1. Alone (3,25 stars, 416 notes)
2. Easy (1,46 stars, 156 notes)
3. Normal (1,8 stars, 206 notes)

• [General]

1. 00:58:127 - ; 00:59:782 - good place for spinner in my opinion.
   
   [Light]
2. 00:28:333 (3,5) - Sliderwaves could have some better shape. (sth like this https://i.imgur.com/igegsOh.png)
3. 00:32:471 (6) - I don't know if you prefer this, but how about to make this slider curved?
4. 00:33:299 (1,2,3,4) - 00:39:920 (1,2,3,4) - patterns lookin too similar.
5. 00:56:471 (4) - add more symmetricity.
6. 01:07:230 - 1/1 slider maybe?
7. 01:45:299 (4,5) - how about this rhythm to emphasize vocal sounds https://i.imgur.com/4VTSKt6.png
8. 01:55:230 (2,4) - Sliders could look more symmetrical.
9. 02:10:954 (5,6,7) - 02:17:575 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1) - these parts looks pretty much duplicated from earlier, some variation would be nice.
   
   [Advanced]
10. 00:21:713 (3) - I think it would be nice to use not only sharp angles.
11. 00:51:092 (2,3,4) - Linear pattern looks a bit odd in my opinion.
12. 01:02:264 (3,4,6) - variation between 3/4 , 1/2 and 1/1 sounds too complicated for normal difficulties in my opinion.
13. 01:41:161 (1) - Symmetrical?
14. 02:20:885 (1) - ^
15. 01:59:368 (3,1) - I think you can stack these.

niyuji wrote:

Hello. Here I am with my mod from your q.
And here is my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/682185
for m4m

General

The bit rate of mp3 you are using is too high. I'm gonna fix as soon as possible!

Alone

00:42:402 (5,6,7) - why did you choose to map 3 circles instead of 1 slider when it's literally the same as 00:35:782 (7) -? It's better to change it to keep it consistent as possible. You're kinda right, but it could be like the beginning of the following pattern, since I can hear something at red tick I thought it was ok! But yeah, maybe I need to think something else.
00:44:058 (4,5,6) - could be the same as 00:42:402 (5,6,7) - if you agree with my suggestion I listed above ^ Nah, this is not the same,
listen properly to vocals.
00:55:644 (5,6,7) - can't really tell anything about this. because it's like the third time and because the song progresses further starting from 00:55:644 (5,6,7) - , 00:55:644 (5,6,7) - could actually fit in there by adding more colors to the map Yeah, it looks like the same as before, but what do you mean with colors here?
00:58:230 - you forgot to insert break time here? No need to add any break.
01:01:437 - to 01:27:920 - as it's more intense section, i think, you should fill gaps and map red ticks because i can hear multiple instruments playing the same note, here's the rhythm: Of course it does sound fine, but what about this 01:02:264 (4) - I don't really wanna change it, but I could try something similar from what you said.
01:11:161 (7,1) - blanket Fixed.
01:20:264 (7) - what about replacing it with a circle, stack it on 01:20:058 (6) - and right after make a slider? First of all I would be breaking the symmetry I want to keep, but the main reason for which I prefer to keep it like this is that Taka's vocals can only be mapped this way since I don't wanna skip the clap neither I can ignore vocals on red ticks, so this is cool for me.
02:44:058 (1) - unnecessary, simple circle would fit I could miss something if I don't map it like this, and adding a triple is kinda overmapped I think.

it's hard to suggest some rhythm changes because i see that it'll complicate things because of symmetric objects placement

Advanced

nothing wrong with the object placement, however, i want to spot out some rhythm ideas:
00:08:885 (5) -

and so on I prefer to keep them like these.
00:28:333 - feels like 00:27:920 (3) - should be there You're right.
00:48:609 (4) - why not expanding this slider?

and so on ... 00:51:920 (4) - ... Should I skip important vocals here?
00:58:333 - you forgot to insert break time here also? Nah trust me, they are ok.
01:07:644 (4,1) - and 01:14:264 (4,1) - quite similar, you change the pattern Straight pattern, I don't see any problem here.
01:43:230 (4) - expand, same as above ^ No need to expand this rhythm, I must say.
02:06:816 (5) - should be here 02:06:402 (4) - like 01:39:920 (4) - , 02:19:644 (4) - and then just add something that would play well I see what you mean, but I see more important this rhythm, somehow. Need to think about it.
basically, i won't repeat myself, so these suggestions apply to the whole map

Light

00:58:333 - break? Like I said...
02:04:333 - my suggestion would be:

feels like you should build more around vocals in kiai, make rhythm more intensive Current rhythms are fine for me.

