-Remi wrote:

What Acromalia said.

Why are we being so negative and pressuring a single person?

These things take time, I'm genuinely amazed at how professionaly ghoulybits is handling this mess.

-Remi wrote:

What Acromalia said.

Why are we being so negative and pressuring a single person?

These things take time, I'm genuinely amazed at how professionaly ghoulybits is handling this mess.

-Remi wrote:

What Acromalia said.

Why are we being so negative and pressuring a single person?

Polyspora wrote:

-Remi wrote:

What Acromalia said.

Why are we being so negative and pressuring a single person?

its funny seeing her explaining the same thing over and over

ghoulybits wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

-Remi wrote:

What Acromalia said.

Why are we being so negative and pressuring a single person?

its funny seeing her explaining the same thing over and over

Every time someone asks me the same question that I've answered just a couple posts up in the same thread, the urge to include a comment about sleeping with their mother in my response grows tenfold.

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

...problems start to surge if other people start revoking or get revoked due to not meeting the current criteria or being unhappy with the system, and we're basically 1 step away from that scenario

OT will turn into a hellhole if that starts happening. And considering abraker's stupid ideas, I would 100% expect him to do that.

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

They can revoke denizenship now?

abraker wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

...problems start to surge if other people start revoking or get revoked due to not meeting the current criteria or being unhappy with the system, and we're basically 1 step away from that scenario

OT will turn into a hellhole if that starts happening. And considering abraker's stupid ideas, I would 100% expect him to do that.

Let me make something clear: The OT! Government controls denizenship. I used to but not anymore.

abraker wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

They can revoke denizenship now?

Dude, you are in the OT! Government. Are you sleeping under a rock?

abraker wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

...problems start to surge if other people start revoking or get revoked due to not meeting the current criteria or being unhappy with the system, and we're basically 1 step away from that scenario

OT will turn into a hellhole if that starts happening. And considering abraker's stupid ideas, I would 100% expect him to do that.

Let me make something clear: The OT! Government controls denizenship. I used to but not anymore.

Cerno wrote:

the wise words of q9

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

tl;dr please?

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

tl;dr please?

Achromalia wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

tl;dr please?

igorsprite had denizenship status revoked.

the introduction of revocable denizenship was interpreted as a scary precedent toward unfair misuse of power and extrajudicial removal of people from the list of denizens.

people turned it into an unreasonably hyperbolic avalanche of complaints and severe misunderstandings about what qualifies denizenship and what qualifies it being revoked.

ghouly tried to clarify, people began to antagonize her and unfortunately failed to sit and listen for a moment.

after establishing that revoking denizenship is done in significantly fringe cases, and that nobody else is in danger of it at the moment, we seemed to have accepted it and quieted down.

Polyspora wrote:

I think this situation would be avoided if you guys only typed "we revoked igor denizenship because he didnt do shit and is a pedo this wont happen again my bad."

Polyspora wrote:

I think this situation would be avoided if you guys only typed "we revoked igor denizenship because he didnt do shit and is a pedo this wont happen again my bad."

ghoulybits wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

I think this situation would be avoided if you guys only typed "we revoked igor denizenship because he didnt do shit and is a pedo this wont happen again my bad."

Yeah, totally. People definitely read those posts too!

(though I do agree that there should have been more of an elaboration in the original statement)

ghoulybits wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

I think this situation would be avoided if you guys only typed "we revoked igor denizenship because he didnt do shit and is a pedo this wont happen again my bad."

Yeah, totally. People definitely read those posts too!

(though I do agree that there should have been more of an elaboration in the original statement)

octowave wrote:

-Remi wrote:

I am always late for his collabs, hopefully I'll be able to secure a spot next time

i already have a date decided for the next one if that helps

20th nov 2023

it's a thematic thing

Polyspora wrote:

I was thinking, I know it doesnt make him innocent but what if igor was just trying really hard to be edgy?

ghoulybits wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

I was thinking, I know it doesnt make him innocent but what if igor was just trying really hard to be edgy?

