I'm inclined to think 0_o
I'm inclined to think too. 0_oEcho wrote:
I'm inclined to think 0_o
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
What? Proposing to lynch someone who isn't being grilled is scum tell? So you are saying that one should just agree with what the majority of people are saying... but oh wait, that's bandwagoning. And hey look, isn't that scum tell too?strager wrote:
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
I have to agree, though, and the buddying is kinda annoying. I understand you trust me but we don't have to be friends for that. ;PI'm not trying to be your bff, I'm trying to keep the person who is most likely to be the doctor alive
Actually I made a mistake. I must have misread what you wrote, because I don't really see how that'd be a Scum tell. =S0_o wrote:
What? Proposing to lynch someone who isn't being grilled is scum tell? So you are saying that one should just agree with what the majority of people are saying... but oh wait, that's bandwagoning. And hey look, isn't that scum tell too?strager wrote:
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
Maybe that's what you meant?0_o wrote:
swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
He was exaggerating.BagelBob wrote:
Maybe that's what you meant?0_o wrote:
swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
What are your other reasons? This isn't a reason itself, really. Forum "conversations" are not real-time and anyone may contribute at any time. Just ignore the timestamps.nardi11011 wrote:
2. One of the reasons I don't post too much is because most of the actual "conversations" happen at times when I'm unable to reply. So all I can do is post my opinion after reading everything that has been said, which hasn't changed much.
I'm smart? xDnardi11011 wrote:
My suspicion for strager comes from the fact that while he seems like a smart guy, a lot of his posts have been pretty vague and I think it's stupid to admit your role on the first day.
I don't know why I myselfadam2046 wrote:
Still voting strager
Well, duh, if you think I'm a Mafia. But of course I don't even consider that.adam2046 wrote:
I can think of another~
No, I didn't look at yours. ;Padam2046 wrote:
I hope you're looking at the right PM...
BagelBob wrote:
Echo wrote:
edit:
note to everyone: I've probably made just as many posts as strager has. If I can pick holes in strager's arguments and claims, then any lies, inconsistencies or logical fallacies I've made should also be just as evident. I encourage you to through and confirm or deny, for yourself, the authenticity of my train of thought.
Well, if you insist.
Echo wrote:
So now you're admitting cop? General rule: first to mention cop in any way is cop themselves.
I was going to vote you now, but since you're suggesting you're cop now, I'll let you defend yourself first.
I've never heard of this rule. Furthermore, I feel as though you're putting words in his mouth. He never claimed to be the cop, and you were the first person who said he was the doc.
Also, I'd like to point out.
Echo wrote:
First, you claim an important role.
viewtopic.php?p=139874#p139874
Echo wrote:
Firstly, strager never claimed doctor.
viewtopic.php?p=139897#p139897
Echo wrote:
First, I suggested that strager was doctor, to which he immediately confirmed.
viewtopic.php?p=140180#p140180
Thus, I repeat
BagelBob wrote:
Echo, could you point me to where strager claims?
However, I don't want to give the wrong idea. I agree with most of the things you've said about strager(one disagreement is that when he gives up, you think that's more scummy while I think it doesn't show anything but fatigue while another is that I'd like to give him more credit than doubt for backing off his claim that he should consider adam town for the day rather than have him continue pushing that adam is still town). But everything else looks right on the money.
I'd also like to add
strager wrote:
Saying I am defending myself (however implicitly) is baseless. So I'll completely disregard your attacks on my defense.
That statement both implies that you were not defending yourself and states that you have a defense.
Oh, and Derekuu-Chan, this is a summery, not a suspicion list. However, I feel that I should apologize. I forgot that sarcasm can't be conveyed over the internets.
When I said before
BagelBob wrote:
I Vote Kuu for lying! This is NO wolf game!
It was in response to
kuu wrote:
I FORGOT AM I INVITED HERE---OH RIGHT IT'S THE WOLF GAME IM NOT IN.
Where I meant to show that kuu was lying about being in the game. Trying to stay low on the radar or just being kuu? I'll never know.
And any parodies I do are for my own amusement. If they should happen to point out a newbie mistake that could be a scum-tell, so be it.
