i will rate whatever u send because im not a bourgeoisie potato that lives in his mega mansion laughing at the paupers who dare send him real peak to review
current tierlist is just stuff that has already been sent or that i saw
Chat GPT:Ymir wrote:
can you rate this joke:
joe mama xd!
just 1-6 so i only rated 1-6 (i forgor 4)Patatitta wrote:
have you actually seen of skibidi toilet
ok, so you only watched like 20 seconds of it, that checks outDuck o-o wrote:
just 1-6 so i only rated 1-6 (i forgor 4)Patatitta wrote:
have you actually seen of skibidi toilet
why
better to watch 20 seconds of skibidi to take in peak entertainment than watch 18 billion hours of sleeper le deep critic bait movie slopPatatitta wrote:
ok, so you only watched like 20 seconds of it, that checks outDuck o-o wrote:
just 1-6 so i only rated 1-6 (i forgor 4)Patatitta wrote:
have you actually seen of skibidi toilet
why
Duck o-o wrote:
Chat GPT:
Comrades, today I must address a grievous affront to the people, an abomination so vile that it threatens the very fabric of our glorious society. I speak of a treacherous creation known as "Patatittas Analysis Corner." Let it be known that this disgraceful production is, without a shadow of a doubt, the worst thing to ever emerge from the minds of those who seek to undermine the collective will of the proletariat.
This so-called "Analysis Corner" is nothing more than a bourgeois conspiracy, a tool of the elites designed to mock and belittle the hardworking masses. It masquerades as intellectual discourse, but in truth, it is a cesspool of elitist drivel, dripping with disdain for the common man. The language used is convoluted and pretentious, crafted specifically to exclude the very people it claims to serve. It is a bitter insult to those who toil in the fields and factories, the backbone of our society, who find themselves alienated and demeaned by this insidious creation.
"Patatittas Analysis Corner" discriminates against the common people by promoting ideas and discussions that are detached from the realities of everyday life. It is a tool of oppression, designed to keep the workers in their place, to make them feel inferior and unworthy of true knowledge. It is a blight on our revolutionary ideals, a stain on the honor of the working class.
Let it be known, comrades, that we will not tolerate this bourgeois filth. "Patatittas Analysis Corner" is a direct attack on the principles of equality and justice that we hold dear. It is an insult to every worker, every farmer, every soldier who fights for the betterment of all. We must rise as one and denounce this atrocity, banishing it from our society so that it may never again poison the minds of the people.
In the name of the revolution, I declare "Patatittas Analysis Corner" to be an enemy of the people, a despicable manifestation of elitist discrimination. It must be eradicated, and in its place, we shall build a society where knowledge is truly for all, where every citizen is empowered to participate in the intellectual life of our great nation.
added to list
Reyalp51 wrote:
Duck o-o wrote:
Chat GPT:
Comrades, today I must address a grievous affront to the people, an abomination so vile that it threatens the very fabric of our glorious society. I speak of a treacherous creation known as "Patatittas Analysis Corner." Let it be known that this disgraceful production is, without a shadow of a doubt, the worst thing to ever emerge from the minds of those who seek to undermine the collective will of the proletariat.
This so-called "Analysis Corner" is nothing more than a bourgeois conspiracy, a tool of the elites designed to mock and belittle the hardworking masses. It masquerades as intellectual discourse, but in truth, it is a cesspool of elitist drivel, dripping with disdain for the common man. The language used is convoluted and pretentious, crafted specifically to exclude the very people it claims to serve. It is a bitter insult to those who toil in the fields and factories, the backbone of our society, who find themselves alienated and demeaned by this insidious creation.
"Patatittas Analysis Corner" discriminates against the common people by promoting ideas and discussions that are detached from the realities of everyday life. It is a tool of oppression, designed to keep the workers in their place, to make them feel inferior and unworthy of true knowledge. It is a blight on our revolutionary ideals, a stain on the honor of the working class.
Let it be known, comrades, that we will not tolerate this bourgeois filth. "Patatittas Analysis Corner" is a direct attack on the principles of equality and justice that we hold dear. It is an insult to every worker, every farmer, every soldier who fights for the betterment of all. We must rise as one and denounce this atrocity, banishing it from our society so that it may never again poison the minds of the people.
