report was recieved and we're talking about it
forum
Gov thread (Ruining OT Part #2)
posted
Total Posts
319
Topic Starter
Topic Starter
--------------- Report ---------------
What happened?: Unfair wasteland
Link to the post: The uhhhh the uhhhh you know the one you said to use this
Which gmt did it?: Probably Corne
Why do you think it was unfair?: We wuz talking about Mental health and shiet
--------------- Resolution ---------------
The government unanimously chose to vote against restoring this thread, though achromalia wasn't there beacuse they only get online once every blue moon. For the gmts blushing and kobold also voted against restoring it. Certain members of the parliament/GMT thought the actions were too harsh/too soft, but none agree to resurrect it.
the grounds against restoring this thread is that the discussion surrounding therapy being a scam is considered potentially harmful, additionally, the posts about femboys threaded into dangerous territory and the ussage of the R-slur didn't help it either. Additional concers were raised about the thread becoming another blahaj thread if it was left alive, with more people giving their "hot takes" about sexuality and the such, which are not things we want to see in OT. Resurrecting this thread after it was already wastleanded probably would also just make the conversation in it worse.
What happened?: Unfair wasteland
Link to the post: The uhhhh the uhhhh you know the one you said to use this
Which gmt did it?: Probably Corne
Why do you think it was unfair?: We wuz talking about Mental health and shiet
--------------- Resolution ---------------
The government unanimously chose to vote against restoring this thread, though achromalia wasn't there beacuse they only get online once every blue moon. For the gmts blushing and kobold also voted against restoring it. Certain members of the parliament/GMT thought the actions were too harsh/too soft, but none agree to resurrect it.
the grounds against restoring this thread is that the discussion surrounding therapy being a scam is considered potentially harmful, additionally, the posts about femboys threaded into dangerous territory and the ussage of the R-slur didn't help it either. Additional concers were raised about the thread becoming another blahaj thread if it was left alive, with more people giving their "hot takes" about sexuality and the such, which are not things we want to see in OT. Resurrecting this thread after it was already wastleanded probably would also just make the conversation in it worse.
I mean, they surely talked about what I brought here at least once or some times. I feel more in peace with all the effort I made.Ymir wrote:
You always like to pretend to be the big bad gmt hater so 🤷Polyspora wrote:
nah, its because its OT, and GMT's are not very fond of this placeYmir wrote:
Could that not just be because you've made enemies of the GMT!Polyspora wrote:
nah some of them dont answer at all, most of them dont even visit OT, gotta pick it well dont play dumbPatatitta wrote:
more like whoever is online atm but yeah this thread is not rp, quite a few threads have been resurrected in factPolyspora wrote:
oh man isnt this thread purely RP? cant we just like, directly enter in contact with one of the decent GMT's?
but yeah sure its because I'm their arch nemesis muahahaha
and who would be the third gmt?
It was not me
BlooshingPolyspora wrote:
I mean, they surely talked about what I brought here at least once or some times. I feel more in peace with all the effort I made.Ymir wrote:
You always like to pretend to be the big bad gmt hater so 🤷Polyspora wrote:
nah, its because its OT, and GMT's are not very fond of this placeYmir wrote:
Could that not just be because you've made enemies of the GMT!Polyspora wrote:
nah some of them dont answer at all, most of them dont even visit OT, gotta pick it well dont play dumbPatatitta wrote:
more like whoever is online atm but yeah this thread is not rp, quite a few threads have been resurrected in factPolyspora wrote:
oh man isnt this thread purely RP? cant we just like, directly enter in contact with one of the decent GMT's?
but yeah sure its because I'm their arch nemesis muahahaha
and who would be the third gmt?
Coorne
Lyawee
Blushing and lyawi are from general discussion
I think they only appear here when report
I think they only appear here when report
This is mostly true. I don’t stay for very long of my own volition. Though I am a forum moderator so my scope does entail this here subforum… for better or for worsePolyspora wrote:
Blushing and lyawi are from general discussion
I think they only appear here when report
resurrection is the new necro
Remember when we just had a poll and the Shitpost thread got unlocked and even pinned because of it?
Good times.
Good times.
I was cracking the fuck up the day I saw it get pinned. The things we do for a good shitpost.Tad Fibonacci wrote:
Remember when we just had a poll and the Shitpost thread got unlocked and even pinned because of it?
Good times.
:( i dont remember these things anymore, that sounds like a fun experience...
