XIGNCODE3 is much akin to EasyAntiCheat basically, but I hear BAD stuff about specifically XIGNCODE3 and possibly word of it being actually illegal in America......Winnyace wrote:
I honestly don't know what you meant in the final spoilerbox, so I will just skip it.
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
maybe he's playing at very low settings or something... idk... im 99% sure that osu is a less demanding game compared to minecraft.Winnyace wrote:
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
like this is pretty low end specs tbh, at that point its most likely the hardware's fault that causing the games to lag.Rhythm32 wrote:
2 GB DDR3 RAM
Intel Pentium dual core cpu
Integrated Graphics
Windows 10
Even then, Minecraft Java Edition is known to be a beast of a game that can put down systems with a 4090 in it, at least without mods.Hydreigon wrote:
maybe he's playing at very low settings or something... idk... im 99% sure that osu is a less demanding game compared to minecraft.Winnyace wrote:
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
yeah i think rendering distance mostly contributes to that, at least it can be changed to low for the one's with 2gb ram pc's to high for the ultimate gamers.Winnyace wrote:
Even then, Minecraft Java Edition is known to be a beast of a game that can put down systems with a 4090 in it, at least without mods.
I forgot to mention that the stable client lags pretty rarely. That's my sister's pc specs. The PC which I have is a BIT better. My PC specs are:Winnyace wrote:
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
I see. That explains things better, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
I forgot to mention that the stable client lags pretty rarely. That's my sister's pc specs. The PC which I have is a BIT better. My PC specs are:Winnyace wrote:
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
4 GB DDR3 RAM
Intel Celeron J3060 @1.60 Ghz Dual-Core Processor
Intel Integrated Graphics(128 MB VRAM I think...)
Windows 10
It's an All-In-One PC which can run osu!stable, Minecraft, among us, DDLC and other low end games pretty nicely BUT it sucks in lazer. Like the performer drop is HIGHLY noticeable.
i used to have an All in one PC, they really do suck in the gaming side, but there cheap and serviceable enough for normal stuff like studies or certain work.Rhythm32 wrote:
It's an All-In-One PC which can run osu!stable, Minecraft, among us, DDLC and other low end games pretty nicely BUT it sucks in lazer. Like the performer drop is HIGHLY noticeable.
Sounds like a (relative to what I have) previous Saga Planets VN since I don't remember any brand that used the Siglus engine with AlphaROM, but thanks for the hint. I still may have to experiment, but that means I could cross Floral Flowlove as OK.KatouMegumi wrote:
Speaking of Siglus VNs. I had no problems running it personally, though I did use a nocd crack.
Admittedly the title I was reading was Hatsukoi 1/1Rizumu Tenshi wrote:
Sounds like a (relative to what I have) previous Saga Planets VN since I don't remember any brand that used the Siglus engine with AlphaROM, but thanks for the hint. I still may have to experiment, but that means I could cross Floral Flowlove as OK.KatouMegumi wrote:
Speaking of Siglus VNs. I had no problems running it personally, though I did use a nocd crack.
That's, I think, 3 of 5 good to go: Floral Flowlove, DEEMO -Reborn- and, somehow, DJMAX RESPECT V since XIGNCODE3 actually went on to support Linux, apparently (excellent work Valve!!).
