You're also starting to quote wrong.
strager wrote:
adam2046 wrote:
Oh, and with regards to adam's vote before:
strager wrote:
adam2046 wrote:
Oh, and with regards to adam's vote before:
Later, strager confirms that he convinced himself adam is townie after I pointed out a contradiction in his posts (bold added my me):strager wrote:
D= I didn't mean to.Echo wrote:
But if you weren't the doctor, you wouldn't care.
dammit WHY do the doctors always need to expose themselves on the first day?
But at this point, adam had only made 4 posts, two of which (here and here) were trash posts directed at strager and kuwarudo respectively, while his first post was a random vote and his latest post at this point was this one:strager wrote:
I meant to say I wasn't convinced by someone else. Sorry.Echo wrote:
strager wrote:
So I think it's safe to say he does believe I am the Mafia and he is not. That is, I am clearing adam's name as a suspect Mafia for me.Read that and tell me you never said you weren't convinced. You were absolutely totally completely convinced in the first quote that adam is not mafia.strager wrote:
I never said I was convinced he wasn't Mafia.
This post is either suspicious because adam made a vote with no evidence, or could be counted as a random early vote post.adam2046 wrote:
I have only found strager suspicious and more suspicious.
I vote Stra-oh I already did that ^_^
Now he's backing out of the claim!strager wrote:
So actually by writing all this I see my claim that adam is on my team [townie] is probably wrong, and Echo is right in questioning my reasoning.
He has a point, maybe we should lynch him tomorrow!adam2046 wrote:
Umm, I'll try...
le'see, I could be mafia and strager could be saying I'm definitley human because we are both mafia together?
That's about the only thing I feel like picking at.
To someone with not a lot of experience I believe this would seem like a perfectly legitimate argument; the mafia wouldn't vote to lynch someone who they were going to kill at night anyway. Again, being a new player, he wouldn't get the idea of random voting and would attempt to analyze every action that is made, regardless of how small.strager wrote:
Indeed, which makes adam somewhat suspect because he is voting for me. Then again, if he were the Mafia, he'd kill me anyway. So I think it's safe to say he does believe I am the Mafia and he is not. That is, I am clearing adam's name as a suspect Mafia for me.
Well he says right there in the quote that he backed out because of your arguments, and while you may take that as being wishy-washy, I think it's just as reasonable to say that he changed his mind because your arguments convinced him that adam might not be as innocent as he thought.Echo wrote:
Now he's backing out of the claim!strager wrote:
So actually by writing all this I see my claim that adam is on my team [townie] is probably wrong, and Echo is right in questioning my reasoning.
Oops, I meant to put 0_o as the author of that. Sorry. >_< I was tired.adam2046 wrote:
You're also starting to quote wrong.strager wrote:
adam2046 wrote:
Oh, and with regards to adam's vote before:
I basically said I changed my mind. I myself realized that such random voting brings about some if's which cannot be backed or anything. However, his persistence in his vote made me confused, making me think he was a "Townie." Now I think he may be a Mafia but I want to stick with my unbased believe that adam is not a Mafia.Echo wrote:
Finally, the coup de grâce (in the same post):Now he's backing out of the claim!strager wrote:
So actually by writing all this I see my claim that adam is on my team [townie] is probably wrong, and Echo is right in questioning my reasoning.
If anything, that final backing out solidifies my argument.
Well, if you insist.Echo wrote:
edit:
note to everyone: I've probably made just as many posts as strager has. If I can pick holes in strager's arguments and claims, then any lies, inconsistencies or logical fallacies I've made should also be just as evident. I encourage you to through and confirm or deny, for yourself, the authenticity of my train of thought.
I've never heard of this rule. Furthermore, I feel as though you're putting words in his mouth. He never claimed to be the cop, and you were the first person who said he was the doc.Echo wrote:
So now you're admitting cop? General rule: first to mention cop in any way is cop themselves.
I was going to vote you now, but since you're suggesting you're cop now, I'll let you defend yourself first.
http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=139874#p139874Echo wrote:
First, you claim an important role.
http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=139897#p139897Echo wrote:
Firstly, strager never claimed doctor.
http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=140180#p140180Echo wrote:
First, I suggested that strager was doctor, to which he immediately confirmed.
