This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Well, I don't ask questions like that, really. I try to be a little more specific in my questions than "how does the Doctor work exactly?" If I had asked the question you suggest I would probably get an answer similar to what the PM states and not what I wanted to know. But you're right, the "claim" wouldn't be discovered and maybe I would have been better protected (because I don't have to worry about the Mafia trying to kill me because they don't know I am the doctor).Echo wrote:
tbh if strager had said something like "I'm just curious to know about the rules around the doctor and how protection works" I wouldn't have had anything to go on, since that would only lead to WIFOM thinking.
lol UR right, but I was busy XDstrager wrote:
Well, I don't ask questions like that, really. I try to be a little more specific in my questions than "how does the Doctor work exactly?" If I had asked the question you suggest I would probably get an answer similar to what the PM states and not what I wanted to know. But you're right, the "claim" wouldn't be discovered and maybe I would have been better protected (because I don't have to worry about the Mafia trying to kill me because they don't know I am the doctor).Echo wrote:
tbh if strager had said something like "I'm just curious to know about the rules around the doctor and how protection works" I wouldn't have had anything to go on, since that would only lead to WIFOM thinking.
Olinard, are you back yet? It's been more than two hours since you said "brb." ;P
EDIT: Echo, what is WIFOM thinking? xD Sounds like "superhypothetical" thinking.
By "you" you mean the not me "you"?Echo wrote:
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Wine_In_Front_Of_Me
I thought I'd linked that before :/
Basically it's what you do in your early posts.
"if adam was mafia then [something] BUT if adam is townie then [something] which means he must be mafia if he did it but then that makes him townie because he's smart enough to know it makes him look townie, which means he's actualy mafia, which makes him townie, which makes him mafia etc."
Article says:Echo wrote:
By "you" I mean the second person pronoun (ie. you, strager), and not the generic "you"
No wonder you were super-suspicious of me. =S However that paragraph talks about after a Night kill so I'm not sure if that really is your reason or if you just don't like my choices about adam.Article wrote:
In Mafia, WIFOM arguments are often a Scum tactic used to distract the Town.
Or just leave a no-vote?adam2046 wrote:
...Why aren't you voting yourself then SFG?
Yeah, SFG seems to be doing more than random voting here.adam2046 wrote:
So you do want to get me lynched?
You are still mad at me.
adam2046 wrote:
I wont be arounf for a little while, if anyone wants to lynch poor little defensless me (SFG) please don't.
You'll make me cryyyyyy T.T
watadam2046 wrote:
Don't you try and allay (^_~) suspicion from yourself by pointing out her.
adam2046 wrote:
Hey, I'm not the one claiming doctor.
watadam2046 wrote:
Don't you try and allay (^_~) suspicion from yourself by pointing out her.
adam2046 wrote:
I don't get it...
Are you two referring to my wat post? If so I'll explain.Echo wrote:
Neither do I.
revote strager
Read part one of my monster post (link).Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Echo, why are you voting for strager after specifically stating that Day 1 was a bad time to lynch an important aux claim?
I didn't get that at all from Echo. =Xadam2046 wrote:
In my mind all Echo was really doing was hinting to to strager that if he was the real doctor he should unclaim or not claim at all, because strager has continued I think Echo may have come to the conclusion that strager is a wolf.
...At least that's my analysis of the situation.
So everyone is 40% mafia.strager wrote:
These are estimates of course but shows my relative suspicions for everyone.
Lynch me~!strager wrote:
Yes, I am 100% sure Echo is a Mafia.
Basically what adam said - I'm pretty sure that strager is not doctor, which is why I'm voting him.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Echo, why are you voting for strager after specifically stating that Day 1 was a bad time to lynch an important aux claim?
Right. =X0_o wrote:
OK, could you PLEASE explain why I am the second most suspicious person for BELIEVING and DEFENDING you? It seems like if you were the doctor then you wouldn't find me wanting to keep you alive so much suspicious...
What?Echo wrote:
So everyone is 40% mafia.strager wrote:
These are estimates of course but shows my relative suspicions for everyone.
I'll ignore that, just as I ignored adam's.Echo wrote:
Lynch me~!strager wrote:
Yes, I am 100% sure Echo is a Mafia.
