you forgot /sPatatitta wrote:
yeah that's why blushing was added actually, I've always wanted them as denizen so I removed the denizen requirement to have them inZain Sugieres wrote:
acceptance of candidates based on their relationship with the presidentManishh wrote:
how is it rigged?Zain Sugieres wrote:
A shame the elections are rigged though.Kobold84 wrote:
Everyone who wanted to sign up already did.Reyalp51 wrote:
bump
show more
+ tbh I think that you don't getting that joke is just because of you not having a good level of reading comprehension and not fully reading the threads
+ coward, don't just say "you already know", mention how you thought I told manishh to kill themselves
I won't go further about this we already discussed about that
+ idk i've been doing sarcasm wihout /s all my life and there hasn't ever been a problem with it
No way I get votes
(also, now that I think about it, isn't it flawed?, I could just add new tokens corresponding to no one and adding votes to them and there would be no way to know)
This means that if every denizen was to check their vote, they are supposed to find their own token. If this doesn't happen, then something is amiss.
Topic Starter
/s is for cowards, I have no obligation to tell when i'm joking or not, you should just knowManishh wrote:
you forgot /sPatatitta wrote:
yeah that's why blushing was added actually, I've always wanted them as denizen so I removed the denizen requirement to have them inZain Sugieres wrote:
acceptance of candidates based on their relationship with the presidentManishh wrote:
how is it rigged?Zain Sugieres wrote:
A shame the elections are rigged though.Kobold84 wrote:
Everyone who wanted to sign up already did.Reyalp51 wrote:
bump
DumbPatatitta wrote:
Manishh wrote:
you forgot /sPatatitta wrote:
yeah that's why blushing was added actually, I've always wanted them as denizen so I removed the denizen requirement to have them inZain Sugieres wrote:
acceptance of candidates based on their relationship with the presidentManishh wrote:
how is it rigged?Zain Sugieres wrote:
A shame the elections are rigged though.Kobold84 wrote:
Everyone who wanted to sign up already did.Reyalp51 wrote:
bump/s is for cowards, I have no obligation to tell when i'm joking or not,you should just know
With you we don't always know if it's sarcasm or not (I don't have to put example you already know what I'm talking about)Patatitta wrote:
/s is for cowards, I have no obligation to tell when i'm joking or not, you should just knowManishh wrote:
you forgot /sPatatitta wrote:
yeah that's why blushing was added actually, I've always wanted them as denizen so I removed the denizen requirement to have them inZain Sugieres wrote:
acceptance of candidates based on their relationship with the presidentManishh wrote:
how is it rigged?Zain Sugieres wrote:
A shame the elections are rigged though.Kobold84 wrote:
Everyone who wanted to sign up already did.Reyalp51 wrote:
bump
Topic Starter
I mean when I say something clearly wrong like "I always wanted blushing to be denizen" I think it's fair that I expect everyone to understand that it was not my stance on that and therefore it's a jokeCorne2Plum3 wrote:
With you we don't always know if it's sarcasm or not (I don't have to put example you already know what I'm talking about)Patatitta wrote:
/s is for cowards, I have no obligation to tell when i'm joking or not, you should just knowManishh wrote:
you forgot /sPatatitta wrote:
yeah that's why blushing was added actually, I've always wanted them as denizen so I removed the denizen requirement to have them inZain Sugieres wrote:
acceptance of candidates based on their relationship with the presidentManishh wrote:
how is it rigged?Zain Sugieres wrote:
A shame the elections are rigged though.Kobold84 wrote:
Everyone who wanted to sign up already did.Reyalp51 wrote:
bump
+ tbh I think that you don't getting that joke is just because of you not having a good level of reading comprehension and not fully reading the threads
+ coward, don't just say "you already know", mention how you thought I told manishh to kill themselves
*sighs*Patatitta wrote:
I mean when I say something clearly wrong like "I always wanted blushing to be denizen" I think it's fair that I expect everyone to understand that it was not my stance on that and therefore it's a jokeCorne2Plum3 wrote:
With you we don't always know if it's sarcasm or not (I don't have to put example you already know what I'm talking about)Patatitta wrote:
/s is for cowards, I have no obligation to tell when i'm joking or not, you should just knowManishh wrote:
you forgot /sPatatitta wrote:
yeah that's why blushing was added actually, I've always wanted them as denizen so I removed the denizen requirement to have them inZain Sugieres wrote:
acceptance of candidates based on their relationship with the presidentManishh wrote:
how is it rigged?Zain Sugieres wrote:
A shame the elections are rigged though.Kobold84 wrote:
Everyone who wanted to sign up already did.Reyalp51 wrote:
bump
+ tbh I think that you don't getting that joke is just because of you not having a good level of reading comprehension and not fully reading the threads
+ coward, don't just say "you already know", mention how you thought I told manishh to kill themselves
I won't go further about this we already discussed about that
lmao what are you on about patatitta? for people who dont know you and personally dont talk to you, its not as easy as you think for people to detect sarcasm. People cannot even identify a joke, sarcasm is on another level, considering most people in OT! are underage.
Topic Starter
the take of "underage people aren't the best at detecting sarcasm" is insaneManishh wrote:
lmao what are you on about patatitta? for people who dont know you and personally dont talk to you, its not as easy as you think for people to detect sarcasm. People cannot even identify a joke, sarcasm is on another level, considering most people in OT! are underage.
+ idk i've been doing sarcasm wihout /s all my life and there hasn't ever been a problem with it
How is it insane? Just because you could understand and I could from the start does not mean other can, you have to use sarcasm to be able to understand it and many who act wholesome dont use it. Its hard for people to understand sarcasm itself, and it becomes much harder when its on text and + they dont know you.Patatitta wrote:
the take of "underage people aren't the best at detecting sarcasm" is insaneManishh wrote:
lmao what are you on about patatitta? for people who dont know you and personally dont talk to you, its not as easy as you think for people to detect sarcasm. People cannot even identify a joke, sarcasm is on another level, considering most people in OT! are underage.
+ idk i've been doing sarcasm wihout /s all my life and there hasn't ever been a problem with it
Topic Starter
I want to say that irl i'm worse than this, I think saying sarcastic things as if they were serious is way fucking funnier
everyone know this already lol
Where is the result bitch
Topic Starter
a week has passed, so now votes are open, you can vote up to 3 candidates, vote by dming me and then confirming here by saying "I voted"
I voted for spoiler, spoiler and spoiler.
Topic Starter
it's fine to say who you voted for if you guys want to
I voted
vote for me if you are a troll
Cerno wrote:
it’s 6 am why u awakeAsian Warlord wrote:
I voted
I voted
I voted UwU
i voted
I voted
I voted
I voted
I voted
I voted
I voted
Topic Starter
surePolyspora wrote:
Can I vote?
I vored
Bupm.
Topic Starter
in 2 daysPolyspora wrote:
when is it going to end
Vote more.
Topic Starter
unless I missed counting a vote (which I don't think I did but tbf I haven't checked)
winners are
karmine
manishh
reyalp
and there was a tie between hydreigon and reyalp, so I chose who won
will add to the discord group
the people who don't appear on that list got 0 votes lmao skill issue better luck next year bozo
winners are
karmine
manishh
reyalp
and there was a tie between hydreigon and reyalp, so I chose who won
will add to the discord group
the people who don't appear on that list got 0 votes lmao skill issue better luck next year bozo
I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...
Also, it's the current parliement who's supposed to decide the 3rd, not only you. why you did that?
Also, it's the current parliement who's supposed to decide the 3rd, not only you. why you did that?
Topic Starter
no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous onesCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...
Topic Starter
so true bestieScyla wrote:
I voted, why am I not there
No i did, i pmed uPatatitta wrote:
so true bestieScyla wrote:
I voted, why am I not there
Topic Starter
no the fuck you didn'tScyla wrote:
No i did, i pmed uPatatitta wrote:
so true bestieScyla wrote:
I voted, why am I not there
I voted for myself, look at ur pmsPatatitta wrote:
no the fuck you didn'tScyla wrote:
No i did, i pmed uPatatitta wrote:
so true bestieScyla wrote:
I voted, why am I not there
Topic Starter
Scyla wrote:
I voted for myself, look at ur pmsPatatitta wrote:
no the fuck you didn'tScyla wrote:
No i did, i pmed uPatatitta wrote:
so true bestieScyla wrote:
I voted, why am I not there
Topic Starter
yeah you actually had like 20 votes but I didn't want you inScyla wrote:
Holy fak, you erased it
Congratulations.
But it's all too late now…
Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.Patatitta wrote:
no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous onesCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...
But it's all too late now…
What, eyy stop flattering mePatatitta wrote:
yeah you actually had like 20 votes but I didn't want you inScyla wrote:
Holy fak, you erased it
No way I get votes
Topic Starter
oh yeah my bad well anyways I don't think there is any problem with this soKobold84 wrote:
Congratulations.Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.Patatitta wrote:
no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous onesCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...
But it's all too late now…
As you forgot to show what each token voted for, at the end the votes are still anonymous. What you're supposed to do, as Kobold84, is to display the tokens (without their username) and their votes, so each uesr can verify if their votes were conuted correctly. Note that for the next time.Patatitta wrote:
oh yeah my bad well anyways I don't think there is any problem with this soKobold84 wrote:
Congratulations.Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.Patatitta wrote:
no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous onesCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...
But it's all too late now…
Topic Starter
I wont note it and I wont remember it 👍Corne2Plum3 wrote:
As you forgot to show what each token voted for, at the end the votes are still anonymous. What you're supposed to do, as Kobold84, is to display the tokens (without their username) and their votes, so each uesr can verify if their votes were conuted correctly. Note that for the next time.Patatitta wrote:
oh yeah my bad well anyways I don't think there is any problem with this soKobold84 wrote:
Congratulations.Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.Patatitta wrote:
no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous onesCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...
But it's all too late now…
(also, now that I think about it, isn't it flawed?, I could just add new tokens corresponding to no one and adding votes to them and there would be no way to know)
I wonder if you actually read how the previous elections were actually organized...
Topic Starter
I mean I read it like half a month ago when I did this thread initially, I kinda forgot about it, also ironic that you're the one blaming me for not reading lmaoCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I wonder if you actually read how the previous elections were actually organized...
Patatitta wrote:
I mean I read it like half a month ago when I did this thread initially, I kinda forgot about it, also ironic that you're the one blaming me for not reading lmaoCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I wonder if you actually read how the previous elections were actually organized...
Topic Starter
the fact that I forgot doesn't undo that you often neglect your duties as gmtCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Patatitta wrote:
I mean I read it like half a month ago when I did this thread initially, I kinda forgot about it, also ironic that you're the one blaming me for not reading lmaoCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I wonder if you actually read how the previous elections were actually organized...
All votes are public (everyone has to post that they voted), so total votes correspond to the amount of tokens.Patatitta wrote:
I wont note it and I wont remember it 👍Corne2Plum3 wrote:
As you forgot to show what each token voted for, at the end the votes are still anonymous. What you're supposed to do, as Kobold84, is to display the tokens (without their username) and their votes, so each uesr can verify if their votes were conuted correctly. Note that for the next time.Patatitta wrote:
oh yeah my bad well anyways I don't think there is any problem with this soKobold84 wrote:
Congratulations.Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.Patatitta wrote:
no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous onesCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...
But it's all too late now…
(also, now that I think about it, isn't it flawed?, I could just add new tokens corresponding to no one and adding votes to them and there would be no way to know)
This means that if every denizen was to check their vote, they are supposed to find their own token. If this doesn't happen, then something is amiss.
Topic Starter
oh yeah that's trueKobold84 wrote:
All votes are public (everyone has to post that they voted), so total votes correspond to the amount of tokens.Patatitta wrote:
I wont note it and I wont remember it 👍Corne2Plum3 wrote:
As you forgot to show what each token voted for, at the end the votes are still anonymous. What you're supposed to do, as Kobold84, is to display the tokens (without their username) and their votes, so each uesr can verify if their votes were conuted correctly. Note that for the next time.Patatitta wrote:
oh yeah my bad well anyways I don't think there is any problem with this soKobold84 wrote:
Congratulations.Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.Patatitta wrote:
no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous onesCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...
But it's all too late now…
(also, now that I think about it, isn't it flawed?, I could just add new tokens corresponding to no one and adding votes to them and there would be no way to know)
This means that if every denizen was to check their vote, they are supposed to find their own token. If this doesn't happen, then something is amiss.
your not making it outta here onigiri manReyalp51 wrote:
i love nepotism lets gooooooo
majorly fisted by the rules. last time out you were supposed to go into sudden death and let people choose between the tied candidates.Hydreigon wrote:
your not making it outta here onigiri manReyalp51 wrote:
i love nepotism lets gooooooo
I WONNNNNNNNNNNN