BagelBob wrote:
Echo, could you point me to where strager claims?
That statement both implies that you were not defending yourself and states that you have a defense.strager wrote:
Saying I am defending myself (however implicitly) is baseless. So I'll completely disregard your attacks on my defense.
It was in response toBagelBob wrote:
I Vote Kuu for lying! This is NO wolf game!
Where I meant to show that kuu was lying about being in the game. Trying to stay low on the radar or just being kuu? I'll never know.kuu wrote:
I FORGOT AM I INVITED HERE---OH RIGHT IT'S THE WOLF GAME IM NOT IN.
viewtopic.php?p=139263#p139263BagelBob wrote:
Echo, could you point me to where strager claims?
Yeah that's what I meant. I seriously need to stop posting after midnight. My brain just doesn't work right.BagelBob wrote:
Oh, and Derekku-Chan, this is a summary, not a suspicion list. However, I feel that I should apologize. I forgot that sarcasm can't be conveyed over the internets.
The last comment about "strager can go on day 2" means Echo suspects either I am not the Doctor or he is a Mafia (or both, but I doubt that).Echo wrote:
ISeriously, forget what I said about not bringing personal issues into the game; vote Kuwarudo. strager can go on day 2.
Also here, it is clear Echo doesn't believe I am the Doctor:BagelBob wrote:
Also, I'd like to point out.http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=139874#p139874Echo wrote:
First, you claim an important role.http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=139897#p139897Echo wrote:
Firstly, strager never claimed doctor.http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=140180#p140180Echo wrote:
First, I suggested that strager was doctor, to which he immediately confirmed.
Thus, I repeatBagelBob wrote:
Echo, could you point me to where strager claims?
Another:Echo wrote:
There's no reason for townies to claim aux roles. "Drawing attention" away from the real aux roles almost never works. The only people with reason to claim an aux role are either wolves or the real aux role.strager wrote:
Eh? Is that a rule, or are you stating a general trend?Echo wrote:
Villagers don't lie about aux roles.
There is an exception, of course, when it's all planned out, but you can't talk behind the scenes in this game so you can't use someone else as a substitute and act through them to protect yourself.
Why would he twist my statement into a role claim for a Cop but not believe my role claim for a Doctor? I know you don't think I'm a Cop and you're trying to confuse us.Echo wrote:
So now you're admitting cop? General rule: first to mention cop in any way is cop themselves.strager wrote:
I see, that's something you've learned from experience? I'll keep that in mind for the next games I play, and even this game when the Cop shows up (if there even is a Cop; see my post a few pages back).
I was going to vote you now, but since you're suggesting you're cop now, I'll let you defend yourself first.
Which contradicts:Echo wrote:
That's not a claim, it's a passing suggestion.
----------Echo wrote:
First, I suggested that strager was doctor, to which he immediately confirmed.
0_o wrote:
I don't really find nardi particularly suspicious, it's just that everyone else just seems innocent
0_o wrote:
as much as kuwarudo's posts can be annoying/pointless, I'm inclined to believe him in his villager claim, and I don't want to lynch a townie just so I don't have to skip over some useless posts. So (sorry) unvote Kuwarudo
0_o seems to stay away from the fray, even though he encourages it. He slips under the radar in most of his posts.0_o wrote:
I just don't have enough to go on to vote anyone right now, we need people to talk so we can get to know them and base decisions off of their arguments.
He doesn't state how he came to this conclusion and how he ruled out anyone as being pro-Town.0_o wrote:
ok, as of now the only 2 people i haven't "diagnosed" in my mind as pro-town is adam2046 and nardi.
True, but 0_o has posted about absolutely nothing as well.Echo wrote:
derekku has posted about absolutely nothing. All the so-called votes he's pointing out as "suspicious" are random votes made at the start of the game.
I can't change my mind? If everything were set in stone this game wouldn't be fun. You may see I seem like a hypocrite because I mentioned Echo's indecisiveness, but this is different. Rather than jumping around some ideas like Echo has to try and put up a convincing argument, I stated that I changed my views because of a valid argument. How is my case wrong?Echo wrote:
Finally, the coup de grâce (in the same post):Now he's backing out of the claim!strager wrote:
So actually by writing all this I see my claim that adam is on my team [townie] is probably wrong, and Echo is right in questioning my reasoning.
