1. What do you want? (4,41 stars, 1205 notes)

[A L P H A] wrote:

jajaja buenas ha todso agpuisimos1!!11!!1!1!11111111111111111111111111111111

iYiyo wrote:

[A L P H A] wrote:

jajaja buenas ha todso agpuisimos1!!11!!1!1!11111111111111111111111111111111

mi no entender xd

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Also that's not an easy <:

Mir wrote:

Hi, from queue.~

[ General]

1. Your audio bitrate is too high (320kbps), you need to turn it down to at most 192kbps. oops fixed xD

[]

[ Beginner]

1. 02:35:570 (1,2,3) - These are not obviously 3/4 like the one before it at 01:52:713 (1,2,3) - due to how little these are spaced comparatively. I recommend increasing spacing here. sure!
2. 03:10:285 (1,2,1) - This also isn't really obvious blue tick rhythm. At least NC 03:10:606 (2) - or something but this really can be misread especially because 03:10:928 (2,3) - is 1/2 and spaced the same.

Generally speaking you really should make rhythm like 03:29:570 (4,5) - more obvious because this is spaced almost exactly like 1/2 is really hard to read and since you're using kicksiders it feels even weirder. I would just change them all the 1/4 doubles. http://i.imgur.com/AS37bYD.png -> http://i.imgur.com/7NshAER.png. Besides, you could make way more interesting patterns with doubles than with kicksliders. Honestly speaking, I find using kick slider more interesting than using doubles all the time, like it'd be crowded of single circles everywhere and meh

1. 05:10:290 (1) - Could start this on a circle and move the spinner back one tick. Just to get that strong beat clickable? sounds good

No other major problems. I'm ignoring aesthetics since you seem to know what you're doing, it's just that blue tick rhythm being really hard to read is killing the map for me lol. Yeah I know the rhythm is a bit confusing sometimes on those blue tick parts but I think that it's mapped fairly right imo

Good luck.~

Explanation on my million posts: internet made osu website die so i tried to post a couple of times (cuz it didn't show for me) but apparently they all posted and then 1 million posts, but i got someone to clean it up so dw!~

pkhg wrote:

te pillamos po compadre

Weber wrote:

what the fuck this map is already so clean

00:10:733 (1) - Move this slider so that the end stacks on top of (2)
01:19:305 (1,2) - Same here ^ did both more consistent but kept the non-stack

Why the deceptive difficulty name? idk D: need some diffname suggestions xd

Kalibe wrote:

that bg : ok_hand :

1. 00:25:305 (1,2,3) - spacing should be a bit as 00:24:448 (1,2,3) - imo, cause they have same sounds and it would be more judicious to make them in the same way
2. 00:29:376 (1,2,3) - I understand why you used this kind of pattern but they're too close compared to 00:15:662 (1,2,3) -
3. 01:22:733 (1,3) - overlap doesn't look good as much D:
4. 01:45:662 (3,4,5,6,7) - shape of this stream is weird to me (as I said you)
5. 01:57:876 (3,4) - I think we expect a spacing similar to 01:57:448 (2,3) -
6. 02:34:519 (4,1,2) - spacing between (4,1) should be less important than (1,2), cause the sound to emphasize is on 02:34:948 (2) -
7. 03:46:947 (4,5,6) - I think it would be better if you skip voluntary (5), cause in the whole map you didn't map this kind of "less important sound"
8. 03:50:912 (5) - same as above :d
9. 03:59:590 - try to add a circle here, sound is too heavy being skipped imo ):

Irohas wrote:

hola señor Bonjour Monsieur

beginner

1. 00:25:305 (1,2,3) - spacing should be a bit as 00:24:448 (1,2,3) - imo, cause they have same sounds and it would be more judicious to make them in the same way
2. 00:29:376 (1,2,3) - I understand why you used this kind of pattern but they're too close compared to 00:15:662 (1,2,3) -
3. 01:22:733 (1,3) - overlap doesn't look good as much D:
4. 01:45:662 (3,4,5,6,7) - shape of this stream is weird to me (as I said you)
5. 01:57:876 (3,4) - I think we expect a spacing similar to 01:57:448 (2,3) -
6. 02:34:519 (4,1,2) - spacing between (4,1) should be less important than (1,2), cause the sound to emphasize is on 02:34:948 (2) -
7. 03:46:947 (4,5,6) - I think it would be better if you skip voluntary (5), cause in the whole map you didn't map this kind of "less important sound" this part is different from the whole song, and it fits good since it follows vocals imo, I don't feel like mapping a single circle :C
8. 03:50:912 (5) - same as above :d same as above :d
9. 03:59:590 - try to add a circle here, sound is too heavy being skipped imo ): Yeah it has a strong sound but the rest of the break has similar emphasis, so I don't really want to map that + it gives a cool touch to make the break there.

