• You should increase the AudioLeadIn to 2000. 1000 makes the first object come onto screen a bit too quickly.
  01:32:542 (1) - On all difficulties, make the timing section at this spinner 5%. 10% makes it too audible. If you plan on keeping 10%, at least make the hitsound soft so you can't really hear the spinner.

• 00:05:473 (2) - Remove the finish from the beginning of this slider. It's not in the music.
  00:23:404 (2) - Remove the finish from the end of this slider for the same reason.
  00:26:163 (2) - ^ Also, remove the whistle at the end of this slider for consistency.
  00:26:852 (3) - Make this slider the same exact shape as 00:24:094 (3), just reversed. It makes more sense.
  00:31:680 (2) - Remove all whistle from this slider for consistency.

• 00:08:921 (1) - Whistle at the beginning of this slider for consistency.
  00:39:439 (2,3) - I really love how you made this overlap. It looks really nice.
  00:44:266 (2) - Move this up a bit to be aligned with 00:43:404 (1).

• In all of the timing sections with custom hitsounds, make them normal. Taiko difficulties really shouldn't have custom hitsounds.

• 00:14:266 - Add a note here to keep the flow going.
  01:19:611 (3) - The sudden slider speed change starting with this slider is totally unpredictable and unreadable. This is mainly because of the fact that the first sliders during the speed change were scrunched up sliders (which are harder to notice speed change in). I read this slider as 1/2 repeat slider before finally getting it after the fifth try.
  01:30:990 (1) - The whistle on this slider burns my eardrums.

• 00:06:163 (1) - Add a whistle to the beginning of this slider along with the finish for consistency.
  01:06:249 (7) - Moving this back by one tick and extending it to be a 1/2 slider makes a lot more sense, is more readable, and keeps the flow going strong.

• 01:09:611 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Call me retarded, but I read these notes as a stream. Since the spacing in the 1/4 sliders was large and the song's speed was increasing at the same time, I expected a stream to be here. Try spacing them further apart or making them a stream.

• 00:22:714 (1,2,1,2) - Absolutely not in a map going for ranking. No way. If this was for approval, it might be okay.
  00:25:473 (1,2,1,2) - ^
  00:39:266 (1) - Don't use an anti-jump here. Players hate it when people do this with streams (same case with stacking). They might hit an extra button on accident and miss the first note of the stream.
  01:05:646 (3,4) - The spacing between this stream and others like it is about 4.0x (not saying this is unrankable, but this isn't fun to play).

Jacob wrote:

General

• You should increase the AudioLeadIn to 2000. 1000 makes the first object come onto screen a bit too quickly. Agree
  01:32:542 (1) - On all difficulties, make the timing section at this spinner 5%. 10% makes it too audible. If you plan on keeping 10%, at least make the hitsound soft so you can't really hear the spinner. Agree

Emdyion's Silver

• 00:14:266 - Add a note here to keep the flow going. No, keeping pattern.
  01:19:611 (3) - The sudden slider speed change starting with this slider is totally unpredictable and unreadable. This is mainly because of the fact that the first sliders during the speed change were scrunched up sliders (which are harder to notice speed change in). I read this slider as 1/2 repeat slider before finally getting it after the fifth try. What sudden slider speed change?
  01:30:990 (1) - The whistle on this slider burns my eardrums. Note to Philippines: Keep whistle on hitcircles, but remove the whistle sound

And yes, Chrome would be a good idea for a diff name.

Philippines wrote:

• Changelog

1. I'd assume Emdyion won't change anything. Since he's trying to make the patterns consistent with the other patterns so he won't add a note on 00:28:921. Also on tic's first suggestion on his diff. Please tell me If I'm wrong. XD Agree, but I'll change the first part of Tic's mod. Later.

• Changelog

1. Changed my Silver to Chrome. Decided to keep Emdyion's as Silver.
   
2. Renamed Wmf's Taiko to Wmf's Platinum Taiko to go with the diff name scheme. (:
   
3. Changed Audio Lead-in to 2,000.
   
4. Followed all hit sound suggestions.
   
5. No change on Platinum and Gold.

TheNutritiousGuy wrote:

Ohi~~

[General]
00:00:646 - 00:11:508 - This part should get soft Hitsounds, in all Difficults. Because the soft Finish sounds way better then normal Finish.
You could delete the .osb File. Uh..I'd somewhat agree with this, but I've already made my part with soft hitsounds already. Maybe Philippines can just use my inherited points...?

