beatmap discussions
00:41:548 (1,2) - this jump sounds very radical considering the whole section where you're going quite chill as 00:39:692 (1,2) - 00:46:187 (3,4) - etc. you could rework on this changing the slider flow as well
03:27:640 (1,2,3,4) - would decrease the jump intensity so to don't make it too different to 03:26:712 (1,2,3,4) -
03:30:402 (1,2,3,1) - pattern doesn't fit that much with snare usage, your intentions are to follow guitar intentions but with a costant snare every 5/12 this sounds quite confusing. Could try to remove some reverse and add some 1/12 slider like this
plus remove NC spam on 03:31:793 (1) -
01:06:244 (1,2,3) - you vocal melody is going to focus too much on instruments unlike 01:04:954 (4,5,6,7) - 01:07:534 (4,5,6,7) - etc. What about to make 01:07:050 an active sound instead with a pattern structure similar to
Metadata check on 2255980#4875023
Last edited by Leomine .
00:19:639 (1) - 00:14:058 (6,1) - you should follow piano better since the current patterns sound without a destination, you might try this kind of pattern
gonna post only these cause i would train more about messable maps, anyway if you like my mods i could make a try again
Hi, i hope my review would help you to improve your map!!
00:24:666 (5) - double reverse is not that predictable as the start. would make something like this instead
01:13:666 (2) - multiple reverse slider is covering importants active hits like 01:13:999 01:14:332 etc. what about to represent the oculele with other notes like this?
same as 01:16:332 (2) - 01:24:333 (2) -
00:11:166 (5,1) - their distance look so close although it's a 1/1 gap. You could make this slider 00:11:166 (5,1) - 1/1 instead and make something like this (NC change would improve too)
00:14:999 (1,2,3) - 00:16:333 (1,2,3) - etc. maybe fully overlapping slider bodies within 2 beats of each other would be confusing, what about making some variant like this (also with straight sliders)
same as 00:16:666 (2,1) - 00:27:333 (2,1) - you might not overlap them
Referring on past mods like this, section from 00:30:665 to 00:51:332 you're currently using just a pattern to cover the whole song.
All difficulties have this kind of problem which patterns repeats each other on the whole section, for example normal has this 00:30:666 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - , hard has this 00:30:666 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2) - and Sunshine has this 00:30:666 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2) - , i know it's the same rhythm but doing similar patterns without changing rhythm costruction would lead to a lack of variation patterning and boring section since the poor patterning choice cause the aggressive repetition of this. I'm sure you can do a lot of good rhythm variation with similar beats and i'm gonna point out someone for you for every diff:
Normal -> i see you're often repeating this pattern 00:30:666 (1,2,3) -, what about to vary with rhythms like these
same will impact on 00:52:665 - 01:11:665
Hard -> you're often repeating this pattern 00:30:666 (1,2,3,4,1) -, i think you can make some different rhythm basing on these examples
Sunshine -> you're repeating this pattern 00:30:666 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - , since you're introducing 3/4 rhythms i think you have more variation choices like these examples
01:06:217 (1) - you could represent better vocals as you did on 01:08:960 (4,5,1) - , you could make something like this basing on your mapping structure
Last edited by Leomine .
00:10:082 vs 00:02:836 (4) - why skip an intentional sound? Suppose the pattern on 00:09:742 (1,2) - could follow even better overmaps with something similar like
00:05:214 (4,5,6,7) - 00:12:459 (1,2,3,4) - what are they supposing to follow? at the 4th circle there's a hitclap where it makes these patterns very confusing since you're hitting nothing except that snare. Consider to make a 1/2 slider in the middle, for example
Metadata check did in past (do not take in consideration additive tags)
Last edited by Leomine .
00:56:249 (1) - reverse slider looks a bit unexpected since the overlap with 00:56:091 (1) - , you could change his verse to make it more visinble to the player, example
00:15:670 (5,6) - this jump does not have the triple but 00:20:564 (4,5,6) - this has one, you could make it more consistent adding another circle on 00:15:749
01:03:196 (2,3) - Flow looks lacking here, circle could get more visibility if it was just under the last slider, for example this kind of pattern
01:13:617 (3,4) - these notes make a stack but 01:03:512 (3,4) - these not, you could make another jump pattern since there are just 4 stacks in the section and they already have a sense unlike this one
00:13:757 (1,2,3,4,5) - this rhythm, similar to 00:03:652 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - , could be improved since sounds like 00:14:704 hardly follows your intentions. consider to make a rhythm which as 00:14:389 as 00:14:547 are active sounds
00:37:757 (1) - vs 00:47:862 (1,2,3,4,5) - what about to overmap a bit more the first stamp, i think it would match better with something similar to the second one
00:57:573 (1) - this reverse slider is barely follow vocals intentions since the last vocal hit is on 00:58:441. you would like to change this pattern and make circle + 3/2 slider
02:57:652 (6,1,2) - you would try to ctrl g on notes 1-2 so to make this 02:58:283 denser since vocals are rising for a little here
i will mod only one diff but maybe in future i will do the rest, hope this will help you
Last edited by Leomine .
00:21:660 (3,1) - jump on these notes lacks on flow, you would improve it using this pattern
same as 00:55:240 (2,3,1,2) - , you could ctrl g these circles 00:55:581 (1,2) -
01:24:805 (1,2) - these are very close objects and they would be masked as 1/2 rhythm, doing this change could bring into make a 1/1 stack with circle and slider
00:58:718 (1,2) - this pattern doesn't follow very weel the melody, you could make sure to hit this kick 00:58:881 and leave this 00:59:207 as passive
same as 01:03:936 (1) -
01:58:963 (3) - not is hitting anything unlike 01:49:099 (2,3,4) - , since you are following more hit drums with jumps, try to keep a faithful pattern with that instead
same as 03:04:832 (3) -
There are some rhythm structures which don't follow/fit with the song. Unlike the other diffs, this one looks out of context and overmapped and it looks disappointing that this happen, i point you out some pattern where you could improve and match better with other diffs.
00:06:055 (2) - you would make 2 circles instead because there are strong drums on it
00:11:599 00:16:816 this is a passive sound although on other diffs you mapped as an active one
same as 00:21:870 (3) - 00:24:479 (4) - 01:14:044 (5) - etc.
notes like 00:12:903 (5) - 00:18:120 (5) - 00:27:903 (4) - etc. are not following any type of vocal in the song but they are still active notes, you could remove them to make more the vocal spread more enjoyable
00:41:599 (5,1,2,3,4) - this combo is completely off since stronger vocals are on 00:41:599 00:42:251 00:42:903, you might try this rhythm costruction:
00:52:686 (2,3) - do ctrl g to follow vocals better as 00:52:196 (1) -
01:37:196 (3) - you could do this 2 circle + 1/2 slider as you did on Insane and Another
00:04:065 this note is not hitted while snares like 00:01:965 (6) - 00:02:715 (1,3) - are, you would do the same since it's quite strong as hit and players would feel the hit
00:30:165 (6,8) - these sliders are not very comfy with the song cause this 1/2 00:30:165 (6) - , you might make the slider 6 1/1 and make a rhythm like this
00:56:115 (3) - circle is overlapping with the HP bar, could you move it a bit down to prevent that from happening
00:54:015 (4,1) - ctrl g this pattern would improve the vocal following, it also make this note 00:54:315 active
00:03:765 (5) - this slider can be 2 circles since both the sounds covered by the slider are actively hittable, you would try something lile this
same as 00:54:165 (6) -
00:56:415 leave this gap looks diapponting since the hit is the same of 00:51:465 (5) - , you would follow the same patterning or add a circle on the gap, here's an example that you can consider about
same as 00:57:615
Difficulty contains multiple density and spread diff issues where it makes it seem more like a normal, or precisely too close with the normal density. Fyi, Density is based by the song's feedback, i.e how much the song is strong (verse, kiai, bridge, breaks) you have to follow it mapping it more or less dense. Spread difficulty is how much a diff (increasing or decreasing), compared with another one, is different counting: density, overmap and patterning difference.
00:01:006 - 00:08:013 Starting with this section, but precisely on 00:04:509, song density is growing up but you're still keeping like this part 00:01:006. snares like 00:04:728 00:05:604 00:06:151 with this whole bunch of high notes are covered by 00:06:261 (5) - you could hit all with some circle and slider, for example.
- 00:04:509 (1) - you might make this 1/2 slider so to have this note 00:04:947 hittable
same as 00:05:385 (3) - - 00:06:151 there is a strong hit, you could make a triple here
- 00:06:261 (5) - this you could change it in 2 1/4 reverse sliders to make this sort of rhythm
- 00:07:356 00:07:575 use the chance to hit these as well, this would change alot the playbase
00:16:553 (1,2,3,4) - also this part is growing up, you would overmap the snares present in the song and increase the contrast between Hard and Normal
00:18:524 - 00:34:290 This whole section is equal with the Normal's density, entire patterns like 00:18:524 (1,2,3,1,2,3,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - are the same and this is not good since you're transforming it in a Normal, let's see what could you change for solve this problem.
- 00:18:524 (1,2,3) - 00:20:276 (1,2) - 00:22:027 (5,6) - you would start indroducing 3/4 patterns like 3/4 slider + circle and make more 1/2 slider
- 00:25:093 (5) - this would be a triple
- 00:30:787 (1,2,3) - also this is equal with the normal, you could change them as you done on 00:23:779 (1,2,3,4) -
- You should increase the SV cause sliders looks very slower than 00:06:261
same as 01:12:830 - 01:23:122
00:55:312 (1,2,1) - you might increase the density here since the map is going like to "explode" for enjoying to the chorus. You would consider to sound actively these notes 00:55:750 00:55:969 etc. and the whole spinner part
00:58:816 - 01:12:830 Also kiai part needs some increasement with density. Objects like 00:58:816 (1) - 01:00:568 (5) - 01:01:881 (1) - 01:05:823 (3) - 01:09:765 (2) - would be changed in something more similar to 1/2 sliders but let's see how would we solve this.
- 00:58:816 (1) - 01:05:823 (3) - you might remove the reverse and place next to it a circle since the vocals
- 01:00:568 (5) - you would follow vocals also with some 1/2 slider to make the density costant with the section
01:09:765 (2) - same thing i said above about costant snares, you would place some 1/4 reverse slider + circle as you already done on 01:11:078 (1,2,3) -
Same density and spread issue is present in this diff. Basically, this diff seems too simplified to be an "almost 4*", and similar patterns are used as on hard as on this one. you need to overmap more and space more since patterns like 00:19:181 (5,6) - 00:26:188 (3,4) - 01:00:787 (7,8) - 01:13:487 (3,4) - 01:20:495 (3,4) - are very simplified and easier considering the difference between this diff and Hard, let's point out them.
00:01:006 - 00:07:137 start looks undermapped, notes like 00:01:443 00:01:662 00:01:772 etc. should be mapped for this section cause it shows how the difficulty spread can vary basing on the diff.
- 00:01:006 (1,2,3,4) - 00:02:757 (1,2,3,4) - would make patterns more impactful like this rhythm
- 00:04:509 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this part, as said on hard diff, needs to be buffed to include all strong notes present in the song, you could make these 1/1 sliders 00:04:509 (1,3) - in 1/2 so to add more active notes.
- 00:06:589 00:06:808 00:07:027 it looks diappointing leave these without a sound, you would like to make a stream instead of a jump pattern, i'll show you what would match better.
00:18:524 - 00:34:290 this section looks simplier than the start, consider to look more at the constrast between song and mapping, it would really help.
- 00:18:524 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - 00:25:531 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i would say you have to focus less on slider placement. i.e 00:19:838 (6) - 00:21:589 (3) - 00:23:341 (3) - can easly be circles
00:55:312 (1,2,1) - exact thing said on hard diff, you can use the same hint gave there
00:58:816 - 01:12:830 there are some patterns that needs a buff to.
- 01:09:108 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you could include these notes 01:09:874 01:10:093 01:10:312 etc. using some stream or slider jump, so you can increase the density together the song. I advice you something like this it would be cool imo
01:05:864 (2,3) - flow is lacking with this surprising note position, you could move it above the last slider so to give a better flow readability
Hello, i'm glad to mod your map, fyi i'm improving my modding skills to join in a future in the BNg, if you consider some point too exceeding you can point it, that would help me to improve my point of view while modding <3
01:18:175 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - this pattern looks very disappointing by his structure and density, unlike you done on 00:24:842 (1,2,3,4) - , this one needs to be changed in another way. Since your intentions are to make a different pattern from the first one, this one could be an idea to improve this pattern
from 01:36:508 to 01:52:508 there are some confusing rhythm and patterning structures, adding also their lack on density present on some point, i show you something:
01:39:008 you are covering this hit with a passive sound, where it would bring into a mess in the playbase caused by this 3/2 slider 01:38:508 (3) - , you might make this slider more active with following instruments present in the map like change it in 1/1 so to hit this hitclap 01:38:842 and leave space to actively hit the mentioned sound
Same as 01:49:175 (1,2,3) -
01:39:508 (1,2) - with 01:40:175 (3,4,5) - they follow the same identical sound but they are hitted in a different way. Not complaining you've used different patterns to fill the map, the issue is the unhitted sound useful to impact more the playbase while paying. For example:
- 01:39:508 (1) - this 2/3 slider covers 01:39:620 but 01:40:286 (4) - is hitted
- 01:39:842 (2) - this kick is hitted but 01:40:508 is not
The solution i wanna tell you is to include the note where they were skipped by each other so to not to make them radically different.
Same as 01:50:175 (1,2,3,4,5) -
Some issue said on general EXPERT hits also this diff, but with lower impact.
00:02:508 (1) - 00:25:842 (1) - even though this has more sense, would be better if you control yourself unsing a max of SV of 3.00x/3.50x as you done on 00:07:175 (1,2,3,4) -
00:26:842 (3,5,6) - 01:20:842 (5,6) - same identical thing told in EXPERT, you are decreasing the SV during a drum n' bass part like 00:21:842
00:56:508 (1) - 4.00x -> 0.50x instead of make the same lenght but different durability, you could try place a different slider shape to give more sense with the scrach song at 0.75x
00:59:791 (1,2,3,4) - 01:01:609 (1,2,3,4) - vs 00:58:882 (1,2,3,4) - 01:00:700 (1,2,3,4) - i would congratulate you for the idea, but these circles are still to close. Try to make sure they don't overlap with each other otherwise you cold make them similar to this spacing 00:49:563 (5,6,7) -
01:20:472 (5,6) - these sliders could confuse the playbase since they are perfectly stacked tail/head. you might do something similar to this:
I'm sorry to say it but i need to mention this.
Easy, Normal and Insane are very centered mapped.
Easy
Normal (least problematic)
Insane
How you can see, comparing from your diffs and the IWEJ's one, your playfield is very minimal with the most of the time it focuses exclusively on the center. This brings to a 2 mapping problems:
- you have less space to map
- in a 4:3 scale screen you will cover less than you could do
I think you don't wish these problems happens if you wanna push this map to rank and ppl judge your map as "bad one" just cause your playfield, so what's should you do in this case? You might recheck your diffs and understand if you have the possibility of changing some pattern position so to include angles or sides where it allows you to have a larger space when you use mapping editor. If you wanna know more about the playfield you can check also this page for more clarifications.
hi, i'm sorry for this but i can't mod this map since the low quality mapping, but i wanna give you some point to improve your mapping style or this map.
First of all i see you're unsing a playfield very very minimum, a good map needs to cover most of the grid possible without any worry, this is an example of comparation of your playfield vs another ENHYPEN ranked map
Second i see you don't follow the Standard Difficulty Star Rating. If you have intentions to rank your maps you need to follow this rule with his respective difficulty rules, i think watch a 2* Insane would result a bit "weird" for a player.
Third i see you use a lot of very close patterns, this is a reason for which your diffs don't fit with SR (Star rating), as first step to improve your pattern knowledge would be watching your favorite mapper's map and try to replace something you really liked.
as conclusion i think you are able to understand what i wanna trasmit to you, hope this post could help you to make your maps better and motivate you to make more (we need kpop mappers lol)
if you wanna get more opinions, you can join in some discord server like this and i'm sure someone will help you
will try to don't overlap with shurelia mods (they were unsolved while modding this)
During this section 02:04:488 you're using very often this sort of patterning 02:05:711 (3,4) - where it repeats until the end section. It might be important make some variation when a song section costantly repeats so to make the diff more impactful and less boring during the play.
To make a compromise about it, you would split the section in 2 types of patterning, for example:
02:04:488 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this will be left as it is
02:12:044 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this part will be changed with some other different pattern of 02:05:711 (3,4) - so to don't repeat the first half section
Consider to use any pattern you think of, you can find some idea below this post as well
I'm unable to mod top diff since the high SR, anyway i hope my modding was good for you and hope it will be understandable
00:28:906 (1,2,1,2) - these 2 patterns looks off from the song, unlike of 00:28:538 (1,2) - where you're following vocals and base, with these you're trying to do the same thing but with a different music base. consider to hit notes like 00:29:090 for making patterns as:
