I understand that this is not a good way to test it, but I still found it funny to tell it to generate an image, and then it can find out "where it is" itself.Patatitta wrote:
I don't think that is really a good test of the geolocating skills of the AI, at the end of the day, if they generated it, they must know how they generated it even if you ask them in a different chat. You asked to draw the philippines, they did draw the philippines asccording to what the AI, in their training data interprets the philippines as looking like. By asking them what that country is, they once again analyze the image, look at their training data and it just so happens that the philippines is a perfect match. If you were to show them a image of an acutal random place, so not generated by them, and asking them to find it, that's the real test, having said that, I think the AI is pretty good at that too, just pointing out that your test is pretty meaningless
edit: i'm actually trying it out, seems to do pretty good whenever there is a building name, but if you're on a road, it shits itself, tho I couldn't try more than two locations since it's asking me to pay a subscription
But I already tried this with an image that Scyla posted here (it is broken and needs Wayback Machine to access it), and I'm pretty sure I could find the exact location if I spent about 3 days searching (but I'm not motivated enough to spend more than about 5 hours on it, lol).
I've rarely seen this word.
