NM from queue
Good luck!
Beginner
I took a look at the lyrics, I think that Desire would be a fitting difficulty name.
01:01:305 (3,4,5,6) - Not a big fan of the emphasis here because 6 doesn't fade in early enough, so it looks like there's a huge jump to 4 for no reason. You may need 4 to be closer to other objects for the desired effect.
01:05:590 (1,2) - Not a fan of the visuals here, since it breaks the circular motion.
01:08:162 (3,4) - Why not try mapping 1/2 sliders here instead and increasing the slider velocity? I think it makes more sense than dropping the beat in between.
01:28:733 (3,4,5,6) - Not really recognizable as a pattern, and the angle is wide. I don't have a problem with the angle, but it'd be nice if you could introduce this earlier in the map.
01:52:304 (4,5) - This feels awkward due to the really tight spacing. Try keeping the same spacing as 01:51:876 (1,4), and if you want to put emphasis on the next note at 01:52:519 (5,1), just increase the spacing and/or move it more towards the bottom left corner.
01:52:733 (1,2,3) - These rhythms aren't exactly common in the course of the map, but I understand you want them clickable. My suggestion would be to use 1/4 sliders for each of these notes and silence the ends. This will give you better polarity as well as emphasizing that guitar sound.
01:57:876 (3,2) - Stack/overlap these better?
02:10:305 (5,1) - Not a fan of this overlap.
02:20:698 - Missing beat.
03:11:805 (6) - If you're following guitar, this beat shouldn't be mapped, or should at the very least be a slider end, because this is mapped to the drums. This pretty much applies to all of your quads.
03:18:555 (5,6,7,8) - This section is more intense, why don't you increase the spacing of your 1/4s to reflect that? It doesn't have to be by too much, but it will also compliment your increased 1/2 spacing.
03:25:305 - This section would benefit from an SV increase, maybe 1.2x or something. Intensity sure picks up with the guitar, but your sliders feel very slow.
03:57:876 (1) - Why not stack this under 03:56:376 (2) - to break the circular flow and put more emphasis on this note?
03:59:590 - I don't agree with your break here. Not mapping the entire measure before works very well, but not necessarily deciding not to map this section.
04:18:019 (4) - Before you mapped this with two circles, why not do that here?
Not bad of a map. You should really work on using more of the playfield though.
01:01:305 (3,4,5,6) - Not a big fan of the emphasis here because 6 doesn't fade in early enough, so it looks like there's a huge jump to 4 for no reason. You may need 4 to be closer to other objects for the desired effect.
01:05:590 (1,2) - Not a fan of the visuals here, since it breaks the circular motion.
01:08:162 (3,4) - Why not try mapping 1/2 sliders here instead and increasing the slider velocity? I think it makes more sense than dropping the beat in between.
01:28:733 (3,4,5,6) - Not really recognizable as a pattern, and the angle is wide. I don't have a problem with the angle, but it'd be nice if you could introduce this earlier in the map.
01:52:304 (4,5) - This feels awkward due to the really tight spacing. Try keeping the same spacing as 01:51:876 (1,4), and if you want to put emphasis on the next note at 01:52:519 (5,1), just increase the spacing and/or move it more towards the bottom left corner.
01:52:733 (1,2,3) - These rhythms aren't exactly common in the course of the map, but I understand you want them clickable. My suggestion would be to use 1/4 sliders for each of these notes and silence the ends. This will give you better polarity as well as emphasizing that guitar sound.
01:57:876 (3,2) - Stack/overlap these better?
02:10:305 (5,1) - Not a fan of this overlap.
02:20:698 - Missing beat.
03:11:805 (6) - If you're following guitar, this beat shouldn't be mapped, or should at the very least be a slider end, because this is mapped to the drums. This pretty much applies to all of your quads.
03:18:555 (5,6,7,8) - This section is more intense, why don't you increase the spacing of your 1/4s to reflect that? It doesn't have to be by too much, but it will also compliment your increased 1/2 spacing.
03:25:305 - This section would benefit from an SV increase, maybe 1.2x or something. Intensity sure picks up with the guitar, but your sliders feel very slow.
03:57:876 (1) - Why not stack this under 03:56:376 (2) - to break the circular flow and put more emphasis on this note?
03:59:590 - I don't agree with your break here. Not mapping the entire measure before works very well, but not necessarily deciding not to map this section.
04:18:019 (4) - Before you mapped this with two circles, why not do that here?
Not bad of a map. You should really work on using more of the playfield though.
Good luck!