But you have to assume I am a Mafia otherwise you'd be killing a Townie. (Just to mention.)Echo wrote:
Basically what adam said - I'm pretty sure that strager is not doctor, which is why I'm voting him.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Echo, why are you voting for strager after specifically stating that Day 1 was a bad time to lynch an important aux claim?
More backwards trickiness from strager.strager wrote:
But you have to assume I am a Mafia otherwise you'd be killing a Townie. (Just to mention.)
No I'm not saying that. I meant that your statement:Echo wrote:
My thinking leads me to believe you're mafia which THEN results in my lynch vote.
You're saying I'm voting to lynch you which THEN makes me try to push the idea you're mafia? o.O
Meant "I'm pretty sure strager is a Mafia, which is why I'm voting for him."Echo wrote:
I'm pretty sure that strager is not doctor, which is why I'm voting him.
I like it when I run unicow's puffy balls all over my face.Derekku Chan wrote:
WIFOM WIFOM WIFOM WIFOM
*head is spinning*
I bet you do. :> Also you said this 25 minutes too early. I JUST got to that part. XPstrager wrote:
I like it when I run unicow's puffy balls all over my face.Derekku Chan wrote:
WIFOM WIFOM WIFOM WIFOM
*head is spinning*
It was more of a relative scale than an absolute scale. 40% is more like, "meh, he's acting more of a Townie than a Mafia."adam2046 wrote:
ok...
So strager you're almost certain I'm human, so you stuck me at 40% with BagelBob?
I'm basically thinking aloud and leaving only the first and third option open. (It was also like 03:19 so I was pretty wonky then.)Echo wrote:
I never ever get the point of listing out all the possibilities. Well of course it's one of the three.strager wrote:
I realized now that when I had four players voting for me, no one jumped on the bandwagon for the lynch. This means one of these:
Both Mafia were on the bandwagon already.
I am a Mafia and the other Mafia may or may not have been on the bandwagon. If he was, he would have certainly jumped off at L-1 and probably at L-2.
One or no Mafia were on the bandwagon and the remaining Mafia could not vote to lynch in time.
I am of course striking off the second and am thinking the first is more likely than the third.
Now, if you list only two out of three, for example, and say why the third can't be possible, with evidence, then that's a totally different story.
Where does it seem random?strager wrote:
For the first case it seems as if adam's vote was random
Where does it seem random?strager wrote:
and SFG's vote was only somewhat random
Where does it seem random?strager wrote:
as was nardi's.
Where does it seem deceitful?strager wrote:
0_o seems to be really trying to defend me which either means he's deceitful
Where does he seem helpful?strager wrote:
or genuinely trying to help the town.
The problem, as you adequately put it, is that you "didn't reference posts or anything when I wrote it, so it was purely out of feeling." Feelings can't prove anything.strager wrote:
Probably my reasoning.
"I'll just vote for whoever seems the most suspicious without any evidence."Echo wrote:
Where does it seem random?strager wrote:
For the first case it seems as if adam's vote was randomWhere does it seem random?strager wrote:
and SFG's vote was only somewhat randomWhere does it seem random?strager wrote:
as was nardi's.
Get on my good side then eventually kill me at night.Echo wrote:
Where does it seem deceitful?strager wrote:
0_o seems to be really trying to defend me which either means he's deceitful
Defend the Doctor.Echo wrote:
Where does he seem helpful?strager wrote:
or genuinely trying to help the town.
You're supporting what I said about the random votes.Echo wrote:
The problem, as you adequately put it, is that you "didn't reference posts or anything when I wrote it, so it was purely out of feeling." Feelings can't prove anything.strager wrote:
Probably my reasoning.
All of this is completely baseless. Could you provide any reasoning at all for these numbers? I realize you say later that you changed your mind, but at this time, what made you choose these numbers? Do you have any reasons for Echo being 100% mafia? Why are Derekku and 0_o above 50? Why are the rest of us above 50?strager wrote:
I have these suspicion percentages (0 - definitely Townie; 100 - definitely Mafia; 50 - undecided):
adam - 40%
BagelBob - 40%
nadi - 40%
SFG - 40%
Olinad - 50%
Derekku - 60%
0_o - 65%
Echo - 100%
These are estimates of course but shows my relative suspicions for everyone.
Yes, I am 100% sure Echo is a Mafia.
