not gonna lie, after having been absent from ot for about 12-18 months, this is strangely interesting to read from. i love any kind of encyclopedia, and this (mainly the important threads section) looks like an ok start
forum
The OT Encyclopedia
posted
Total Posts
82
Yeah the previous threads for that were outdated and an update was long overdue.Achromalia wrote:
not gonna lie, after having been absent from ot for about 12-18 months, this is strangely interesting to read from. i love any kind of encyclopedia, and this (mainly the important threads section) looks like an ok start
The Art of OT was already starting to get outdated when I first joined OT over 2 years ago.
OT wiki when
i was actually thinking about making an OT wiki but then i was like "nah we already have the encyclopedia"Farfocele wrote:
OT wiki when
i still have my meraheze account so if any the mods over there feel kind enough to accept the idea of an OT wiki and majority of us want an OT wiki well..
i would want to be a contributor!sametdze wrote:
i was actually thinking about making an OT wiki but then i was like "nah we already have the encyclopedia"Farfocele wrote:
OT wiki when
i still have my meraheze account so if any the mods over there feel kind enough to accept the idea of an OT wiki and majority of us want an OT wiki well..
A wiki would work well if you pull it off; that is make it work like an actual wiki. It doesn't have to be like the Encyclopedia at all.
I suggest making it using Wikia or something, unless you find a way to format it well here.
I suggest making it using Wikia or something, unless you find a way to format it well here.
no, fuck fandom. there are far better wiki services out there, like the previously mentioned miraheze. i might use fandom as a last resort though.Ymir wrote:
I suggest making it using Wikia or something, unless you find a way to format it well here.
fuck fandom honestlyYmir wrote:
A wiki would work well if you pull it off; that is make it work like an actual wiki. It doesn't have to be like the Encyclopedia at all.
I suggest making it using Wikia or something, unless you find a way to format it well here.
I have no idea what fandom did but I imagine your reaction is justified.
basically they're hella greedyYmir wrote:
I have no idea what fandom did but I imagine your reaction is justified.
If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.
You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide firstKarmine wrote:
If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.
i ain't bothering with that- Marco - wrote:
You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide firstKarmine wrote:
If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.
Farfocele wrote:
i ain't bothering with that- Marco - wrote:
You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide firstKarmine wrote:
If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.
Farfocele wrote:
i would want to be a contributor!sametdze wrote:
i was actually thinking about making an OT wiki but then i was like "nah we already have the encyclopedia"Farfocele wrote:
OT wiki when
i still have my meraheze account so if any the mods over there feel kind enough to accept the idea of an OT wiki and majority of us want an OT wiki well..
lol lmao lmfao <3 love this from y'allKarmine wrote:
Farfocele wrote:
i ain't bothering with that- Marco - wrote:
You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide firstKarmine wrote:
If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.Farfocele wrote:
i would want to be a contributor!sametdze wrote:
i was actually thinking about making an OT wiki but then i was like "nah we already have the encyclopedia"Farfocele wrote:
OT wiki when
i still have my meraheze account so if any the mods over there feel kind enough to accept the idea of an OT wiki and majority of us want an OT wiki well..
use antifandom to put on a protective suitB0ii wrote:
basically they're hella greedyYmir wrote:
I have no idea what fandom did but I imagine your reaction is justified.
welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it
Would be funny if they say "you already have an ingame wiki you can edit though?".sametdze wrote:
welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it
Karmine wrote:
Would be funny if they say "you already have an ingame wiki you can edit though?".sametdze wrote:
welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it
son of a-sametdze wrote:
Karmine wrote:
Would be funny if they say "you already have an ingame wiki you can edit though?".sametdze wrote:
welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it
OT: Will there be any rules against editing your own page, provided you are notable enough for one?
probably not? i don't see why editing your own page would be a bad thing
Ah, nice. On Wikipedia, directly editing your own entry could actually result in sanctions from violating Conflict of Interest rules, lol.sametdze wrote:
probably not? i don't see why editing your own page would be a bad thing
I don't think OT users should have their own page.