Couldn't find much in aesthetics, maybe because of the symmetric style, however, rhythm could be improved.
Good luck

SLM wrote:

Hello, from your queue



[General]

* maybe silence slider-slide? I'm not allowed to do that if I'm going to rank if I'm not mistaken.



[Light]

* 00:21:299 (3) - Just a suggestion, considering how you handled other parts, you might wanna remove this and add another object at 00:22:954 - Sounds cool.

* 00:43:230 (5,7) - loosening this a bit could improve flow with 00:44:471 (6) - I don't really get this, it's pretty similar from what I did.

* 00:56:471 (4) - could polish this slider's tail portion to be parallel with head portion, so it has better flow with 00:57:713 (5) - Improved a bit.

* 01:32:885 (7) - maybe shorten this then add a circle at 01:34:540 - ?
Having only three circles at 01:35:368 (1,2,3) - feels a bit awkward since 4-symmetry-circles patterns were used continuosly before.
00:33:299 (1,2,3,4) - 00:39:920 (1,2,3,4) - 01:27:920 (1,2,3,4) - It's basically the same mapped in a different way.

* 02:12:609 (7) - ^ Same.

* 01:55:230 (2,4) - I don't think this much twisted slider is really necessary, imo this is more like hurting consistency rather than adding diversity.
I would recommend simplifying the shape (possibly like this ? http://puu.sh/y42Y5/b88d436f15.jpg) I see what you mean, but I'm really tired of doing the same sliders every time xD So I try to change sometimes.

* 02:03:506 (3) - I think you should prioritize the vocals (these four ticks 02:04:333 - 02:05:161 - 02:05:989 - 02:06:816 - ) since they're very unique part of the whole song.
So my suggestion is to change (3) into a 1/1 slider or just a circle, then start 2/1 sliders from 02:04:333 - and 02:05:989 - . I will keep the symmetry for now.



[Advanced]

I doubt that the sv is a bit high for this difficulty? just my thought. Looks like that, yeah, but it's 3.5 so should be ok lol
looks good beside that.



[Alone]

* 00:09:092 (3) - how about x:224 y:97 ? snapping here would be nice imo. Nah, quite a weird flow for me.

* 00:18:816 (6,7,8,9) - why whistle on red ticks? seems weird to me You're right, changed.

* 00:42:402 (5,6,7) - imo using a 1/1 slider would be better, so that it could be a contrast to 00:43:230 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - , like you did at 00:35:782 (7) - I explained that before, I'll take care of this!

* 00:55:644 (5,6,7) - ^ Same.

* 01:02:264 (4) - imo rather than using a reverse slider here, it would be better to have a circle at 01:02:885 - , considering how you mapped Advanced.
this applies to other reverse 3/4s (01:08:885 (3) - 01:17:161 (7) - and etc..) I see what you mean, but gonna keep them for now, I think the rhythm in Advanced is still easier.

* 01:32:885 (7,8,9) - maybe nerf the distance somehow? it's even harder than this part 01:39:506 (7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - , seems a bit unfitting. I don't think so.

* 02:12:609 (7,8,9) - ^ Same as before, I prefered to move (8) further.

* 02:05:161 (5,6) - this could be really confusing as a 1/2 gap, since you used filler rhythm so many times.
maybe move (5) to x:256 y:350 ? But then (6) needs to be further...



That's all. Good luck!

EggsGone wrote:

M4M

• [General]

1. 00:58:127 - ; 00:59:782 - good place for spinner in my opinion. That's a cool idea indeed, but somehow a bit forcing for me, I need to think about this.
   