[]
gl dude
fighter when omg what is this

might change diffname later

1. 00:22:733 (1,3) - why not center red tick in middle of slider body
2. 01:24:876 (2,5) - this can be cleaned up, try centering the circle on the slider body
3. 01:42:019 (2,3,4,7,8) - i feel like these are too close due to stacking, try moving this around
4. 02:07:733 (2,4) - i think control G would be better since this pattern is pretty unique and doesnt match other typical flow designs of this section
5. 02:20:590 (4) - maybe a bit more spacing
6. 02:58:091 (4) - center red point would look better
7. 02:58:091 (4,2) - why not just stack
8. 03:53:590 (4) - should be circles to fit vocals

Xexxar wrote:

asfd m4m xd

[What do YOU want??] pass my exams :c

1. 00:22:733 (1,3) - why not center red tick in middle of slider body
2. 01:24:876 (2,5) - this can be cleaned up, try centering the circle on the slider body
3. 01:42:019 (2,3,4,7,8) - i feel like these are too close due to stacking, try moving this around
4. 02:07:733 (2,4) - i think control G would be better since this pattern is pretty unique and doesnt match other typical flow designs of this section
5. 02:20:590 (4) - maybe a bit more spacing I think it's fine with that spacing cause the gap in time is quite "big", did increase 02:20:162 (3,4) - this a bit tho so it's more noticeable i guess
6. 02:58:091 (4) - center red point would look better
7. 02:58:091 (4,2) - why not just stack
8. 03:53:590 (4) - should be circles to fit vocals

ya not bad

Sotarks wrote:

i've seen you got star icon u still want mod ? well i didn't think i'd get a star o: anyway feedback is always appreciated
nvm

What?

00:55:305 (1) - RIP guitar sound here, how about mapping it at least with a 1/2 slider + circle ? I think having 1/1 is fine enough, gives more variation + following vocals fit good too imo.

02:36:876 (2,3) - you missed a note in between! I think I missed a few more triplets, but don't feel like mapping all of them. right now plays good without "crowding" with all possible triplets

03:25:305 (1) - wot, this entire section is like 'wtf rythmn', like 1/4 should be 03:25:305 (1,2) - here for the guitar, instead of 03:25:733 (3,4,5) - which made the rythmn really akward here... 03:26:162 (6) - also this can just be a normal circle, no need to make kickslider here..
03:29:590 (5,7,5,7) - same for those, why do you even want to overmap 1/4 here, since you skip most of important 1/4 everywhere else :thinking: Actually it doesn't have anything bad imo, before reworking that part I was following guitar, but it felt just... too easy for such a strong section. Fixed the second though

rest was fixed

hey it's like the spacing and noteplacement at some place feels completly random, even for your rythmn choice.. once you follow vocals, once guitar, and once drums in the same pattern, which will make the player feel unconfortable to play.. plus you're not helping with the unconsistency choice of 1/4 placement..
i really think this can need more work before trying to push this forward, you can polish more your aestethics and fix spacing at some place..
considering a review of the way you mapped 1/4 on this map could be nice aswell Does it really make the player feel uncomfortable to play? Tbh I found it's a decent map overall + testplayers found it enjoyable to play, so ye not that uncomfortable i think xd. However I fixed a lot of parts you mentioned + some aesthetics and spacing things.

good song tho
gl

Irohas wrote:

where's my ok_hand bg

1. 02:35:590 (1,2) - Es necesario que sean sliders? se sienten raros al jugar y pues, no hay ni un sonido prolongado aqui, parece que solo quieres evitar que se saquen 100 los jugadores. Si es así, confia en los jugadores, saber timearse es igual una habilidad ;^)
2. 03:10:304 (4,5,6,1) - Y aqui confias demasiado en los jugadores, todos los 3 minutos que lleva el mapa utilizas un ritmo demaciado simple y de la nada introduces dobles, rompes un poco el tema establecido de tu mapa que es simple. Sugerencia http://puu.sh/u812u/205c321746.jpg (como bonus, mas enfazis en el inicio de la siguiente seccion \:D/)
3. 03:11:376 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - No estoy de acuerdo con este ritmo, no le da el enfazis a las notas importantes y, como resultado, se sienten debiles (No hagas clickeable esto 03:11:805 (7) - , solo las notas con la guitarra, un beat silencioso como que no justifica un click en esa parte). No es algo que *tienes* que cambiar ya que lo haces a cada rato (aunque seria genial si lo hicieras), pero en tus siguientes mapas intenta seguir el ritmo de la cancion de manera más fiel.
4. 03:41:376 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Puedo sugerir un ritmo aqui? http://puu.sh/u80om/67bae32ebc.jpg Le daria un buen enfazis a la guitarra :^)