You call what I do tyranny, yet isn't forcing others to join an economical system without their consent also tyrannical in nature? I don't fear falling, I simply fear being replaced by a weak, power-hungry institution that does not care about the rights afforded to everyone on OT.Polyspora wrote:
TYRANNY! she’s afraid of falling! Resistance is essential!
forum
Official statement from the OT!President about recent events
posted
Total Posts
54
Topic Starter
I don't blame the misunderstanding, yet there was one.
The economy in the Coalition is strictly related to Coalition goods.
Posters will be pulled into the economy via money being delivered to their account,
but can choose to do nothing with the money they were given, hence they are free to break rules if they choose not to care.
Rules only apply within the Coalition and it's various property and events, not the greater OT.
Hope that clears things up for you, and I hope we can co-operate peacefully in future.
The Economy is still a pending suggestion, since it's a complicated topic.
Also, it will run seperately to OT!Bucks.
The economy in the Coalition is strictly related to Coalition goods.
Posters will be pulled into the economy via money being delivered to their account,
but can choose to do nothing with the money they were given, hence they are free to break rules if they choose not to care.
Rules only apply within the Coalition and it's various property and events, not the greater OT.
Hope that clears things up for you, and I hope we can co-operate peacefully in future.
The Economy is still a pending suggestion, since it's a complicated topic.
Also, it will run seperately to OT!Bucks.
hmmmmm....... I think you're afraid of someone who isnt you in the power señorita (or señora idk), competition will always benefit the consumer, the consumer now being denizens and other participants of OT. we haven't even started and yet you call us power-hungry and weak, if that isn't fear or prepotency I dont know what it is.ghoulybits wrote:
You call what I do tyranny, yet isn't forcing others to join an economical system without their consent also tyrannical in nature? I don't fear falling, I simply fear being replaced by a weak, power-hungry institution that does not care about the rights afforded to everyone on OT.Polyspora wrote:
TYRANNY! she’s afraid of falling! Resistance is essential!
With Elegancy
OT! Representative Polyspora
--- ..-. ..-. -....- - --- .--. .. -.-. ---... / -.-. --- -- -- ..- -. .. - -.-- / .-... / ..- -. .. --- -.
not gonna lie, this kind of announcement can be picked apart as "weak"
Govern yourself a will to live
Dear Ghostly,
Okay
From [ Sebastian ].
Okay
From [ Sebastian ].
I thought the government was gone
Why is the government limiting our rights to research weapons? It is mostly used for self defense anyways, also not every weapon is gonna be used and/or be donated towards prolonging the war because most of us remains neutral in this situation
we demand explanation as soon as possible
- your local engineer
we demand explanation as soon as possible
- your local engineer
Every pro-weapon argument everNotRaffi wrote:
Why is the government limiting our rights to research weapons? It is mostly used for self defense anyways, also not every weapon is gonna be used and/or be donated towards prolonging the war because most of us remains neutral in this situation
we demand explanation as soon as possible
- your local engineer
is this your first act as a president?, cant really recall anything else lol
OT was at peace, there was no need for the government, but the padorus are trying to overthrow it so they have to actPatatitta wrote:
is this your first act as a president?, cant really recall anything else lol
Ty for the audiobook, wayy better than a tldr
I like my pew pews sorryCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Every pro-weapon argument everNotRaffi wrote:
Why is the government limiting our rights to research weapons? It is mostly used for self defense anyways, also not every weapon is gonna be used and/or be donated towards prolonging the war because most of us remains neutral in this situation
we demand explanation as soon as possible
- your local engineer
so government is just mainly an rp thing?Karmine wrote:
OT was at peace, there was no need for the government, but the padorus are trying to overthrow it so they have to actPatatitta wrote:
is this your first act as a president?, cant really recall anything else lol
Yeah, the only thing they do is name denizens but that doesn't mean anything. There's also OT!Court and all but it's all rp, in the end they don't have any actual power, only GMTs do.Patatitta wrote:
so government is just mainly an rp thing?Karmine wrote:
OT was at peace, there was no need for the government, but the padorus are trying to overthrow it so they have to actPatatitta wrote:
is this your first act as a president?, cant really recall anything else lol
ah, thought they had more actual power, my badKarmine wrote:
Yeah, the only thing they do is name denizens but that doesn't mean anything. There's also OT!Court and all but it's all rp, in the end they don't have any actual power, only GMTs do.Patatitta wrote:
so government is just mainly an rp thing?Karmine wrote:
OT was at peace, there was no need for the government, but the padorus are trying to overthrow it so they have to actPatatitta wrote:
is this your first act as a president?, cant really recall anything else lol
tl;dr
Topic Starter
If you can clarify this in your original post, that would be greatly appreciated.-Remi wrote:
I don't blame the misunderstanding, yet there was one.