[Emdiyon's Silver]
00:19:956 (10) - NC Agree, Philippines can do that
00:20:128 (1) - Remove NC ^
00:30:128 (3) - The current lenght doesn't fit well. Do . This fits fine. Huh? I don't get this..
00:32:370 (1,2,3,4) - I'm not sure if this is ok for a Hard Diff. ...I think it should be fine.
01:10:301 (5) - Extend this until to the End Point of (6). So make a 1/4 repeater to 1/2? Hmm...
01:10:646 (6) - Delete it if you follow this^. ...Not changing for now.
01:30:990 (1) - I don't know. I don't see the reason why you should set the clap here. ?

• A few infos..

1. Didn't changed TNG's Soft Hitsound Suggestion.
2. Changed all TNG's Suggestion for [Rust].
3. Decreased Circle Size in [Bronze] by 1 to remove those ugly overlaps.
4. Fixed the little white line on the Background of taiko diff.
5. OD +1 for [Gold].
   
   To TNG, If I added OD +1 on [Platinum], max score would be 20M which will make it run for approval, so no.

eddieee wrote:

hmmm streams... so creative..

1. 00:14:094 (3) - missed a clap?
2. 00:55:990 (1) - eh, you still keep this spinner?

1. 00:01:680 (2,3) - you better use half-beat notes later, not at the very beginning
2. 00:15:301 (2) - to be honest, I don't like when people skip beat(s), especially big white ones. Also, you did it a lot on this diff
3. 00:54:439 (3,4) - uncomfortable for playing
   
   Also, I recommend you to reduce spacing here since it's Normal, make it at least 1.0.

1. 00:28:232 (1) ~ 00:36:335 (9) — I dislike it again, too many notes in a row, in my opinion. Even if it's Hard, you shouldn't spam that much

1. 01:06:508 (6,6) - again? It's too far from next and previous streams. Also, it doesn't seem that you followed my suggestions before

• 
  All I'd say here was already said before me. The only thing I can post is my personal opinion: I don't think that constant streaming fits this music. Yeah, it might be associated w/ piano play or something, but not with streaming.

1. Inconsistency in the slider tick rate. If you're going to use 2 tick rate on your diffs then please use it for every diff that you made. Currently Gold and Platinum have 1 tick rate

1. Increase OD by 1 to make it balanced with the next diff
2. 00:55:990 (1) - The spinner doesn't fit the current place. Xgor have given a good reason and I agree with him. It's better to just remove it
3. 01:32:370 (2) - NC to this note

1. I feel iffy about the difficulty jump from Rust to Bronze. I'll just say it here, let's see if others agree with me or not
2. Increase HP and OD by 1
3. 00:55:990 (1) - Same problem as the above diff

1. 00:55:990 (1) - I'm starting to sound like a parrot here but again the same problem as above
2. 01:31:680 (5) - NC this note

1. 00:38:921 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - At first this plays nice but you're using it way too much and it become too repetitive. Try not to use the same pattern over and over in a short time span as it may quickly become boring. For this pattern I suggest to just use it until 00:41:680 (6) and starting from 00:42:025 you should use a different pattern. Maybe something like 1/4 sliders stream then a circle. Here's an example
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:47:542 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Same problem as above. A stream pattern that were used many time it became repetitive.
3. 00:55:990 (1) - Yup, the spinner
4. 01:17:025 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Repetitive pattern, but for this one I suggest to use it 4 times until 01:19:611 (6) then change to other pattern (maybe using kick slider stream) on 01:19:783. Of course you can use your own idea but please avoid using the same pattern again
5. 01:24:783 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - This one is a very long stream, too long maybe. Try to tone it down a little, maybe stop the stream on 01:28:232 (1) then use 1/1 beat until 01:28:921 then start the stream again from 01:29:266. Oh and try to use different pattern too for the next stream
6. 01:32:370 (2) - NC this

1. Now this is where everything goes wrong. As I said before, there are no rules that forbid using streams but a 5 second stream of 1/4 beat again and again is just silly.There's nothing I can suggest for this diff other than re-map or scrap the diff
2. 00:22:714 (1,2,1,2) - Another tedious pattern. This super fast slider is very sudden you won't know that they are 1/4 beat slider until you miss it

LifestreamEyenine wrote:

Wow, you really shot almost all of your kudosu on this map...

