I am quite definitley not relying on you, first time I heavily suspect you of being Mafia, I will lynch you.
Please remember me IIRCnardi11011 wrote:
QFTEcho wrote:
よろしくおねがいしま~す
like i know what it means
Are you trying to be punny?nardi11011 wrote:
Anyway, I'm keeping my vote on strager as he just seems to be acting too strange to me.
Again, claiming Doctor was a mistake. I didn't mean to "risk dying" by doing it because I didn't mean to do it.nardi11011 wrote:
Especially his very first slip-up doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of his posts, as I don't see why someone would rather risk dying the first night than lie about their role.
Could you explain farther what you mean by "fit in with the rest of his posts"? Also, are you going to be more active, or are we going to see you once every three days?nardi11011 wrote:
Holy shit, 6 pages? I hate timezones. Anyway, I'm keeping my vote on strager as he just seems to be acting too strange to me. Especially his very first slip-up doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of his posts, as I don't see why someone would rather risk dying the first night than lie about their role. I don't see anyone else as overly suspicious, so I'm not changing my vote.
also,QFTEcho wrote:
よろしくおねがいしま~す
like i know what it means
I'm indifferent on whether we lynch nardi or adam, and nardi hasn't said anything that would convince me to change my vote, so for now, my vote stands.BagelBob wrote:
0_o, who are you voting for right now? That last one was only 80% there.
BagelBob was referring to this:0_o wrote:
I'm indifferent on whether we lynch nardi or adam, and nardi hasn't said anything that would convince me to change my vote, so for now, my vote stands.BagelBob wrote:
0_o, who are you voting for right now? That last one was only 80% there.
Please state CLEARLY who you are voting for.0_o wrote:
Funny, that's exactly what someone who is in the mafia would saystrager wrote:
I am not a Mafia.Derekku Chan wrote:
That means you are mafia? :<
vote stra-
lol
I'm not confident enough to vote Echo and I believe SFG is a townie. So I'm fine with either nardi or adam, and since nardi is already on L-2, then well, there you go. I'm not going to split the vote between 2 people who I think should be lynched.0_o wrote:
EDIT: and if you think about it, his theory on strager's bandwagon (Echo, SFG, adam, nardi) does make some sense. Wouldn't you think a mafia member would jump at the chance to lynch the potential doctor? I think it's very likely that both of the mafia members are in that group.
Which actions/posts make you believe that Echo and SFG are townies?0_o wrote:
That vote for you was a joke, I obviously wouldn't defend you this whole time, then vote for you because you said you weren't mafia
And I'm voting for him because as I've already saidI'm not confident enough to vote Echo and I believe SFG is a townie. So I'm fine with either nardi or adam, and since nardi is already on L-2, then well, there you go. I'm not going to split the vote between 2 people who I think should be lynched.0_o wrote:
EDIT: and if you think about it, his theory on strager's bandwagon (Echo, SFG, adam, nardi) does make some sense. Wouldn't you think a mafia member would jump at the chance to lynch the potential doctor? I think it's very likely that both of the mafia members are in that group.
strager answered your question about Echo aboveBagelBob wrote:
Which actions/posts make you believe that Echo and SFG are townies?
They both voted for strager, just like nardi and adam, who you believe is the doctor.
First of all, he's at L-2 - Bagelbob retracted his votestrager wrote:
0_o, IMO voting because of the number of votes on one's head isn't a good idea for a Townie (only a Mafia because a Mafia knows if he's lynching a Townie or not). If you are split between nardi and adam you'll need another reason to vote for one or the other. If you stick to your vote for nardi solely to keep him at L-1 without another reason I'm more incline to believe you are a Mafia. (This is supported by you avoiding voting on Echo.)
BagelBob wrote:
Which actions/posts make you believe that Echo and SFG are townies?
They both voted for strager, just like nardi and adam, who you believe is the doctor.