   [Light]
2. 00:28:333 (3,5) - Sliderwaves could have some better shape. (sth like this https://i.imgur.com/igegsOh.png) They were cool already,
   but improved them a bit.
3. 00:32:471 (6) - I don't know if you prefer this, but how about to make this slider curved? Would be nice, but I will keep it, so there's no need to change distance etc.
4. 00:33:299 (1,2,3,4) - 00:39:920 (1,2,3,4) - patterns lookin too similar. Indeed, I didn't notice them, but there's no problem with that.
5. 00:56:471 (4) - add more symmetricity. Fixed before already.
6. 01:07:230 - 1/1 slider maybe? Just one circle instead.
7. 01:45:299 (4,5) - how about this rhythm to emphasize vocal sounds https://i.imgur.com/4VTSKt6.png Good suggestion, but it breaks completely my pattern.
8. 01:55:230 (2,4) - Sliders could look more symmetrical. Maybe, but I like them already.
9. 02:10:954 (5,6,7) - 02:17:575 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1) - these parts looks pretty much duplicated from earlier, some variation would be nice. Indeed, but in low diffs sometimes it's necessary for me. Adding the same kind of patterns or sliders instead of copypasting would be the same, right? It's part of my style.
   
   [Advanced]
10. 00:21:713 (3) - I think it would be nice to use not only sharp angles. I bet you saw other kind of sliders already xD
11. 00:51:092 (2,3,4) - Linear pattern looks a bit odd in my opinion. Did something different.
12. 01:02:264 (3,4,6) - variation between 3/4 , 1/2 and 1/1 sounds too complicated for normal difficulties in my opinion. I honestly think that Taka's voice needs to be mapped as much as possible, also I didn't add many 1/2 here, talking about circles of course. For this diff I wanna keep 1/1 sliders,
    simple circles and some 1/2 and 3/4 rhythms. Besides this is not just "normal" difficulty like "alone" diff is not just "hard".
13. 01:41:161 (1) - Symmetrical? No need x) I like to have some variety on sliders.
14. 02:20:885 (1) - ^ Same.
15. 01:59:368 (3,1) - I think you can stack these. Nice catch.

1. 00:18:402 (7) - Add whistle on slider's end as well to accentuate the high-pitched vocals?
2. 00:32:471 (6) - Remove whistle on slider's end? Contrary to the above, there are nothing strong enough to be emphasized on that point, so removing the whistle there would actually greatly emphasize your next 00:33:299 (1)'s whistle hehe xD
3. 00:49:851 (3) - A small suggestion here, perhaps use this slider shape instead to deliver a greater (and less rigid) flow from your previous 00:48:196 (2) while maintaining the linear shape you're using here?
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:57:713 (5,6) - This is merely a personal thought, but in my opinion rather than forcing the symmetry before the long break here (which results in a visibly uneven triangle) I think it would be much better to arrange them in a pattern that allows it to flow around more naturally - like this for example :
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:06:816 (4) - Remove whistle here? There's nothing from the song that fits the whistle here...
6. 01:31:230 (5,7) - I think the flow would be much greater here if both slider are placed a bit more upward and then reshaped so that (5,7) holds a higher stance compared to your (4) and (6) here :
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 02:10:954 (5,7) - Same as above
8. 02:43:230 (3) - A small suggestion here, rather than forcing a tilted slider perhaps I think it would be better if you used two circles here instead as it fits your symmetry trend very much while also flows good to your next slider :
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 02:46:954 (7,1) - Similar to 00:57:713 (5,6) here, I think rather than forcing the (1) to be located on ~y:192 (which results in an abruptly angled arc here) I think it would be best if you arrange them in a way they flow more naturally, for example :
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 02:47:368 (1,2,3,4) - ...in which you can then directly follow with a pattern like this for the ending ((4) is being stacked with your previous (6)'s end, by the way) :
    
    SPOILER

    

1. Since the difficulty name is set to "Advanced" instead of "Normal" I think it would be acceptable to add some (slight) jumps in case you see it fits (instead of fully following the spacing here) hehe xD

1. 00:10:127 (1.3) - This is simply a personal opinion, but I think these slider's angles are very much too sharp so that (for me) it doesn't carry out the flow/transition well from your previous (5). You can though, for example, use a slider shape less sharp here while still keeping your linear shape at this point for better flow :
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:13:437 (1) - Remove whistle on slider's end here? (you previously don't put on a whistle on 00:07:230 (2))
3. 00:29:161 (5,6,1,2) - Perhaps rearrange these four so that (1) would be perfectly centered? (I don't know whether this is intentional or not, though xD)
4. 00:31:644 (3,4) - I personally think that the flow would be greatly improved here if (4) is placed in a somewhat higher position compared to (3), for example :
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:48:609 (4) - Add circle here (stacked atop of the slider) and move the slider 1/2 after to let the vocals be fully represented here? (you shouldn't worry about the spacing between the slider and the next (1) too much though, because - as I stated earlier - the small jump should be something very acceptable for "Advanced" diff~)
   
   1. This very much applies as well to the similar parts like this :
   2. ---
   3. 00:51:920 (4) -
   4. 01:43:230 (4) -
   5. 01:46:540 (4) -
   6. 02:26:264 (4) -
   7. 02:22:954 (4) -
6. 01:14:264 (4) - Small suggestion here, perhaps curve this downward instead so that this slider will somewhat be blanketed by the previous (3)?
7. 01:39:506 (3,5) - Hmm, is it intentional to put the (3) in ~x:316 but the (5) in ~x:308 (considering that in my .osu the (4) and (1) is placed in the same x-coordinate)? o.o
8. 01:41:161 (1) - This is very much minor stuff, but considering that Taka's voice was beginning to change pitch on 01:41:575 - I think it would be nice if the second red node on the slider is being placed there instead to perfectly represent the pitch change from the song (:
9. 02:20:885 (1) - Same as above
10. 02:38:678 (2,4) - A small suggestion here, perhaps try to put (2) and (4) inward towards the center instead? This allows the (4) to have a greater flow in conjunction to your next (1) imo :
    
    SPOILER

    

1. Perhaps reduce the stack leniency (to ~5) in order to make the objects which are 1/2 apart (such as 00:53:161 (1,3)) be perfectly stacked in-game? (this is nothing major by any way, but I think this would greatly enhance your symmetry style imo hehe)

1. 00:05:782 - Add circle here (without any hitsound) stacked atop your next (1)? To be honest it sounds (and plays) a lot more natural following the vocals this way imo (as you already did on 00:13:230 (1,2))~
2. 00:13:437 (2) - Remove whistle on slider's end? Previously you don't have it there on 00:06:816 (3) o.o
3. 00:15:920 (6,7) - Minor stuff, but these should be on ~x:336 y:73 to make (7)'s end be placed perfectly on the center of the playfield xD
4. 00:37:437 (4) - A small thought here, perhaps you can arrange them somehow so that (4)'s end is symmetrical to 00:35:782 (7)'s end for better aesthetics? Like this for example :
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:41:989 (5,6,7) - Due to how the vocals sounded here I think it would be better to convert this into another 1/1 slider instead and then create another symmetry between your (3), (4), and (5) - like this for example :
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:44:885 (7,8,9) - Umm, why are these three being stacked awkwardly to your (1,2,3)? I think it would be much better if these three are moved up a bit so that they'll stack (1,2,3) perfectly though~
7. 00:48:816 (7) - Add circle (preferably in ~x:35 y:146) to fill in for the vocals that you missed here (so that the map sounds and plays more naturally according to the song's rhythm)? Also
8. 00:49:230 (9) - Consider adding whistle on slider's start here to emphasize the high-pitched vocals (:
9. 00:52:540 (9) - Same as above
10. 00:55:644 (5,6,7) - Same as 00:41:989 (5,6,7) here (this one's even more unfitting in my opinion as there's virtually no sound at all which occurs on the red tick) - perhaps arrange the rhythm and the symmetry like this so that it'll also flow well to your next (1,2,3)? (the (3) is stacked to your previous (9)'s end)
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 01:03:092 (5) - Shift the whistle on slider's start to (4)'s end instead in order to follow Taka's high-pitched vocals? (this applies to your upcoming similar parts as well hehe)
12. 01:16:747 (6,1) - Hmm, is it intentional not to stack them properly here? Your current stacking feels awkward in-game imo ._.
13. 01:20:264 (7) - Umm, actually if you listened closely to the song you can hear that the most significant part here actually comes on 01:20:471, so I think it would be much better if you turn this into a circle + 1/2 slider instead so that 01:20:471 can be much more emphasized by being a place where the player clicks to the beat - you can use this pattern for example :
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 01:28:747 (2,3) - Small suggestion here, perhaps swap (2) and (3)'s position so that the player keeps on moving here? (the stack on (1) -> (2) somewhat drops the player's momentum here imo, especially considering how the next (2) -> (3) is quite widely spaced)
15. 01:34:540 (1,2,3,4) - Another small suggestion here - perhaps arrange them in so that one note is further than the previous one (accelerated spacing) to generate that build-up mood? For example :
    
