Alone00:05:687 - I would possibly add a circle here, as this is a vocal sound, but considering the flow of the vocals, if this would impact the map, it's not necessary. Nah, there's nothing here to start with.
00:08:311 - Clear, loud instrumental sound here, should be a circle at this. Definitely not, vocals are prioritized here.
00:33:346 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This is kind of awkward as a whole, due to the alternation between the important vocals and the unimportant background instrumental. The pattern itself is fine, but players, especially of which this map is targeted to may not realize the alternation, and expect that they'll still be playing to vocals, even tho that's not the case on every even note. While slider tails do end on vocal notes, which is fine, this isn't one of those cases. You might be right, but since I don't consider this an overmapping, I will keep the pattern.
00:37:484 (4,5,6) - NC here? Nah, I do long combos in whole map.
00:38:311 (7,8,9) - Here too. It would make sense to have nc on those notes simply due to the fact they are completely separate phrases. Nah, same as before.
00:39:967 (1,2,3) - Same as 00:33:346 - ESPECIALLY since 00:40:794 (3,4) - doesn't follow this same mapping. Did something different.
00:42:449 (5,6,7) - NC possibly. As I said, nope.
00:44:105 (4,5,6) - and 00:44:932 (7,8,9) - Follow the NC logic at 00:37:484 - I won't repeat it again, sorry.
00:53:829 (2) - Unimportant instrumental sound, does not warrant a circle here. And what about the vocal?
00:55:691 (5,6,7) - Can possibly add NC here
00:57:346 (4,5,6) - Add NC here, same logic as most above NCs
01:01:691 - Important sound, add something here. No, it's not important.
01:05:001 - ^ Same. Haven't you noticed my vocal mapping?
01:15:346 - ^ Possibly if it works. There's a circle, I don't get this.
01:16:794 (6,7) - Flows unnaturally due to the slider. I'd split 7 into two sliders, or a circle and slider.. I don't get the problem here. It follows everything well.
01:21:346 (1,2) - Instrumental here that could be mapped to as previously. As I said, it is more like vocal mapping.
01:32:105 (4,5,6) - and 01:32:932 (7,8,9) - NCs as suggested above.
01:38:725 (4,5,6) - ^
01:41:208 (1,2) - Hitsounds here sound awkward. Probably make the first quieter than the other. Why do they sound awkward? I don't think it's very loud or it has some noise.
01:46:587 (8,9) - NC?
01:50:311 (9) - Could be a slider here due to the held vocal note. Gotta agree here.
01:50:932 (1,2,3) - While you used hitsound manipulation quite well previously, this doesn't need a stack just due to the notes no longer being held out like they had been Since I changed the pattern now everything should be fine.
01:51:967 (6,7,8) - NC here
02:07:484 (6,7,1) - Stack feels awkward, especially since there is already a snare sound in the song on Note 6. I don't think stacks are awkward here.
02:11:829 (4,5,6) - and 02:12:656 (7,8,9) - I think you get the drill, NC here
02:18:449 (4,5,6) - and 02:19:277 (7,8) - ^
02:20:932 (1,2) - Awkward hitsounding here too, try what I mentioned above. What I said before.
02:25:070 (3) - Don't like this slider. Ruins flow. Try something like this (https://puu.sh/ybVL6/5e1264380a.png, Highlighted notes). You might want an NC too, then. Why is flow ruined though? I don't want to make the same sliders everytime.
02:31:691 (4,5,6) - NC boy
02:41:622 (3) - Not a huge fan of this reverse either. Could split into two sliders. Same as before.
02:42:656 - Put something here. Important sound. For me it's not important.
02:44:058 (1) - Yeah, nothing that suggests this. I'd recommend something like this (https://puu.sh/ybWeD/482ea79729.png) Ok, I will change this.
Good map, but you should separate phrases and try to map to more important sounds. Otherwise, I see this rankable in the near future with some touchups!