dont actually know if you need to, but reading the photographer's licensing terms it might be wise to mention "Angela B Pan Photography" in the link just to make sure we're complying
normal
00:00:686 (1,2,3,4) 00:06:879 (1,2,3,4) - feels really active for the section i would suggest making it a little less dense
everywhere that's like 00:55:266 in both choruses - i get focusing stronger vocals but not having circle here just feels underwhelming imo
its 155bpm u dont need to have so many gaps like that
hard
insane
another
01:28:750 (4,1) - nerf/change this, i understand why you did it, but 1/4 jump of this degree here is a little concerning
if you want to keep 1/4 then maybe a little more than this one works ok 01:33:588 (1,2) -
top
01:12:492 (1,1) - nitpick: kinda feels weird to keep these nc'd because you're trying to emphasize two different things with ncs like 1 second apart
01:36:879 (1,1,1) - might be nicer to keep the nc spam out until 01:37:460 (1) - cuz that part just feels gunga weak otherwise
02:06:427 (1,1) - this one in particular is kinda messed up, making it more vertical like 02:09:395 (1,1,1,1) would be good
ik u probably did that for a reason but honestly i feel like emphasizing using higher spacing instead of angle might work better overall
dont actually know if you need to, but reading the photographer's licensing terms it might be wise to mention "Angela B Pan Photography" in the link just to make sure we're complying
00:00:686 (1,2,3,4) 00:06:879 (1,2,3,4) - feels really active for the section i would suggest making it a little less dense
01:28:750 (4,1) - nerf/change this, i understand why you did it, but 1/4 jump of this degree here is a little concerning
if you want to keep 1/4 then maybe a little more than this one works ok 01:33:588 (1,2) -
01:12:492 (1,1) - nitpick: kinda feels weird to keep these nc'd because you're trying to emphasize two different things with ncs like 1 second apart
01:36:879 (1,1,1) - might be nicer to keep the nc spam out until 01:37:460 (1) - cuz that part just feels gunga weak otherwise
02:06:427 (1,1) - this one in particular is kinda messed up, making it more vertical like 02:09:395 (1,1,1,1) would be good
ik u probably did that for a reason but honestly i feel like emphasizing using higher spacing instead of angle might work better overall