    SPOILER

    
16. 01:50:678 - Add note (perhaps in ~x:212 y:116, symmetrical to (4)) to fill in for the drum beats? Personally I think the 3/2 delay between objects here are very much out of context compared to how the other parts were mapped with higher note intensity hehe xD
17. 02:00:816 (1,2,3) - Consider putting this in a lower position compared to your previous (8) instead? I can see that you're aiming for a horizontal symmetry here, but due to how (1,2,3) is stacked the symmetry is very much broken/not appearing the way you want it to appear during gameplay. Perhaps try something like this instead. for example :
    
    SPOILER

    
18. 02:07:437 (6,7,1) - Minor suggestion here, but perhaps you can try manual-stacking these three for aesthetics :
    
    SPOILER

    
19. 02:14:264 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 01:34:540 (1,2,3,4) here about the accelerated spacing arrangement (:
20. 02:20:471 (4,1) - Put these two lower? The logic here is that you've previously set up a jump on (7,8,1), so to follow the jump with an regularly spaced anti-jump here would very much unfitting and puts off the player's momentum >_<
    
    SPOILER

    
21. 02:34:540 (2) - A small suggestion here, perhaps shape this slider as following instead to make it parallel with your previous stream pattern while carrying out a better flow in regards to your next (3)?
    
    SPOILER

    
22. 02:44:058 (1) - Umm, why the repeating slider? I don't really hear anything audible from the song coming on the blue tick though, so I think it would be better to simply use two circles instead o.o

Yusomi wrote:

hii m4m request from your queue
song is so nice, thanks for introducing me to it c':

Alone

00:05:989 (1,2) - blanket can be made more pretty here if you want It's fine imo.
00:12:816 (8) - maybe use a 1/2 slider here since all the previous white ticks have objects on them? if you agree then here 00:07:851 (5) - would need one as well for consistency Nah, you can know perfectly the rhythm I'm following, no need to add 1/2 sliders here.
00:42:402 (5,6,7) - i think it would be better here to map the held vocal in a different way than the 3 fast vocal beats here 00:43:230 (1,2,3) - . it would also be more consistent with how you map these vocals later on in the map Yeah ok, I already explained my reasons. It is a good way to start the following pattern, I don't really wanna change it.
00:55:644 (5,6,7) - same again here Same.
01:01:437 (1) - there's a such a strong sound on the red tick after this not, maybe use a 1/2 slider? This is vocal mapping if you notice.
01:04:747 (1) - same here, feels odd to ignore that sound imo Same.
01:24:609 (1) - i don't think the sounds here deserve a 1/1 slider? especially since you previously mapped these sounds using this pattern 01:17:989 (1,2,3) - It's the same as these 01:04:747 (1,1) - I don't see the problem.
01:32:058 (4,5,6) - maybe stack them on the sliderends of 01:32:885 (7,8,9) - like No need to do that but thanks.
02:11:782 (4,5,6) - same thing here as well Same.
02:44:058 (1) - you could make this just a 1/4 slider without the reverse which would allow for clickable object on red tick to match other patterns throughout the map I explained that before.

Advanced

00:05:989 (1) - i think the sound on this sliderend should actually be start of a slider. Such a strong sound and held vocal sounds like it should be start of a slider rather than the end. Like you have done here 00:13:437 (1) - Yeah, but this is the beginning of the map, you know?
I'm following the first vocal and I go on.
00:18:402 (3) - you could move the 2nd white node down a little to be half way between the first node and the red anchor to make this slider more beautiful Changed the slider.
00:48:609 (4) - i think maybe two 1/2 slider would be better here to match the vocals, it also avoids that loud drum being mapped to a sliderend I did this in almost the whole map cause the spacing is quite high and I didn't like the overlapping when I did use 2 joined circles for example. So yeah, just reverse sliders are fine.
00:51:920 (4) - same again here Same.
01:43:230 (4) - and also in this chorus too Same.
02:27:506 (1,3) - any reason these aren't the same shape? They are the same...

Light

00:24:196 (6,1) - maybe place a circle between these? Nah, this is a simple diff, only when it's really necessary.
00:57:713 (5,6) - maybe move these to x:483 y:211 so they flow straight off of the slider? I don't really see a problem with this symmetry,
honestly...
01:10:540 (3,4) - i think there should be circle between these to match 01:04:747 (3,4,5) - You're right.
01:30:402 (4) - you can maybe highlight strong vocal here with a 1/1 slider? No need.
01:37:023 (3) - same again here Same.
01:47:782 (1) - i think two 1/1 sliders may be better here, since this slider ends on such a strong vocal As I said, it's a simple diff, no need to map everything.
02:02:678 (2,3,4,5) - if you move these down just a little then you can vertically straighten 02:06:816 (6,7,1) - and stack on 02:04:747 (4) - which i think makes it much more pretty, since the current placement with the slight angle looks out of place compared to the nice structure in the rest of the map It's not my intention to make a vertical pattern.

good luck !

IsomirDiYandere wrote:

Hi m4m request from ur queue
Sorry if I'm too inexperienced as a modder, especially in low difficulties

Alone

00:06:196 (3,4) - I would move these objects a bit apart cause they overlap a bit, but it might be for better flow. I don't really mind in reality I appreciate it, but the overlap is intentional.
01:01:437 (1) - Starting here, this section feels so undermapped. I know it's only a hard difficulty, but from that star rating I think players start to get used to play all sounds, even if those are undermapped but still mapped, if you see what i mean. You could turn 01:01:437 (1) - into a 1/2 beat slider and every sound like these too I won't get them all. I don't really miss anything here to be honest. I mean, why is a problem mapping only the strongest vocal here? It also defines the beginning of Taka's singing.
01:03:092 (5) - 01:07:230 (8) - 01:08:058 (1) - you could map those sounds for example instead of skipping them, + 01:07:230 (8) - this one has different drum sound from the others and is mapped just like any other one, a slider skipping all the sounds. It should at least be mapped like these imo 01:13:644 (5,6,7,8) -
I mean I agree for vocal mapping in the intro but now that drum comes in it feels bad to just ignore it and continue mapping vocal and use drum as a filler when there's no vocal
It might be personal cause I don't really like maps where vocals are mainly mapped while totally ignoring background sounds, it just feels frustrating to me I feel you, but I think drums are mapped when it's necessary. My mapping seems to be mainly vocals, I guess.
02:34:127 (1) - How about a 1/2 slider right here ? Would fit the rythm and the same sounds 1 beat later are mapped with a 1/2 beat slider too + it's easier for new players when a stream ends on a slider cause if they spam too much they won't be punished Done.
02:45:713 (6,7,8,9) - For the end intense words I would've done some more active mapping. Turn all of these into hit circles might be too bad but maybe the 2 first sliders might be an option I will keep sliders, but I will try to think about something~
Aside for that 'undermapped' part, which you can deny cause it's purely subjective, this map plays well and I can't find any other issue

Advanced

00:45:713 (4,1) - I would align properly these objects so it flows better, this occurs many times in the map so I don't know if it's done on purpose, just noticing it Current flow is fine for me, I wanna the following slider on the center.
Sorry couldn't find anything else here

Hope this helps, good luck

1. To be honest, I don't think that the bg is a great choice. Taka is just a featured artist here, maybe you could find more interesting images if you go for something less "artists related"

1. 01:28:747 (2) - On these bass drum sounds, maybe a drum finish would fit a little better?
2. 02:44:058 (5) - Fix DS here

1. 00:05:989 (1) - This slider could be rotate a little in order to make it "straight"
2. 00:28:333 (4) - Maybe this slider could be on a angle like 00:26:678 (1,2,3) - since closing the angle only on this note is kinda strange
3. 00:46:540 (1) - This position seems off, makes your map lose structure. You could align it with 00:45:713 (4)
4. 01:03:920 (6) - Minor suggestion, but this slider doesn't seems good turned up. Turning it down looks a lot better while playing
5. 01:04:747 (1) - This position seems off too, maybe you could use the suggestion above and align sliders paths. Maybe something like this
6. 02:06:402 (4,5) - - Check this. There's no changes on song that supports such sudden angle and position variation. You could make (4) angle like (2), and adjust (5).
7. 02:17:575 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2) - Uhh, I don't know. I really don't thing that literally copy/paste/invert previous kiai is cool. There's more sounds on this kiai compared to last one, maybe you could make things a little bit different to reflect such intensity change
8. 02:49:023 (4) - NC maybe?

