Magic Cylinder is MY weapon.
That's how I used your weapon against you.
That's how I used your weapon against you.
abraker wrote:
A-Breaking News: Denizens hate what they've had created.
owoCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Where is thisshittier list?
community/forums/topics/1101424
Bruh when I can post a thread again if there is more tier list, I gonna make a tier-list of tier-list
My tier list is the only one that matters, excuse meCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Where is thisshittier list?
community/forums/topics/1101424
Bruh when I can post a thread again if there is more tier list, I gonna make a tier-list of tier-list
That's not a Church, that's literal heaven.abraker wrote:
The Cults, Shrines, and Churches
forum/t/1107268 - ※ The Church of Wisp ※
Euh... No. It's a church, it's on the titleq9za wrote:
That's not a Church, that's literal heaven.abraker wrote:
The Cults, Shrines, and Churches
forum/t/1107268 - ※ The Church of Wisp ※
Well maybe it IS a church, but it is a GOOD church.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Euh... No. It's a church, it's on the titleq9za wrote:
That's not a Church, that's literal heaven.abraker wrote:
The Cults, Shrines, and Churches
forum/t/1107268 - ※ The Church of Wisp ※
but... what makes a church good? are the values it supports that make it good? is it the community?q9za wrote:
Well maybe it IS a church, but it is a GOOD church.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Euh... No. It's a church, it's on the titleq9za wrote:
That's not a Church, that's literal heaven.abraker wrote:
The Cults, Shrines, and Churches
forum/t/1107268 - ※ The Church of Wisp ※
No. nothing about that at all, if it's cool, it's good!Winnyace wrote:
but... what makes a church good? are the values it supports that make it good? is it the community?q9za wrote:
Well maybe it IS a church, but it is a GOOD church.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Euh... No. It's a church, it's on the titleq9za wrote:
That's not a Church, that's literal heaven.abraker wrote:
The Cults, Shrines, and Churches
forum/t/1107268 - ※ The Church of Wisp ※
just like the bibleq9za wrote:
No. nothing about that at all, if it's cool, it's good!Winnyace wrote:
but... what makes a church good? are the values it supports that make it good? is it the community?q9za wrote:
Well maybe it IS a church, but it is a GOOD church.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Euh... No. It's a church, it's on the titleq9za wrote:
That's not a Church, that's literal heaven.abraker wrote:
The Cults, Shrines, and Churches
forum/t/1107268 - ※ The Church of Wisp ※
Also not related to this conversation, I absolutely love the people who try to document the history of stuff that happened in OT.
All churches are good if so, burn them all down.KatouMegumi wrote:
Best OT church is the one being burned down by me.
damn anti-theistsKatouMegumi wrote:
Best OT church is the one being burned down by me.
hey that emoji is mine give it backabraker wrote:
The Emoji Takeover
forum/t/1134990 - 😎
Did you file a patent in the OT patent Bureau?nedd83 wrote:
hey that emoji is mine give it backabraker wrote:
The Emoji Takeover
forum/t/1134990 - 😎
rip:Corne2Plum3 wrote:
You forget this :
community/forums/topics/1161847
samX500 wrote:
ah, now Corne's thread won't be allowed in the OT!event thread cause it's not in OT.
It was in OT but idk why this is in Survey.axl2468 wrote:
rip:Corne2Plum3 wrote:
You forget this :
community/forums/topics/1161847samX500 wrote:
ah, now Corne's thread won't be allowed in the OT!event thread cause it's not in OT.
'cause Flanster decided it belongs thereCorne2Plum3 wrote:
It was in OT but idk why this is in Survey.axl2468 wrote:
rip:Corne2Plum3 wrote:
You forget this :
community/forums/topics/1161847samX500 wrote:
ah, now Corne's thread won't be allowed in the OT!event thread cause it's not in OT.
I was the pioneer of this back in 2019 with my "Hand Thread". It took people nearly 20 months to realize that they can just copy-paste my formula for easy success.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
(thing) Thread.
I don't have a better name but this is threads you have to post something and the creator of the Thread rate this.
I'll be honest: I copied the Beatmap Thread.Penguin wrote:
I was the pioneer of this back in 2019 with my "Hand Thread". It took people nearly 20 months to realize that they can just copy-paste my formula for easy success.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
(thing) Thread.
I don't have a better name but this is threads you have to post something and the creator of the Thread rate this.
What do you think the beatmap thread copied though?Corne2Plum3 wrote:
I'll be honest: I copied the Beatmap Thread.Penguin wrote:
I was the pioneer of this back in 2019 with my "Hand Thread". It took people nearly 20 months to realize that they can just copy-paste my formula for easy success.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
(thing) Thread.
I don't have a better name but this is threads you have to post something and the creator of the Thread rate this.
mine wasn't part of this fad/trend though. it was before it's time.Tad Fibonacci wrote:
You forgot the hand thread.
Yeah, I suppose so.Penguin wrote:
mine wasn't part of this fad/trend though. it was before it's time.Tad Fibonacci wrote:
You forgot the hand thread.
Nope, I guess...igorsprite wrote:
judges, is this a necro?
Use letters instead if you are going to rank like that.abraker wrote:
You are either getting 0, a 5, 7, 8.5, or 10. And it's gonna be a 0 or 5 unless it's electronic.
ShinRun wrote:
“If this get 2000 post, I will start rating song”
Abraker already listed a meta made by only 1 person. In addition to that, abraker started to contribute to the meta by making his own post, and there will be probably other like this by other people in the next few days.ShinRun wrote:
It’s not really a meta since there is really only one person who’s doing it
I mean, Abraker's "contribution" was more of a thinly-veiled warning, so does it really count?Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Abraker already listed a meta made by only 1 person. In addition to that, abraker started to contribute to the meta by making his own post, and there will be probably other like this by other people in the next few days.ShinRun wrote:
It’s not really a meta since there is really only one person who’s doing it
^ShinRun wrote:
It’s not really a meta since there is really only one person who’s doing it
Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Abraker already listed a meta made by only 1 person. In addition to that, abraker started to contribute to the meta by making his own post, and there will be probably other like this by other people in the next few days.ShinRun wrote:
It’s not really a meta since there is really only one person who’s doing it