Why do you need to use a VM?- Marco - wrote:
I would use GNU/Linux but my 1060 doesn't want to work using passthough
You know how Hitler's doctor was actually a Jew but Hitler spared him?Polyspora wrote:
not eblfYmir wrote:
total furry death
thats uh, interesting I guessYmir wrote:
You know how Hitler's doctor was actually a Jew but Hitler spared him?Polyspora wrote:
not eblfYmir wrote:
total furry death
No.Ymir wrote:
total furry death
Off-Topic > General DiscussionRizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
ah yes, the ultimate honor that a thread on OT can aspire to, killed by being moved to another subforumRizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
Typical Tourist Behavior.Patatitta wrote:
ah yes, the ultimate honor that a thread on OT can aspire to, killed by being moved to another subforumRizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
Even though this is a good enough thread to be put on General Discussion, OP put it in OT first. You don't typically see threads getting moved out of OT unless it's a language issue.Rizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
i have gamepass untill June 😳👉👈Winnyace wrote:
Why do you need to use a VM?- Marco - wrote:
I would use GNU/Linux but my 1060 doesn't want to work using passthough
The thread wasn't meant to be in GD, so I don't know why you're feeling so mad.Rizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
Oh. I see. I think there's a way to get that working under Linux natively, but I don't know.- Marco - wrote:
i have gamepass untill June 😳👉👈Winnyace wrote:
Why do you need to use a VM?- Marco - wrote:
I would use GNU/Linux but my 1060 doesn't want to work using passthough
Oh don't worry, I mean to see if there's any better choice before committing to avoid distro hopping.Winnyace wrote:
The thread wasn't meant to be in GD, so I don't know why you're feeling so mad.Rizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
If Pop!_OS doesn't work for you, sure thing, look for more distros. If it does, don't distrohop just for the sake of doing that.
Linux mint "edge" edition exists. It shipped with latest kernel iircUnknown Duck wrote:
Great guide for convincing players to try Linux. Although I advise to use a more up-to-date distro like Fedora or Ubuntu since Linux Mint updates only periodically which would cause issues on people that run on more newer hardware (which is common nowadays).
I've seen countless people trying Linux for the first time through Linux Mint and almost all of them encounter issues. The main cause of their issues is mostly due to an outdated kernel out of the box and they had to research for hours when simply using a later kernel version from the Kernel Manager fixes all of their issues. A lot of first-time Linux users fail to encounter this solution and just quits overall before they can come across it.
As of now, Linux Mint uses a more up-to-date kernel that supports most hardware out right now, which makes it fine to use right now, but it'll get outdated sooner than you think and in the future, the same thing will happen again due to newer hardware coming out every year while Linux Mint updates every 2 years.
I recommend Fedora or Fedora-based distros. They're very beginner-friendly and the only hard part of using Fedora is from the installer. Once you've passed that, you'll run into little to no issues using your PC. You can stay up-to-date while being very stable with Fedora.
Either work in my eyes. I have used Linux Mint as my primary distro back when I was starting out and it worked more than okay. I have used Fedora Plasma Spin too for a little bit recently and it worked as expected.Unknown Duck wrote:
Great guide for convincing players to try Linux. Although I advise to use a more up-to-date distro like Fedora or Ubuntu since Linux Mint updates only periodically which would cause issues on people that run on more newer hardware (which is common nowadays).
I've seen countless people trying Linux for the first time through Linux Mint and almost all of them encounter issues. The main cause of their issues is mostly due to an outdated kernel out of the box and they had to research for hours when simply using a later kernel version from the Kernel Manager fixes all of their issues. A lot of first-time Linux users fail to encounter this solution and just quits overall before they can come across it.
As of now, Linux Mint uses a more up-to-date kernel that supports most hardware out right now, which makes it fine to use right now, but it'll get outdated sooner than you think and in the future, the same thing will happen again due to newer hardware coming out every year while Linux Mint updates every 2 years.
I recommend Fedora or Fedora-based distros. They're very beginner-friendly and the only hard part of using Fedora is from the installer. Once you've passed that, you'll run into little to no issues using your PC. You can stay up-to-date while being very stable with Fedora.
Great to hear that osu! stable runs under BSD. I don't think peppy will waste time making Lazer compatible on BSD, mostly because BSD isn't ran all that much as a desktop OS, like Linux. The fact Lazer even supports Linux is great though.Espionage724 wrote:
osu! (not lazer) works good on FreeBSD 14.1 through 32-bit Wine! I did winetricks mono_remove, dotnet20, dotnet40, and dotnet45, but I'm pretty sure only dotnet45 is needed.
Can't use Lazer because no native FreeBSD compatibility, it's win64-only (FreeBSD Wine is either 32 or 64, no both, I chose 32) and it won't compile (something dotnet-related iirc doesn't support FreeBSD).