Good luck! Looking forward to seeing this map ranked

eddieee wrote:

hmmm streams... so creative..

Jacob wrote:

Uguu.

Philippines wrote:

i guess this'll be the new record for lowest star rating. XD but thanks everyone!

Blue Dragon wrote:

No need to troll, guys.

Derekku wrote:

Happy belated birthday!

Philippines wrote:

:|, lemme do a little working. :O

1. Where is your SPREAD? EIIIII IS H O R R I B L E.
2. Why was this map ranked even with a spread such as this, or even as a map like this? Will you actually respond to what you guys did, Derek and Mafiamaster?

1. Consider everything below this as an italics tag, or even a bold tag.
2. This diff has an identity crisis between a Hard and an Insane.
3. 00:11:680 (1) - This slider can be composed better.
4. 00:13:059 (1,3) - These two sliders can look better.
5. 00:19:956 (1,2,3,4,5) - Is this a hard, or an insane?
6. 00:23:404 (5,6,1) - This anti-jump doesn't make any sense flow wise.
7. 00:28:577 (2) - Stack on 1
8. 00:28:749 (3,4,5,6) - There's your hard vs insane clause again.
9. 00:29:611 (2) - Stack on 1
10. 00:30:128 (3,4,5,6) - Same as ^
11. ^ nice copy paste
12. 00:31:335 (2) - Stack on 1, you get the point
13. 00:32:370 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ???? is this platinum???
14. 00:35:128 (1,2,3,4,5) - This stream of 5, and the ALL THE ONES ahead of it are bad in terms of flow and the difficulty.

1. Consider everything below this as an italics tag, or even a bold tag.
2. The overall difficulty of this difficulty is RIDICULOUS. These JUMPS are HORRID. H O R R I D.
3. 00:12:714 (13,1) - 136miliseconds for a 2.36x jump? Are you a robot? These streams NEED to be reworked.
4. 00:14:094 (13,1) - ^
5. 00:15:473 (13,1) - ^
6. 00:18:232 (13,14) - This jump is utterly ridiculous. Fix it.
7. 00:19:611 (13,14) - ^
8. 00:20:990 (13,14) - ^
9. 00:22:370 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - I don't know how this was even ranked to begin with?
10. 00:30:128 (6,7,8,9) - ???? ^
11. 00:31:508 (6,7,8,9,10) - ^
12. 00:34:266 (6,7,8,9) - ^
13. 00:35:646 (6,7,8,9,10) - ^
14. 00:37:025 (6,7,8,9,10) - ^
15. 00:38:921 (13,1) - What is this anti-jump? Breaks the flow of the map.
16. 01:02:370 (13,1) - Spacing in this as well.
17. 01:05:473 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - ^
18. 01:06:852 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - ^
19. 01:12:456 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - (AND ALL OTHER COMBOS LIKE THIS) just NO
20. 01:16:852 (4,1,6,6,6,6,6,6) - Everything with the beat on the top here with the random streams is utterly ridiculous and do not even correspond to flow.

SapphireGhost wrote:

00:37:887 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,1) - Please don't do this. Oftentimes while attempting to hit the fast-paced (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13), it is very easy to hit too many times and end up missing (1).

Jacob wrote:

Also, please don't stack a stream under another stream when they're 1/1 beats apart. The player might accidentally hit the start of the stream too early. A solution to this would be this.

dkun wrote:

136miliseconds for a 2.36X jump?

SPOILER

Derekku wrote:

dkun: Star rating cannot be used to judge difficulty spread. I feel that this spread is proper and nice; easy/normal/hard/hard+/insane/expert.

As for Platinum itself: I stand behind my decision that this map is rankable, intuitive, and readable.

dkun wrote:

Then you do not know what difficulty spread is.

There is NO way in hell this is an E/N/H/H+/I/EX. Your decision? Look AROUND you. Everyone else clearly doesn't!

SapphireGhost wrote:

I don't know if "too hard" is a good reason to deny rankability on this map.
TJ.Hangneil - Kamui [SHD] and celas - Azul (Remix) are at least as difficult and also ranked.

Gaba wrote:

SapphireGhost wrote:

I don't know if "too hard" is a good reason to deny rankability on this map.
TJ.Hangneil - Kamui [SHD] and celas - Azul (Remix) are at least as difficult and also ranked.

Yes, but they are actually good maps.

No offense to the mapper, but this map is...meh.