Well, it is kuu...0_o wrote:
1) I don't think he would quit if he was mafia
I don't see a reason not to lie, other than wanting to be truthful.0_o wrote:
2) why would he lie if he is quitting?
strager wrote:
0_o, IMO voting because of the number of votes on one's head isn't a good idea for a Townie (only a Mafia because a Mafia knows if he's lynching a Townie or not). If you are split between nardi and adam you'll need another reason to vote for one or the other. If you stick to your vote for nardi solely to keep him at L-1 without another reason I'm more incline to believe you are a Mafia. (This is supported by you avoiding voting on Echo.)
Not at the time you voted.0_o wrote:
First of all, he's at L-2 - Bagelbob retracted his vote
Still doesn't mean anything to me. I understand it, but it's definitely not a reason from what I can see.0_o wrote:
I'm not really split between them, I'm indifferent between them. I would be just as happy voting off adam as I would nardi. And since nardi is the more likely candidate right now, it would be pointless to vote for adam since that would just make it more difficult to lynch nardi, whom I believe is just as likely to be mafia as adam.
I hope that made sense?
strager wrote:
Well you're not getting it.Echo wrote:
I would like you to do two things:Echo wrote:
Whereas I've conjured up a single sentence with enough evidence to send you to kingdom come, none of which you've satisfactorily defended against, you've brought none of my posts against me.
- refute my 3 points in the linked post
- attack me with my posts
I defended too, somewhat:Echo wrote:
You're trying to bring suspicion onto someone who is obviously townie. Now why would you do that?
And isn't the point of the game is to present likely possibilities and have others debunk them?strager wrote:
SFG's first vote on me was just a bandwagon vote it seems, because I was the more suspicious.
SFG's second vote on me was a misunderstanding: viewtopic.php?p=141154#p141154
Because nardi hasn't defended himself either. He was at L-1 and still hadn't posted. He may just be a townie that does't give a crap about the game, though. =/Echo wrote:
Can someone explain to me why we just jumped to voting for nardi when strager has been so suspicious and refusing to defend himself?
Yes it is a loss. That's one Night the Mafia has to waste their kill on.Derekku Chan wrote:
But as one of you said: If a townie gets lynched that didn't contribute in the first place, it wouldn't even be a loss. :<
I doubt your Mafia buddy would kill you, and I doubt today we'll lynch you. You'll have your chance to lynch your own friend someday.Echo wrote:
I just fear I won't be around to lynch a mafia :X
That reasoning goes both ways really. That is, he could be a major asset to the Mafia.0_o wrote:
Echo is coming out very strongly this game, and while he does have that level of suspicion, he can also be very useful if he is pro-town. I don't want to lynch him yet because the potential of Echo being a strong asset for the town is greater than my suspicion that he is mafia.
So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
Because you know things we don't I'm more inclined to think you are a Mafia.0_o wrote:
There are a few more specific reasons that I don't want to lynch Echo yet, but I can't say them here because I don't want these reasons to be visible to the mafia.
strager wrote:
That reasoning goes both ways really. That is, he could be a major asset to the Mafia.0_o wrote:
Echo is coming out very strongly this game, and while he does have that level of suspicion, he can also be very useful if he is pro-town. I don't want to lynch him yet because the potential of Echo being a strong asset for the town is greater than my suspicion that he is mafia.
That's true, but again I have other reasons for keeping him around that I can't let the mafia be aware of.So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
If you read my next sentence you would see..You are risky to lynch because of the possibility you are the doctor.0_o wrote:
If it turns out they aren't mafia, it wouldn't be as much of a loss to the town as Echo and strager would if they were pro-town.Because you know things we don't I'm more inclined to think you are a Mafia.0_o wrote:
There are a few more specific reasons that I don't want to lynch Echo yet, but I can't say them here because I don't want these reasons to be visible to the mafia.
Unless you discovered these reasons through real reasoning, of course.
I don't have evidence per se, but theories of how the mafia will behave (not on how they are behaving now). I obviously can't openly discuss these theories, because the mafia of course will see them and act accordingly.
