Actually when proofreading this I noticed you may have gotten me wrong on the sequence of events.
Actually when proofreading this I noticed I was compeletely misunderstanding your statement.
Actually I think I'll just remove that part about me trying to make you understand based of my own misunderstandings of what you misunderstand.
ANYWAY, it's gone now and here's what I really need to say.
Echo wrote:
My thinking leads me to believe you're mafia which THEN results in my lynch vote.
You're saying I'm voting to lynch you which THEN makes me try to push the idea you're mafia? o.O
No I'm not saying that. I meant that your statement:
Echo wrote:
I'm pretty sure that strager is not doctor, which is why I'm voting him.
Meant "I'm pretty sure strager is a Mafia, which is why I'm voting for him."
----------I realized now that when I had four players voting for me, no one jumped on the bandwagon for the lynch. This means one of these:
Both Mafia were on the bandwagon already.
I am a Mafia and the other Mafia may or may not have been on the bandwagon. If he was, he would have certainly jumped off at L-1 and probably at L-2.
One or no Mafia were on the bandwagon and the remaining Mafia could not vote to lynch in time.
I am of course striking off the second and am thinking the first is more likely than the third.