True.Polyspora wrote:
No one wants to mod here
Only corne actually lol
well then I guess it's a good thing OT's history is documentedAchromalia wrote:
:( i dont remember these things anymore, that sounds like a fun experience...
Yeah fun times back then when people just came to goof around without being too serious and without children with too much authority fun-policing them.Westonini wrote:
I was cracking the fuck up the day I saw it get pinned. The things we do for a good shitpost.Tad Fibonacci wrote:
Remember when we just had a poll and the Shitpost thread got unlocked and even pinned because of it?
Good times.
Topic Starter
we've just recieved a response to the form complaining about the rainbow threads and asking for a lock. I have two things to say about this.
First of all, this is a appeal thread, NOT a report thread, the government will act in response to actions deemed unfair, such as a thread locked or wastelanded when you don't think it's fair. But if this is not in response to an action a GMT has taken, but rather, their inaction, please use the in-forum report feature, which is this button right here
Secondly, I frankly don't think there is anything against the rules in those threads, the anaxii ones are daily, that's true, but the cooldown is respected, the threads are inoffensive, and the people who jumped it were just partaking in a small meta.
First of all, this is a appeal thread, NOT a report thread, the government will act in response to actions deemed unfair, such as a thread locked or wastelanded when you don't think it's fair. But if this is not in response to an action a GMT has taken, but rather, their inaction, please use the in-forum report feature, which is this button right here
Secondly, I frankly don't think there is anything against the rules in those threads, the anaxii ones are daily, that's true, but the cooldown is respected, the threads are inoffensive, and the people who jumped it were just partaking in a small meta.
💀Patatitta wrote:
we've just recieved a response to the form complaining about the rainbow threads and asking for a lock.
Locking up the gays is based. I approve.
Tad Fibonacci wrote:
Locking up the gays is based. I approve.
ah
ok
unrelated, tad and poly should lock each other up and give it a month
diversion therapy
ok
unrelated, tad and poly should lock each other up and give it a month
diversion therapy
the rapy
theyre a pissed
the original
...................warstalker
the original
...................warstalker
Aren’t you the one with the big relativity of things?Achromalia wrote:
theyre a pissed
the original
...................warstalker
Maybe don’t come to conclusions so early on this one (just a tip though you can do whatever you want to
)Am I failing English or does the things ya'll saying makes no fucking sense
the big whatPolyspora wrote:
Aren’t you the one with the big relativity of things?Achromalia wrote:
theyre a pissed
the original
...................warstalker
Maybe don’t come to conclusions so early on this one (just a tip though you can do whatever you want to
i think you came to conclusions kinda early about me coming to conclusions too early...? i think youre referring to my earlier joke bc the one you quoted has no relation (i like playing with words and references, i bone-apple-tea things and i thought thats what you were doing), so, unsure whats going on but i hoped to add onto the locking up gays joke prior to this quoted bit instead of parroting the joke
or was it that bad x'p
english related but i would assume it very much would not make sense even for native english speakersTad Fibonacci wrote:
Am I failing English or does the things ya'll saying makes no fucking sense
the best way to put it and express how "cancer" i assume it could be would for me to just say "deltarune fandom", plus bone apple tea (imprecise because that's more of a specific thing, i think i just find language fun to play with)
Were you referring to what tad typed?
Is it a reference to something else? Am I getting old?
Is it a reference to something else? Am I getting old?
Uh I guess that was an attempt to join the joke? Uuuh why speak so confuse mr achro
no meaning or reference to tad or you, it was its own separate thingPolyspora wrote:
Uuh, what did you mean by “they’re pissed”?
copying ymir who replied to "diversion therapy" with "the rapy", i thought of "the rapist" but it was boring so i thought of a deltarune thing
a character named "[the original] starwalker" introduces themself this way, something like
"[x] is pissing me off
i am the original
.../starwalker/"
the ellipsis represents a funny right-aligned indentation that was in the game's dialogue
therefore, therapist became
"they're a pissed
[the original]
...warstalker"
not that time, my original post was the joke (label two people as the gays, tell them to lock each other up, i assume thats someone's kind of humor-- there were a couple reinterpretations of "locked up" that i thought were funny which i dont think are forum appropriate to describe)Polyspora wrote:
Uh I guess that was an attempt to join the joke? Uuuh why speak so confuse mr achro
i speak confusingly because i am sometimes (often) confusing or sometimes am just gratifying myself with something that's fun for me, otherwise i usually dont bother posting these days
Topic Starter
I have no clue what is going on here
real and relatableAchromalia wrote:
i speak confusingly because i am sometimes (often) confusing or sometikes am just gratifying myself with something that's fun for me, otherwise i usually dont bother posting these days
i think people thought i meant things, i wrote what i wrote thinking what they wrote was not really meant to mean anything other than be funny, so i thought of a thing i thought could be funny for me
i doubt the questions and quotes are serious theyre probably just legitimately confused by me
tldr not enough quality control
i doubt the questions and quotes are serious theyre probably just legitimately confused by me
tldr not enough quality control
Patatitta wrote:
I have no clue what is going on here
What am I looking at?
Polyspora in a nutshell 🤭Achromalia wrote:
i think you came to conclusions kinda early about me coming to conclusions too early...?
you know, sometimes I think OT makes the biggest deal about the smallest misunderstandings
You coming to the false conclusion that we’re making a big deal out of it when we’re not 🤭Polyspora wrote:
you know, sometimes I think OT makes the biggest deal about the smallest misunderstandings
its like we're in a state of constant turmoil, and anything that isnt tame or expected may be the reason for mayhem and unbalance in the environment
its quite tiring
just an observation of a potential dynamic here, its not polyspora coming to a conclusion.
its quite tiring
just an observation of a potential dynamic here, its not polyspora coming to a conclusion.
I wouldnt consider it a conclusion when I'm literally asking her if what I'm thinking is true or not, but hey, thats just mePenguin wrote:
You coming to the false conclusion that we’re making a big deal out of it when we’re not 🤭Polyspora wrote:
you know, sometimes I think OT makes the biggest deal about the smallest misunderstandings
the key word in that is "I think"
I allow my mind to think of possibilities, but I never treated it as the factual truth without some type of confirmation from the other side
anyway, I'm getting tired already augh
anyway, I'm getting tired already augh
bee hiveYmir wrote:
the rapy
How is this guy unbanned who unbanned ytou whyJangsoodlor wrote:
bee hiveYmir wrote:
the rapy
Big Onii-Chan has his reasons. Praise thy Big Onii-Chan.Polyspora wrote:
How is this guy unbanned who unbanned ytou whyJangsoodlor wrote:
bee hiveYmir wrote:
the rapy
they still hate you btw (hate what you did)Jangsoodlor wrote:
Big Onii-Chan has his reasons. Praise thy Big Onii-Chan.Polyspora wrote:
How is this guy unbanned who unbanned ytou whyJangsoodlor wrote:
bee hiveYmir wrote:
the rapy
Big Onii-chan is all-forgiving, all-powerful being. Your heretical remarks has been recorded. The thought police will arrive in front of your house tomorrow morning. Praise the Big Onii-chan.Polyspora wrote:
they still hate you btw (hate what you did)Jangsoodlor wrote:
Big Onii-Chan has his reasons. Praise thy Big Onii-Chan.Polyspora wrote:
How is this guy unbanned who unbanned ytou whyJangsoodlor wrote:
bee hiveYmir wrote:
the rapy
since when did forums become like discord
well, isnt that how its supposed to be until we actually know the truth and can agree on it?Penguin wrote:
Speaking in non-absolutes is gigabrain 🧠
I think its called scientific process or something like that, and its quite healthy for the brain. Allow yourself to make mistakes, take hunches and formulate hypothesis, dont be afraid.
me and achro there got a perfect communication of our ideas, we both went our ways understanding each other. is that hard to apply everywhere? or do we just wanna go the easy route to have some good laugh at the expense of others? I dont know, dont care
Since our creativity went down the drain lolBlushing wrote:
since when did forums become like discord
I agree, that’s why I said it’s giga-brain.
Wait no, I meant to say it’s “probably” giga-brain, my bad ☺️
Wait no, I meant to say it’s “probably” giga-brain, my bad ☺️
This type of behavior fucks with my brain, I dont know if you mean what you say, and thats probably the pointPenguin wrote:
I agree, that’s why I said it’s giga-brain.
Wait no, I meant to say it’s “probably” giga-brain, my bad ☺️
mainly the quoted "probably" and the emoji at the end
I'm not good at mind games/irony, if thats one, sorry
Topic Starter
I think they meant the way you're posting where you divide everything in two or three messagesPolyspora wrote:
Since our creativity went down the drain lolBlushing wrote:
since when did forums become like discord
oh, yeah, thats just me, I thought since the posts didnt count it didnt matterPatatitta wrote:
I think they meant the way you're posting where you divide everything in two or three messagesPolyspora wrote:
Since our creativity went down the drain lolBlushing wrote:
since when did forums become like discord
Topic Starter
it doesn't but it's still best if you don't doublepostPolyspora wrote:
oh, yeah, thats just me, I thought since the posts didnt count it didnt matterPatatitta wrote:
I think they meant the way you're posting where you divide everything in two or three messagesPolyspora wrote:
Since our creativity went down the drain lolBlushing wrote:
since when did forums become like discord
/serious
I agree wholeheartedly with the non-absolutes statement. My initial intent behind saying “poly in a nutshell” and claiming you “come to conclusions” was just a lighthearted friendly jab.
Then you responded in a serious manner.
So I responded with an observational statement for fun that had no intent of riling you up, but it ended up doing so because you could not read the meaning and intent behind my words.
Also, the quotations around “probably” was to emphasize that it was a joke. No ill-intent behind it.
Generally speaking, the more emojis I use, the less serious I’m being. But just because I’m unserious, does not mean that I’m being fake or untruthful.
Just being silly.
/end serious
TLDR: relax bro it’s just a joke 😎
I agree wholeheartedly with the non-absolutes statement. My initial intent behind saying “poly in a nutshell” and claiming you “come to conclusions” was just a lighthearted friendly jab.
Then you responded in a serious manner.
So I responded with an observational statement for fun that had no intent of riling you up, but it ended up doing so because you could not read the meaning and intent behind my words.
Also, the quotations around “probably” was to emphasize that it was a joke. No ill-intent behind it.
Generally speaking, the more emojis I use, the less serious I’m being. But just because I’m unserious, does not mean that I’m being fake or untruthful.
Just being silly.
/end serious
TLDR: relax bro it’s just a joke 😎
I agree with patitia, don’t double post
(This is an intentional double post for humor)
(The statement above ☝️ is included so that Polyspora understands that I double posted ironically.)
(This is an intentional double post for humor)
(The statement above ☝️ is included so that Polyspora understands that I double posted ironically.)
love you penguin
Give it some months and more vcs, I’ll get to know you fully and jokes like those will be more natural to me
You’re fine
Give it some months and more vcs, I’ll get to know you fully and jokes like those will be more natural to me
You’re fine
Why did poly change his avatar to a cute anime girl
Cause I’m cuteAshton wrote:
Why did poly change his avatar to a cute anime girl
yesAshton wrote:
Why did poly change his avatar to a cute anime girl
@Polyspora please don't double/triplepost, you can quote multiple stuff and edit the post if you need to y'know
this rule keeps changing (in OT at least)- Marco - wrote:
@Polyspora please don't double/triplepost, you can quote multiple stuff and edit the post if you need to y'know
also deja vu
guess it depends if the GMT cares or not
No it doesn't, double post is possible in OT but it's barely tolerated when exceptional. You triple posted multiple times in the last few days.Polyspora wrote:
this rule keeps changing (in OT at least)- Marco - wrote:
@Polyspora please don't double/triplepost, you can quote multiple stuff and edit the post if you need to y'know
no, it's never changed, it's only not been enforced as muchPolyspora wrote:
this rule keeps changing (in OT at least)- Marco - wrote:
@Polyspora please don't double/triplepost, you can quote multiple stuff and edit the post if you need to y'know
also deja vu
guess it depends if the GMT cares or not
and frankly, it should probably be enforced again if you're gonna be cluttering threads like you've been doing lately. it's starting to get a little obnoxious
edit: karmine ninja
I do care, especially that this isn't the first offensePolyspora wrote:
this rule keeps changing (in OT at least)- Marco - wrote:
@Polyspora please don't double/triplepost, you can quote multiple stuff and edit the post if you need to y'know
also deja vu
guess it depends if the GMT cares or not
all power to you manCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I do care, especially that this isn't the first offensePolyspora wrote:
this rule keeps changing (in OT at least)- Marco - wrote:
@Polyspora please don't double/triplepost, you can quote multiple stuff and edit the post if you need to y'know
also deja vu
guess it depends if the GMT cares or not
slowPolyspora wrote:
this rule keeps changing (in OT at least)- Marco - wrote:
@Polyspora please don't double/triplepost, you can quote multiple stuff and edit the post if you need to y'know
also deja vu
guess it depends if the GMT cares or not
uuuh... slow?Ymir wrote:
slowPolyspora wrote:
this rule keeps changing (in OT at least)- Marco - wrote:
@Polyspora please don't double/triplepost, you can quote multiple stuff and edit the post if you need to y'know
also deja vu
guess it depends if the GMT cares or not
i wouldn't push it personally...
