quadruple kill
Polyspora wrote:
just use windows
- Marco - wrote:
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!
Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Try KDE plasma as desktop environmentPolyspora wrote:
gnome lmaoKarmine wrote:
Legit the best advice for people who want to get to know Linux is using Windows and WSL.Polyspora wrote:
just use windows
I wish I had that as my first Linux experience instead of a shitty live usb with a gnome 🤢 interface.
Okay.Patatitta wrote:
windows users:Polyspora wrote:
just use windows
linux users:- Marco - wrote:
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Try KDE plasma as desktop environmentPolyspora wrote:
gnome lmaoKarmine wrote:
Legit the best advice for people who want to get to know Linux is using Windows and WSL.Polyspora wrote:
just use windows
I wish I had that as my first Linux experience instead of a shitty live usb with a gnome 🤢 interface.
Sir, this is a Wendy's.Kobold84 wrote:
Hello, is this an off-topic subforum?
How to patch KDE2 under FreeBSD?
and vice versaz0z wrote:
windows users don't need to discourage others from using linux
Re-read the first section of the original post. I quite clearly said people are free to use whatever works for them. If you don't want to use Linux, go ahead and don't use it.B0ii wrote:
and vice versaz0z wrote:
windows users don't need to discourage others from using linux
Rizumu Tenshi wrote:
You guys aren't helpful holy God
Only the topic creator so far wrote awesome stuff here, why don't you guys actually exchange actual info
I may need a completely different device, a phone for example, with its notepad, to memo all the apps (and games) I need with me before I can uninstall Windows completely in favour of, say, Pop!_OS, but..............Tetris Effect: ConnectedThis one is a lost cause, thanks Microsoft. I'll need to re-buy this on Steam to even get started. Unless UWP on Linux is somewhat possible......Floral Flowlove (フローラル・フローラブ)I have a raw dump, for starters.
Some forums out there call out the Siglus engine as the problematic when it comes to launching this game, but what they don't know is the game not only needs the Japanese locale on Windows but as well the Japanese timezone setting. If I'm down to the NekoNyan translated release, well, crap, this is the one going into the Bottles I guess......assuming it works there, if I don't need Proton for it.
If this one works, automatically any other visual novel should work.Princess Connect! Re:Dive (プリンセスコネクト!Re:Dive)This one honestly has me thinking all the time, since it's a DMM GAMES release, and DMM in itself could be a DRM for some out there. I tried asking r/Priconne about this, but the post was immediately filtered and auto-deleted by reddit itself, which is a shame honestly, but reddit being reddit as usual. Whether Wine or Proton will do I'm not sure, since while there's the stuff like Lutris and Heroic, whether they can take in DMM Game Player or not is the question.
If this one works, retroactively Uma Musume: Pretty Derby (ウマ娘 プリティーダービー) should work as well.DEEMO -Reborn-Pirated copy. I'm not going to buy this until Rayark redeem themselves after the AI fiasco.
In fact what makes this a problem is the fact I pirated it, given I don't know EXACTLY how Wine deals with these sorts of stuff. Or Proton at that. (Bottles is just a Wine interface after all.) If anyone on Linux pirated a Windows game before, any info would help.DJMAX RESPECT VI'll have to figure out for these aforementioned first before I can uninstall Windows, but maybe if anyone knows (please read the spoilerboxes) I could use help before experimenting with Pop!_OS (dualboot first) and getting any results, be it good or bad?I did not buy this yet.
XIGNCODE3.
Period.
For reference:
Lenovo Legion Y540Detailed specs if curious
- Intel Core i7-9750H
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB
- 16GB DDR4-2666
- 256GB NVMe M.2 Gen3 + 1TB SATA 5400RPM
EDIT: For reference I tried using a virtual machine first, but Bottles couldn't even get started, so I thought maybe it's the idea I'm using a VM that's holding it back.
XIGNCODE3 is much akin to EasyAntiCheat basically, but I hear BAD stuff about specifically XIGNCODE3 and possibly word of it being actually illegal in America......Winnyace wrote:
I honestly don't know what you meant in the final spoilerbox, so I will just skip it.
