m4m
General
01:45:324 (1,2,3,4,1) - polish up the pattern a bit.. looks messy right now
02:12:701 (6) - this note is too low (most players have offset meter on so it gets in the way)
04:29:750 (2,4,5,6,7,8) - fix blanket?
Transient
00:38:111 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - approach circles look messy if you align them like this
01:04:176 (3,4,5) - why use triplet here but not 01:09:422 (3,1) - here?
01:11:553 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - NC pattern here is different from 01:09:258 (2,3,1,2,3) - here or other parts
01:36:471 (1,3) - move them a bit so slider 3 can blanket 1 better?
01:42:701 (4) - NC here if you're gonna NC 01:41:389 (1,2) - these two
02:24:340 (1) - align this with the stream
02:25:979 (1) - ^
02:57:947 (1) - I don't think this needs a single NC
That's about it, but the diffs look quite messy. I guess you can say that's your style.. not a big fan though.
Playability-wise there's no problem. Good luck on rank man.
General
- enable epilepsy warning
01:45:324 (1,2,3,4,1) - polish up the pattern a bit.. looks messy right now
02:12:701 (6) - this note is too low (most players have offset meter on so it gets in the way)
04:29:750 (2,4,5,6,7,8) - fix blanket?
Transient
00:38:111 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - approach circles look messy if you align them like this
01:04:176 (3,4,5) - why use triplet here but not 01:09:422 (3,1) - here?
01:11:553 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - NC pattern here is different from 01:09:258 (2,3,1,2,3) - here or other parts
01:36:471 (1,3) - move them a bit so slider 3 can blanket 1 better?
01:42:701 (4) - NC here if you're gonna NC 01:41:389 (1,2) - these two
02:24:340 (1) - align this with the stream
02:25:979 (1) - ^
02:57:947 (1) - I don't think this needs a single NC
That's about it, but the diffs look quite messy. I guess you can say that's your style.. not a big fan though.
Playability-wise there's no problem. Good luck on rank man.