BagelBob wrote:
First, I want to finish up what I started.
I believe this is the full list concerning the doktor.
s: The Doctor PM says "If your protection is successful" -- does this mean the protection can fail? Or does it mean that the protection fails if the Mafia did not target the person you targeted?
E: Doesn't that mean you're doctor >.>
E: dammit WHY do the doctors always need to expose themselves on the first day?
s: D= I didn't mean to.
E: strager hasn't even role claimed - I said he was doctor
D: Sounds like he confirmed it to me. >_>
E: That's not a claim, it's a passing suggestion.
E: First, you claim an important role.
E: Firstly, strager never claimed doctor. He just went with what I said. The real doctor would have tried to cover it up. strager, on the other hand, admitted it straight away.
E: First, I suggested that strager was doctor, to which he immediately confirmed. The real doctor wouldn't have wanted to expose himself - he'd die night 1 and the whole town would be in a bit of trouble.
BB: Echo, could you post where strager role claims?
E: viewtopic.php?p=139263#p139263 (s: D= I didn't mean to.)
When I say he "claimed" doctor, I was referring to this incident in the post above. I merely suggested he was doctor, and he "claimed" it by saying he "didn't mean to". As (I think) I've pointed out before, strager didn't claim doctor explicitly, which is what I mean by him not "claiming" doctor.
What I learned from all of this is that I didn't read thoroughly enough. It turns out that that second time that Echo says firstly, he expands it to say that he did admit the claim soon. The only part that isn't exactly consistent now is "That's not a claim, it's a passing suggestion", but that's negligible.
Result: strager has claimed to be the doc (by which I mean that I won't say it's too suspicious)
Also, FOS, is a Finger of Suspicion. It's a way of saying that you think someone is a candidate for lynching, but not as strong as a vote.(feel free to say I'm wrong about the weight, Echo, you are the one who used it)
strager wrote:
By the "defense" I meant Echo accusing me of using my role claim as a Doctor to defend myself. I didn't mean defending myself against his arguments.
This confuses me so much, I'll probably end up dropping it unless I can make sense of it when I wake up.
I don't know where you got the idea that I think having the doktor role-claim on the first day is a good idea. I distinctly remember saying "I dislike role claims", and you first quoting me about it, then doing an analysis earlier. Seriously, short term- Hey look, a butterfly!
However, I do like the idea of a fake-claim of the doktor, like I thought Suburu and kuu were doing in WW2. I've seen it work before, and I know it has the potential to be really great.
strager wrote:
----------
Echo seems to be super defensive of adam in his latest next-to-latest post. Why? I'm not pointing my finger at him.
I re-read that post and I don't think Echo is being even slightly defensive of adam.
In fact, he says specifically "None of adam's posts in any way indicate that he is townie"
I don't know how you came up with this, would you care to explain?
lulz @ adam for the Monty Python reference
I still consider strager my major suspect at the moment, and I don't see the reasons why Echo is backing off.
However, I think we still have ~6 days left to decide things, so I'm not ready to lynch him yet. I'd really like to hear a bit more from SFG(with her amazing 1 post), Olinad(with double that), and nardii(with a record 3) before doing anything that can't be reversed.
strager wrote:
Damnit, I think I made a mistake.
I know someone was questioning SFG, but I guess it wasn't BagelBob.
Unvote until I find out who it was (or I'm convinced to vote for someone else).
Sorry for the confusion. I don't drink but something must have happened. =S I'll be quiet now.#forumshit wrote:
19:33 < SFG|Rh> hey Subi can i ask BagelBob if i summarized his posts correctly or is that a no-no
19:33 < strager|irc> SFG|Rh: In M2?
19:33 < SFG|Rh> yeah
19:33 < BagelBob> and can I ask who the mafiosi are?
19:33 < BagelBob> I'm dead anyway
19:33 < strager|irc> SFG|Rh: As long as no one notices you misquoted everything you're fine =]
19:33 < strager|irc> SFG|Rh: Misquotes (intentional or not) are legal if that's what you're asking
19:33 < SFG|Rh> misquoted everything?