By the "defense" I meant Echo accusing me of using my role claim as a Doctor to defend myself. I didn't mean defending myself against his arguments.BagelBob wrote:
I'd also like to addThat statement both implies that you were not defending yourself and states that you have a defense.strager wrote:
Saying I am defending myself (however implicitly) is baseless. So I'll completely disregard your attacks on my defense.
And BagelBob's response:Echo wrote:
There's no reason for townies to claim aux roles. "Drawing attention" away from the real aux roles almost never works. The only people with reason to claim an aux role are either wolves or the real aux role.strager wrote:
Eh? Is that a rule, or are you stating a general trend?Echo wrote:
Villagers don't lie about aux roles.
Echo shows that a certain strategy won't work for the Town, and BagelBob says it does. Echo also probably doesn't believe I am the Doctor (see first part of this post), and thus thinks I am "drawing attention away from the real aux roles." He is thus stating a plan will fail, and tries to fail that plan. More reason to suspect Echo is a Mafia.BagelBob wrote:
Oh, and I have to disagree with you on that matter. A fake-claim by a town could work out nicely. I certainly don't think that's what's happening here, but I could see it working.
As for putting you on cop: I didn't (and still don't) believe you are doctor. Thus, since you so eagerly claimed doctor, when I don't think you are, your reluctance to mention anything to do with the cop after I suggested it makes me think there's something more to that.Echo wrote:
viewtopic.php?p=139263#p139263BagelBob wrote:
Echo, could you point me to where strager claims?
When I say he "claimed" doctor, I was referring to this incident in the post above. I merely suggested he was doctor, and he "claimed" it by saying he "didn't mean to". As (I think) I've pointed out before, strager didn't claim doctor explicitly, which is what I mean by him not "claiming" doctor.
I don't believe you there.Echo wrote:
I've explained why I've been mixing and matching "claim" and "didn't claim" here:Echo wrote:
viewtopic.php?p=139263#p139263BagelBob wrote:
Echo, could you point me to where strager claims?
When I say he "claimed" doctor, I was referring to this incident in the post above. I merely suggested he was doctor, and he "claimed" it by saying he "didn't mean to". As (I think) I've pointed out before, strager didn't claim doctor explicitly, which is what I mean by him not "claiming" doctor.
0_o already has for me:Echo wrote:
As for putting you on cop: I didn't (and still don't) believe you are doctor. Thus, since you so eagerly claimed doctor, when I don't think you are, your reluctance to mention anything to do with the cop after I suggested it makes me think there's something more to that.
If you want me to explain why I mentioned the Cop, here's why.0_o wrote:
And how exactly does mentioning the cop imply that he's claiming cop??
Why I mentioned the Cop is simple: he must exist assuming my conclusion on which roles are in the game is correct. Thus, I would use your knowledge that role-claiming is disadvantageous for a Town player, and advantageous for the Cop himself and a Mafia.strager wrote:
I see, that's something you've learned from experience? I'll keep that in mind for the next games I play, and even this game when the Cop shows up (if there even is a Cop; see my post a few pages back).Echo wrote:
There's no reason for townies to claim aux roles. "Drawing attention" away from the real aux roles almost never works. The only people with reason to claim an aux role are either wolves or the real aux role.strager wrote:
Echo write: Villagers don't lie about aux roles. (Nested quote limit, sorry.)
Eh? Is that a rule, or are you stating a general trend?
There is an exception, of course, when it's all planned out, but you can't talk behind the scenes in this game so you can't use someone else as a substitute and act through them to protect yourself.
strager wrote:
0_o seems to be very forgiving, and I'm not sure how to take this.Well (at the time I wrote this at least) there was simply no one who set off any warning bells in my mind.0_o wrote:
I don't really find nardi particularly suspicious, it's just that everyone else just seems innocentI voted for him because he was being annoying, saying he wanted to quit because he was a townie changed my mind; if he was threatening to quit (which he did) why would he lie?0_o wrote:
as much as kuwarudo's posts can be annoying/pointless, I'm inclined to believe him in his villager claim, and I don't want to lynch a townie just so I don't have to skip over some useless posts. So (sorry) unvote Kuwarudo0_o seems to stay away from the fray, even though he encourages it. He slips under the radar in most of his posts.0_o wrote:
I just don't have enough to go on to vote anyone right now, we need people to talk so we can get to know them and base decisions off of their arguments.