Looks like you.burgernfat wrote:
KatouMegumi wrote:
Looks like you.burgernfat wrote:
russian secret service agent doxxed my ass ...KatouMegumi wrote:
Looks like you.burgernfat wrote:
Your first mistake: trying Manjaro.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
Sadly I decided once to try Manjaro on a VM, it was laggy as heck even if it was i3, couldn't even install.
Not first, my ACTUAL first was breaking Arch. Like 5 times.Winnyace wrote:
Your first mistake: trying Manjaro.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
Sadly I decided once to try Manjaro on a VM, it was laggy as heck even if it was i3, couldn't even install.
That isn't a mistake, that's the indented learning curve. I'm only half joking here, to be honest.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
Not first, my ACTUAL first was breaking Arch. Like 5 times.Winnyace wrote:
Your first mistake: trying Manjaro.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
Sadly I decided once to try Manjaro on a VM, it was laggy as heck even if it was i3, couldn't even install.
would imagine its worth it just to become familiar with unix, since most servers aren't going to be running a full on windows OS.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
If you're gonna use your pc for studies don't use Linux, you'll 100% have to use stuff that's only on Windows.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
I'm a student in a CS major and most students use Windows. At the labs, it is a mixture of Windows and Linux. Some teachers have expressed directly that they don't really like Linux. Ultimately, many of the things you will learn during your time there will be on Windows, with Linux supported. If you want to use Linux, go ahead and install it. Linux Mint is honestly fine. Linux is, in my opinion, better for a developer, but it depends a lot on what you're also programming.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
I was forced during the two years out of three of college here to use Windows once because the library I used was from the DOS era and it was only ported over to Windows. Yes, you hear that right, WinBGI was something I """learnt""". WSL or a VM also works, however, if you don't want to bother with the full thing.Karmine wrote:
If you're gonna use your pc for studies don't use Linux, you'll 100% have to use stuff that's only on Windows.
You'll also most likely have to use Linux too for basic programming and stuff but WSL or a vm are more than enough for that.
I agree with this. I honestly believe that, for basic things, Linux has a better desktop experience than Windows or MacOS. There are caveats, obviously, but seriously, for someone who does basic office work and multimedia, Linux works just as well as Windows, if not better.Isshiki Kaname wrote:
I don't know why people have this disposition that you have to be a programmer to use or need to use linux to program. Like, that makes no sense.
I mean, sure. Most Linux distributions have it easier when you want to install a dependency library or something, but like, on windows you could just download visual studio and start coding.
This disposition of "hacking" just to have a usable operating system makes no sense, too. People, we don't use Spectrums or C64's anymore. Even then, you usually just use a load command on such computers to run software.
If anything, I think TempleOS fits this false Linux disposition a lot more, because you could actually edit the OS code on runtime.
Okay, apparently using Linux is completely optional.Winnyace wrote:
I'm a student in a CS major and most students use Windows. At the labs, it is a mixture of Windows and Linux. Some teachers have expressed directly that they don't really like Linux. Ultimately, many of the things you will learn during your time there will be on Windows, with Linux supported. If you want to use Linux, go ahead and install it. Linux Mint is honestly fine. Linux is, in my opinion, better for a developer, but it depends a lot on what you're also programming.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?I was forced during the two years out of three of college here to use Windows once because the library I used was from the DOS era and it was only ported over to Windows. Yes, you hear that right, WinBGI was something I """learnt""". WSL or a VM also works, however, if you don't want to bother with the full thing.Karmine wrote:
If you're gonna use your pc for studies don't use Linux, you'll 100% have to use stuff that's only on Windows.
You'll also most likely have to use Linux too for basic programming and stuff but WSL or a vm are more than enough for that.I agree with this. I honestly believe that, for basic things, Linux has a better desktop experience than Windows or MacOS. There are caveats, obviously, but seriously, for someone who does basic office work and multimedia, Linux works just as well as Windows, if not better.Isshiki Kaname wrote:
I don't know why people have this disposition that you have to be a programmer to use or need to use linux to program. Like, that makes no sense.