The economy in the Coalition is strictly related to Coalition goods.
Posters will be pulled into the economy via money being delivered to their account,
but can choose to do nothing with the money they were given, hence they are free to break rules if they choose not to care.
Rules only apply within the Coalition and it's various property and events, not the greater OT.
Hope that clears things up for you, and I hope we can co-operate peacefully in future.
The Economy is still a pending suggestion, since it's a complicated topic.
Also, it will run seperately to OT!Bucks.
I think this is the first time someone's ever messed up my username.[ Sebastian ] wrote:
Dear Ghostly,
Okay
From [ Sebastian ].
NO MORE WAR!!! PEACE....
THE ONLY WAY TO FIND PEACE IS ACTUALLY EASIER IF WE ALL JOIN TO CREATE A HAPPY AND INCLUSIVE OT...
defeating padoru-ers...
but, without all these organizations.
ILL BE THE FIRST ANARCHIST
FUCK PADORU
FUCK OT COALITION
FUCK OT GOVERNMENT
FUCK ALL COMPANIES
THE ONLY WAY TO FIND PEACE IS ACTUALLY EASIER IF WE ALL JOIN TO CREATE A HAPPY AND INCLUSIVE OT...
defeating padoru-ers...
but, without all these organizations.
ILL BE THE FIRST ANARCHIST
FUCK PADORU
FUCK OT COALITION
FUCK OT GOVERNMENT
FUCK ALL COMPANIES
If there is no groups no large amount of members will go against each otherRigbyuis wrote:
NO MORE WAR!!! PEACE....
THE ONLY WAY TO FIND PEACE IS ACTUALLY EASIER IF WE ALL JOIN TO CREATE A HAPPY AND INCLUSIVE OT...
defeating padoru-ers...
but, without all these organizations.
ILL BE THE FIRST ANARCHIST
FUCK PADORU
FUCK OT COALITION
FUCK OT GOVERNMENT
FUCK ALL COMPANIES
anarco-pacifist side of the war
anarco-pacifist side of the boardoctowave wrote:
saw "anarchist", i'm on boardRigbyuis wrote:
NO MORE WAR!!! PEACE....
THE ONLY WAY TO FIND PEACE IS ACTUALLY EASIER IF WE ALL JOIN TO CREATE A HAPPY AND INCLUSIVE OT...
defeating padoru-ers...
but, without all these organizations.
ILL BE THE FIRST ANARCHIST
FUCK PADORU
FUCK OT COALITION
FUCK OT GOVERNMENT
FUCK ALL COMPANIES
If there's anarchy, meaning there are no rulesRigbyuis wrote:
anarco-pacifist side of the waranarco-pacifist side of the boardoctowave wrote:
saw "anarchist", i'm on boardRigbyuis wrote:
NO MORE WAR!!! PEACE....
THE ONLY WAY TO FIND PEACE IS ACTUALLY EASIER IF WE ALL JOIN TO CREATE A HAPPY AND INCLUSIVE OT...
defeating padoru-ers...
but, without all these organizations.
ILL BE THE FIRST ANARCHIST
FUCK PADORU
FUCK OT COALITION
FUCK OT GOVERNMENT
FUCK ALL COMPANIES
There cannot be peace as people have no reason to not act out
There is no order when there's nothing to keep order
you're confusing libertarianism with anarchy.Jarcrafted wrote:
If there's anarchy, meaning there are no rulesRigbyuis wrote:
anarco-pacifist side of the waranarco-pacifist side of the boardoctowave wrote:
saw "anarchist", i'm on boardRigbyuis wrote:
NO MORE WAR!!! PEACE....