erm, what? Besides you and Echo I'm pretty sure I've contributed the most to this game out of the players so far. Though granted most of my posts have been on the topic of keeping you aroundHe doesn't state how he came to this conclusion and how he ruled out anyone as being pro-Town.0_o wrote:
ok, as of now the only 2 people i haven't "diagnosed" in my mind as pro-town is adam2046 and nardi.
"Diagnosed" was in quotations because it was mainly just my instincts/first impressions of the 2 or 3 posts each person (again, besides you and Echo) made so far. It definitely isn't "official", it's just those were the two people who when I read through made me go "mm, I dunno about this guy..."
Do you really think it's that hard to keep track of saying whether you claimed doctor or not, unless there was a reason behind mixing claim with not claim?strager wrote:
I don't believe you there.Echo wrote:
I've explained why I've been mixing and matching "claim" and "didn't claim" here:Echo wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=139263#p139263
When I say he "claimed" doctor, I was referring to this incident in the post above. I merely suggested he was doctor, and he "claimed" it by saying he "didn't mean to". As (I think) I've pointed out before, strager didn't claim doctor explicitly, which is what I mean by him not "claiming" doctor.
You're drawing conclusions from Suburu's pregame story now? Any one of the four combinations are possible. There is absolutely no way you can tell which combination is being used in the game. Don't even try to go there.strager wrote:
Why I mentioned the Cop is simple: he must exist assuming my conclusion on which roles are in the game is correct. Thus, I would use your knowledge that role-claiming is disadvantageous for a Town player, and advantageous for the Cop himself and a Mafia.
It's never good to role claim on the first day, when there's nothing you can do to prove or disprove the claim. And since you can't talk outside the thread, you can't use it to convince anyone anyway.strager wrote:
However, in my previous post I have stated that BagelBob believes claiming Doctor is a good idea, so this may apply to the Cop but I am not sure.
Uh...Echo wrote:
Do you really think it's that hard to keep track of saying whether you claimed doctor or not, unless there was a reason behind mixing claim with not claim?
I was explaining that my mention of a Cop was NOT a role claim and I was assuming my prediction near the beginning of the game was correct for this reason, and only this reason.Echo wrote:
You're drawing conclusions from Suburu's pregame story now? Any one of the four combinations are possible. There is absolutely no way you can tell which combination is being used in the game. Don't even try to go there.strager wrote:
Why I mentioned the Cop is simple: he must exist assuming my conclusion on which roles are in the game is correct. Thus, I would use your knowledge that role-claiming is disadvantageous for a Town player, and advantageous for the Cop himself and a Mafia.
It was not a "sudden" backing out. You mentioned something which "foiled my plans" and I explained that it did "foil my plans." Accepting your argument causes more suspicion?Echo wrote:
What strikes me the most is how you repeatedly confirm you know adam is innocent, then suddenly back out of that claim when I say it's impossible for you to know that. This is what makes me think with almost 100% certainty that you are mafia.
I made a mistake.Echo wrote:
So I'm throwing things at strager.
But don't just sit back, say, and I quote, I "need to stop being so fucking aggresive. strager has never even played before, and you're throwing every fucking thing in the book at him."
THEN THROW THINGS AT ME. BUT BE DAMN SURE YOU BACK IT UP WITH QUOTES FROM THIS THREAD.
LIKE I DID. LIKE STRAGER DID. LIKE 0_o DID. LIKE BAGEL DID. He's enjoying the game. I'm enjoying the game. We're all enjoying the game. If you're not, get out.
You had a right to, though. *hugs Echo* =)Echo wrote:
Maybe I shouldn't have blown off like I did. I'm sorry.
Aww, gay love. <3Derekku Chan wrote:
You had a right to, though. *hugs Echo* =)Echo wrote:
Maybe I shouldn't have blown off like I did. I'm sorry.
