so you cant really make rows that would look great, would take too much space going down
Do anyone know how to make it even each time?, or another way I could do it?
I've also tried using the portraits, however, this is also uneven, so you cant really make rows that would look great, would take too much space going down
In photoshop or any other image editor you can have a few layers with the right colors and everything, and then you paste their avatars along with the name and optionally the flag+title.
Topic Starter
yeah I was thinking on doing something like that, will check it later how to exactly do itKobold84 wrote:
In photoshop or any other image editor you can have a few layers with the right colors and everything, and then you paste their avatars along with the name and optionally the flag+title.
I like how that looks.Patatitta wrote:
Bump, i'm starting to work on making this thread pretty, I have thought of a compact way to include images for all users, however, i'm afraid that the uneven position may trigger some people, as I don't know how to make the exact same crop each time and opening photoshop for EVERY image would take forever
Do anyone know how to make it even each time?, or another way I could do it?
I've also tried using the portraits, however, this is also uneven, so you cant really make rows that would look great, would take too much space going down
Topic Starter
found an easier way to do it by searching the username in the user search, taking a screenshot of my monitor. Repeat that for all the names, put it all into photoshop, mass select all layers, crop them all, and export them all individually, then mass drop and upload into catbox
now time to repeat for everyone
now time to repeat for everyone