I mean, sure. Most Linux distributions have it easier when you want to install a dependency library or something, but like, on windows you could just download visual studio and start coding.
This disposition of "hacking" just to have a usable operating system makes no sense, too. People, we don't use Spectrums or C64's anymore. Even then, you usually just use a load command on such computers to run software.
If anything, I think TempleOS fits this false Linux disposition a lot more, because you could actually edit the OS code on runtime.
Try to get a dual boot, with both Linux and Windows. If you do advanced stuff with computer you will most likely need Linux, and imo it's better having a dual boot than WSL or a virtual machine.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
Yea, it is better to just start dual booting at first, so when you get the Linux vibes, you can choose if you keep dual booting (if you need something that Linux doesn't support), or switch to Linux altogether.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Try to get a dual boot, with both Linux and Windows. If you do advanced stuff with computer you will most likely need Linux, and imo it's better having a dual boot than WSL or a virtual machine.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
And it's possible in lab to still have Windows only stuff, such as Matlab.
Honestly yeah, this is extremely useful for cases like mine for example, where I'm just fully chosing to move over to linux, however any normal/casual or even competitive players with normal pc's and needs pretty much shouldnt lol,Polyspora wrote:
just use windows
this one I heard its pretty much recommended a lot for gaming on linux overall, although these days Nobara seems to be the most and best popular optionCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Try KDE plasma as desktop environmentPolyspora wrote:
gnome lmaoKarmine wrote:
Legit the best advice for people who want to get to know Linux is using Windows and WSL.Polyspora wrote:
just use windows
I wish I had that as my first Linux experience instead of a shitty live usb with a gnome 🤢 interface.
if upgrading to win11 isnt an option for you (same case for me since my computer doesnt supported, why I hopped to linux in the first place) I'd tell ya to do your research on linux, watch videos and wait for Windows 10 Support (the security one it is I think) to end in 2025, then maybe think or try to hop over to linux and try it outBehrauder wrote:
Okay, apparently using Linux is completely optional.Winnyace wrote:
I'm a student in a CS major and most students use Windows. At the labs, it is a mixture of Windows and Linux. Some teachers have expressed directly that they don't really like Linux. Ultimately, many of the things you will learn during your time there will be on Windows, with Linux supported. If you want to use Linux, go ahead and install it. Linux Mint is honestly fine. Linux is, in my opinion, better for a developer, but it depends a lot on what you're also programming.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?I was forced during the two years out of three of college here to use Windows once because the library I used was from the DOS era and it was only ported over to Windows. Yes, you hear that right, WinBGI was something I """learnt""". WSL or a VM also works, however, if you don't want to bother with the full thing.Karmine wrote:
If you're gonna use your pc for studies don't use Linux, you'll 100% have to use stuff that's only on Windows.
You'll also most likely have to use Linux too for basic programming and stuff but WSL or a vm are more than enough for that.I agree with this. I honestly believe that, for basic things, Linux has a better desktop experience than Windows or MacOS. There are caveats, obviously, but seriously, for someone who does basic office work and multimedia, Linux works just as well as Windows, if not better.Isshiki Kaname wrote:
I don't know why people have this disposition that you have to be a programmer to use or need to use linux to program. Like, that makes no sense.
I mean, sure. Most Linux distributions have it easier when you want to install a dependency library or something, but like, on windows you could just download visual studio and start coding.
This disposition of "hacking" just to have a usable operating system makes no sense, too. People, we don't use Spectrums or C64's anymore. Even then, you usually just use a load command on such computers to run software.
If anything, I think TempleOS fits this false Linux disposition a lot more, because you could actually edit the OS code on runtime.
From what I understand, I can program perfectly well on Windows, and there are even specific cases of things that cannot be done on Linux, not to mention that I'm already used to Windows 10, so I should stick with windows, and maybe consider using a VM or WSL.
Yes.Shinku wrote:
Hi, I have a simple question, is mapping in stable possible without any problems?
I have been using ubuntu server for about 6 years, so I am not afraid of using the terminal and doing troubleshooting, but I have no experience with the desktop.
If possible, I am considering switching to Linux as there is no reason for me to continue using windows.
Thank you, I will try it when I'm ready to completely move to Linuxgreat_elmo wrote:
Yes.
Use it if you need.Shinku wrote:
Hi, I have a simple question, is mapping in stable possible without any problems?
I have been using ubuntu server for about 6 years, so I am not afraid of using the terminal and doing troubleshooting, but I have no experience with the desktop.
If possible, I am considering switching to Linux as there is no reason for me to continue using windows.
Unless you're using Arch, Ubuntu, or Mint, you'll have to get actively involved in patent games with codecs. In Fedora's case, they use RPM Fusion, which had the fun ordeal of mesa-freeworld (AMDGPU video accel) causing broken graphcis stacks when their package clashed with Fedora's package on genuine updates. openSUSE seems lucky, but Pacman still exists.Winnyace wrote:
I agree with this. I honestly believe that, for basic things, Linux has a better desktop experience than Windows or MacOS. There are caveats, obviously, but seriously, for someone who does basic office work and multimedia, Linux works just as well as Windows, if not better.
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
Some people prefer to tweak things endlessly. You might see them as tools, some might see them as toys. If the guy likes to spend his time this way, there is nothing wrong.Patatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
That's what I do, I seek better performance wherever possible :pPatatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
fair, I guess my problem with this and the reason why I pointed it out it's because it feels insincere?, it's fine to say you're doing it for fun, but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when that really isn't the case felt bad to meWinnyace wrote:
Some people prefer to tweak things endlessly. You might see them as tools, some might see them as toys. If the guy likes to spend his time this way, there is nothing wrong.Patatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
FreeBSD is faster and more optimal to me than Linux, and is faster to me than Windows. Technically Linux and FreeBSD is more optimal than Windows on my server, but I like consistency. I generally know what I'm doing :pPatatitta wrote:
fair, I guess my problem with this and the reason why I pointed it out it's because it feels insincere?, it's fine to say you're doing it for fun, but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when that really isn't the case felt bad to meWinnyace wrote:
Some people prefer to tweak things endlessly. You might see them as tools, some might see them as toys. If the guy likes to spend his time this way, there is nothing wrong.Patatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
with the line "but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when that really isn't the case felt bad to me" I meant "but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when you're actually just doing it for fun and that isn't really your highest priority feels bad to me"Espionage724 wrote:
FreeBSD is faster and more optimal to me than Linux, and is faster to me than Windows. Technically Linux and FreeBSD is more optimal than Windows on my server, but I like consistency. I generally know what I'm doing :pPatatitta wrote:
fair, I guess my problem with this and the reason why I pointed it out it's because it feels insincere?, it's fine to say you're doing it for fun, but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when that really isn't the case felt bad to meWinnyace wrote:
Some people prefer to tweak things endlessly. You might see them as tools, some might see them as toys. If the guy likes to spend his time this way, there is nothing wrong.Patatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
I'm not sure what version of the game you have installed, nor your specs. Both would help out here, but at the same time, I am not sure how much I can help. Not sure if I've said this in the original post, but ThePooN's Discord Server has a section for helping people out with running osu! under Linux. You can perhaps ask there.rikia wrote:
hey this is really helpful and made it super easy to install on arch i just wanted to ask if it's normal for FPS to tank in the editor? its 1000+ fps normally but once i enter the editor it tanks to like 50 fps consistently. not impossible but kinda uncomfortable to use
