nardi barely posted at all. But I meant: Whenever adam posts, it's nothing useful.strager wrote:
I see how far that reasoning went with nardi.
Exactly. adam keeps saying over and over that you're "suspicious", but hasn't backed it up with anything of his own. At least Echo had arguments.strager wrote:
I guess that is true. If I recall his reasoning for voting for me yesterday was because I was suspicious and Echo had a convincing argument.
What I said above in this post =)strager wrote:
I still don't see how this makes adam a Mafia. Can you try explaining in a different way?