I see that, but it wasn't in that one sentence (only Echo was) so I got a bit suspicious...0_o wrote:
So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
If you read my next sentence you would see..You are risky to lynch because of the possibility you are the doctor.0_o wrote:
If it turns out they aren't mafia, it wouldn't be as much of a loss to the town as Echo and strager would if they were pro-town.
That's because Bagelbob was only asking about Echo, nardi and adam. I just threw you in as another example.strager wrote:
I see that, but it wasn't in that one sentence (only Echo was) so I got a bit suspicious...0_o wrote:
So there isn't much rick in lynching me either?0_o wrote:
Now adam and nardi on the other hand, haven't been contributing a whole lot to the game, so as opposed to the case with Echo, there isn't much risk in lynching them.
If you read my next sentence you would see..You are risky to lynch because of the possibility you are the doctor.0_o wrote:
If it turns out they aren't mafia, it wouldn't be as much of a loss to the town as Echo and strager would if they were pro-town.
Any ideas on who strager's buddy is?Echo wrote:
I think lynching nardi is a mistake.
I'm inclined to think too. 0_oEcho wrote:
I'm inclined to think 0_o
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
What? Proposing to lynch someone who isn't being grilled is scum tell? So you are saying that one should just agree with what the majority of people are saying... but oh wait, that's bandwagoning. And hey look, isn't that scum tell too?strager wrote:
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
I have to agree, though, and the buddying is kinda annoying. I understand you trust me but we don't have to be friends for that. ;PI'm not trying to be your bff, I'm trying to keep the person who is most likely to be the doctor alive
Actually I made a mistake. I must have misread what you wrote, because I don't really see how that'd be a Scum tell. =S0_o wrote:
What? Proposing to lynch someone who isn't being grilled is scum tell? So you are saying that one should just agree with what the majority of people are saying... but oh wait, that's bandwagoning. And hey look, isn't that scum tell too?strager wrote:
But that's an obvious Scum tell, if you're carefully read (and since you don't have TOO many posts I wouldn't think it'd be difficult to read).0_o wrote:
Sure I would try to keep him alive, but I would do it passively by pushing someone else, not by swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
Maybe that's what you meant?0_o wrote:
swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
He was exaggerating.BagelBob wrote:
Maybe that's what you meant?0_o wrote:
swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
What are your other reasons? This isn't a reason itself, really. Forum "conversations" are not real-time and anyone may contribute at any time. Just ignore the timestamps.nardi11011 wrote:
2. One of the reasons I don't post too much is because most of the actual "conversations" happen at times when I'm unable to reply. So all I can do is post my opinion after reading everything that has been said, which hasn't changed much.
I'm smart? xDnardi11011 wrote:
My suspicion for strager comes from the fact that while he seems like a smart guy, a lot of his posts have been pretty vague and I think it's stupid to admit your role on the first day.
I don't know why I myselfadam2046 wrote:
Still voting strager
Well, duh, if you think I'm a Mafia. But of course I don't even consider that.adam2046 wrote:
I can think of another~
No, I didn't look at yours. ;Padam2046 wrote:
I hope you're looking at the right PM...
BagelBob wrote:
Echo wrote:
edit:
note to everyone: I've probably made just as many posts as strager has. If I can pick holes in strager's arguments and claims, then any lies, inconsistencies or logical fallacies I've made should also be just as evident. I encourage you to through and confirm or deny, for yourself, the authenticity of my train of thought.
Well, if you insist.
Echo wrote:
So now you're admitting cop? General rule: first to mention cop in any way is cop themselves.
I was going to vote you now, but since you're suggesting you're cop now, I'll let you defend yourself first.
I've never heard of this rule. Furthermore, I feel as though you're putting words in his mouth. He never claimed to be the cop, and you were the first person who said he was the doc.
Also, I'd like to point out.