That is, if you plan on genuinely continuing this project.
My only reason being that half of us haven't done anything worthy of documentation. Maybe an Abraker page or a JohnMedina page would be alright. Keep the standards high.
I could also contribute to writing anything if you have some open spaces.
That is, if you plan on genuinely continuing this project.
My only reason being that half of us haven't done anything worthy of documentation. Maybe an Abraker page or a JohnMedina page would be alright. Keep the standards high.
I could also contribute to writing anything if you have some open spaces.
too bad i alreay bought 10000 domainsYmir wrote:
I don't think OT users should have their own page.
Yeah, I wouldn't say I am notable either lol.Ymir wrote:
I don't think OT users should have their own page.
That is, if you plan on genuinely continuing this project.
My only reason being that half of us haven't done anything worthy of documentation. Maybe an Abraker page or a JohnMedina page would be alright.
i'm actually kind of curious how bad it could get, if it were to be problemYmir wrote:
I don't think OT users should have their own page.
among my curiosities is whether peoples' pages end up reflecting the tone/texture/character of the users themselves, as well as whether there's a general forum-wide bias from likability or if it'll really remain neutral after all
so maybe a mixture of logistics issues and the status likely held by having a particular kind of wiki page in depth or length or tone. makes the forum somewhat incentivized toward something awfully competitive, through some form of ego-stroking self-obsession (a slightly hyperbolic generalization, but probably somewhere near there)
i kind of don't care either way yet, but i'm sure i would at least find a reason to start caring in practice depending on how it ultimately affects ot
...
didn't refresh in time to see the edit, i had an entirely different rationale i guess lmao
If that was enforced there would be no Wikipedia page about Wikipedia, especially not one that's basically saying it's the best wiki ever and the only one you should ever use (it may have changed but it used to be like that kinda).Farfocele wrote:
Ah, nice. On Wikipedia, directly editing your own entry could actually result in sanctions from violating Conflict of Interest rules, lol.sametdze wrote:
probably not? i don't see why editing your own page would be a bad thing
If someone change their own page (or any page) to write shit it can be reverted I guess.
Don't know if miraheze allows locking pages like Wikipedia does.
Some definitely deserve one, others not. I guess there should only be pages for people who have done something significant or stayed long enough to have left a trace. Although that can be hard to decide for some (especially the old ones few remember) it shouldn't be too hard for people who have been here in the last 3-4 years since there are still active people from then.Ymir wrote:
I don't think OT users should have their own page.
That is, if you plan on genuinely continuing this project.
My only reason being that half of us haven't done anything worthy of documentation. Maybe an Abraker page or a JohnMedina page would be alright. Keep the standards high.
I could also contribute to writing anything if you have some open spaces.
Either that or everyone who's posted somewhat significantly (denizens?) gets one but most would be nearly empty.
Time to make a guestbook like in the old times where users give their opinion on each other through their wiki pageAchromalia wrote:
among my curiosities is whether peoples' pages end up reflecting the tone/texture/character of the users themselves, as well as whether there's a general forum-wide bias from likability or if it'll really remain neutral after all
.what the-sametdze wrote:
Karmine wrote:
Would be funny if they say "you already have an ingame wiki you can edit though?".sametdze wrote:
welp just sent a wiki request to miraheze lets hope they accept it
anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself
https://chatgpt.comsametdze wrote:
anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself
Don't.Reyalp51 wrote:
https://chatgpt.comsametdze wrote:
anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself
even trying to form a prompt for it would be a difficult task depending on what you're going to include in it. without any idea of the specific components and formatting and general documentation philosophy, i can't really imagine what "the OT wiki" is either, much less what an accurately descriptive paragraph would look likesametdze wrote:
anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself
dont use chatgpt, sametKarmine wrote:
Don't.Reyalp51 wrote:
https://chatgpt.comsametdze wrote:
anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself
dont give in
Don't know why I read this like "Never Give Up".lostsilver wrote:
dont use chatgpt, sametKarmine wrote:
Don't.Reyalp51 wrote:
https://chatgpt.comsametdze wrote:
anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself
dont give in
when is - Marco - becoming a GMT- Marco - wrote:
You can submit pull requests on the ppy/osu-wiki GitHub. Just make sure to check wiki/osu!_wiki/Contribution_guide firstKarmine wrote:
If you want to make OT wiki you can just edit the wiki page.
