frog summer

00:09:353 (1) - reverse doesn't follow anything considering the unique sound present is on 00:10:019. You might rework this kind of reverse slider usage and enjoy more something similar to Normal's patterns

00:11:166 (5,1) - their distance look so close although it's a 1/1 gap. You could make this slider 00:11:166 (5,1) - 1/1 instead and make something like this (NC change would improve too)

00:14:666 (1) - could you make the spacing for this more clear?

its spacing suggests it's a 1/2 but in reality it's a 1/1 gap for its former and latter objects

the nc is a nice and all indication, but it's difficult to read

00:14:999 (1,2,3) - 00:16:333 (1,2,3) - etc. maybe fully overlapping slider bodies within 2 beats of each other would be confusing, what about making some variant like this (also with straight sliders)

same as 00:16:666 (2,1) - 00:27:333 (2,1) - you might not overlap them

00:18:499 (3,4) - spacing looks quite difficult to reach, you could try 2 things for this:

• Get close the the reverse slider until they overlap a bit
• remove 1/4 slider and leave just the triple

same as 00:18:666 (4,1) - 00:52:333 (2,3) -

00:39:333 (3,4) - you could try catching the synths (?) in the background with repeats like what you did at 00:18:333 (1,2,3,4,1) -

00:52:333 (2) - 1/6 as you did on Sunshine?

01:13:666 (1,2,3,4) - 01:14:666 (1,2,3,4) - etc. this pattern looks like more a stream considering also after this one you're making a bigger spacing on 01:14:166 (4,5) - although the beat is similar. I would go adding some 1/2 slider as well and to not mix spacing or ppl would not expect what the next pattern will be

01:15:499 (1,2,3,4) - could really space it a bit more because the current spacing suggests it's a 1/2 when it's not

01:16:333 (1,2,3,4,5) - no need to space out 4-5 on a hard diff. you already have a complex spacing idea going on with the varying sizes of 1/2 rhythms seen at 01:18:166 (1,2,3,1,2,3). It's best to keep the structure simple for baby players

01:18:666 (1,2,3,4) - could space it a little similar to the spacing on notes such as 01:14:166 (4,5) - 01:16:833 (4,5) -

to give more emphasis to 01:18:666 (1) - since it's a different instrument

01:24:833 (5) - 01:27:499 (6) - would remove this circle since the oculele is playing on 01:24:665 but here not

01:25:333 (1,2,3,4) - could you group these up?

it's pretty much the same as 01:14:666 (1,2,3,4) -

01:29:333 (1,1,2,3) - can be mapped the same as 01:27:999 (1,2,3,4) -

the nc at 01:29:499 (1) - is redundant tbh

01:29:833 (4,1) - 01:30:500 (3,1) - please space it more clearly