Echo wrote:
First, you claim an important role.
viewtopic.php?p=139874#p139874
Echo wrote:
Firstly, strager never claimed doctor.
viewtopic.php?p=139897#p139897
Echo wrote:
First, I suggested that strager was doctor, to which he immediately confirmed.
viewtopic.php?p=140180#p140180
Thus, I repeat
BagelBob wrote:
Echo, could you point me to where strager claims?
However, I don't want to give the wrong idea. I agree with most of the things you've said about strager(one disagreement is that when he gives up, you think that's more scummy while I think it doesn't show anything but fatigue while another is that I'd like to give him more credit than doubt for backing off his claim that he should consider adam town for the day rather than have him continue pushing that adam is still town). But everything else looks right on the money.
I'd also like to add
strager wrote:
Saying I am defending myself (however implicitly) is baseless. So I'll completely disregard your attacks on my defense.
That statement both implies that you were not defending yourself and states that you have a defense.
Oh, and Derekuu-Chan, this is a summery, not a suspicion list. However, I feel that I should apologize. I forgot that sarcasm can't be conveyed over the internets.
When I said before
BagelBob wrote:
I Vote Kuu for lying! This is NO wolf game!
It was in response to
kuu wrote:
I FORGOT AM I INVITED HERE---OH RIGHT IT'S THE WOLF GAME IM NOT IN.
Where I meant to show that kuu was lying about being in the game. Trying to stay low on the radar or just being kuu? I'll never know.
And any parodies I do are for my own amusement. If they should happen to point out a newbie mistake that could be a scum-tell, so be it.
BagelBob wrote:
First, I want to finish up what I started.
I believe this is the full list concerning the doktor.
s: The Doctor PM says "If your protection is successful" -- does this mean the protection can fail? Or does it mean that the protection fails if the Mafia did not target the person you targeted?
E: Doesn't that mean you're doctor >.>
E: dammit WHY do the doctors always need to expose themselves on the first day?
s: D= I didn't mean to.
E: strager hasn't even role claimed - I said he was doctor
D: Sounds like he confirmed it to me. >_>
E: That's not a claim, it's a passing suggestion.
E: First, you claim an important role.
E: Firstly, strager never claimed doctor. He just went with what I said. The real doctor would have tried to cover it up. strager, on the other hand, admitted it straight away.
E: First, I suggested that strager was doctor, to which he immediately confirmed. The real doctor wouldn't have wanted to expose himself - he'd die night 1 and the whole town would be in a bit of trouble.
BB: Echo, could you post where strager role claims?
E: viewtopic.php?p=139263#p139263 (s: D= I didn't mean to.)
When I say he "claimed" doctor, I was referring to this incident in the post above. I merely suggested he was doctor, and he "claimed" it by saying he "didn't mean to". As (I think) I've pointed out before, strager didn't claim doctor explicitly, which is what I mean by him not "claiming" doctor.
What I learned from all of this is that I didn't read thoroughly enough. It turns out that that second time that Echo says firstly, he expands it to say that he did admit the claim soon. The only part that isn't exactly consistent now is "That's not a claim, it's a passing suggestion", but that's negligible.
Result: strager has claimed to be the doc (by which I mean that I won't say it's too suspicious)
Also, FOS, is a Finger of Suspicion. It's a way of saying that you think someone is a candidate for lynching, but not as strong as a vote.(feel free to say I'm wrong about the weight, Echo, you are the one who used it)
strager wrote:
By the "defense" I meant Echo accusing me of using my role claim as a Doctor to defend myself. I didn't mean defending myself against his arguments.
This confuses me so much, I'll probably end up dropping it unless I can make sense of it when I wake up.
I don't know where you got the idea that I think having the doktor role-claim on the first day is a good idea. I distinctly remember saying "I dislike role claims", and you first quoting me about it, then doing an analysis earlier. Seriously, short term- Hey look, a butterfly!
However, I do like the idea of a fake-claim of the doktor, like I thought Suburu and kuu were doing in WW2. I've seen it work before, and I know it has the potential to be really great.
strager wrote:
----------
Echo seems to be super defensive of adam in his latest next-to-latest post. Why? I'm not pointing my finger at him.
