This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
I defended too, somewhat:Echo wrote:
You're trying to bring suspicion onto someone who is obviously townie. Now why would you do that?
And isn't the point of the game is to present likely possibilities and have others debunk them?strager wrote:
SFG's first vote on me was just a bandwagon vote it seems, because I was the more suspicious.
SFG's second vote on me was a misunderstanding: viewtopic.php?p=141154#p141154
Because nardi hasn't defended himself either. He was at L-1 and still hadn't posted. He may just be a townie that does't give a crap about the game, though. =/Echo wrote:
Can someone explain to me why we just jumped to voting for nardi when strager has been so suspicious and refusing to defend himself?
Yes it is a loss. That's one Night the Mafia has to waste their kill on.Derekku Chan wrote:
But as one of you said: If a townie gets lynched that didn't contribute in the first place, it wouldn't even be a loss. :<
I doubt your Mafia buddy would kill you, and I doubt today we'll lynch you. You'll have your chance to lynch your own friend someday.Echo wrote:
I just fear I won't be around to lynch a mafia :X
That reasoning goes both ways really. That is, he could be a major asset to the Mafia.0_o wrote:
Echo is coming out very strongly this game, and while he does have that level of suspicion, he can also be very useful if he is pro-town. I don't want to lynch him yet because the potential of Echo being a strong asset for the town is greater than my suspicion that he is mafia.
So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
Because you know things we don't I'm more inclined to think you are a Mafia.0_o wrote:
There are a few more specific reasons that I don't want to lynch Echo yet, but I can't say them here because I don't want these reasons to be visible to the mafia.
strager wrote:
That reasoning goes both ways really. That is, he could be a major asset to the Mafia.0_o wrote:
Echo is coming out very strongly this game, and while he does have that level of suspicion, he can also be very useful if he is pro-town. I don't want to lynch him yet because the potential of Echo being a strong asset for the town is greater than my suspicion that he is mafia.
That's true, but again I have other reasons for keeping him around that I can't let the mafia be aware of.So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
If you read my next sentence you would see..You are risky to lynch because of the possibility you are the doctor.0_o wrote:
If it turns out they aren't mafia, it wouldn't be as much of a loss to the town as Echo and strager would if they were pro-town.Because you know things we don't I'm more inclined to think you are a Mafia.0_o wrote:
There are a few more specific reasons that I don't want to lynch Echo yet, but I can't say them here because I don't want these reasons to be visible to the mafia.
Unless you discovered these reasons through real reasoning, of course.
I don't have evidence per se, but theories of how the mafia will behave (not on how they are behaving now). I obviously can't openly discuss these theories, because the mafia of course will see them and act accordingly.
I see that, but it wasn't in that one sentence (only Echo was) so I got a bit suspicious...0_o wrote:
So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
If you read my next sentence you would see..You are risky to lynch because of the possibility you are the doctor.0_o wrote:
If it turns out they aren't mafia, it wouldn't be as much of a loss to the town as Echo and strager would if they were pro-town.
That's because Bagelbob was only asking about Echo, nardi and adam. I just threw you in as another example.strager wrote:
I see that, but it wasn't in that one sentence (only Echo was) so I got a bit suspicious...0_o wrote:
So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
If you read my next sentence you would see..You are risky to lynch because of the possibility you are the doctor.0_o wrote:
If it turns out they aren't mafia, it wouldn't be as much of a loss to the town as Echo and strager would if they were pro-town.
Any ideas on who strager's buddy is?Echo wrote:
I think lynching nardi is a mistake.
I'm inclined to think too. 0_oEcho wrote:
I'm inclined to think 0_o
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
What? Proposing to lynch someone who isn't being grilled is scum tell? So you are saying that one should just agree with what the majority of people are saying... but oh wait, that's bandwagoning. And hey look, isn't that scum tell too?strager wrote:
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
I have to agree, though, and the buddying is kinda annoying. I understand you trust me but we don't have to be friends for that. ;PI'm not trying to be your bff, I'm trying to keep the person who is most likely to be the doctor alive
Actually I made a mistake. I must have misread what you wrote, because I don't really see how that'd be a Scum tell. =S0_o wrote:
What? Proposing to lynch someone who isn't being grilled is scum tell? So you are saying that one should just agree with what the majority of people are saying... but oh wait, that's bandwagoning. And hey look, isn't that scum tell too?strager wrote:
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
Maybe that's what you meant?0_o wrote:
swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
He was exaggerating.BagelBob wrote:
Maybe that's what you meant?0_o wrote:
swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
What are your other reasons? This isn't a reason itself, really. Forum "conversations" are not real-time and anyone may contribute at any time. Just ignore the timestamps.nardi11011 wrote:
2. One of the reasons I don't post too much is because most of the actual "conversations" happen at times when I'm unable to reply. So all I can do is post my opinion after reading everything that has been said, which hasn't changed much.
I'm smart? xDnardi11011 wrote:
My suspicion for strager comes from the fact that while he seems like a smart guy, a lot of his posts have been pretty vague and I think it's stupid to admit your role on the first day.
I don't know why I myselfadam2046 wrote:
Still voting strager
Well, duh, if you think I'm a Mafia. But of course I don't even consider that.adam2046 wrote:
I can think of another~