Data check

Unromanised artist should have "ê" in the name, so it should change in Black Raison d'être

i don't find anything about this artist discussion, so i think i'll start on my own and see if this is right

Hi, are you sure Artist name is correct right now?

Current artist field 神楽めあ, 湊あくあ which romanised is Kagura Mea, Minato Aqua

Metadata source, However, it provides a different field 神楽めあ×湊あくあ which it will be Kagura Mea x Minato Aqua. Could i know why this choice even your different data field?

who is will stetson

from 00:41:269 to 01:03:043 there is not a single gap to remake the chain. Easy diffs, as hards', need to get some 1/1 or 2/1 breaks to remake the chain, you can find this example here. This does not count on kiai parts

imma go to make some gap on 00:44:334 (4) - 00:56:592 (7) - making them a circle + you could remove this circle 00:49:817 (4) - for the same reason

begin from 00:32:076 to 00:42:398 there's any variation between sliders and circles which it makes a rhythm costruction lack and contrast issue between this section and the next one. It's ok make super simplified notes like these for easy diff but you still need to represent intensity song with your mapping style.

i think 00:36:592 (6) - can freely be a circle so as not to repeat the same rhythm pattern used on 00:32:076 (1,2,3) -

First timing still needs to be moved. As i can see, i think -4 would match better.

i still hear some off sync with 00:10:015, i would suggest to use something similar at this

16,333.333333333333,4,2,0,100,1,0 9349,331.491712707182,4,2,0,100,1,0 10011,320.855614973262,4,2,0,100,1,0 10333,333.333333333333,4,2,0,20,1,0 10666,333.333333333333,4,2,0,20,1,0

DS starting from 00:30:665 until 01:13:332 is not for a normal diff. The current one is passed from 0.9x to 1.3x which it's a radical change considering the intensity choosen before and this is so unexpected since you just raised your SV from 1.00x to 1.20x. Current patterns look very distant from each other, considering also RC guideline 1/2 notes should overlap each other on the playfield

Consider to not change or minimize spacing change keeping it as 0.9x/1.0x and also density will decrease with it. You can find a similar issue on this difficulty

ex: You can do patterns similar at 01:18:166 (3,1,2) - etc. just they are visibly overlapped

Tags on Hard diff are in conflict with all other diffs, make sure to copy paste all the tags on all your difficulties

Some NC need to be rewatched cause they are a lot expecting the overall (Normal 50 / Hard 80)

00:11:666 (1,2) - 00:22:333 (1,2) - ctrl g on NC
00:14:999 (1) - 00:25:666 (1) - remove NC since you're already keeping oe on 00:14:666 (1) -
00:17:333 (1) - 00:28:000 (1) - would remove NC to make contrast with 00:15:999 (4) -
00:19:999 (1) - 01:11:999 (1) - since this circle is still part of the pattern before the gap it would be good remove the NC
00:24:666 (1) - 00:35:333 (1) - 00:40:666 (1) - etc. this NC looks so random to just cover a different rhythm choice, what about to remove it
00:31:666 (1,2) - 00:32:999 (1,2) - 01:15:999 (4,1) - etc. ctrl g on NC since the song is repeating starting to white tick
01:13:666 (1) - remove NC here since you already keeping one on 01:13:333 (1) -
01:21:999 (1) - 01:23:332 (1) - unnecessary NC spam since you're following a pattern and disguise them would lead to a pattern misunderstanding
01:28:833 (1) - why NC this if you already have one on 01:29:333 (1) - ? what about to remove it

HP5 so the overall spread would be 3->4->5

Greenline begin from 00:02:681 looks offset, you should resnap all of these after moving a timing point

Hard + Sunshine. 00:18:333 5% volume pattern, this may be hard to hear over the song since it is a silent pattern rn, try to raise a bit his sound of around ~40%

Hard + Sunshine.

These diffs, basing on section contrast, look like too similar for the all their sections, it does not follow a difficulty contrast considering the visual spacing of 00:09:353 - 00:27:999 vs 00:30:665 - 01:11:999 quite similar or the same except for SV. A good diff needs to identify and show how sections are different from each other giving more or less mapping intensity referring on song's intentions, your current situation is you are not following anything about it making these sections look like the same.
I'm pretty sure you are more inclined to decrease intensity on this section 00:09:353 - 00:27:999 since it's the quiest section comparing to the next one

Hard -> you could decrease your DS to something like 1.2x + make more 1/2 stack patterns like 00:10:499 (2,3) - 00:13:166 (2,3) - etc.

Sunshine -> you could decrease your SV to 0.80x since your shapes look so fast rn

Referring on past mods like this, section from 00:30:665 to 00:51:332 you're currently using just a pattern to cover the whole song.

All difficulties have this kind of problem which patterns repeats each other on the whole section, for example normal has this 00:30:666 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - , hard has this 00:30:666 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2) - and Sunshine has this 00:30:666 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2) - , i know it's the same rhythm but doing similar patterns without changing rhythm costruction would lead to a lack of variation patterning and boring section since the poor patterning choice cause the aggressive repetition of this. I'm sure you can do a lot of good rhythm variation with similar beats and i'm gonna point out someone for you for every diff:

Normal -> i see you're often repeating this pattern 00:30:666 (1,2,3) -, what about to vary with rhythms like these


same will impact on 00:52:665 - 01:11:665

Hard -> you're often repeating this pattern 00:30:666 (1,2,3,4,1) -, i think you can make some different rhythm basing on these examples

Sunshine -> you're repeating this pattern 00:30:666 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - , since you're introducing 3/4 rhythms i think you have more variation choices like these examples

Unused files.

drum-hitclap.wav drum-hitclap2.wav normal-hitclap.wav normal-hitclap2.wav soft-sliderslide.wav soft-slidertick.wav soft-sliderwhistle.wav

Metadata Check

title and artist are fine to me, DESKPOP is a discography building for who's wondering

add instrumental in tags

HS

Current hitsounds are lacking of feedback on the most of the instruments, this lead to a misinterpretation song and we don't wanna this happens, you would add whistle on some piano like 00:09:353 00:10:333 00:10:499 00:10:999 00:11:166 00:11:665 etc.

what about to add a normal-hitclap on sounds like 00:10:019 00:11:332 00:12:665 00:13:999 etc. i think it would improve the music rappresentation

00:18:666 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - as Hard as Sunshine, hitclap sounds quite strong again, i would go with whistles instead

from 00:30:665 to 00:51:332 there's an absence of kick appresentation as well, try to identify all kick starting from these hints 00:30:665 00:30:999 00:31:999 00:32:332 etc.

00:31:332 00:32:665 etc. default drum-hitclap sounds wrong for me, what about to change this sound with a soft-hitclap instead?

from 00:09:353 to 00:30:665 would fit better a volume around ~40/45%
from 00:30:665 to 01:13:332 would fit better a volume around ~65/70%
from 01:13:332 to 01:32:665 would fit better a volume around 50/55%
01:32:665 what about to increase the volume to ~30/35%

MP3 is fine to me

00:57:696 this sounds more like a 1/6

Basensorex GD owner :)

OD looks still a bit high cosidering the normal and hard setup difference. what about a 6.5 instead?