1. What do you want? (4,41 stars, 1205 notes)

[A L P H A] wrote:

jajaja buenas ha todso agpuisimos1!!11!!1!1!11111111111111111111111111111111

iYiyo wrote:

[A L P H A] wrote:

jajaja buenas ha todso agpuisimos1!!11!!1!1!11111111111111111111111111111111

mi no entender xd

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Also that's not an easy <:

Mir wrote:

Hi, from queue.~

[ General]

1. Your audio bitrate is too high (320kbps), you need to turn it down to at most 192kbps. oops fixed xD

[]

[ Beginner]

1. 02:35:570 (1,2,3) - These are not obviously 3/4 like the one before it at 01:52:713 (1,2,3) - due to how little these are spaced comparatively. I recommend increasing spacing here. sure!
2. 03:10:285 (1,2,1) - This also isn't really obvious blue tick rhythm. At least NC 03:10:606 (2) - or something but this really can be misread especially because 03:10:928 (2,3) - is 1/2 and spaced the same.

Generally speaking you really should make rhythm like 03:29:570 (4,5) - more obvious because this is spaced almost exactly like 1/2 is really hard to read and since you're using kicksiders it feels even weirder. I would just change them all the 1/4 doubles. http://i.imgur.com/AS37bYD.png -> http://i.imgur.com/7NshAER.png. Besides, you could make way more interesting patterns with doubles than with kicksliders. Honestly speaking, I find using kick slider more interesting than using doubles all the time, like it'd be crowded of single circles everywhere and meh

1. 05:10:290 (1) - Could start this on a circle and move the spinner back one tick. Just to get that strong beat clickable? sounds good

No other major problems. I'm ignoring aesthetics since you seem to know what you're doing, it's just that blue tick rhythm being really hard to read is killing the map for me lol. Yeah I know the rhythm is a bit confusing sometimes on those blue tick parts but I think that it's mapped fairly right imo

Good luck.~

Explanation on my million posts: internet made osu website die so i tried to post a couple of times (cuz it didn't show for me) but apparently they all posted and then 1 million posts, but i got someone to clean it up so dw!~

pkhg wrote:

te pillamos po compadre

Weber wrote:

what the fuck this map is already so clean

00:10:733 (1) - Move this slider so that the end stacks on top of (2)
01:19:305 (1,2) - Same here ^ did both more consistent but kept the non-stack

Why the deceptive difficulty name? idk D: need some diffname suggestions xd

Kalibe wrote:

that bg : ok_hand :

1. 00:25:305 (1,2,3) - spacing should be a bit as 00:24:448 (1,2,3) - imo, cause they have same sounds and it would be more judicious to make them in the same way
2. 00:29:376 (1,2,3) - I understand why you used this kind of pattern but they're too close compared to 00:15:662 (1,2,3) -
3. 01:22:733 (1,3) - overlap doesn't look good as much D:
4. 01:45:662 (3,4,5,6,7) - shape of this stream is weird to me (as I said you)
5. 01:57:876 (3,4) - I think we expect a spacing similar to 01:57:448 (2,3) -
6. 02:34:519 (4,1,2) - spacing between (4,1) should be less important than (1,2), cause the sound to emphasize is on 02:34:948 (2) -
7. 03:46:947 (4,5,6) - I think it would be better if you skip voluntary (5), cause in the whole map you didn't map this kind of "less important sound"
8. 03:50:912 (5) - same as above :d
9. 03:59:590 - try to add a circle here, sound is too heavy being skipped imo ):

Irohas wrote:

hola señor Bonjour Monsieur

beginner

1. 00:25:305 (1,2,3) - spacing should be a bit as 00:24:448 (1,2,3) - imo, cause they have same sounds and it would be more judicious to make them in the same way
2. 00:29:376 (1,2,3) - I understand why you used this kind of pattern but they're too close compared to 00:15:662 (1,2,3) -
3. 01:22:733 (1,3) - overlap doesn't look good as much D:
4. 01:45:662 (3,4,5,6,7) - shape of this stream is weird to me (as I said you)
5. 01:57:876 (3,4) - I think we expect a spacing similar to 01:57:448 (2,3) -
6. 02:34:519 (4,1,2) - spacing between (4,1) should be less important than (1,2), cause the sound to emphasize is on 02:34:948 (2) -
7. 03:46:947 (4,5,6) - I think it would be better if you skip voluntary (5), cause in the whole map you didn't map this kind of "less important sound" this part is different from the whole song, and it fits good since it follows vocals imo, I don't feel like mapping a single circle :C
8. 03:50:912 (5) - same as above :d same as above :d
9. 03:59:590 - try to add a circle here, sound is too heavy being skipped imo ): Yeah it has a strong sound but the rest of the break has similar emphasis, so I don't really want to map that + it gives a cool touch to make the break there.