"almost 2am" huh.Derekku Chan wrote:
Okay, I'm gonna click off this topic for now. I'd rather not try and do any critical thinking at almost 2am.
You're the one that wanted gay sex earlier :<strager wrote:
Aww, gay love. <3Derekku Chan wrote:
You had a right to, though. *hugs Echo* =)Echo wrote:
Maybe I shouldn't have blown off like I did. I'm sorry.
How soon is that? =SLadySubaru wrote:
Edit: Deadline next Thurs at 6:00 PM
This confuses me so much, I'll probably end up dropping it unless I can make sense of it when I wake up.strager wrote:
By the "defense" I meant Echo accusing me of using my role claim as a Doctor to defend myself. I didn't mean defending myself against his arguments.
I re-read that post and I don't think Echo is being even slightly defensive of adam.strager wrote:
----------
Echo seems to be super defensive of adam in hislatestnext-to-latest post. Why? I'm not pointing my finger at him.
Well I said before that I was thinking either you or nardi, and from the general feel of your posts I just started to lean towards you. It's the first day and there isn't a lot of evidence from anyone to go on, so for today I'm just playing by my gutadam2046 wrote:
Oh and I didn't realise 0_o changed his vote yet again without reasoning (and to me of all people!...jk)
I don't remember making a Monty Python reference...
lol?0_o wrote:
Well I said before that I was thinking either you or nardi, and from the general feel of your posts I just started to lean towards you. It's the first day and there isn't a lot of evidence from anyone to go on, so for today I'm just playing by my gut
I agree that bolded part is quite suspicious...Echo wrote:
lol?0_o wrote:
Well I said before that I was thinking either you or nardi, and from the general feel of your posts I just started to lean towards you. It's the first day and there isn't a lot of evidence from anyone to go on, so for today I'm just playing by my gut
To clarify:BagelBob wrote:
This confuses me so much, I'll probably end up dropping it unless I can make sense of it when I wake up.strager wrote:
By the "defense" I meant Echo accusing me of using my role claim as a Doctor to defend myself. I didn't mean defending myself against his arguments.
I then I responded:Echo wrote:
First, you claim an important role. Then you make a post saying that people shouldn't be voting for someone who claims a role. How is that not defending yourself!?
The "claiming Doctor to defend myself" is what I meant by "defending myself" there, and that's what I tried explaining in the post you quoted.strager wrote:
Saying I am defending myself (however implicitly) is baseless. So I'll completely disregard your attacks on my defense.
I was responding to this:strager wrote:
I don't know where you got the idea that I think having the doktor role-claim on the first day is a good idea. I distinctly remember saying "I dislike role claims", and you first quoting me about it, then doing an analysis earlier.
I was working off that the 'could' is 'would' in the hypothetical situation.BagelBob wrote:
Oh, and I have to disagree with you on that matter. A fake-claim by a town could work out nicely. I certainly don't think that's what's happening here, but I could see it working.
ohi adam! <3strager wrote:
Seriously, short term- Hey look, a butterfly!
Mainly in response to this:BagelBob wrote:
I re-read that post and I don't think Echo is being even slightly defensive of adam.strager wrote:
Echo seems to be super defensive of adam in hislatestnext-to-latest post. Why? I'm not pointing my finger at him.
In fact, he says specifically "None of adam's posts in any way indicate that he is townie"
I don't know how you came up with this, would you care to explain?
He claims no one should know anything, yet says I do know something. Also, I haven't "confirmed" this -- confirmation requires more information, not a reiteration of the same information.Echo wrote:
None of adam's posts in any way indicate that he is townie, and no one should be able to confirm this. Yet strager claims to believe, and has managed to convince himself, that adam is townie. I suspect this is because strager is mafia and knows that adam is townie.
Maybe because Derekku voted for him and is being more cautious now?BagelBob wrote:
I still consider strager my major suspect at the moment, and I don't see the reasons why Echo is backing off.
Quite.BagelBob wrote:
However, I think we still have ~6 days left to decide things, so I'm not ready to lynch him yet. I'd really like to hear a bit more from SFG(with her amazing 1 post), Olinad(with double that), and nardii(with a record 3) before doing anything that can't be reversed.