Idk if you can create more pages to add stuff to it, never edited wikis before.
I'm sure ChatGPT wouldn't be able to make an OT! wiki even decentlostsilver wrote:
dont use chatgpt, sametKarmine wrote:
Don't.Reyalp51 wrote:
https://chatgpt.comsametdze wrote:
anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself
dont give in
Topic Starter
yeah the point is that it must be ass and chatgpt isn't the best for thatCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I'm sure ChatGPT wouldn't be able to make an OT! wiki even decentlostsilver wrote:
dont use chatgpt, sametKarmine wrote:
Don't.Reyalp51 wrote:
https://chatgpt.comsametdze wrote:
anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself
dont give in
In addition, on the actual Wikipedia, ChatGPT is very not recommended.Patatitta wrote:
yeah the point is that it must be ass and chatgpt isn't the best for thatCorne2Plum3 wrote:
I'm sure ChatGPT wouldn't be able to make an OT! wiki even decentlostsilver wrote:
dont use chatgpt, sametKarmine wrote:
Don't.Reyalp51 wrote:
https://chatgpt.comsametdze wrote:
anyways yeah can someone write a very nice professional detailed paragraph about what the OT wiki is because i cant really do it myself
dont give in
people really used ChatGPT because they are lazy, what a shame
chatgpt is a language learning model, not a knowledge model, and especially not a niche knowledge model
it would fuck up to a comedic degree
it would fuck up to a comedic degree
You need to add dweller to the vocabulary
It's barely used anymore, people still use overlord despite it being obsolete though.abraker wrote:
You need to add dweller to the vocabulary
Topic Starter
fact checked that and it turns it hasn't been really ever used, at allKarmine wrote:
It's barely used anymore, people still use overlord despite it being obsolete though.abraker wrote:
You need to add dweller to the vocabulary
like really, that word has only been used 350 times in total, and only 250 or so with the modern meaning
and besides, a dweller isn't something exclusive to the community of otPatatitta wrote:
fact checked that and it turns it hasn't been really ever used, at allKarmine wrote:
It's barely used anymore, people still use overlord despite it being obsolete though.abraker wrote:
You need to add dweller to the vocabulary
like really, that word has only been used 350 times in total, and only 250 or so with the modern meaning
Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?
you could make it as an article i guessAireunaeus wrote:
Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?
Wdym by article? Like a news article?Farfocele wrote:
you could make it as an article i guessAireunaeus wrote:
Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?
Like a wikipedia article, but in the OT encyclopedia instead. I think it may be warranted.Aireunaeus wrote:
Wdym by article? Like a news article?Farfocele wrote:
you could make it as an article i guessAireunaeus wrote:
Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?
Unless you meant the other way around and throwing this into the iceberg, which you should also do.
actually a good idea lol but i just thought about the other way around lelFarfocele wrote:
Like a wikipedia article, but in the OT encyclopedia instead. I think it may be warranted.Aireunaeus wrote:
Wdym by article? Like a news article?Farfocele wrote:
you could make it as an article i guessAireunaeus wrote:
Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?
Unless you meant the other way around and throwing this into the iceberg, which you should also do.
isn't it outdated?Aireunaeus wrote:
Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?
oh yeah i also need to upsdatre it lol 😅Corne2Plum3 wrote:
isn't it outdated?Aireunaeus wrote:
Is it necessary to add the ot iceberg in the encyclopedia?