The numbers were just to state relative suspicions. nardi is less suspicious than 0_o, for example. I used numbers instead of a simple list to group similarly suspicious people together (the 40%'s) and to point out Echo as a Mafia more than just "most suspicious." Again, looking back it was a pretty dumb thing to do.BagelBob wrote:
All of this is completely baseless. Could you provide any reasoning at all for these numbers? I realize you say later that you changed your mind, but at this time, what made you choose these numbers? Do you have any reasons for Echo being 100% mafia? Why are Derekku and 0_o above 50? Why are the rest of us above 50?strager wrote:
I have these suspicion percentages (0 - definitely Townie; 100 - definitely Mafia; 50 - undecided):
adam - 40%
BagelBob - 40%
nadi - 40%
SFG - 40%
Olinad - 50%
Derekku - 60%
0_o - 65%
Echo - 100%
These are estimates of course but shows my relative suspicions for everyone.
Yes, I am 100% sure Echo is a Mafia.
See my pseudo-raging (link).BagelBob wrote:
Do you have any reasons for Echo being 100% mafia?
Actually those first three lines were saying "I totally misread your post so I deleted what I had here before." I thought he was asking me how he voted for me, which kinda confused me so I came back to it later then realized what he meant.BagelBob wrote:
This post is full of nothings. First, you say you come to two realizations. Then, you don't post them, and say you'll remove them from your post.
Yes, I was explaining why I said something, because Echo asked for an explanation (Echo's quote expanded for clarification):BagelBob wrote:
Next, you quote Echo and restate his post.
strager wrote:
No I'm not saying that. I meant that your statement:Echo wrote:
More backwards trickiness from strager.strager wrote:
But you have to assume I am a Mafia otherwise you'd be killing a Townie. (Just to mention.)
My thinking leads me to believe you're mafia which THEN results in my lynch vote.
You're saying I'm voting to lynch you which THEN makes me try to push the idea you're mafia? o.OMeant "I'm pretty sure strager is a Mafia, which is why I'm voting for him."Echo wrote:
I'm pretty sure that strager is not doctor, which is why I'm voting him.
Ah, I had not even considered this. I would expect the Mafia to try and kill a Townie as soon as the chance arises. I don't see a reason why they wouldn't so it'd be nice if you could point at least one out.BagelBob wrote:
In your last section, you present a logical fallacy known as false dichotomy. Those are not the only options, there could have been one voting for you and mafia could have any reasons for voting or not voting for you. With this and all your short posts, it's like your posting without saying anything.
No, I already deduced Echo as a Mafia so you can squeeze that info in there if you want.BagelBob wrote:
Can I assume from This post that you no longer consider Echo a mafia member?
All I meant to say there that one or two of adam, Echo, nardi, and SFG were bandwagonning as a Mafia, not all of them.BagelBob wrote:
In addition, did you mean that adam, SFG, and nardii's votes looked like bandwagon votes?
Where is this "junk about random voting?"BagelBob wrote:
You state that you think 0_o and Derekuu were not on the bandwagon, but then you throw junk about random voting.
And this matters how? I already know this.BagelBob wrote:
Adam's vote started out random, but he kept posting and saying that he was reading the thread and agreed with Echo's logic.
I have to agree here; it's as if you're voting at random with "support" from another player. The number of votes on one's head shouldn't be used as a reason for voting.BagelBob wrote:
SFG, you've said you're going with adam since 0_o said he finds him suspicious. All I can find is that his gut says that. Are you satisfied lynching someone who you think is a townie?
I just went with BagelBob on the above. I'll investigate myself.adam2046 wrote:
SFG is not voting me because of 0_o, I do not find it said anywhere.
adam2046 wrote:
SFG is not voting me because of 0_o, I do not find it said anywhere.
kthxSaturos-fangirl wrote:
well i suppose i am a bit suspicious because when you were mafia last game i couldnt tell that you were at ALL. i think it might have been nardi that pointed a FOS at adam or maybe the FOS wa-oh fuck it let me go find the post
yeah 0_o pointed a FOS at adam and nardi and i chose adam.
also im lol'ing about how you guys are trying to pick apart logic that doesn't exist @_@ also im sick of vote-hopping which is why i havent changed it
*stragerLadySuburu wrote:
Not voting: 3 - (Olinad, Derekku, Strager)
Not sure how me being impatient and me defending strager are correlated...Bagelbob wrote:
0_o, why are you in such a hurry? Is it because you were buddying with strager earlier?