I re-read that post and I don't think Echo is being even slightly defensive of adam.
In fact, he says specifically "None of adam's posts in any way indicate that he is townie"
I don't know how you came up with this, would you care to explain?
lulz @ adam for the Monty Python reference
I still consider strager my major suspect at the moment, and I don't see the reasons why Echo is backing off.
However, I think we still have ~6 days left to decide things, so I'm not ready to lynch him yet. I'd really like to hear a bit more from SFG(with her amazing 1 post), Olinad(with double that), and nardii(with a record 3) before doing anything that can't be reversed.
strager wrote:
Damnit, I think I made a mistake.
I know someone was questioning SFG, but I guess it wasn't BagelBob.
Unvote until I find out who it was (or I'm convinced to vote for someone else).
Sorry for the confusion. I don't drink but something must have happened. =S I'll be quiet now.#forumshit wrote:
19:33 < SFG|Rh> hey Subi can i ask BagelBob if i summarized his posts correctly or is that a no-no
19:33 < strager|irc> SFG|Rh: In M2?
19:33 < SFG|Rh> yeah
19:33 < BagelBob> and can I ask who the mafiosi are?
19:33 < BagelBob> I'm dead anyway
19:33 < strager|irc> SFG|Rh: As long as no one notices you misquoted everything you're fine =]
19:33 < strager|irc> SFG|Rh: Misquotes (intentional or not) are legal if that's what you're asking
19:33 < SFG|Rh> misquoted everything?
19:33 < strager|irc> Was kidding
19:34 < SFG|Rh> i was gonna say
19:34 < strager|irc> Not sure why you would think it'd be illegal otherwise though
19:34 < SFG|Rh> how do you misquote with ctrl-v
19:34 < BagelBob> I was gonna say, discussion needs to take place in the thread
19:34 < SFG|Rh> because Bobby is dead
19:34 < BagelBob> Oops, sorry adam
19:34 < BagelBob> I need to kill a "Spirit Dragon"
19:34 < BagelBob> I think spirit implies that it's already dead
19:34 < adam2046> oh
19:34 < LadySuburu> Yeah, you can't ask bobby. If you did something wrong leave it to the others to find it and
point it out
19:34 < LadySuburu> lol
19:34 < adam2046> <caps>motherfucker!</caps>
19:35 < strager|irc> Oh BagelBob's dead?
19:35 < adam2046> runningrunningruninng
19:35 < LadySuburu> @strager: Did you skip the deathscene entirely?
19:35 < strager|irc> eh?
19:35 < LadySuburu> Did you even notice D1 ended?
19:35 < LadySuburu> and N1?
19:35 < BagelBob> fasdf
19:35 < strager|irc> x___________x
19:36 < strager|irc> lol apparently I used his death as an excuse to vote for SFG
19:36 < strager|irc> wtf xD
19:36 < strager|irc> I don't even remember that
19:36 < strager|irc> gah
19:36 < SFG|Rh> of course
19:36 < strager|irc> Well I don't remember voting for him
19:36 < SFG|Rh> strager is digging his hole deeper and deeper
19:37 < strager|irc> I saw your post SFG
19:37 < SFG|Rh> i just posted again
19:37 < strager|irc> yeah saw
#forumshit wrote:
19:39 < SFG|Rh> if strager isnt mafia ill eat my hat
This was directed at strager in response to him misreading/misquoting a post of mine (not an attack)Bagelbob wrote:
0_o wrote:
swooping to his rescue whenever someone makes an assusation.
Maybe that's what you meant?
i was summarizing his intent in each post. i didnt include responses because the point of all that was to analyze the Bobbys-eye-view of the game. Which happened to be pointing straight at straiger when he died, despite strangers insistance that he wanted to kill ME0_o wrote:
I think I've been slightly misrepresented by SFG's analysis, since it doesn't include answers to his comments/"accusations", and if you look through I've had perfectly legitimate responses to all of his questions.