Double wrong...strager wrote:
ohi adam! <3strager wrote:
Seriously, short term- Hey look, a butterfly!
I did not intend to claim myself as Doctor. I just did it because Echo forced me to.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
On to my analysis of strager. he's obviously a noob, its hard to tell if his "claim" was actually intentional or not so im going to say...strager if you fully intended to claim the role of doctor when you supposedly did, please do so in bold in your next post.
I think almost all my mistakes have been me either mistyping or miswriting what I meant (which I clarified shortly thereafter).Saturos-fangirl wrote:
As for his repeated mistakes
Are you suggesting more slip-ups mean someone is less intelligent? And how are my slips "out-of-proportion"? Please point them out (I would like to know).Saturos-fangirl wrote:
The relative numbers of slip-ups made in the first game are pretty reasonably proportional to how intelligent the player is outside of the game, and strager's slips are out-of-proportion unless he has a serious mental disability that he's been hiding (take it as a compliment, strager, i think you're intelligent).
That supports my strong belief that Echo is a Mafia.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
However if Echo is mafia than strager is not mafia, and vice versa, because both are intelligent and no intelligent mafia team would attack each other like that.
As I have said, I really don't know what to think of 0_o and I don't know what he's up to (if anything).Saturos-fangirl wrote:
0_o is doing a beautiful job of defending strager. there are really three possibilities. 1. strager and 0_o are both mafia - if Echo is mafia this is completely invalid. If Echo is town, either 0_o and strager are misled citizens or mafia. 2. strager is mafia and 0_o is a misled citizen. 3. strager and 0_o are both citizens.
based on tone, im guessing that 0_o is a citizen, but that doesnt give me any help at all as to identifying strager.
Eek!Saturos-fangirl wrote:
also since strager no longer has the appearance of claiming doctor, which was what was stopping me from voting against him before. this is also making me begin to doubt Echo's skill at this game, but meh.
unvote
vote strager
Think anyway.nardi11011 wrote:
I'm not sure what to think of the current situation.
so you confirm that you are a Doctor then? ugh i dont know which direction to go now. despite all my logic my gut instinct is still to trust Echo on these things.....but one of the things Echo said is that you should never lynch someone who claims Doctor on day 1. im pretty sure 0_o is a civvy and for above reason i cant vote for either strager or Echo.strager wrote:
Eek!
I meant I didn't mean to spill the beans! I thought that's what you were asking. I didn't mean I wasn't "unclaiming" myself as Doctor.
This, along withstrager wrote:
I was responding to this:strager wrote:
I don't know where you got the idea that I think having the doktor role-claim on the first day is a good idea. I distinctly remember saying "I dislike role claims", and you first quoting me about it, then doing an analysis earlier.I was working off that the 'could' is 'would' in the hypothetical situation.BagelBob wrote:
Oh, and I have to disagree with you on that matter. A fake-claim by a town could work out nicely. I certainly don't think that's what's happening here, but I could see it working.
this, makes it sound like you're trying to back out of your doctor claim now. You didn't mean to spill the beans about not being the doctor? Double negative meaning that you are trying to un-claim yourself as the doctor? You've been being very vague from the beginning.strager wrote:
Eek!Saturos-fangirl wrote:
also since strager no longer has the appearance of claiming doctor, which was what was stopping me from voting against him before. this is also making me begin to doubt Echo's skill at this game, but meh.
unvote
vote strager
I meant I didn't mean to spill the beans! I thought that's what you were asking. I didn't mean I wasn't "unclaiming" myself as Doctor.
I don't know how to explain this better. =SBagelBob wrote:
strager wrote:
I was responding to this:strager wrote:
I don't know where you got the idea that I think having the doktor role-claim on the first day is a good idea. I distinctly remember saying "I dislike role claims", and you first quoting me about it, then doing an analysis earlier.I was working off that the 'could' is 'would' in the hypothetical situation.BagelBob wrote:
Oh, and I have to disagree with you on that matter. A fake-claim by a town could work out nicely. I certainly don't think that's what's happening here, but I could see it working.