[]
gl dude
fighter when omg what is this

might change diffname later

1. 00:22:733 (1,3) - why not center red tick in middle of slider body
2. 01:24:876 (2,5) - this can be cleaned up, try centering the circle on the slider body
3. 01:42:019 (2,3,4,7,8) - i feel like these are too close due to stacking, try moving this around
4. 02:07:733 (2,4) - i think control G would be better since this pattern is pretty unique and doesnt match other typical flow designs of this section
5. 02:20:590 (4) - maybe a bit more spacing
6. 02:58:091 (4) - center red point would look better
7. 02:58:091 (4,2) - why not just stack
8. 03:53:590 (4) - should be circles to fit vocals

Xexxar wrote:

asfd m4m xd

[What do YOU want??] pass my exams :c

1. 00:22:733 (1,3) - why not center red tick in middle of slider body
2. 01:24:876 (2,5) - this can be cleaned up, try centering the circle on the slider body
3. 01:42:019 (2,3,4,7,8) - i feel like these are too close due to stacking, try moving this around
4. 02:07:733 (2,4) - i think control G would be better since this pattern is pretty unique and doesnt match other typical flow designs of this section
5. 02:20:590 (4) - maybe a bit more spacing I think it's fine with that spacing cause the gap in time is quite "big", did increase 02:20:162 (3,4) - this a bit tho so it's more noticeable i guess
6. 02:58:091 (4) - center red point would look better
7. 02:58:091 (4,2) - why not just stack
8. 03:53:590 (4) - should be circles to fit vocals

ya not bad

Sotarks wrote:

i've seen you got star icon u still want mod ? well i didn't think i'd get a star o: anyway feedback is always appreciated
nvm

What?

00:55:305 (1) - RIP guitar sound here, how about mapping it at least with a 1/2 slider + circle ? I think having 1/1 is fine enough, gives more variation + following vocals fit good too imo.

02:36:876 (2,3) - you missed a note in between! I think I missed a few more triplets, but don't feel like mapping all of them. right now plays good without "crowding" with all possible triplets

03:25:305 (1) - wot, this entire section is like 'wtf rythmn', like 1/4 should be 03:25:305 (1,2) - here for the guitar, instead of 03:25:733 (3,4,5) - which made the rythmn really akward here... 03:26:162 (6) - also this can just be a normal circle, no need to make kickslider here..
03:29:590 (5,7,5,7) - same for those, why do you even want to overmap 1/4 here, since you skip most of important 1/4 everywhere else :thinking: Actually it doesn't have anything bad imo, before reworking that part I was following guitar, but it felt just... too easy for such a strong section. Fixed the second though

rest was fixed

hey it's like the spacing and noteplacement at some place feels completly random, even for your rythmn choice.. once you follow vocals, once guitar, and once drums in the same pattern, which will make the player feel unconfortable to play.. plus you're not helping with the unconsistency choice of 1/4 placement..
i really think this can need more work before trying to push this forward, you can polish more your aestethics and fix spacing at some place..
considering a review of the way you mapped 1/4 on this map could be nice aswell Does it really make the player feel uncomfortable to play? Tbh I found it's a decent map overall + testplayers found it enjoyable to play, so ye not that uncomfortable i think xd. However I fixed a lot of parts you mentioned + some aesthetics and spacing things.

good song tho
gl

Irohas wrote:

where's my ok_hand bg

1. 02:35:590 (1,2) - Es necesario que sean sliders? se sienten raros al jugar y pues, no hay ni un sonido prolongado aqui, parece que solo quieres evitar que se saquen 100 los jugadores. Si es así, confia en los jugadores, saber timearse es igual una habilidad ;^)
2. 03:10:304 (4,5,6,1) - Y aqui confias demasiado en los jugadores, todos los 3 minutos que lleva el mapa utilizas un ritmo demaciado simple y de la nada introduces dobles, rompes un poco el tema establecido de tu mapa que es simple. Sugerencia http://puu.sh/u812u/205c321746.jpg (como bonus, mas enfazis en el inicio de la siguiente seccion \:D/)
3. 03:11:376 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - No estoy de acuerdo con este ritmo, no le da el enfazis a las notas importantes y, como resultado, se sienten debiles (No hagas clickeable esto 03:11:805 (7) - , solo las notas con la guitarra, un beat silencioso como que no justifica un click en esa parte). No es algo que *tienes* que cambiar ya que lo haces a cada rato (aunque seria genial si lo hicieras), pero en tus siguientes mapas intenta seguir el ritmo de la cancion de manera más fiel.
4. 03:41:376 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Puedo sugerir un ritmo aqui? http://puu.sh/u80om/67bae32ebc.jpg Le daria un buen enfazis a la guitarra :^)

Atsuro wrote:

Holi
No pude encontrar nada objetivamente mal, pero hay algunos detalles del ritmo que me cuestiono en algunas partes

1. 02:35:590 (1,2) - Es necesario que sean sliders? se sienten raros al jugar y pues, no hay ni un sonido prolongado aqui, parece que solo quieres evitar que se saquen 100 los jugadores. Si es así, confia en los jugadores, saber timearse es igual una habilidad ;^) En parte si es para evitar que saquen 100 ya que la diff no es muy difícil en general, y el tener bajo bpm afecta bastante xD Además siento que le da un buen énfasis a la batería.
2. 03:10:304 (4,5,6,1) - Y aqui confias demasiado en los jugadores, todos los 3 minutos que lleva el mapa utilizas un ritmo demaciado simple y de la nada introduces dobles, rompes un poco el tema establecido de tu mapa que es simple. Sugerencia http://puu.sh/u812u/205c321746.jpg (como bonus, mas enfazis en el inicio de la siguiente seccion \:D/) omg sure!
3. 03:11:376 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - No estoy de acuerdo con este ritmo, no le da el enfazis a las notas importantes y, como resultado, se sienten debiles (No hagas clickeable esto 03:11:805 (7) - , solo las notas con la guitarra, un beat silencioso como que no justifica un click en esa parte). No es algo que *tienes* que cambiar ya que lo haces a cada rato (aunque seria genial si lo hicieras), pero en tus siguientes mapas intenta seguir el ritmo de la cancion de manera más fiel. Entiendo, el problema era que si seguía simplemente la guitarra, la dificultad era notoriamente más fácil siendo que la música no daba esa sensación, por eso opté por esos streams
4. 03:41:376 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Puedo sugerir un ritmo aqui? http://puu.sh/u80om/67bae32ebc.jpg Le daria un buen enfazis a la guitarra :^) nais

Mapa simple y seguro, el ritmo puede mejorar por ser precisamente demasiado simple en algunas ocasiones, pero lo veo listo para rankear

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

catchy song <3 i love it yeah!

i dunno

00:04:090 (1,2) - im prefer to stack the slidertail (2) to slidertail (1) (im just dont like the pattern :/) I like it and use them a lot so if I change I'd have to change the rest of the map zzz
01:06:448 (3) - i think it would be better if you put jump betwen (2,3) cause the vocal looks strong for this one idk, sometimes stack also works when emphasizing something
01:10:733 (1) - jump here or ctrl g this? same as you did at 01:13:734 - cause the sounds is same 01:13:734 (4,1) - reduced that ds instead
01:34:519 (1) - 1/1 slider here but you skipped the important beat at 01:34:733 - i think it would be better if you map this kinda but I'm really following the vocals.
01:36:448 - 01:50:162 - hmm at this part you always add triplet every sliders that nc-ed 01:22:733 - 01:34:305 - but at this part the triplet less than that part.so maybe delete some triplets at 01:36:448 - 01:50:162 or adds some triplets at 01:22:733 - 01:34:305 - this part .I cheked all the inconsistent in the triplets in the kiai now but didn't wanted to add a triplet 01:48:126 - and the rest.
02:05:590 (1) - finish here for cymbal oops
02:14:162 (1) - ^
02:17:590 (1) - ^
02:18:448 (4,1) - the ds is too far imo,make it a bit closer
02:48:233 (1) - same as 01:34:519 (1) same
02:54:019 (2) - ctrl j for better flow imo right now flows good to next circle
03:01:948 (1) - same as 01:34:519 (1) -
03:03:876 (1) - finish for cymbal
03:30:019 (8,9) - too far if you compare with previous pattern that have same sound like this one oops xd
03:59:590 - at least put circle here pls,cause there's vocal and instrument on it that should be emphatize but the rest of the break has same vocals/emphasize. I wanted that effect where the breaks starts
04:20:590 (2) - ctrl j this cause this slider somehow mess up the pattern imo i like it :d
04:25:090 (1) - same as before
04:29:162 (2) - maybe ctrl g this or make it farther betwen (1,2) for emphatize the vocal well did something
04:38:805 (1) - same as before
04:47:590 (1) - finish here
05:02:269 (6,7,8,9) - i think it would be good flow if you make the patter same as 05:00:555 (6,7,8,9) I like the transition between curve stream to linear stream so no change

ok thats it from me
GL ~
and thx for mod my map ~

1. Fixed a couple of rhythms that were ignored.
2. Fixed some patterns to increase the aesthetics.
3. Improved the flow in some sections of the difficulty.
4. Added some hitsounds that were missed.
5. We've nerf some patterns to keep it consistent with other jumps.

22:28 Gero: podemos hacer IRC ahora? puedes?
22:29 Gero: así lo dejo bubbled
22:29 iYiyo: Claro!
22:29 Gero: puedes darme np?
22:29 iYiyo: ooka :3
22:29 *iYiyo is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1156642 KANA-BOON - Nandemo Nedari]
22:31 *Gero is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/1156642 KANA-BOON - Nandemo Nedari [What do you want?]]
22:32 Gero: 00:03:233 (5,6,7,8) - Bueno, lo primero que noté es que este jump fue un poco incomodo para jugar, debido a que la densidad de la canción es la misma (aunque cambia un poco) por lo tanto me gustaria mover 6 un poco más cerca
22:32 Gero: para evitar inconsistencias más que nada
22:32 Gero: el patrón me parece bien
22:33 Gero: 00:06:876 (6,7) - Lo mismo, quieres enfatizar el cambio de la musica pero es un poco exagerado el salto 1/4 además de que el triple no ayuda del todo imo
22:34 Gero:  y bueno, lo mismo para los demás que hay en toda la dificultad
22:34 iYiyo: Ahí los acerqué
22:34 iYiyo: para reducir el jumperino
22:36 Gero: 00:14:162 - Me parece un raro que hayas ignorado completamente los triples de la instrumental, ¿es por alguna razón en espacial o algo? de alguna manera se siente que los drums deben ser enfatizados por notas o algo
22:36 Gero: ¿oh solo querías seguir la guitarra?
22:37 Gero: 03:25:305 - Es que es inconsistente, no es la misma instrumental pero aun así acá te enfocaste en mapear los drums cuando en el inicio los ignoras completamente
22:38 iYiyo: 03:25:305 - el mapeado que hago acá es para poder reflejar la intensidad de la canción
22:38 iYiyo: antes estaba lleno de sliders siguiendo la guitarra
22:38 Gero: 01:00:019 (4,2) - Nazi* se te olvido apilarlos bien (?) *runs*
22:38 iYiyo: y no quedaba bien, era muy "fácil"
22:39 Gero: ¿y por qué los cambiaste? digo, uno que otro triple en esa parte estaria bien para equilibrar la siguiente sección
22:39 Gero: no necesariamente tienes que añadir todos obvio xD
22:40 iYiyo: (el stack no me deja moverlo xd creo que está bien solo que en el edito está meh)
22:40 iYiyo: Ya ahora si
22:40 iYiyo: 00:14:162 - Desde acá sigue la guitarra mayoritariamente
22:41 iYiyo: y no queda simple ya que uso 1/2 + circles
22:41 iYiyo: en cambio en la otra parte que mencionaste
22:41 iYiyo: usaba sliders 3/2 a cada rato creo
22:41 Gero: supongo que esta bien, espero que no se quejen xD
22:41 iYiyo: y eso lo hacia todo muy lento
22:41 iYiyo: antes había seguido la guitarra todo el rato, pero luego quise cambiar xD
22:41 iYiyo: esperemos :d
22:43 Gero: 02:24:019 (5,6) - 02:24:019 (5,6) - ¿Podrias acercalos un poco más? es demasiada distancia, es decir, es raro debido a que usaste una pequeña distancia para kicksliders pero cuando viene un triple el jump es casi de 3
22:44 Gero: igual para los otros patrónes que hiciste
22:44 Gero: o podrias solamente separar 4 de 5 un poco más para hacer el jump más consistente
22:44 Gero: y evitar mover muchas cosas
22:45 iYiyo: justo estaba en eso xd
22:45 iYiyo: estaba viendo los kicks a partir de lo primero que mencionaste
22:45 Gero: es basicamente eso, el resto del mapa esta bien xD
22:46 Gero: 05:03:769 (5,6) - Dios mio xd.
22:47 Gero: 05:07:898 (3) - Yo usaria un NC acá, el cambio de SV no es predecible además de que el ritmo que usaste tampoco ayuda
22:47 Gero: cuando hayas arreglado esas cosas avisame, así hago recheck~
22:47 iYiyo: oki a lo del NC
22:48 iYiyo: 05:03:769 (5,6) - qué tienen? D:
22:48 Gero: el spacing ;_;
22:48 Gero: eres maligno xD
22:48 iYiyo: xDDD
22:49 iYiyo: Naa, si al final ese slider se juega como una nota xd
22:49 iYiyo: además que la música sube de intensidad
22:49 Gero: igual es el final, así que no hay tanto drama xD
22:50 iYiyo: updated~
22:51 Gero: 00:10:412 - ¿Clap?
22:52 iYiyo: Según yo está bien sin clap ahí
22:53 Gero: vale~
22:53 Gero: pues seria todo, la metadata ya fue checada, ¿verdad? 
22:53 Gero: D:
22:53 iYiyo: yep
22:53 iYiyo: por kwan
22:53 iYiyo: está en la descrp
22:56 Gero: perfecto, entonces~