You haven't posted much in the way of cases. In fact, your reason for voting adam, is it still your gut?Now that WWG3 is over I can actually say this: IMO he's been acting similar to when he was in WWG3, and I knew he was a wolf then because I was a wolf myself
I'd like it if you could state your opinions on strager. Do you think that he is telling the truth about being the doctor?Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure almost every post I've made so far has said my opinion on strager He isn't a zero on my suspicion-o-meter that's for sure, but I think the odds of him being the doctor are worth keeping him around at least for today.
If yes, do you think Echo is a mafia member?.I can't say for sure he isn't mafia, but I feel like our differing opinions are based mainly on different interpretations of strager's posts, and again, I'm not gonna vote for someone just because they have a different opinion than me.
it looks to me like you're trying to stay out of the whole messI haven't posted lately because I've had nothing to say; we've hardly made any progress in the last few pages (until now), and I've already stated my opinions on the Echo-strager/adam issue several times over.
he was quick to jump on the bangwagon and vote for strager without any reasoning or proof.nardi11011 wrote:
It's annoying that 90% of the posts in mafia/ww game threads are made when I'm either asleep or at school. Anyway, I vote strager as he seems the most suspicious to me and this game is confusing as hell compared to WWG.
I've stated this a while ago.adam2046 wrote:
So you're no longer certain I'm human Strager, right?
It looks like you're dodging the question there. Why?0_o wrote:
If yes, do you think Echo is a mafia member?.I can't say for sure he isn't mafia
What bangwagon? ;PDerekku Chan wrote:
Both olinad and nardi have both pretty much contributed NOTHING to this topic's discussion.
BUThe was quick to jump on the bangwagon and vote for strager without any reasoning or proof.nardi11011 wrote:
It's annoying that 90% of the posts in mafia/ww game threads are made when I'm either asleep or at school. Anyway, I vote strager as he seems the most suspicious to me and this game is confusing as hell compared to WWG.
Because no one accused it of not being a random vote? He was never attacked so he wouldn't defend himself. If he did defend himself in advanced that'd looks suspicious because it'd seem as if he had something to hide.nardi11011 wrote:
I'm not even counting that as a "random" vote because he hasn't even come back to say otherwise.
By the time nardi voted for you, strager, two other people had voted for you. He seemed to only vote for you because you were the "most suspicious", which isn't a good reason imo.strager wrote:
What bangwagon? ;P
I meant in the case that nardi's vote WAS a random vote, which I don't think it was, but I wanted to cover that groundstrager wrote:
No one's random vote was explicitly denoted as a random vote by the voter, either.
On the bandwagon against strager? I've already stated many times that I believe strager isn't mafia. :/adam2046 wrote:
The only person jumping strager's bangwagon is Derek.
nardi's vote was not random because he stated he had a general idea and that strager seemed suspicious.strager wrote:
What bangwagon? ;PDerekku Chan wrote:
Both olinad and nardi have both pretty much contributed NOTHING to this topic's discussion.
BUThe was quick to jump on the bangwagon and vote for strager without any reasoning or proof.nardi11011 wrote:
It's annoying that 90% of the posts in mafia/ww game threads are made when I'm either asleep or at school. Anyway, I vote strager as he seems the most suspicious to me and this game is confusing as hell compared to WWG.
I have to agree but as a Mafia why would he do this at L-2 and not L-1? (I asked BagelBob this in my last "real" post.)Because no one accused it of not being a random vote? He was never attacked so he wouldn't defend himself. If he did defend himself in advanced that'd looks suspicious because it'd seem as if he had something to hide.nardi11011 wrote:
I'm not even counting that as a "random" vote because he hasn't even come back to say otherwise.
No one's random vote was explicitly denoted as a random vote by the voter, either.
So I don't really see your reasoning here Derekku.
I think you're actually supporting me by saying I don't know anything.Echo wrote:
In a single sentence:
What strager's been posting are plain facts (reiterating the obvious as explained by BagelBob in his third point), mostly baseless accusations (eg. this post right here, make sure you read previous/next post(s) for context), or blatant coverups of his contradictions (eg. most points in this post).