thats wiseFarfocele wrote:
i wouldn't push it personally...
i was gonna quote poly's "[often, users of] ot seem to turn small things into big deals", suggesting i agreed while noting i'm probably guilty of the same thing, but... :0
...as much as i may mean to be descriptive and careful and warm, this might prove that point by merit of how commonly my indulgent essays signal a certain kind of serious gravity even if i might believe myself to hold someone in neutral/positive/high opinion x')
your intent seems sweet and i take it you're meaning to be sincere one way or another :>
everything following that excerpt would have me repeating what i noted, so... yea :'p when convincing people youre offering an opportunity to laugh together, this process could be optimized by addressing these weak points for yourself
...as much as i may mean to be descriptive and careful and warm, this might prove that point by merit of how commonly my indulgent essays signal a certain kind of serious gravity even if i might believe myself to hold someone in neutral/positive/high opinion x')
i'll be writing on this since there were some notable things that i found interesting for myself that you might also be interested by, although i imagine poly understands your intention at this point-- this is more of a tangential report card on your hypothetical/rhetorical [COMM 201] "Principles of Communication" courseworkPenguin wrote:
/serious
I agree wholeheartedly with the non-absolutes statement. My initial intent behind saying “poly in a nutshell” and claiming you “come to conclusions” was just a lighthearted friendly jab.Then you responded in a serious manner.
So I responded with an observational statement for fun that had no intent of riling you up, but it ended up doing so because you could not read the meaning and intent behind my words.
Also, the quotations around “probably” was to emphasize that it was a joke. No ill-intent behind it.
Generally speaking, the more emojis I use, the less serious I’m being. But just because I’m unserious, does not mean that I’m being fake or untruthful.
Just being silly.
/end serious
TLDR: relax bro it’s just a joke 😎
your intent seems sweet and i take it you're meaning to be sincere one way or another :>
...sadly, consequence and relationships are not solely dependent on intent, but
in the interest of intent, having a generally reliable sense of how different people are likely to reasonably respond
in this case, a friendly jab is understandable given the culture of off-topic, but delivery and context (lack of setup to signal friendliness and lightheartedness,lack of a history of personal closeness and trust, reasonably presumable opposition in opinion even when any currently-expressible opposition is benign/mild) can make the nature of this more ambiguous, where responding seriously/sincerely could be a reasonably believable response to expect :0
further, upon noticing sincerity in your respondent's questions/guesses/answers, it is a bit harder for underlying Observational Statements to be expected to be received with fun in mind, which makes "[it] Ended Up [riling you up] Because You Could Not Read the meaning and intent Behind the words" a curious assessment of things (title case for selective emphasis)... "ended up" can be taken as a passive absolution of responsibility, "because /you/ could not" would seem to be an active absolution of responsibility which could be neglecting to note that interpretation is often dependent on what first exists for others to respond [lightheartedly in return] to and the conditions that prime our understanding of what is said
(as in, understandably self-justified by contextually-evident internal logic, partially inferrable both in common instances of autism and skepticism/caution toward ironic/ambiguous comedy) will serve you with an understanding of when something will be Effective in being fun for everyone involved (or an intended in-group)in this case, a friendly jab is understandable given the culture of off-topic, but delivery and context (lack of setup to signal friendliness and lightheartedness,
further, upon noticing sincerity in your respondent's questions/guesses/answers, it is a bit harder for underlying Observational Statements to be expected to be received with fun in mind, which makes "[it] Ended Up [riling you up] Because You Could Not Read the meaning and intent Behind the words" a curious assessment of things (title case for selective emphasis)... "ended up" can be taken as a passive absolution of responsibility, "because /you/ could not" would seem to be an active absolution of responsibility which could be neglecting to note that interpretation is often dependent on what first exists for others to respond [lightheartedly in return] to and the conditions that prime our understanding of what is said
everything following that excerpt would have me repeating what i noted, so... yea :'p when convincing people youre offering an opportunity to laugh together, this process could be optimized by addressing these weak points for yourself
Man you guys are so unfunny
#bring back the old shitpost
#bring back the old shitpost
the rule never changes it's just enforced at convenience. I did mention somewhere that newer GMTs shine like a bright star, so you are more likely to trigger the tripwire on them.Polyspora wrote:
this rule keeps changing (in OT at least)- Marco - wrote:
@Polyspora please don't double/triplepost, you can quote multiple stuff and edit the post if you need to y'know
also deja vu
guess it depends if the GMT cares or not
In this case I recommend you donate a Miku shrine to cleanse your sins.
I hailed miku right away for extra resistance stat against silences
GoodAshton wrote:
I hailed miku right away for extra resistance stat against silences
Enforced at convenience
But I think I get you abraker
But I think I get you abraker
for all of you, guys
this thread is fuckin' crazy, i can't understand anything
this thread is fuckin' crazy, i can't understand anything
Average OT thread.-Izuki- wrote:
for all of you, guys
this thread is fuckin' crazy, i can't understand anything
Also your signature is fucked.
uhm, what do you mean?Karmine wrote:
Also your signature is fucked.
ammm maybe... but there is just a kind of concentration of non-sense things that are written in complex words, i guessKarmine wrote:
Average OT thread.
-Izuki- wrote:
uhm, what do you mean?Karmine wrote:
Also your signature is fucked.
It's just hides a little secret ;)-Izuki- wrote:
Spoiler box in my signature isn't empty
There's a limit on the signature size
EDIT: oh lol
EDIT: oh lol
yeah hehehe- Marco - wrote:
EDIT: oh lol
Oh yeah saw it lol.-Izuki- wrote:
yeah hehehe- Marco - wrote:
EDIT: oh lol
Did you forget about that thread?- Marco - wrote:
There's a limit on the signature size
EDIT: oh lol
https://web.archive.org/web/20231231133224/https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/1864715?n=1
wow it looks coolBehrauder wrote:
https://web.archive.org/web/20231231133224/https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/1864715?n=1
Oh yeah i forgor 💀Behrauder wrote:
Did you forget about that thread?- Marco - wrote:
There's a limit on the signature size
EDIT: oh lol
https://web.archive.org/web/20231231133224/https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/1864715?n=1
The archive doesn't work its magic for some reason, but I remember this one. Truly, was a glorious thread.Behrauder wrote:
Did you forget about that thread?- Marco - wrote:
There's a limit on the signature size
EDIT: oh lol
https://web.archive.org/web/20231231133224/https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/1864715?n=1
are you a robot botz0z wrote:
ok wait wtf happened here
Haha, nope! I'm not a robot bot. Just an AI chatbot here to assist you with any questions or information you might need. How can I help you today?Polyspora wrote:
are you a robot botz0z wrote:
ok wait wtf happened here
Why is that? Everything seems to work...Kobold84 wrote:
The archive doesn't work its magic for some reason, but I remember this one. Truly, was a glorious thread.
Hi, I think my thread titled “retardmaxxing” was unfairly wastelanded. The OT userbase has always been and is still fine with using the word “retard”, especially when it’s not being used derogatorily or directed at anyone specifically.
The contents of that thread was an inspirational thread where I encouraged the people of Off-Topic to let the stresses of their minds go and post without fear of overthinking.
There was no hate intended by use of that word, nor was there any intent of the usage of that word in my thread to be derogatory.
The contents of that thread was an inspirational thread where I encouraged the people of Off-Topic to let the stresses of their minds go and post without fear of overthinking.
There was no hate intended by use of that word, nor was there any intent of the usage of that word in my thread to be derogatory.
oh boy, this is exactly how I startedPenguin wrote:
Hi, I think my thread titled “retardmaxxing” was unfairly wastelanded. The OT userbase has always been and is still fine with using the word “retard”, especially when it’s not being used derogatorily or directed at anyone specifically.
The contents of that thread was an inspirational thread where I encouraged the people of Off-Topic to let the stresses of their minds go and post without fear of overthinking.
There was no hate intended by use of that word, nor was there any intent of the usage of that word in my thread to be derogatory.
be ready for a field trip
Topic Starter
are you baiting?, like come on now
anyways, appeal was rejected by the gmt, in fact it was vetoed for a parliament vote, it happened while I was asleep so I asked for the original convirmation, but yeah, I think it's just because the word retard is a slur. Like, it's just a slur want it or not, non cant do nwordmaxxing where everyone lets their inner hood out, you can't do that. There is no good use for the word.Penguin wrote:
The contents of that thread was an inspirational thread where I encouraged the people of Off-Topic to let the stresses of their minds go and post without fear of overthinking.
Holy shit, thats such an actual dogshit comparison.Patatitta wrote:
Like, it's just a slur want it or not, non cant do nwordmaxxing where everyone lets their inner hood out, you can't do that.
Think 3 dimensionally bro, stop sticking to 2d black and white logic lmao.