In the name of the revolution, I declare "Patatittas Analysis Corner" to be an enemy of the people, a despicable manifestation of elitist discrimination. It must be eradicated, and in its place, we shall build a society where knowledge is truly for all, where every citizen is empowered to participate in the intellectual life of our great nation.
added to list
Valhalla
does anne crank actually get 200 pumped at the end or does she die in a more sensible wayburgernfat wrote:
review anne frank's diary
i think she got stink bombedsametdze wrote:
does anne crank actually get 200 pumped at the end or does she die in a more sensible wayburgernfat wrote:
review anne frank's diary
Chat GPT:Farfocele wrote:
rate this
ChatGPT:burgernfat wrote:
review anne frank's diary
that is great, will still keep making fun of number 57 thoughDuck o-o wrote:
Chat GPT:Farfocele wrote:
rate this
The ongoing Wikipedia elections edit war has captivated many, but in the midst of the chaos, number 57 has become a highly misunderstood figure. While critics hastily dismiss 57 as a mere disruptor, a closer examination reveals a more nuanced picture. Number 57 is not just another participant in the fray; they are a staunch defender of editorial integrity, battling tirelessly against the waves of misinformation and bias that plague the platform during such contentious times.
What sets 57 apart is their commitment to upholding the core values of Wikipedia—neutrality, verifiability, and consensus. Though their edits might seem aggressive or contrarian, they are often rooted in a desire to preserve the integrity of the content, ensuring that it remains accurate and unbiased. Unfortunately, this dedication has led to frequent clashes with other editors who might prioritize speed over precision, or who bring their own biases to the table.
In truth, number 57's role in the edit war is one of vigilance, not sabotage. They remind us that in the digital age, where information flows rapidly and unchecked, the need for careful, principled editing is more crucial than ever. Misunderstood they may be, but 57’s efforts are essential to maintaining the quality of collective knowledge.
its fine, but theyre really stale now :<Duck o-o wrote:
Chat GPT:
Lost Silver’s work is nothing short of a revelation in the realm of high art. The artist’s approach to form and color is both haunting and evocative, drawing the viewer into a world that is at once familiar yet profoundly mysterious. The recurring motif of loss permeates each piece, creating a palpable sense of yearning that is hard to shake off. The texture, the subtle shifts in hue—each element seems to whisper of something lost, something precious. One can't help but ponder, “I wonder where their silver went though.”
The interplay between light and shadow in Lost Silver's compositions is masterful, revealing just enough to keep us captivated, yet withholding enough to leave us questioning. The deliberate ambiguity invites us to speculate endlessly. And always, the question lingers in the back of one’s mind: “I wonder where their silver went though.”
This theme of absence, of something missing, is what makes Lost Silver’s work so compelling. The title itself—so fitting, so elusive—beckons us to consider not just what is present, but what has been lost. As I walked through the gallery, each piece seemed to echo the same, haunting refrain: “I wonder where their silver went though.” In this, the artist has truly succeeded in leaving a lasting impression, a reminder that art is not just about what we see, but also about what we search for.
added to list
also srry about the lost silver jokes but i just had to ;-;
it's chatgptlostsilver wrote:
its fine, but theyre really stale now :<Duck o-o wrote:
Chat GPT:
Lost Silver’s work is nothing short of a revelation in the realm of high art. The artist’s approach to form and color is both haunting and evocative, drawing the viewer into a world that is at once familiar yet profoundly mysterious. The recurring motif of loss permeates each piece, creating a palpable sense of yearning that is hard to shake off. The texture, the subtle shifts in hue—each element seems to whisper of something lost, something precious. One can't help but ponder, “I wonder where their silver went though.”
The interplay between light and shadow in Lost Silver's compositions is masterful, revealing just enough to keep us captivated, yet withholding enough to leave us questioning. The deliberate ambiguity invites us to speculate endlessly. And always, the question lingers in the back of one’s mind: “I wonder where their silver went though.”
This theme of absence, of something missing, is what makes Lost Silver’s work so compelling. The title itself—so fitting, so elusive—beckons us to consider not just what is present, but what has been lost. As I walked through the gallery, each piece seemed to echo the same, haunting refrain: “I wonder where their silver went though.” In this, the artist has truly succeeded in leaving a lasting impression, a reminder that art is not just about what we see, but also about what we search for.
added to list
also srry about the lost silver jokes but i just had to ;-;
BUT TYY <333
is still my opinion lulPatatitta wrote:
it's chatgptlostsilver wrote:
its fine, but theyre really stale now :<Duck o-o wrote:
Chat GPT:
Lost Silver’s work is nothing short of a revelation in the realm of high art. The artist’s approach to form and color is both haunting and evocative, drawing the viewer into a world that is at once familiar yet profoundly mysterious. The recurring motif of loss permeates each piece, creating a palpable sense of yearning that is hard to shake off. The texture, the subtle shifts in hue—each element seems to whisper of something lost, something precious. One can't help but ponder, “I wonder where their silver went though.”