1. 00:06:196 (3,4) - This sliderbody overlap isn't cool, avoid that
2. 00:11:782 (5) - At least NC this so angle changing wouldn't feel awkward
3. 00:18:402 (5) - Same as above
4. 00:26:058 (8) - Could be blanket'd on 00:25:437 (6) -
5. 00:32:471 (7) - NC maybe?
6. 00:57:299 (4) - NC
7. 00:58:127 (7) - NC
8. 01:11:368 (1) - Fix tail, blanket is off
9. 01:32:058 (4) - NC
10. 01:38:678 (4) - NC. NC every pattern like this. Keep differents phrases structured like this on same combo doesn't feels good
11. 01:52:747 (9) - NC
12. 02:02:058 (6,7) - This overlap is kinda "ugh". Perhaps you could try something different here?
13. 02:44:058 (1) - There's no sound or vocal on blue tick that justifies that

Pulse wrote:

hi, m4m!

[General]

1. To be honest, I don't think that the bg is a great choice. Taka is just a featured artist here, maybe you could find more interesting images if you go for something less "artists related" I honestly think Taka's vocals are important in this song. I will look for something else, but will be a Taka wallpaper too.

[Light]

1. 01:28:747 (2) - On these bass drum sounds, maybe a drum finish would fit a little better? If I add drum sounds this is not the correct place where I would do it.
2. 02:44:058 (5) - Fix DS here I tested it, should be okay o.o

[Advanced]

1. 00:05:989 (1) - This slider could be rotate a little in order to make it "straight" Nah, I prefer to start with this symmetry.
2. 00:28:333 (4) - Maybe this slider could be on a angle like 00:26:678 (1,2,3) - since closing the angle only on this note is kinda strange For me it's more strange to make the same type of slider here.
3. 00:46:540 (1) - This position seems off, makes your map lose structure. You could align it with 00:45:713 (4) Fixed a bit.
4. 01:03:920 (6) - Minor suggestion, but this slider doesn't seems good turned up. Turning it down looks a lot better while playing The flow is fine for me.
5. 01:04:747 (1) - This position seems off too, maybe you could use the suggestion above and align sliders paths. Maybe something like this I'm going to break the symmetry, I don't really want to change everything here.
6. 02:06:402 (4,5) - - Check this. There's no changes on song that supports such sudden angle and position variation. You could make (4) angle like (2), and adjust (5). Not sure if you noticed the triangle pattern, but I also did it.
7. 02:17:575 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2) - Uhh, I don't know. I really don't thing that literally copy/paste/invert previous kiai is cool. There's more sounds on this kiai compared to last one, maybe you could make things a little bit different to reflect such intensity change It's exactly the same. I didn't copypaste everything, just the first part.
8. 02:49:023 (4) - NC maybe? Alright.

[Alone]

1. 00:06:196 (3,4) - This sliderbody overlap isn't cool, avoid that It's cool for me, it's intentional.
2. 00:11:782 (5) - At least NC this so angle changing wouldn't feel awkward My combos are long, I will keep them as much as I can.
3. 00:18:402 (5) - Same as above Same.
4. 00:26:058 (8) - Could be blanket'd on 00:25:437 (6) - It should be a blanket.
5. 00:32:471 (7) - NC maybe? As I said, should be fine.
6. 00:57:299 (4) - NC Same.
7. 00:58:127 (7) - NC Same.
8. 01:11:368 (1) - Fix tail, blanket is off Fixed after many times, I hope it's okay now.
9. 01:32:058 (4) - NC Same as before.
10. 01:38:678 (4) - NC. NC every pattern like this. Keep differents phrases structured like this on same combo doesn't feels good Same.
11. 01:52:747 (9) - NC Same.
12. 02:02:058 (6,7) - This overlap is kinda "ugh". Perhaps you could try something different here? It's intentional.
13. 02:44:058 (1) - There's no sound or vocal on blue tick that justifies that Feels like that somehow. If I get more opinions on this I will change it.

Good luck!

Aelin wrote:

Hi, One Ok Rock fan here, found via osu!direct. Great song, and I'll be awaiting this under ranked.

General

Your timing is a little ahead. I'd recommend using offset: 243 instead of your current at 253. Did you redownload everything?
Because I checked it twice and should be okay.