Okay, let me (try to) clarify.BagelBob wrote:
this, makes it sound like you're trying to back out of your doctor claim now. You didn't mean to spill the beans about not being the doctor? Double negative meaning that you are trying to un-claim yourself as the doctor? You've been being very vague from the beginning.strager wrote:
Eek!Saturos-fangirl wrote:
also since strager no longer has the appearance of claiming doctor, which was what was stopping me from voting against him before. this is also making me begin to doubt Echo's skill at this game, but meh.
unvote
vote strager
I meant I didn't mean to spill the beans! I thought that's what you were asking. I didn't mean I wasn't "unclaiming" myself as Doctor.
Obviously, because almost all of what Echo has been doing is "making a case on me." There's nothing else to go on from him, really.BagelBob wrote:
Also, I've failed to see your case on Echo. So far, the only reason I can come up with for your vote is that he was making a case on you. Could you give anything more than that?
S: Indeed, which makes adam somewhat suspect because he is voting for me. Then again, if he were the Mafia, he'd kill me anyway. So I think it's safe to say ... he is not. That is, I am clearing adam's name as a suspect Mafia for me.That is basically the exchange that went on. Every line is a direct quote from chronological posts in this thread.
E: adam's done absolutely nothing to convince anyone that he's not mafia.
S: I never said I was convinced he wasn't Mafia. I'm just saying for today I won't consider him a possible target.
E: [quoting first line] Read that and tell me you never said you weren't convinced.
S: I meant to say I wasn't convinced by someone else. Sorry.
E: So you admit that you convinced yourself adam is townie?
S: You're attacking. Am I supposed to just take that? Okay, I will.
strager wrote:
D= I didn't mean to.
I'll stop hammering strager.strager wrote:
I did not intend to claim myself as Doctor.
Claim: Doctor.Echo wrote:
btw - strager, can you claim doctor in bold without using a negative sentence construct? Something like "claim: doctor"strager wrote:
D= I didn't mean to.strager wrote:
I did not intend to claim myself as Doctor.
Wrong - if I was mafia, then, as you noted, I was the only person who suggested he accidentally leaked the fact that he was doctor. In which case, I would not bring it up, kill him at night, and leave the whole town wondering why the mafia killed him the next day.SFG wrote:
If i assume he's mafia, he would be trying to kill strager because strager "claimed" doctor.
Obviously, I don't want the identity of the doctor leaked. I actually did expect strager to deny doctor but instead he said he didn't mean to leak his role. However, theoretically speaking the real doctor has nothing to gain by repeated affirming the fact that he was doctor since he can't protect himself, making revealing his role a really stupid thing to do, which is what makes me extremely suspicious of him.SFG wrote:
Echo: explain why you spent so much time pointing out strager's claim if the claim appears to have been invisible to nearly everyone else and you specifically did not want it to have happened.
Echo wrote:
Wrong - if I was mafia, then, as you noted, I was the only person who suggested he accidentally leaked the fact that he was doctor. In which case, I would not bring it up, kill him at night, and leave the whole town wondering why the mafia killed him the next day.SFG wrote:
If i assume he's mafia, he would be trying to kill strager because strager "claimed" doctor.
You're right. You may have been deceived right there.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Echo wrote:
Wrong - if I was mafia, then, as you noted, I was the only person who suggested he accidentally leaked the fact that he was doctor. In which case, I would not bring it up, kill him at night, and leave the whole town wondering why the mafia killed him the next day.SFG wrote:
If i assume he's mafia, he would be trying to kill strager because strager "claimed" doctor.
and once again Echo can come up with more devious strategies than i could in my normal mind imagine. Echo is way too pro for this.
Oops; when I read that I thought you were quoting your entire post, not part of it.Echo wrote:
I asked the same question again in this post to which you requoted the same thing. I don't see how it's out of context.
Okay, I made a mistake in my last post.Echo wrote:
I was quoting the whole post, which you admit applying your reply to. You refused to answer/comment on my statements/questions, one of which was the conversation in the quoted text. Since it applied to all my questions/statements, I don't think it's out of context?
I would only try to cover it up to prevent myself from being killed by the Mafia during the Night. If I do that I may be suspect of being a Mafia by the town, because I am trying to cover up things I have said. Then again, keeping open about me being a Doctor also makes me a Mafia suspect because I'd be using it as a way to point votes away from me.Echo wrote:
Firstly, strager never claimed doctor. He just went with what I said. The real doctor would have tried to cover it up. strager, on the other hand, admitted it straight away.strager wrote:
D= I didn't mean to.Echo wrote:
dammit WHY do the doctors always need to expose themselves on the first day?