also i get stutters in-game but sometimes they go away so im not sure if thats a problem with this or my linux
If Editor is switching from fullscreen to windowed, a compositor might be enabling. Disabling the compositor depends on what DE you're using and Xorg or Wayland.rikia wrote:
hey this is really helpful and made it super easy to install on arch i just wanted to ask if it's normal for FPS to tank in the editor? its 1000+ fps normally but once i enter the editor it tanks to like 50 fps consistently. not impossible but kinda uncomfortable to use
also i get stutters in-game but sometimes they go away so im not sure if thats a problem with this or my linux
Because they had something relevant to say. It's one of the rare justified necroes.BluePyTheDeer_ wrote:
why necro
Sorry, yeah I'll just troubleshoot on discord server. I just wasn't sure if it was normal but then I realized this happens whenever osu isn't fullscreened not just on editor so it's definitely a case-by-case thing.Winnyace wrote:
I'm not sure what version of the game you have installed, nor your specs. Both would help out here, but at the same time, I am not sure how much I can help. Not sure if I've said this in the original post, but ThePooN's Discord Server has a section for helping people out with running osu! under Linux. You can perhaps ask there.rikia wrote:
hey this is really helpful and made it super easy to install on arch i just wanted to ask if it's normal for FPS to tank in the editor? its 1000+ fps normally but once i enter the editor it tanks to like 50 fps consistently. not impossible but kinda uncomfortable to use
also i get stutters in-game but sometimes they go away so im not sure if thats a problem with this or my linux
Omg are you serious? This thread is not about silly situations, this is about TECHBluePyTheDeer_ wrote:
why necro
Don't worry too much about it. It's fine, really.rikia wrote:
Sorry, yeah I'll just troubleshoot on discord server. I just wasn't sure if it was normal but then I realized this happens whenever osu isn't fullscreened not just on editor so it's definitely a case-by-case thing.Winnyace wrote:
I'm not sure what version of the game you have installed, nor your specs. Both would help out here, but at the same time, I am not sure how much I can help. Not sure if I've said this in the original post, but ThePooN's Discord Server has a section for helping people out with running osu! under Linux. You can perhaps ask there.rikia wrote:
hey this is really helpful and made it super easy to install on arch i just wanted to ask if it's normal for FPS to tank in the editor? its 1000+ fps normally but once i enter the editor it tanks to like 50 fps consistently. not impossible but kinda uncomfortable to use
also i get stutters in-game but sometimes they go away so im not sure if thats a problem with this or my linux
I'm using Arch on Plasma 6 (Wayland) but don't bother giving advice here since yeah I'll be on the discord.
My apologies for the Necro, I saw last post was 4 months ago and didn't think it would be considered a problem.
howManishh wrote:
I spent 19 hours over two days creating a Minecraft server on my second PC running Ubuntu Linux. It's headless, so I can connect to it from my main PC.
Half of that time was just spent troubleshooting why Java kept crashing. After hours of digging, I found out that the guy I got the PC from didn't apply any thermal paste, so the temperatures were hitting 85°C. I fixed that, then ran MemTest86 and at just 40% through the test, it had already logged 30,000 errors.
After reseating the RAM, the errors somehow disappeared...
connection is loose igBluePyTheDeer_ wrote:
howManishh wrote:
I spent 19 hours over two days creating a Minecraft server on my second PC running Ubuntu Linux. It's headless, so I can connect to it from my main PC.
Half of that time was just spent troubleshooting why Java kept crashing. After hours of digging, I found out that the guy I got the PC from didn't apply any thermal paste, so the temperatures were hitting 85°C. I fixed that, then ran MemTest86 and at just 40% through the test, it had already logged 30,000 errors.
After reseating the RAM, the errors somehow disappeared...
HowDoom Mood wrote:
connection is loose igBluePyTheDeer_ wrote:
howManishh wrote:
I spent 19 hours over two days creating a Minecraft server on my second PC running Ubuntu Linux. It's headless, so I can connect to it from my main PC.
Half of that time was just spent troubleshooting why Java kept crashing. After hours of digging, I found out that the guy I got the PC from didn't apply any thermal paste, so the temperatures were hitting 85°C. I fixed that, then ran MemTest86 and at just 40% through the test, it had already logged 30,000 errors.
After reseating the RAM, the errors somehow disappeared...