THE ONLY WAY TO FIND PEACE IS ACTUALLY EASIER IF WE ALL JOIN TO CREATE A HAPPY AND INCLUSIVE OT...
defeating padoru-ers...
but, without all these organizations.
ILL BE THE FIRST ANARCHIST
FUCK PADORU
FUCK OT COALITION
FUCK OT GOVERNMENT
FUCK ALL COMPANIES
There cannot be peace as people have no reason to not act out
in anarchy, what reigns is the no agression principle. anarchists look for a better world, and see the abolition of any kind of government or religion as the only way, since in theory (and stated by jean jacques rosseau) the human is good in nature
libertarianism is what is often confused with anarchism, and is doing whatever you want. that doesn't mean it doesn't have a philosophy though
As much as I believe Anarchy = Fun, you have to remember who did denizenship all this time, and who keeps track of the lore and law.
Spoiler alert, it was the OT!Govt.
It's also worth noting that 2 of the 3 people advocating for Anarchy are either new, or invisible (aka: rarely posted until now).
Spoiler alert, it was the OT!Govt.
It's also worth noting that 2 of the 3 people advocating for Anarchy are either new, or invisible (aka: rarely posted until now).
Topic Starter
Let them be anarchists, it gives me things to do-Remi wrote:
As much as I believe Anarchy = Fun, you have to remember who did denizenship all this time, and who keeps track of the lore and law.
Spoiler alert, it was the OT!Govt.
It's also worth noting that 2 of the 3 people advocating for Anarchy are either new, or invisible (aka: rarely posted until now).
I like seeing my position finally be usefulAbolition of government obviously will lead to no laws, and if there are no laws to stop one from doing bad, people will do bad.Rigbyuis wrote:
you're confusing libertarianism with anarchy.Jarcrafted wrote:
If there's anarchy, meaning there are no rulesRigbyuis wrote:
anarco-pacifist side of the waranarco-pacifist side of the boardoctowave wrote:
saw "anarchist", i'm on boardRigbyuis wrote:
NO MORE WAR!!! PEACE....
THE ONLY WAY TO FIND PEACE IS ACTUALLY EASIER IF WE ALL JOIN TO CREATE A HAPPY AND INCLUSIVE OT...
defeating padoru-ers...
but, without all these organizations.
ILL BE THE FIRST ANARCHIST
FUCK PADORU
FUCK OT COALITION
FUCK OT GOVERNMENT
FUCK ALL COMPANIES
There cannot be peace as people have no reason to not act out
in anarchy, what reigns is the no agression principle. anarchists look for a better world, and see the abolition of any kind of government or religion as the only way, since in theory (and stated by jean jacques rosseau) the human is good in nature
libertarianism is what is often confused with anarchism, and is doing whatever you want. that doesn't mean it doesn't have a philosophy though
If EVERYONE is under that, there will be no one to stop others from doing wrong even if they suppose that they prioritize "no aggression"
You can't have peace, people will always disagree, you just have to hope they can find a stalemate
i'm "not" new here (nor inactive, except for the 1 month break i took since i didnt find forums interesting anymore) i've actually been posting in OT since like... half of the year-Remi wrote:
As much as I believe Anarchy = Fun, you have to remember who did denizenship all this time, and who keeps track of the lore (and law.)
It's also worth noting that 2 of the 3 people advocating for Anarchy are either new, or invisible (aka: rarely posted until now).
now, one thing it's me not being new or inactive, but another one it's me being irrelevant to the ot lore and the ot circle in general because i stay away from it for no reason
Half a year is still very new, my brother...Rigbyuis wrote:
i'm "not" new here (nor inactive, except for the 1 month break i took since i didnt find forums interesting anymore) i've actually been posting in OT since like... half of the year-Remi wrote:
As much as I believe Anarchy = Fun, you have to remember who did denizenship all this time, and who keeps track of the lore (and law.)
It's also worth noting that 2 of the 3 people advocating for Anarchy are either new, or invisible (aka: rarely posted until now).
now, one thing it's me not being new or inactive, but another one it's me being irrelevant to the ot lore and the ot circle in general because i stay away from it for no reason
WTF has happened since I went inactive???