Alone

00:05:687 - I would possibly add a circle here, as this is a vocal sound, but considering the flow of the vocals, if this would impact the map, it's not necessary. Nah, there's nothing here to start with.
00:08:311 - Clear, loud instrumental sound here, should be a circle at this. Definitely not, vocals are prioritized here.
00:33:346 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This is kind of awkward as a whole, due to the alternation between the important vocals and the unimportant background instrumental. The pattern itself is fine, but players, especially of which this map is targeted to may not realize the alternation, and expect that they'll still be playing to vocals, even tho that's not the case on every even note. While slider tails do end on vocal notes, which is fine, this isn't one of those cases. You might be right, but since I don't consider this an overmapping, I will keep the pattern.
00:37:484 (4,5,6) - NC here? Nah, I do long combos in whole map.
00:38:311 (7,8,9) - Here too. It would make sense to have nc on those notes simply due to the fact they are completely separate phrases. Nah, same as before.
00:39:967 (1,2,3) - Same as 00:33:346 - ESPECIALLY since 00:40:794 (3,4) - doesn't follow this same mapping. Did something different.
00:42:449 (5,6,7) - NC possibly. As I said, nope.
00:44:105 (4,5,6) - and 00:44:932 (7,8,9) - Follow the NC logic at 00:37:484 - I won't repeat it again, sorry.
00:53:829 (2) - Unimportant instrumental sound, does not warrant a circle here. And what about the vocal?
00:55:691 (5,6,7) - Can possibly add NC here
00:57:346 (4,5,6) - Add NC here, same logic as most above NCs
01:01:691 - Important sound, add something here. No, it's not important.
01:05:001 - ^ Same. Haven't you noticed my vocal mapping?
01:15:346 - ^ Possibly if it works. There's a circle, I don't get this.
01:16:794 (6,7) - Flows unnaturally due to the slider. I'd split 7 into two sliders, or a circle and slider.. I don't get the problem here. It follows everything well.
01:21:346 (1,2) - Instrumental here that could be mapped to as previously. As I said, it is more like vocal mapping.
01:32:105 (4,5,6) - and 01:32:932 (7,8,9) - NCs as suggested above.
01:38:725 (4,5,6) - ^
01:41:208 (1,2) - Hitsounds here sound awkward. Probably make the first quieter than the other. Why do they sound awkward? I don't think it's very loud or it has some noise.
01:46:587 (8,9) - NC?
01:50:311 (9) - Could be a slider here due to the held vocal note. Gotta agree here.
01:50:932 (1,2,3) - While you used hitsound manipulation quite well previously, this doesn't need a stack just due to the notes no longer being held out like they had been Since I changed the pattern now everything should be fine.
01:51:967 (6,7,8) - NC here
02:07:484 (6,7,1) - Stack feels awkward, especially since there is already a snare sound in the song on Note 6. I don't think stacks are awkward here.
02:11:829 (4,5,6) - and 02:12:656 (7,8,9) - I think you get the drill, NC here
02:18:449 (4,5,6) - and 02:19:277 (7,8) - ^
02:20:932 (1,2) - Awkward hitsounding here too, try what I mentioned above. What I said before.
02:25:070 (3) - Don't like this slider. Ruins flow. Try something like this (https://puu.sh/ybVL6/5e1264380a.png, Highlighted notes). You might want an NC too, then. Why is flow ruined though? I don't want to make the same sliders everytime.
02:31:691 (4,5,6) - NC boy
02:41:622 (3) - Not a huge fan of this reverse either. Could split into two sliders. Same as before.
02:42:656 - Put something here. Important sound. For me it's not important.
02:44:058 (1) - Yeah, nothing that suggests this. I'd recommend something like this (https://puu.sh/ybWeD/482ea79729.png) Ok, I will change this.
Good map, but you should separate phrases and try to map to more important sounds. Otherwise, I see this rankable in the near future with some touchups!

Kisses wrote:

Vayne is seriously op, 200 IQ on her will get you anything

Nyukai wrote:

Could also add more for triplet like this 00:37:080 (3,6) - for Normal and Alone diff, and stuff like 00:38:735 - for last diff only for same reason. They are mapped like 00:36:666 (1) - or 00:37:494 (2) - and so on~ I don't want to add those triples on Normal because it's very clean for me now and seeing circles touching due to spacing is not clean for me, but increasing spacing would have been so much for the diff. I tried my best to explain this ><

KittyAdventure wrote:

Congratulations! <3
Btw, can you show me where you can find "Dreaming Alone feat. Taka from ONE OK ROCK"?

In this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6aBAQsq5jI
I think the title should be Dreaming Alone and "feat. Taka from ONE OK ROCK" in artist