sorry but I wont use formating
m4m00:00:430 - At the very beginning you are forced (by the editor) to put NC on the first slider, maybe you could add it on the next similar sliders (As 00:03:430 (4) - 00:06:430 (4) - 00:09:430 (4) - ) to keep the consistency
00:12:430 (2,3) - Have you tried doing Ctrl+G on this? It'd play better imo
00:16:930 (1) - Please your blankets make me feel like i'm watching at Mir's mapsets
00:22:930 (1) - yeah i love u too thanks mr.mirai
00:36:055 (2) - Stack with 00:34:367 (2) - ? (or stack the slider to the circle better)
01:01:930 (4) - This would play better as a slider imo, it feels like the space between this and the next note doesn't really fit the feeling of "The song is becoming intense!"
01:09:805 - For this small part you could do something like this
http://puu.sh/yPsbu/37b91c7ade.osu (sorry i had to do it like this because i can't really explain it). Don't mind the placements, but I wanted to show you that you could do a jump at the first two circles then stack the third circle at the end of the first jump and repeat the process. It would really fit the feeling of the song in that moment and I think you will also agree that
01:13:742 (4) - You could move this behind the followpoint, because right now, the placement of that circle reflects the position of the next note (whose is suposed to be below 01:13:555 (3) - ) So you're not really reflecting it correctly imo, so you could just move it to x444 y:130 ... at least give it a try
01:34:555 (3) - you could make this straight lol it feels kinda weird while playing since its going to nowhere
01:42:055 (4) - I know this is stacked with a previous circle, but the spacing is way bigger than the previous similar one 01:38:680 (3,4) - (this is 2,85x spacing and the previous is 2,65x)
01:43:555 (3) - Yes, after a lot of thinking and testing, I concluded that doing Ctrl+J on this slider would fit a lot better than the current one, because it will fit both flows (01:43:930 (1) - as a flow break and 01:43:367 (2) - as a fluid flow)
01:45:805 (1,2) - I mean it's the slowest and calmest part that i've heard on the song, and you used way TOO MUCH MORE spacing than the other parts (even considering the difference of time between notes it's still too high)
It just doesn't make sense at all
01:52:367 (2,3) - Normal spacing vs 01:57:430 (5,6) - Big spacing on similar parts lol why... you also used a way lower spacing on the same similar part 02:03:430 (5,6) -
02:33:805 - same than before
02:48:055 (4) - NC for vocals and emphasis? unexpected big jump lol
02:55:555 (3) - woahh try doing Ctrl+G on this, I mean you lose a bit of spacing but it plays hella good LOL
02:58:930 (1) - pls add a curve at the end of this slider, I assure you that It will be a lot better
03:03:430 - Undermapped lol why
03:06:430 (2) - This feels like a single circle more than a slider
03:09:430 - BabyRage
03:36:055 (3,4,5,6) - Why did you map it 1/4? That's clearly 1/3 lol
03:39:805 - Tell me im not the only hearing a non-hitsounded whistle here
04:03:242 (5) - NC for emphasis would difference both patterns a lot and that would look better
last kiai is weird to play but it looks ok
04:38:680 - You should add small kiais (like 1 sec kiais) on specific parts of this whole section since it has the feeling and intensity of a kiai, but you can't put a whole kiai on this cuz that would be a lot. Then you could just use 1 sec kiais, to represent the most intense parts of this section (just in case you don't know but you can give it the brightness and stars effect from a kiai just with 1 second)
05:09:430 (1,2,3) - I don't really think these three are from the same rhythm, I mean, they doesn't really seem to be fitting being all in the same pattern and position
done, sorry for the wall, but most of them are shitty suggestions