I didn't insist.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
despite strangers insistance that he wanted to kill ME
And a response:strager wrote:
BagelBob was most suspicious of SFG, which may mean SFG killed him.
SFG may have mistaken me by 0_o's comment.0_o wrote:
I can't find anywhere where Bagelbob attacks SFG.. link/quote?
I don't.0_o wrote:
But yeah, anyway
vote adam
and you all know why by now
I don't either.adam2046 wrote:
I don't.0_o wrote:
But yeah, anyway
vote adam
and you all know why by now
maybe b/c adam and nardi were supposedly mafia mates? innostrager wrote:
I don't either.adam2046 wrote:
I don't.0_o wrote:
But yeah, anyway
vote adam
and you all know why by now
Uh, what?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
maybe b/c adam and nardi were supposedly mafia mates? inno
and now nardi's gone. who does that leave?0_o wrote:
And I'm voting for nardi because as I've already saidI'm not confident enough to vote Echo and I believe SFG is a townie. So I'm fine with either nardi or adam, and since nardi is already on L-2, then well, there you go. I'm not going to split the vote between 2 people who I think should be lynched.0_o wrote:
EDIT: and if you think about it, his theory on strager's bandwagon (Echo, SFG, adam, nardi) does make some sense. Wouldn't you think a mafia member would jump at the chance to lynch the potential doctor? I think it's very likely that both of the mafia members are in that group.
0_o, adam, Derekku, Echo, Olinad, SFG, strager. BagelBob's gone too.0_o wrote:
and now nardi's gone. who does that leave?
woah, what? where did that come from?strager wrote:
Unvote
Vote: 0_o
0_o wrote:
woah, what? where did that come from?strager wrote:
Unvote
Vote: 0_o
0_o wrote:
Oh come on, if I were mafia with him I wouldn't have made my defence of him so obvious. Although again, I've already gone through this here.
I would really like to hear from strager right now, cause I'm really starting to have doubts about my entire thought process about him... if he really was the doctor then why would he target the person who believes (or believed) him the most?
Echo wrote:
I'd like to know what derekku and sfg think about voting for adam and 0_o. If you can, present some sort of argument for who you would vote for and why.
I saw this as pretty much trying to derail discussion on strager.Derekku Chan wrote:
I'm really sick of all this shit flying back and forth. To sum up how I feel without having to type a 20-page essay, Echo needs to stop being so fucking aggresive. strager has never even played before, and you're throwing every fucking thing in the book at him. We're human. We make mistakes. We slip up. It doesn't mean that strager is the bad guy, and the way that you keep pushing shit at him is really making you look the most suspicious in my book.
I'm finally throwing my vote down.
Vote. Echo.
*goes to lay down because his back is killing him*
the reason adam and nardi were under heightened suspicion in the first place was because of strager's bandwagon theory - a point which is entirely moot now that i know that strager is mafia and nardi is not. i also, i must confess, have not gone back to do a post study of adam to try and move him back off of the default suspicion again. perhaps i should do that after church.Echo wrote:
My mistake, fixed. So you would pick 0_o over adam? Can you show me what makes you think that adam must be paired with nardi?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
for that matter, its 4 to lynch and strager has 2 votes - doesnt that put him on L-2?
Mind posting some quotes? I may have restated a few points, but I don't recall making any "emotional arguments"?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Furthermore unlike most other people who defended strager with logic and basic mafia concepts (me, BagelBob, etc.) he generally either restated points or went with sort of emotional arguments?
0_o wrote:
Mind posting some quotes? I may have restated a few points, but I don't recall making any "emotional arguments"?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Furthermore unlike most other people who defended strager with logic and basic mafia concepts (me, BagelBob, etc.) he generally either restated points or went with sort of emotional arguments?
Echo asked me what i thought about adam. what ive said is basically that i dont particularly suspect him but i also havent done my research on him yetDerekku wrote:
SFG - Has also been pointing towards adam for no reason. I must be missing something here. -_-
I didn't cover myself up because that'd be a Mafia tell I think.Olinad wrote:
*) strager looks suspicious, but I think he only made a mistake at the beginning and then thought that not claiming as the doctor would be even worse than doing it.