BTW: If people want to be like US democrats then honestly I can’t support that. War is bad.
I will stay against Padoruship.
BTW: If people want to be like US democrats then honestly I can’t support that. War is bad.
I will stay against Padoruship.
It isn't an effort to let the Padoru have total control, it's an effort to let this be our last invasion.YyottaCat wrote:
WTF has happened since I went inactive???
BTW: If people want to be like US democrats then honestly I can’t support that. War is bad.
I will stay against Padoruship.
This is why I made sure to have 2 Anti-Padoru members, and 1 Padoru member.
Topic Starter
At this point, this thread has evolved well past any of my expectationsoctowave wrote:
jesus christ, i'm just here for silly roleplaying, not whatever political debate is going on here
if it start getting political we'll cease the roleplay. everyone here just wants to have a good timeoctowave wrote:
jesus christ, i'm just here for silly roleplaying, not whatever political debate is going on here
I dont know why yyotta brought politics up, but lets end it here please
YeahPolyspora wrote:
if it start getting political we'll cease the roleplay. everyone here just wants to have a good timeoctowave wrote:
jesus christ, i'm just here for silly roleplaying, not whatever political debate is going on here
I dont know why yyotta brought politics up, but lets end it here please
If we're being deadass, all the stuff related to Padoru is just silly roleplay.
Only thing that isn't is probably Events and shit
i prefer the [REDACTED] party, i like their stuff more than the [REDACTED] party
it's pretty much not a good idea to bring up such a thing in most contexts though
i think she brought it up as a object of comparisonPolyspora wrote:
if it start getting political we'll cease the roleplay. everyone here just wants to have a good timeoctowave wrote:
jesus christ, i'm just here for silly roleplaying, not whatever political debate is going on here
I dont know why yyotta brought politics up, but lets end it here please
it's pretty much not a good idea to bring up such a thing in most contexts though
Topic Starter
Based and [REDACTED]pilledz0z wrote:
i prefer the [REDACTED] party, i like their stuff more than the [REDACTED] party
Hey! You can't say that!z0z wrote:
i prefer the [REDACTED] party, i like their stuff more than the [REDACTED] party
why are teenagers so obsessed with real world politics lol its boring adult shit anyways
Because it makes them feel speshullKaaruumii wrote:
why are teenagers so obsessed with real world politics lol its boring adult shit anyways
Stop with all the real-world politics -_-
Stop! It's a trick!Kaaruumii wrote:
NO NO NO NO NO NO WAITKaaruumii wrote:
WAITTT WOMEN. NO NO NO, THIS ISNT RIGHT. I will not help this government.
Manish momentManishh wrote:
WAITTT WOMEN. NO NO NO, THIS ISNT RIGHT. I will not help this government.
this is looking pretty fun :>
---
granted, i guess it's pretty common for that teenager to also want to affirm and propagate their own perspective through the scope of what they see in their world politically, or... some kind of reason adjacent to that. probably could be a way form them to process or extrapolate that to another realm like OT in service of any number of motives, from idealism to hedonism.
that said, not sure why "feeling special" became something pejorative anyways... if anything, malignant contrarianism would be more significant and problematic.
...i should clarify that i'm not painting you as that, it's more that the phrase brings some notable things to mind that people do act on.
---
manish moment...WitherMite wrote:
Manish momentManishh wrote:
WAITTT WOMEN. NO NO NO, THIS ISNT RIGHT. I will not help this government.
seems to be a pretty inaccurate assessment. in this case, it might genuinely be a lot more simple than that: it's fun.Jarcrafted wrote:
Because it makes them feel speshullKaaruumii wrote:
why are teenagers so obsessed with real world politics lol its boring adult shit anyways
granted, i guess it's pretty common for that teenager to also want to affirm and propagate their own perspective through the scope of what they see in their world politically, or... some kind of reason adjacent to that. probably could be a way form them to process or extrapolate that to another realm like OT in service of any number of motives, from idealism to hedonism.
that said, not sure why "feeling special" became something pejorative anyways... if anything, malignant contrarianism would be more significant and problematic.
...i should clarify that i'm not painting you as that, it's more that the phrase brings some notable things to mind that people do act on.