From what I see, you do emphasis for objects either by Aim direction change or Big spacing.

But then, sometimes this is not applied consistently, for example:

• 00:38:332 (5,6,7) - there's no direction change here
  (See how the sliders on 00:29:332 (6,7) flow in different directions which causes sudden change in aim direction (A.K.A emphasis) )
• 01:10:475 (6,7) spacing is small
  (See how spacing on 00:28:189 (5,6) is so much larger compared to that)
• etc.

You're also doing kicksliders here but the spacing is quite small compared to the circle jumps like 00:36:332 (6,7,1). Considering that this is the Top diff, you definitely have more leeway to add big spacings and movement variation

You can make some tweaks to the emphasis so that these kicksliders have more impact.

00:28:618 (1) - 00:29:189 (4) - 00:29:761 (1) - 00:33:761 (5) - etc.

These 1/1 sliders and 1/2 reverse being placed in the chorus feels a bit too passive and underwhelming. Ideally, since you generally mapped snares actively in this map, you should also make the snares in these chorus sections active.

You can try something like this: (This is 00:28:618 (1,2,3,4,5))

But

If you'd like to keep the rhythm as is, you should add some things to compliment them with the objects around them.
Right now, they're not really complimented by efforts on emphasis (no direction change, no spacing change.)

• For example, 00:28:618 (1,2,3,4,5) - (The 1/2 reverse in this case)
  The aim direction change is there, so that's nice. But, (1)->(4)->(5) have similar spacings. If we're leaving the snare on the 1/2 reverse sliderend, could at least space (2,3,4) or (5) away a bit to complement the passive rhythm. (Kinda like 00:33:761 (5,6) where the (6) is a bit far after the snare)
  

• Another example, 00:29:761 (1,2,3,4) - (The 1/1 reverse in this case)
  Flow from (1)->(2) is just one continuous line (no emphasis on (2) ) and the spacing is quite small. You can make the trajectory of (4) the opposite of (1) for emphasis, like this:
  

00:45:761 - I think you should just map this part.

You did map this similar section anyways 02:08:047

I mean, even the Normal diff mapped it so it's a bit weird that it's inconsistent spread wise.

00:29:332 (2) - , 00:33:904 (2) - , etc. & 00:42:904 (3) - , 00:45:189 (5) - , etc.
Snare drum on sliderends feel underwhelming.

Snare drums are pretty strong sounds, so, ideally you want to make them active.

You could do these rhythms instead:
For 00:29:332 (2) - , 00:33:904 (2) - , etc.

and For 00:42:904 (3) - , 00:45:189 (5) - , etc.

00:26:332 (1,3) - you could just make these all 3/4 reverses. It's fine in a hard diff with a BPM this high and it follows the background drum better.

It'd also be much easier to follow for newer players.

Would definitely do something like this instead

00:45:761 - I think you should just map this part.

You did map this similar section anyways 02:08:047

I mean, even the Normal diff mapped it so it's a bit weird that it's inconsistent spread wise.