19:33 < strager|irc> Was kidding
19:34 < SFG|Rh> i was gonna say
19:34 < strager|irc> Not sure why you would think it'd be illegal otherwise though
19:34 < SFG|Rh> how do you misquote with ctrl-v
19:34 < BagelBob> I was gonna say, discussion needs to take place in the thread
19:34 < SFG|Rh> because Bobby is dead
19:34 < BagelBob> Oops, sorry adam
19:34 < BagelBob> I need to kill a "Spirit Dragon"
19:34 < BagelBob> I think spirit implies that it's already dead
19:34 < adam2046> oh
19:34 < LadySuburu> Yeah, you can't ask bobby. If you did something wrong leave it to the others to find it and
point it out
19:34 < LadySuburu> lol
19:34 < adam2046> <caps>motherfucker!</caps>
19:35 < strager|irc> Oh BagelBob's dead?
19:35 < adam2046> runningrunningruninng
19:35 < LadySuburu> @strager: Did you skip the deathscene entirely?
19:35 < strager|irc> eh?
19:35 < LadySuburu> Did you even notice D1 ended?
19:35 < LadySuburu> and N1?
19:35 < BagelBob> fasdf
19:35 < strager|irc> x___________x
19:36 < strager|irc> lol apparently I used his death as an excuse to vote for SFG
19:36 < strager|irc> wtf xD
19:36 < strager|irc> I don't even remember that
19:36 < strager|irc> gah
19:36 < SFG|Rh> of course
19:36 < strager|irc> Well I don't remember voting for him
19:36 < SFG|Rh> strager is digging his hole deeper and deeper
19:37 < strager|irc> I saw your post SFG
19:37 < SFG|Rh> i just posted again
19:37 < strager|irc> yeah saw
#forumshit wrote:
19:39 < SFG|Rh> if strager isnt mafia ill eat my hat
This was directed at strager in response to him misreading/misquoting a post of mine (not an attack)Bagelbob wrote:
0_o wrote:
swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
Maybe that's what you meant?
i was summarizing his intent in each post. i didnt include responses because the point of all that was to analyze the Bobbys-eye-view of the game. Which happened to be pointing straight at straiger when he died, despite strangers insistance that he wanted to kill ME0_o wrote:
I think I've been slightly misrepresented by SFG's analysis, since it doesn't include answers to his comments/"accusations", and if you look through I've had perfectly legitimate responses to all of his questions.
I didn't insist.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
despite strangers insistance that he wanted to kill ME
And a response:strager wrote:
BagelBob was most suspicious of SFG, which may mean SFG killed him.
SFG may have mistaken me by 0_o's comment.0_o wrote:
I can't find anywhere where Bagelbob attacks SFG.. link/quote?
I don't.0_o wrote:
But yeah, anyway
vote adam
and you all know why by now
I don't either.adam2046 wrote:
I don't.0_o wrote:
But yeah, anyway
vote adam
and you all know why by now
maybe b/c adam and nardi were supposedly mafia mates? innostrager wrote:
I don't either.adam2046 wrote:
I don't.0_o wrote:
But yeah, anyway
vote adam
and you all know why by now
Uh, what?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
maybe b/c adam and nardi were supposedly mafia mates? inno
and now nardi's gone. who does that leave?0_o wrote:
And I'm voting for nardi because as I've already saidI'm not confident enough to vote Echo and I believe SFG is a townie. So I'm fine with either nardi or adam, and since nardi is already on L-2, then well, there you go. I'm not going to split the vote between 2 people who I think should be lynched.0_o wrote:
EDIT: and if you think about it, his theory on strager's bandwagon (Echo, SFG, adam, nardi) does make some sense. Wouldn't you think a mafia member would jump at the chance to lynch the potential doctor? I think it's very likely that both of the mafia members are in that group.
0_o, adam, Derekku, Echo, Olinad, SFG, strager. BagelBob's gone too.0_o wrote:
and now nardi's gone. who does that leave?
woah, what? where did that come from?strager wrote:
Unvote
Vote: 0_o
0_o wrote:
woah, what? where did that come from?strager wrote:
Unvote
Vote: 0_o
0_o wrote:
Oh come on, if I were mafia with him I wouldn't have made my defence of him so obvious. Although again, I've already gone through this here.