I think we've already gone over this. (If not I am mistaken.)Echo wrote:
Secondly, he admitted to convincing himself adam is townie without adam making any real posts. Plus, he completely ignored this accusation in his last post.Echo wrote:
So you admit that you convinced yourself adam is townie? My point still stands - you can't convince yourself someone is townie when they haven't made a single proper post unless you already know they're townie.strager wrote:
I meant to say I wasn't convinced by someone else. Sorry.
I can't find my post but I'm pretty fucking sure I wrote a post answering this question.Echo wrote:
The cop role shouldn't be on your mind, since he's useless until after the first night. Therefore, mentioning it is a tad suspicious. Why would strager be thinking about the cop, then?0_o wrote:
And how exactly does mentioning the cop imply that he's claiming cop??
adam2046 wrote:
So uh...Why am I being voted if you want to lynch Echo or strager?
Can I have some follow up points on how I'm suspicious?
thx, brbLadySuburu wrote:
Votecount 3:
strager - 2 (adam, nardi)
adam - 2 (0_o, SFG)
Echo - 1 (strager)
SFG - 1 (BagelBob)
Not voting: 3 - (Olinad, Echo, Derekku)
Well, I don't ask questions like that, really. I try to be a little more specific in my questions than "how does the Doctor work exactly?" If I had asked the question you suggest I would probably get an answer similar to what the PM states and not what I wanted to know. But you're right, the "claim" wouldn't be discovered and maybe I would have been better protected (because I don't have to worry about the Mafia trying to kill me because they don't know I am the doctor).Echo wrote:
tbh if strager had said something like "I'm just curious to know about the rules around the doctor and how protection works" I wouldn't have had anything to go on, since that would only lead to WIFOM thinking.
lol UR right, but I was busy XDstrager wrote:
Well, I don't ask questions like that, really. I try to be a little more specific in my questions than "how does the Doctor work exactly?" If I had asked the question you suggest I would probably get an answer similar to what the PM states and not what I wanted to know. But you're right, the "claim" wouldn't be discovered and maybe I would have been better protected (because I don't have to worry about the Mafia trying to kill me because they don't know I am the doctor).Echo wrote:
tbh if strager had said something like "I'm just curious to know about the rules around the doctor and how protection works" I wouldn't have had anything to go on, since that would only lead to WIFOM thinking.
Olinard, are you back yet? It's been more than two hours since you said "brb." ;P
EDIT: Echo, what is WIFOM thinking? xD Sounds like "superhypothetical" thinking.
By "you" you mean the not me "you"?Echo wrote:
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Wine_In_Front_Of_Me
I thought I'd linked that before :/
Basically it's what you do in your early posts.
"if adam was mafia then [something] BUT if adam is townie then [something] which means he must be mafia if he did it but then that makes him townie because he's smart enough to know it makes him look townie, which means he's actualy mafia, which makes him townie, which makes him mafia etc."
Article says:Echo wrote:
By "you" I mean the second person pronoun (ie. you, strager), and not the generic "you"
No wonder you were super-suspicious of me. =S However that paragraph talks about after a Night kill so I'm not sure if that really is your reason or if you just don't like my choices about adam.Article wrote:
In Mafia, WIFOM arguments are often a Scum tactic used to distract the Town.
Or just leave a no-vote?adam2046 wrote:
...Why aren't you voting yourself then SFG?
Yeah, SFG seems to be doing more than random voting here.adam2046 wrote:
So you do want to get me lynched?
You are still mad at me.
adam2046 wrote:
I wont be arounf for a little while, if anyone wants to lynch poor little defensless me (SFG) please don't.
You'll make me cryyyyyy T.T
watadam2046 wrote:
Don't you try and allay (^_~) suspicion from yourself by pointing out her.
adam2046 wrote:
Hey, I'm not the one claiming doctor.
watadam2046 wrote:
Don't you try and allay (^_~) suspicion from yourself by pointing out her.