~ Bubbled #1 ~

Naotoshi wrote:

late never is too late

[diff]
00:21:019 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - having jumps on the part where the main guitar seems to stop seems weird to me. Imo it doesn't look weird just because it seems to change guitar. Also the beats are fairly supported by single circle ~ jumps so yeah
00:36:448 (1,3) - imo this visual spacing is kinda weird cuz you dont use stuff this close together normally fixed into something better~
00:40:519 (4,1,2) - pretty strange wide angle jump imo yup, fixed
00:41:483 (6,1) - nazi but can you line up the slider path of 1 a bit better with the stream? something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7772905 I tried xd
00:45:019 (1,1,1) - all sound like same sound but followed differently o.o followed differently? o.o I use 2 sliders rhythm but then 00:47:590 (3,4,5,6,3,4,5,6) - here I use circles in order to follow vocals better.
00:59:590 (3,4) - can u line this up lol sure
01:51:019 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - i don't really like the design of this stream since you have jumps with angle changes on 01:51:448 - and 01:52:090 - which aren't particularly different from the rest of the drums to me They're emphasizing the NC change which occur every half of a downbeat.
Idk... I don't see these as "jumps" so they don't really make people missread or something imo
03:11:805 (7) - imo remove all of these and follow the double based rhythm in the guitar properly, it will be a lot more interesting.
same in the ending. you arent following the constant 1/4 drums for 04:56:162 (1,2,3,4,5) - so there isn't a reason to switch back to it for 04:57:126 (6,7,8,9) - . Aaa I don't really like double based rhythm tbh. Yeah, doing so would follow "better" the guitar, but honestly speaking I find it more enjoyable and more intuitive to play streams instead, so deleting 03:11:805 (7) - wouldn't help based on that. Also for the ending, I'm doing the same as before, which is following guitar + I don't really want to map every single drum right there cause it will raise sr quite a bit D:
pm me when u respond

Naotoshi wrote:

[diff]
00:48:448 (1) - what i mean when comparing to 00:50:162 (1) - . basically same guitar sound but different slider rhythms ooo you were talking about that other slider xd Yep fixed, my bad xp

main thing:
03:11:483 (5,6,7,8,9) - this rhythm. main reason i think it is bad is because 03:10:733 (1,2,3,4,5) - follows the guitar but then 03:11:698 (6,7,8,9) - randomly switches to quiet drums. a rhythm like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7776122 would make the guitar clickable for the entire time and this would also make the map follow the song a lot better and feel more unique rather than just circles placed on a metronome. i highly, highly suggest doing this. very highly. your current rhythm just feels out of place and unfitting to me and is something i think is a serious issue. especially cuz stuff like 03:22:733 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - also clearly follows the guitar melody. making it intuitive just makes it bland and imo incorrect rhythm.