The interplay between light and shadow in Lost Silver's compositions is masterful, revealing just enough to keep us captivated, yet withholding enough to leave us questioning. The deliberate ambiguity invites us to speculate endlessly. And always, the question lingers in the back of one’s mind: “I wonder where their silver went though.”
This theme of absence, of something missing, is what makes Lost Silver’s work so compelling. The title itself—so fitting, so elusive—beckons us to consider not just what is present, but what has been lost. As I walked through the gallery, each piece seemed to echo the same, haunting refrain: “I wonder where their silver went though.” In this, the artist has truly succeeded in leaving a lasting impression, a reminder that art is not just about what we see, but also about what we search for.
added to list
also srry about the lost silver jokes but i just had to ;-;
BUT TYY <333
Chat GPT :Nyzhenets wrote:
How would you rate my avatar? (Drew it myself)
i didnt read that it was chatgpt lol,,Duck o-o wrote:
is still my opinion lulPatatitta wrote:
it's chatgptlostsilver wrote:
its fine, but theyre really stale now :<Duck o-o wrote:
Chat GPT:
Lost Silver’s work is nothing short of a revelation in the realm of high art. The artist’s approach to form and color is both haunting and evocative, drawing the viewer into a world that is at once familiar yet profoundly mysterious. The recurring motif of loss permeates each piece, creating a palpable sense of yearning that is hard to shake off. The texture, the subtle shifts in hue—each element seems to whisper of something lost, something precious. One can't help but ponder, “I wonder where their silver went though.”
The interplay between light and shadow in Lost Silver's compositions is masterful, revealing just enough to keep us captivated, yet withholding enough to leave us questioning. The deliberate ambiguity invites us to speculate endlessly. And always, the question lingers in the back of one’s mind: “I wonder where their silver went though.”
This theme of absence, of something missing, is what makes Lost Silver’s work so compelling. The title itself—so fitting, so elusive—beckons us to consider not just what is present, but what has been lost. As I walked through the gallery, each piece seemed to echo the same, haunting refrain: “I wonder where their silver went though.” In this, the artist has truly succeeded in leaving a lasting impression, a reminder that art is not just about what we see, but also about what we search for.
added to list
also srry about the lost silver jokes but i just had to ;-;
BUT TYY <333
potatos job has been stolen by ai
joever for him
am just gonna watch season 2 for now (seems to be 5 - 8)Patatitta wrote:
can you actually finish watching skibidi toilet and rating every single chapter without using chatGPT?
G'day mates! Let me tell ya about this Aussie fella, Samet. He's the real deal, no doubt about it. Samet’s got that laid-back charm and an easy-going vibe that makes him a top bloke in any pub. Whether he’s cracking jokes or lending a hand, you can always count on Samet to bring a smile to your face. He’s got a knack for making any gathering a good time, and there’s no denying he’s got a bit of that Aussie magic about him.sametdze wrote:
review me
As someone who’s deeply invested in the future of technology, I’ve spent a fair bit of time exploring AI language tools like ChatGPT. Let me start by saying this: they’re a commendable effort and represent a significant leap forward in AI capabilities. There’s no denying the sophistication involved in generating coherent and contextually relevant text, which is no small feat.sametdze wrote:
review chatgpt
Chat GPT:Nuuskamuikkunen wrote:
Garten of Banban
the mario movie was amazingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Review:
Deltarune
Zootopia
Wall-E
Super Mario Bros The Movie (2023)
osu!
me when I don't read the threadCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Review:
Deltarune
Zootopia
Wall-E
Super Mario Bros The Movie (2023)
osu!
gatekeeping my thread wadafakPatatitta wrote:
me when I don't read the threadCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Review:
Deltarune
Zootopia
Wall-E
Super Mario Bros The Movie (2023)
osu!
Zootopia -Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Review:
Deltarune
Zootopia
Wall-E
Super Mario Bros The Movie (2023)
osu!
Chat GPT-Serraionga wrote:
danganronpa trigger happy havoc