That still wouldn't change the fact that he was clearly aware that his actions were wrong and had been given multiple different warnings, none of which he listened to.

Polyspora wrote:

I was thinking, I know it doesnt make him innocent but what if igor was just trying really hard to be edgy?

Polyspora wrote:

I was thinking, I know it doesnt make him innocent but what if igor was just trying really hard to be edgy?

ghoulybits wrote:

That still wouldn't change the fact that he was clearly aware that his actions were wrong and had been given multiple different warnings, none of which he listened to.

WitherMite wrote:

at some point it stops mattering if it was done "ironically" and is still just a fucked up thing to do/say.

much of what he's done is over that line

WitherMite wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

I was thinking, I know it doesnt make him innocent but what if igor was just trying really hard to be edgy?

at some point it stops mattering if it was done "ironically" and is still just a fucked up thing to do/say.

much of what he's done is over that line

Polyspora wrote:

I was thinking, I know it doesnt make him innocent but what if igor was just trying really hard to be edgy?

abraker wrote:

Polyspora wrote:

I was thinking, I know it doesnt make him innocent but what if igor was just trying really hard to be edgy?

Fuck around and find out

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

It's hard to think that everyone was complaining about the OT government a few days ago. Now it seems like nobody cares.

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

It's hard to think that everyone was complaining about the OT government a few days ago. Now it seems like nobody cares.

ghoulybits wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

It's hard to think that everyone was complaining about the OT government a few days ago. Now it seems like nobody cares.

People are able to continue to complain if they wish, but I can't say I'll be too inclined to respond if the only complaints are either about things that we've already addressed or things that aren't true/won't happen.

Manishh wrote:

ghoulybits wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

It's hard to think that everyone was complaining about the OT government a few days ago. Now it seems like nobody cares.

People are able to continue to complain if they wish, but I can't say I'll be too inclined to respond if the only complaints are either about things that we've already addressed or things that aren't true/won't happen.

Ryu Sei wrote:

but which gen am i, confusion noises

looks great tbh

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Congrats to Stomiks! But this begs a question. How often are you guys electing new denizens?

abraker wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Congrats to Stomiks! But this begs a question. How often are you guys electing new denizens?

We got a few lined up, but I want to space them out by a week at the very least. Doing them all at once is ehhh

octowave wrote:

Kaaruumii wrote:

I LITERALLY CALLED IT



GRATS BROTHER!!

i was expecting stomiks to be the next denizen as well

B0ii wrote:

Who's next?

abraker wrote:

B0ii wrote:

Who's next?

not you

Stomiks wrote:

Damn I got denizenship on Christmas day. Thanks for the Christmas present guys.

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Becoming a denizen doesn't matter that much. The only real advantage you get is having a title that's specific to this subforum. A denizen like Stomiks and a Dweller like me realistically basically have the same level of "advantageness".

Stomiks wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Becoming a denizen doesn't matter that much. The only real advantage you get is having a title that's specific to this subforum. A denizen like Stomiks and a Dweller like me realistically basically have the same level of "advantageness".

You get to run and vote in elections

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Becoming a denizen doesn't matter that much. The only real advantage you get is having a title that's specific to this subforum. A denizen like Stomiks and a Dweller like me realistically basically have the same level of "advantageness".

You get to run and vote in elections

There's that too, but my main point is denizen isn't something that gives you a lot of advantages like supporter.

Cerno wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Becoming a denizen doesn't matter that much. The only real advantage you get is having a title that's specific to this subforum. A denizen like Stomiks and a Dweller like me realistically basically have the same level of "advantageness".

You get to run and vote in elections

There's that too, but my main point is denizen isn't something that gives you a lot of advantages like supporter.

u also get a pat on the back by abraker

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

[ Sebastian ] wrote:

Becoming a denizen doesn't matter that much. The only real advantage you get is having a title that's specific to this subforum. A denizen like Stomiks and a Dweller like me realistically basically have the same level of "advantageness".

You get to run and vote in elections

There's that too, but my main point is denizen isn't something that gives you a lot of advantages like supporter.