I would really like to hear from strager right now, cause I'm really starting to have doubts about my entire thought process about him... if he really was the doctor then why would he target the person who believes (or believed) him the most?
Echo wrote:
I'd like to know what derekku and sfg think about voting for adam and 0_o. If you can, present some sort of argument for who you would vote for and why.
I saw this as pretty much trying to derail discussion on strager.Derekku Chan wrote:
I'm really sick of all this shit flying back and forth. To sum up how I feel without having to type a 20-page essay, Echo needs to stop being so fucking aggresive. strager has never even played before, and you're throwing every fucking thing in the book at him. We're human. We make mistakes. We slip up. It doesn't mean that strager is the bad guy, and the way that you keep pushing shit at him is really making you look the most suspicious in my book.
I'm finally throwing my vote down.
Vote. Echo.
*goes to lay down because his back is killing him*
the reason adam and nardi were under heightened suspicion in the first place was because of strager's bandwagon theory - a point which is entirely moot now that i know that strager is mafia and nardi is not. i also, i must confess, have not gone back to do a post study of adam to try and move him back off of the default suspicion again. perhaps i should do that after church.Echo wrote:
My mistake, fixed. So you would pick 0_o over adam? Can you show me what makes you think that adam must be paired with nardi?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
for that matter, its 4 to lynch and strager has 2 votes - doesnt that put him on L-2?
Mind posting some quotes? I may have restated a few points, but I don't recall making any "emotional arguments"?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Furthermore unlike most other people who defended strager with logic and basic mafia concepts (me, BagelBob, etc.) he generally either restated points or went with sort of emotional arguments?
0_o wrote:
Mind posting some quotes? I may have restated a few points, but I don't recall making any "emotional arguments"?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Furthermore unlike most other people who defended strager with logic and basic mafia concepts (me, BagelBob, etc.) he generally either restated points or went with sort of emotional arguments?
Echo asked me what i thought about adam. what ive said is basically that i dont particularly suspect him but i also havent done my research on him yetDerekku wrote:
SFG - Has also been pointing towards adam for no reason. I must be missing something here. -_-
I didn't cover myself up because that'd be a Mafia tell I think.Olinad wrote:
*) strager looks suspicious, but I think he only made a mistake at the beginning and then thought that not claiming as the doctor would be even worse than doing it.
Confusion is encouraged by the Mafia I believe. I know I've been confusing but that's by my nature I guess. (If you've spoke to me IRL...) Staying away from the confusion ... I don't know how to take that myself. Whatever; this part doesn't lead me anywhere.Olinad wrote:
*) Derekku isn't posting much, but well, even I am not posting much but that doesn't mean I'm part of the mafia... And even not helping the train of thought can lead to mafia, as he could simply be hiding as he has an aux role or not knowing what to say as he's confused (as I am actually! XD). So I guess I have no motivation to vote for him.
In his defense he really hasn't been attacked with a convincing argument.Olinad wrote:
*) Echo is always a big question mark in my head. I have no idea of what his role could be, as he's always attacking and really rarely defending. So... I dunno, really
Indeed; see below.Olinad wrote:
*) SFG seems too resolutive. Simplyfing things is good but could lead to mistakes... and jumping to conclusions about strager and 0_o being Mafia is too much I guess.
Neither I but he seems to be arousing confusion a bit, though I just think he's being playful.adam wrote:
*) dunno what to say about adam ATM, I'll read the topic more carefully and point smth out but I don't see him as really suspicious
Nothing else to say for him?0_o wrote:
*) No idea about 0_o either - I won't hide I think he may be Mafia, but I'm not really sure as others are.
lol at point 1.Derekku Chan wrote:
I haven't been posting a lot because 1) I've been busy IRL 2) I haven't really had much to say.
He defends me because he believes me. He also believes in my bandwagon theory, as he has stated, and is most of the reason he's voting for adam.Derekku Chan wrote:
0_o - Keeps pointing fingers at adam for no reason; Defends strager; I don't understand this.
