more or less this yeah, and it really rustles my jimmies honestlyWitherMite wrote:
if someone maps it it will probably just be mapped as if it was 250bpm or something (1/32 of the original bpm, which is a multiple of 4 and will line up if the song is in 4/4 time)
then they edit the red line to be 8000 bpm.
Camellia could use different divisions and the map would be made differently though.
no song is going to sound good if it was actually that fast, camellia likes do do clickbait like that. only the background noise runs are likely to actually be that fast. actual melody and stuff will be much slower.
(see the 2022 and 2021 new years songs for an example of what I mean)
Yes ikr. The same thing with the WYSI song, in which the actual melody is 181.75 BPM instead of 727 BPM.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
We are doomed
I knowTHETM wrote:
Yes ikr. The same thing with the WYSI song, in which the actual melody is 181.75 BPM instead of 727 BPM.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
We are doomed
This really just hurts my ears. Songs with absurdly high bpm just doesn't work naturally compared to normal ones.Shiren- wrote:
Watch this (10000 BPM):
https://youtu.be/VOzIZBEpdaI
the thing is, at A=440 the note E3 has a frequency of 164.81Hz.Stomiks wrote:
This really just hurts my ears. Songs with absurdly high bpm just doesn't work naturally compared to normal ones.Shiren- wrote:
Watch this (10000 BPM):
https://youtu.be/VOzIZBEpdaI
There is a period where it increases/decreases but still kinda remains similar pitched, seen by the ridges that appear. That effect actually has a name: Shepard tone. I am now fascinated at what speed that starts to happen, and how different drum pitches affect that.WitherMite wrote:
an example of how sufficiently fast rhythm becomes a pitch(s):
any way to ease the painTHETM wrote:
players when seeing 4 digit bpms be like: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, and they immediately used HT (even though that decreases the speed into 0.75x of the song)
Imagine trying to stream fuckin' 3,599,040,000,000,000 BPMHoosierTransfer wrote:
8000bpm is slow compared to this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrygWYBUchU
It's earrape as a song lolB0ii wrote:
Imagine trying to stream fuckin' 3,599,040,000,000,000 BPMHoosierTransfer wrote:
8000bpm is slow compared to this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrygWYBUchU
me too honestly, if only it exists in osu thoughPuremotive wrote:
Sorry for the necropost but its been a year and no updates on this. Kind of sad since I was excited to see what camellia would come up with.
He probably forgorPuremotive wrote:
Sorry for the necropost but its been a year and no updates on this. Kind of sad since I was excited to see what camellia would come up with.
It won't be terrible. He already made a 2023bpm song and it was coolClevelandsMyBro wrote:
the idea is so bad that he let time erase it from everyones memories. absolutely terrible idea to make an 8000 bpm song anyway.
blud cant even make a 727 bpm song tf he supposed to do with 8k lmaoAnaxii wrote:
It won't be terrible. He already made a 2023bpm song and it was coolClevelandsMyBro wrote:
the idea is so bad that he let time erase it from everyones memories. absolutely terrible idea to make an 8000 bpm song anyway.
Hope that he didn't forget lolJLuca913 891 wrote:
Camellia literally can make a 72727 bpm song if he wants to do it
and 8000 bpm is amazing, cant wait for it
around 238123820832Patatitta wrote:
is there even a difference between 1000bpm and 238123821832bpm?
awwww manAnaxii 3 wrote:
sorry for necroing but tribute to my first ever thread
it's been one and a half year, camellia was probably joking about making this type of speedcore music
B0ii wrote:
Imagine trying to stream fuckin' 3,599,040,000,000,000 BPMHoosierTransfer wrote:
8000bpm is slow compared to this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrygWYBUchU
