Okay stop anything that's happening. :O I don't wanna get this locked D:
I find it funny that you bubble a map like this, but refuse to bubble a map because you ''feel'' the normal is too hardDerekku wrote:
Happy belated birthday!
Lovely!Philippines wrote:
:|, lemme do a little working. :O
SapphireGhost wrote:
00:37:887 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,1) - Please don't do this. Oftentimes while attempting to hit the fast-paced (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13), it is very easy to hit too many times and end up missing (1).
I find this reasoning to be extremely flawed to be honest. In my opinion the player should be perfectly able to play this. If not, it's the player's fault not the mapper. Changing a difficulty in order to allow a player to play a map better just seems to defeat a certain purpose of mapping.Jacob wrote:
Also, please don't stack a stream under another stream when they're 1/1 beats apart. The player might accidentally hit the start of the stream too early. A solution to this would be this.
dkun wrote:
136miliseconds for a 2.36X jump?
Yeah, super fast sliders are totally readable! (no they're not.)Derekku wrote:
dkun: Star rating cannot be used to judge difficulty spread. I feel that this spread is proper and nice; easy/normal/hard/hard+/insane/expert.
As for Platinum itself: I stand behind my decision that this map is rankable, intuitive, and readable.
Not needed to be as rude as you are being now, but I can agree with you here dkun, there is not way to call it an E/N/H/H+/I/EX. Derekku probably played the map, at least I'm sure he can play it easily. I don't think the map is as messy as you are saying dkun, but it's not even decent to rank a map as it is.dkun wrote:
Then you do not know what difficulty spread is.
There is NO way in hell this is an E/N/H/H+/I/EX. Your decision? Look AROUND you. Everyone else clearly doesn't!