Hmm, I wonder who pushed the vote on nardi for that.Derekku Chan wrote:
Olinad - Hasn't posted a whole lot, so I really don't what to make of him. One reason I thought nardi was scum was because he didn't post much, but we know how far that went...
What hasn't been suspicious about adam, really? He's said a whole lot of nothing lately, IMO.Derekku Chan wrote:
adam - I really see nothing suspicious about adam, but he hasn't said a whole lot either. Please post more =) inb4youtwoaremafiatogetherandyou'redefendinghimyouscum
"So yes, I have a different opinion than Echo, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna vote for him. Personally I'd rather wait a day and see what happens; some of your posts have been a little strange (hereby suspicious) but the fact that you might be (and probably are) the doctor is keeping me from voting for you."iirc this was in response to strager wondering why I wasn't voting Echo when I was defending him. And it's true, I thought Echo was wrong about strager, but just because I don't agree with someone's reasoning doesn't necessarily mean I think they are mafia.
"ok, as of now the only 2 people i haven't "diagnosed" in my mind as pro-town is adam2046 and nardi."I'll admit, there wasn't a lot (or any) of hard evidence here. It was the first day, and we didn't have a lot to go on (and I already said I wasn't voting strager). So yes, this was mainly random/instincts.
"Well I said before that I was thinking either you or nardi, and from the general feel of your posts I just started to lean towards you. It's the first day and there isn't a lot of evidence from anyone to go on, so for today I'm just playing by my gut"Pretty much this The only people who really got any attention conversation-wise was strager and Echo. There was little to no evidence against anyone else, so I didn't want to vote for either of them, then all I really had to go on was intuition.
Can you respond to what I said elsewhere in that post you responded to?0_o wrote:
It's just right now the only thing I had going against him is his strong conviction that you were mafia (and now I'm starting to wonder myself). I'm waiting for more information, particularly who the next night kills are, and what he has to say about other people besides you.
strager wrote:
Today Echo doesn't seem to have been suspicious of me at all, whereas yesterday he was crazy about me.
Just because he hasn't mentioned you yet doesn't mean he isn't suspicious of you anymore. I think right now he's just trying to get information from everyone else, since we've been so focused on you so far.strager wrote:
Today Echo doesn't seem to have been suspicious of me at all, whereas yesterday he was crazy about me.
Well this was the tip-off:0_o wrote:
Just because he hasn't mentioned you yet doesn't mean he isn't suspicious of you anymore. I think right now he's just trying to get information from everyone else, since we've been so focused on you so far.strager wrote:
Today Echo doesn't seem to have been suspicious of me at all, whereas yesterday he was crazy about me.
Echo wrote:
I would advise that no one else vote strager as he is on L-1 L-2 right now. If you do vote him, you better make sure you have a nice argument.
I said that because I was sick of the arguing back and forth. Now I see that I shouldn't have posted that and I was just raging that night because I wasn't feeling good. Like I said earlier, I'm not "buddy buddy" with strager. I'm very suspicious of him just like most of us are.adam2046 wrote:
If I had to, I would probably vote Derekku since he seems to subtly be all buddy buddy with strager in this game...hmm actually
Then again 0_o has been acting rather weird...I haven't really seen him play much so I don't really know.
Also I don't like his "gut feeling" excuse for voting, it makes him sound like a weirdo.
Oh and this is one of the things that made me suspicious of Derek:I saw this as pretty much trying to derail discussion on strager.Derekku Chan wrote:
I'm really sick of all this shit flying back and forth. To sum up how I feel without having to type a 20-page essay, Echo needs to stop being so fucking aggresive. strager has never even played before, and you're throwing every fucking thing in the book at him. We're human. We make mistakes. We slip up. It doesn't mean that strager is the bad guy, and the way that you keep pushing shit at him is really making you look the most suspicious in my book.
I'm finally throwing my vote down.
Vote. Echo.
*goes to lay down because his back is killing him*
If strager is mafia I would probably vote Derek over 0_o (unless something else comes up) if strager is human I would most likely vote for Echo (but I would probably be lynched that next day though)
Too bored...
