02:53:182 (1,2,3) - i would like to see some kinda progression on this since the harmony just got way more intense
02:49:556 (5,6,7) - and 02:50:545 (1,2,3) - being basically the same rhythm i think is kinda bad for emphasis on 02:50:545 (1,2,3) -.
i think it would be better to map the orchestra 02:49:556 (5,6,7) - here, with 1/4 circles, or sliders, even if its just something simple like this
02:41:973 (7) - i think making this a 1/2 slider would be better for rhythm contrast in this section as it would help make 02:42:633 (1,2,3) - this stand out more
01:58:786 (3,1,2) - this spacing was kinda jumpscare when playtesting,
i think even if its lowered to 0.8dx it still has the same movement and emphasis
i think 00:28:127 (1,2,3,4) - should have something to progress it from 00:22:853 (1,2,3,4) - using rhythm, so that it justifies that 00:26:809 (1,2,3,4) - also progresses from 00:21:534 (1,2,3,4) - using rhythm.
otherwise, 00:26:809 (1,2,3,4) - this is the only pattern with different rhythm from before, making it stand out the most, which i dont think agrees with the song.
00:17:248 (6) - think this deserves more emphasis imo, i would personally ctrl g it or something//
i dont really think this is that important, even if it was noticable. on top of that i do actually think the patterns are not that similar, the first pattern also stands out in the section it is in, whereas the latter does not.
i think a player is highly unlikely to cross reference these 2 patterns, and then consider if there is some link here, which there turns out not to be (aside from me maintaining a more consistent style) and then ultimately taking away from the experience.
not following piano because its present during break. 00:50:788 (2) - is to create explosive transition to when bass drum starts