Confusion is encouraged by the Mafia I believe. I know I've been confusing but that's by my nature I guess. (If you've spoke to me IRL...) Staying away from the confusion ... I don't know how to take that myself. Whatever; this part doesn't lead me anywhere.Olinad wrote:
*) Derekku isn't posting much, but well, even I am not posting much but that doesn't mean I'm part of the mafia... And even not helping the train of thought can lead to mafia, as he could simply be hiding as he has an aux role or not knowing what to say as he's confused (as I am actually! XD). So I guess I have no motivation to vote for him.
In his defense he really hasn't been attacked with a convincing argument.Olinad wrote:
*) Echo is always a big question mark in my head. I have no idea of what his role could be, as he's always attacking and really rarely defending. So... I dunno, really
Indeed; see below.Olinad wrote:
*) SFG seems too resolutive. Simplyfing things is good but could lead to mistakes... and jumping to conclusions about strager and 0_o being Mafia is too much I guess.
Neither I but he seems to be arousing confusion a bit, though I just think he's being playful.adam wrote:
*) dunno what to say about adam ATM, I'll read the topic more carefully and point smth out but I don't see him as really suspicious
Nothing else to say for him?0_o wrote:
*) No idea about 0_o either - I won't hide I think he may be Mafia, but I'm not really sure as others are.
lol at point 1.Derekku Chan wrote:
I haven't been posting a lot because 1) I've been busy IRL 2) I haven't really had much to say.
He defends me because he believes me. He also believes in my bandwagon theory, as he has stated, and is most of the reason he's voting for adam.Derekku Chan wrote:
0_o - Keeps pointing fingers at adam for no reason; Defends strager; I don't understand this.
Hmm, I wonder who pushed the vote on nardi for that.Derekku Chan wrote:
Olinad - Hasn't posted a whole lot, so I really don't what to make of him. One reason I thought nardi was scum was because he didn't post much, but we know how far that went...
What hasn't been suspicious about adam, really? He's said a whole lot of nothing lately, IMO.Derekku Chan wrote:
adam - I really see nothing suspicious about adam, but he hasn't said a whole lot either. Please post more =) inb4youtwoaremafiatogetherandyou'redefendinghimyouscum
"So yes, I have a different opinion than Echo, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna vote for him. Personally I'd rather wait a day and see what happens; some of your posts have been a little strange (hereby suspicious) but the fact that you might be (and probably are) the doctor is keeping me from voting for you."iirc this was in response to strager wondering why I wasn't voting Echo when I was defending him. And it's true, I thought Echo was wrong about strager, but just because I don't agree with someone's reasoning doesn't necessarily mean I think they are mafia.
"ok, as of now the only 2 people i haven't "diagnosed" in my mind as pro-town is adam2046 and nardi."I'll admit, there wasn't a lot (or any) of hard evidence here. It was the first day, and we didn't have a lot to go on (and I already said I wasn't voting strager). So yes, this was mainly random/instincts.
"Well I said before that I was thinking either you or nardi, and from the general feel of your posts I just started to lean towards you. It's the first day and there isn't a lot of evidence from anyone to go on, so for today I'm just playing by my gut"Pretty much this
Can you respond to what I said elsewhere in that post you responded to?0_o wrote:
It's just right now the only thing I had going against him is his strong conviction that you were mafia (and now I'm starting to wonder myself). I'm waiting for more information, particularly who the next night kills are, and what he has to say about other people besides you.
strager wrote:
Today Echo doesn't seem to have been suspicious of me at all, whereas yesterday he was crazy about me.
Just because he hasn't mentioned you yet doesn't mean he isn't suspicious of you anymore. I think right now he's just trying to get information from everyone else, since we've been so focused on you so far.strager wrote:
Today Echo doesn't seem to have been suspicious of me at all, whereas yesterday he was crazy about me.