...I should be worse at being mafia so it's easier to tell when I'm a human.
After rereading, I'm going with adam.Echo wrote:
Derekku, you missed this post. Please answer this question:
Out of adam and 0_o, who would you vote and why?
D=Derekku Chan wrote:
I'm not "buddy buddy" with strager.
I see how far that reasoning went with nardi.Derekku Chan wrote:
In this post, I said that I wasn't suspicious of adam. I said that because he hasn't said a whole lot, but now that I think about it, that only makes him MORE suspicious.
I guess that is true. If I recall his reasoning for voting for me yesterday was because I was suspicious and Echo had a convincing argument.Derekku Chan wrote:
He has hardly backed up any of his claims at all. What started off as a random vote against strager quickly turned into some sort of plan. Every time he has voted for strager, he's acted like strager is just another person instead of scum.
I still don't see how this makes adam a Mafia. Can you try explaining in a different way?Derekku Chan wrote:
If adam is mafia, then this fits. His goal is to eliminate all townies, which makes strager one too (save his possible aux role). I've hardly seen anything useful from adam's posts. 0_o, Echo, SFG, strager, and myself all defend our accusations on others and accusations against ourselves.
nardi barely posted at all. But I meant: Whenever adam posts, it's nothing useful.strager wrote:
I see how far that reasoning went with nardi.
Exactly. adam keeps saying over and over that you're "suspicious", but hasn't backed it up with anything of his own. At least Echo had arguments.strager wrote:
I guess that is true. If I recall his reasoning for voting for me yesterday was because I was suspicious and Echo had a convincing argument.
What I said above in this post =)strager wrote:
I still don't see how this makes adam a Mafia. Can you try explaining in a different way?
I realise I don't know enough about anyone other than you, since I spent too much of yesterday focussing on only one person. I'm just trying to salvage as much information as I can.strager wrote:
Echo, can you please explain yourself as to why you haven't mentioned me today?
Eh, so you're claiming Cop? Because you say you know something about me.Echo wrote:
I realise I don't know enough about anyone other than you, since I spent too much of yesterday focussing on only one person. I'm just trying to salvage as much information as I can.strager wrote:
Echo, can you please explain yourself as to why you haven't mentioned me today?
I'm not. I'm trying to find out why Derekku says he is a Mafia. Maybe I'm just missing something in his logic, but it seems as if he's giving bogus reasoning.Echo wrote:
edit: strager, why are you suddenly so defensive of adam?
That doesn't mean you know unless you trust.Echo wrote:
I never claimed anything of that sort. I know more about you than anyone else because I focussed only on you yesterday?strager wrote:
Eh, so you're claiming Cop? Because you say you know something about me.Echo wrote:
I realise I don't know enough about anyone other than you, since I spent too much of yesterday focussing on only one person. I'm just trying to salvage as much information as I can.
I thought the Doctor can only investigate at Night.0_o wrote:
I don't think Echo is cop; if he was he probably would have investigated you before accusing you all day
Yeah, but why would he have made such a case against you the first day if all he had to do to know for sure was wait till the next day?strager wrote:
I thought the Doctor can only investigate at Night.0_o wrote:
I don't think Echo is cop; if he was he probably would have investigated you before accusing you all day
Thus Echo may have investigated me at Night and saw I was the Doctor, thus getting off my case.
Because he probably isn't the cop. >_> Like strager said, I think cop can only do something at night 1.0_o wrote:
Yeah, but why would he have made such a case against you the first day if all he had to do to know for sure was wait till the next day?strager wrote:
I thought the Doctor can only investigate at Night.0_o wrote:
I don't think Echo is cop; if he was he probably would have investigated you before accusing you all day
Thus Echo may have investigated me at Night and saw I was the Doctor, thus getting off my case.
