Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Manishh wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Zain Sugieres wrote:

Manishh wrote:

Zain Sugieres wrote:

Kobold84 wrote:

Reyalp51 wrote:

bump

Everyone who wanted to sign up already did.

A shame the elections are rigged though.

how is it rigged?

acceptance of candidates based on their relationship with the president

yeah that's why blushing was added actually, I've always wanted them as denizen so I removed the denizen requirement to have them in

you forgot /s

/s is for cowards, I have no obligation to tell when i'm joking or not, you should just know

With you we don't always know if it's sarcasm or not (I don't have to put example you already know what I'm talking about)

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Manishh wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Zain Sugieres wrote:

Manishh wrote:

Zain Sugieres wrote:

Kobold84 wrote:

Reyalp51 wrote:

bump

Everyone who wanted to sign up already did.

A shame the elections are rigged though.

how is it rigged?

acceptance of candidates based on their relationship with the president

yeah that's why blushing was added actually, I've always wanted them as denizen so I removed the denizen requirement to have them in

you forgot /s

/s is for cowards, I have no obligation to tell when i'm joking or not, you should just know

With you we don't always know if it's sarcasm or not (I don't have to put example you already know what I'm talking about)

I mean when I say something clearly wrong like "I always wanted blushing to be denizen" I think it's fair that I expect everyone to understand that it was not my stance on that and therefore it's a joke

+ tbh I think that you don't getting that joke is just because of you not having a good level of reading comprehension and not fully reading the threads

+ coward, don't just say "you already know", mention how you thought I told manishh to kill themselves

Manishh wrote:

lmao what are you on about patatitta? for people who dont know you and personally dont talk to you, its not as easy as you think for people to detect sarcasm. People cannot even identify a joke, sarcasm is on another level, considering most people in OT! are underage.

Patatitta wrote:

Manishh wrote:

lmao what are you on about patatitta? for people who dont know you and personally dont talk to you, its not as easy as you think for people to detect sarcasm. People cannot even identify a joke, sarcasm is on another level, considering most people in OT! are underage.

the take of "underage people aren't the best at detecting sarcasm" is insane

+ idk i've been doing sarcasm wihout /s all my life and there hasn't ever been a problem with it

Asian Warlord wrote:

I voted

Cerno wrote:

Asian Warlord wrote:

I voted

it’s 6 am why u awake

Polyspora wrote:

Can I vote?

Polyspora wrote:

when is it going to end

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...

Scyla wrote:

I voted, why am I not there

Patatitta wrote:

Scyla wrote:

I voted, why am I not there

so true bestie

Scyla wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Scyla wrote:

I voted, why am I not there

so true bestie

No i did, i pmed u

Patatitta wrote:

Scyla wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Scyla wrote:

I voted, why am I not there

so true bestie

No i did, i pmed u

no the fuck you didn't

Scyla wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Scyla wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Scyla wrote:

I voted, why am I not there

so true bestie

No i did, i pmed u

no the fuck you didn't

I voted for myself, look at ur pms

Scyla wrote:

Holy fak, you erased it

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...

no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous ones

Patatitta wrote:

Scyla wrote:

Holy fak, you erased it

yeah you actually had like 20 votes but I didn't want you in

Kobold84 wrote:

Congratulations.

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...

no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous ones

Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.
But it's all too late now…

Patatitta wrote:

Kobold84 wrote:

Congratulations.

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...

no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous ones

Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.
But it's all too late now…

oh yeah my bad well anyways I don't think there is any problem with this so

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I wonder if you actually read how the previous elections were actually organized...

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I wonder if you actually read how the previous elections were actually organized...

I mean I read it like half a month ago when I did this thread initially, I kinda forgot about it, also ironic that you're the one blaming me for not reading lmao

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I wonder if you actually read how the previous elections were actually organized...

I mean I read it like half a month ago when I did this thread initially, I kinda forgot about it, also ironic that you're the one blaming me for not reading lmao

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Kobold84 wrote:

Congratulations.

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...

no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous ones

Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.
But it's all too late now…

oh yeah my bad well anyways I don't think there is any problem with this so

As you forgot to show what each token voted for, at the end the votes are still anonymous. What you're supposed to do, as Kobold84, is to display the tokens (without their username) and their votes, so each uesr can verify if their votes were conuted correctly. Note that for the next time.

I wont note it and I wont remember it 👍

(also, now that I think about it, isn't it flawed?, I could just add new tokens corresponding to no one and adding votes to them and there would be no way to know)

Kobold84 wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

Kobold84 wrote:

Congratulations.

Patatitta wrote:

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

I don't think you were supposed to leak the tokens of each player...

no I actually am supposed to do it, if not just look at the previous ones

Rather than revealing who tokens belong to, you're supposed to reveal who tokens voted for, so that it's possible to cross-reference your own votes and see if they're indeed unchanged.
But it's all too late now…

oh yeah my bad well anyways I don't think there is any problem with this so

As you forgot to show what each token voted for, at the end the votes are still anonymous. What you're supposed to do, as Kobold84, is to display the tokens (without their username) and their votes, so each uesr can verify if their votes were conuted correctly. Note that for the next time.

I wont note it and I wont remember it 👍

(also, now that I think about it, isn't it flawed?, I could just add new tokens corresponding to no one and adding votes to them and there would be no way to know)

All votes are public (everyone has to post that they voted), so total votes correspond to the amount of tokens.
This means that if every denizen was to check their vote, they are supposed to find their own token. If this doesn't happen, then something is amiss.

Reyalp51 wrote:

i love nepotism lets gooooooo

Hydreigon wrote:

Reyalp51 wrote:

i love nepotism lets gooooooo

your not making it outta here onigiri man