My vote holds until someone provides a convincing case for strager's behaviour.
That is all.
(edit: found some references)
Read what I quoted from you carefully, and read my response.Derekku Chan wrote:
=( It's late and you guys are making fun of me. D:
EDIT: Yeah, I'm not seeing it. *very tired tonight* Hint plz
I'm not saying your vote is right or wrong. I'm just saying it's without real reason or justification, and it's better to have a convincing argument behind your vote.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
*suppresses rage*
fine if you WANT to get lynched and be emo instead of helping the town and youre BOUND and DETERMINED to do so despite my attempts to save you, go the fuck ahead. I give up on saving you.
unvote
no vote
I'm really not trying to attack you. I'm just saying "you have no reason from what I see." I'm not demanding an explanation. I see where you are coming from but I don't see that as a real reason from my perspective. That's all.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
im not going to respond until i have cooled down cus right now, strager, your impossible "logic" is pissing me off SO much. This game has ceased to be fun for me when everyone instantly objects to every action i make. I thought my logic was clear-cut but you don't seem to be understanding it despite every attempt on my part to educate you. im completely sick of your idiocy.
maybe im overreacting a bit but i feel like im getting attacked every time i try to help. This is a game, not a war zone. I'll try again tomorrow i guess and see if things have improved then.
...strager wrote:
Read what I quoted from you carefully, and read my response.Derekku Chan wrote:
=( It's late and you guys are making fun of me. D:
EDIT: Yeah, I'm not seeing it. *very tired tonight* Hint plz
I don't know what you are trying to get at here, but these votes were cast for kuwarudo because he was being annoying. I retracted my vote when he claimed townie right before quitting, and Echo retracted his in his next post for the obvious reason that he was replaced by someone who DOESN'T annoy him.strager wrote:
Hmm.strager wrote:
Echo: SFG
0_o: -
0_o: SFG
0_o: -
Echo: -
Because I don't like lying.nardi11011 wrote:
One thing I don't get: why did strager reveal his role instead of just saying "I was looking at the PM in the OP and was just wondering"?
Oh dear you're right. I completely forgot. x_x0_o wrote:
I don't know what you are trying to get at here, but these votes were cast for kuwarudo because he was being annoying. I retracted my vote when he claimed townie right before quitting, and Echo retracted his in his next post for the obvious reason that he was replaced by someone who DOESN'T annoy him.strager wrote:
Hmm.strager wrote:
Echo: SFG
0_o: -
0_o: SFG
0_o: -
Echo: -
This really should have been obvious...
strager wrote:
Anyway I read somewhere that if the Town doesn't choose to lynch on the first game in a nine-player game with one Mafia the Town gets a statistical advantage, assuming completely random lynching and killing. I'll calculate how this would work with the current setup later.
read the OP again. There are two Mafia.strager wrote:
with one Mafia
Read my post again (bold added):Saturos-fangirl wrote:
strager wrote:
Anyway I read somewhere that if the Town doesn't choose to lynch on the first game in a nine-player game with one Mafia the Town gets a statistical advantage, assuming completely random lynching and killing. I'll calculate how this would work with the current setup later.read the OP again. There are two Mafia.strager wrote:
with one Mafia
strager wrote:
Anyway I read somewhere that if the Town doesn't choose to lynch on the first game in a nine-player game with one Mafia the Town gets a statistical advantage, assuming completely random lynching and killing. I'll calculate how this would work with the current setup later.
Of course such calculations ignore the Mafia or aux roles slipping up, but if the probability sways in favor of the Town by not lynching the first day there is likely a better chance of a Town win. (Note the use of maybies and perhapses.)Saturos-fangirl wrote:
also in retrospect it seems kinda stupid for us to, each Day, roll a n-sided die where n is the number of remaining players and lynch that person off, then expect the mafia to do the same and us to win. takes the entire point out of the game.
:!g++ -g mafia.cpp && ./a.outStill need to code the Doctor in and the Role Blocker too. Cop is ignored and I probably won't code him because he doesn't really do anything to sway the statistics except in claims and investigations and things, which are human factors.
Setup:
Mafia:
Normal: 2
Role blocker: 0
Town:
Normal: 9
Doctor: 0
Mafia wins 64.790765% of the time with lynch on Day 1
Mafia wins 78.437500% of the time with no lynch on Day 1