That's what I saidDerekku Chan wrote:
Because he probably isn't the cop. >_>
I know and I was agreeing with you ^_^0_o wrote:
That's what I saidDerekku Chan wrote:
Because he probably isn't the cop. >_>
He tried to get me killed because he was a Mafia. If I were a Mafia he probably thought I would kill him. In that case, he wouldn't have the chance to use his ability.0_o wrote:
Yeah, but why would he have made such a case against you the first day if all he had to do to know for sure was wait till the next day?strager wrote:
I thought the Doctor can only investigate at Night.0_o wrote:
I don't think Echo is cop; if he was he probably would have investigated you before accusing you all day
Thus Echo may have investigated me at Night and saw I was the Doctor, thus getting off my case.
That still doesn't explain why you think he is a Mafia.Derekku Chan wrote:
@strager: I'm just saying that adam has been using baseless accusations against you other than "you're suspicious".
True, but that makes adam more suspicious / likely to be a Mafia. That doesn't make him a Mafia.Derekku Chan wrote:
@strager: Well, we don't really have anything to go on. Something is better than nothing.
I meant to say, why don't you help me lynch 0_o, if you think he's a Mafia? (I think you misread "with" as "as well as.")Saturos-fangirl wrote:
if you'd bother reading my other posts, 1. i FOS'd 0_o 2. i cant vote for two people at the same time 3. i still think there is a chance that 0_o is some poor misguided human soul.strager wrote:
SFG
viewtopic.php?p=145925#p145925
Genius! But why aren't you voting for 0_o with me, if you think we are both Mafia?
I have to admit I forgot for a second I voted for you (I just recalled my unvote), and I forgot BagelBob was dead. After a reread though I realized I had made a mistake.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
again, if you bother reading my other posts and for that matter some of the things strager says ("HEY lets go accuse SFG of murdering Bobby cus yknow he was TOTALLY attacking her (plus she actually bothers reading and thinking so that makes her dangerous)...oh shit she caught me lets pretend i didnt know i was voting for her *whistle*")
LS disagrees.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
strager is an obvious mafia.
strager wrote:
I have to admit I forgot for a second I voted for you (I just recalled my unvote), and I forgot BagelBob was dead. After a reread though I realized I had made a mistake.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
again, if you bother reading my other posts and for that matter some of the things strager says ("HEY lets go accuse SFG of murdering Bobby cus yknow he was TOTALLY attacking her (plus she actually bothers reading and thinking so that makes her dangerous)...oh shit she caught me lets pretend i didnt know i was voting for her *whistle*")
And how did you "catch me?" The only thing you "caught" me on was a mistake in IRC.
(I don't remember exactly how I forgot, or why; I think I was busy with something else at the time.)
???? explain please!strager wrote:
LS disagrees.
I think LS=LadySubaruSaturos-fangirl wrote:
???? explain please!strager wrote:
LS disagrees.
My post was only regarding Echo; I know this lynch is important, but seeing as all we know about Echo right now is that he is completely against strager, I simply can't come to any conclusions about him yet.SFG wrote:
uhh let me clear this up a bit for you. last game of this ended in three days. THREE. if we don't hit a mafia tonight we'll be LyLo tomorrow and if we dont hit a mafia then either we're all dead. That's what happened last game. Do you want to give the mafia a chance to pick off villagers while we bumble around saying "we need more info!"? strager is an obvious mafia.0_o wrote:
And to strager: I already said before that I haven't counted him out as mafia. It's just right now the only thing I had going against him is his strong conviction that you were mafia (and now I'm starting to wonder myself). I'm waiting for more information, particularly who the next night kills are, and what he has to say about other people besides you.
Yes.0_o wrote:
I think LS=LadySubaruSaturos-fangirl wrote:
???? explain please!strager wrote:
LS disagrees.
One, I never said he was attacking you, just being suspicious of you.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
what im referring to as "catching you" was pointing out that Bobby's posts had nothing to do with attacking me and everything to do with attacking you.
She snuck in an edit.0_o wrote:
EDIT: oh, didn't notice this before
what i mean is, when and where did LS disagree. i KNOW who LS is guyz im not retardedstrager wrote:
Yes.0_o wrote:
I think LS=LadySubaruSaturos-fangirl wrote:
???? explain please!
what i mean is, when and where did LS disagree. i KNOW who LS is guyz im not retardedI assume he means in his role PM?