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
maybe he's playing at very low settings or something... idk... im 99% sure that osu is a less demanding game compared to minecraft.Winnyace wrote:
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
like this is pretty low end specs tbh, at that point its most likely the hardware's fault that causing the games to lag.Rhythm32 wrote:
2 GB DDR3 RAM
Intel Pentium dual core cpu
Integrated Graphics
Windows 10
Even then, Minecraft Java Edition is known to be a beast of a game that can put down systems with a 4090 in it, at least without mods.Hydreigon wrote:
maybe he's playing at very low settings or something... idk... im 99% sure that osu is a less demanding game compared to minecraft.Winnyace wrote:
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
yeah i think rendering distance mostly contributes to that, at least it can be changed to low for the one's with 2gb ram pc's to high for the ultimate gamers.Winnyace wrote:
Even then, Minecraft Java Edition is known to be a beast of a game that can put down systems with a 4090 in it, at least without mods.
I forgot to mention that the stable client lags pretty rarely. That's my sister's pc specs. The PC which I have is a BIT better. My PC specs are:Winnyace wrote:
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
I see. That explains things better, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
I forgot to mention that the stable client lags pretty rarely. That's my sister's pc specs. The PC which I have is a BIT better. My PC specs are:Winnyace wrote:
I'm just confused how you have trouble running stable compared to Minecraft Java, to be honest.Rhythm32 wrote:
The OS doesn't lag but the games do. Like it can run Minecraft Java pretty fine, but sucks to run lazer and sometimes even stable client.Winnyace wrote:
The fact you're running Windows 10 on that is extremely impressive. Anyway, yes, yes you can. In fact, it might actually work better. Linux Lite or Lubuntu would work better than Windows on that I think
4 GB DDR3 RAM
Intel Celeron J3060 @1.60 Ghz Dual-Core Processor
Intel Integrated Graphics(128 MB VRAM I think...)
Windows 10
It's an All-In-One PC which can run osu!stable, Minecraft, among us, DDLC and other low end games pretty nicely BUT it sucks in lazer. Like the performer drop is HIGHLY noticeable.
i used to have an All in one PC, they really do suck in the gaming side, but there cheap and serviceable enough for normal stuff like studies or certain work.Rhythm32 wrote:
It's an All-In-One PC which can run osu!stable, Minecraft, among us, DDLC and other low end games pretty nicely BUT it sucks in lazer. Like the performer drop is HIGHLY noticeable.
Sounds like a (relative to what I have) previous Saga Planets VN since I don't remember any brand that used the Siglus engine with AlphaROM, but thanks for the hint. I still may have to experiment, but that means I could cross Floral Flowlove as OK.KatouMegumi wrote:
Speaking of Siglus VNs. I had no problems running it personally, though I did use a nocd crack.
Admittedly the title I was reading was Hatsukoi 1/1Rizumu Tenshi wrote:
Sounds like a (relative to what I have) previous Saga Planets VN since I don't remember any brand that used the Siglus engine with AlphaROM, but thanks for the hint. I still may have to experiment, but that means I could cross Floral Flowlove as OK.KatouMegumi wrote:
Speaking of Siglus VNs. I had no problems running it personally, though I did use a nocd crack.
That's, I think, 3 of 5 good to go: Floral Flowlove, DEEMO -Reborn- and, somehow, DJMAX RESPECT V since XIGNCODE3 actually went on to support Linux, apparently (excellent work Valve!!).
Why do you need to use a VM?- Marco - wrote:
I would use GNU/Linux but my 1060 doesn't want to work using passthough![]()
![]()
You know how Hitler's doctor was actually a Jew but Hitler spared him?Polyspora wrote:
not eblfYmir wrote:
total furry death
thats uh, interesting I guessYmir wrote:
You know how Hitler's doctor was actually a Jew but Hitler spared him?Polyspora wrote:
not eblfYmir wrote:
total furry death
No.Ymir wrote:
total furry death
Off-Topic > General DiscussionRizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
ah yes, the ultimate honor that a thread on OT can aspire to, killed by being moved to another subforumRizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
Typical Tourist Behavior.Patatitta wrote:
ah yes, the ultimate honor that a thread on OT can aspire to, killed by being moved to another subforumRizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
Even though this is a good enough thread to be put on General Discussion, OP put it in OT first. You don't typically see threads getting moved out of OT unless it's a language issue.Rizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
i have gamepass untill June 😳👉👈Winnyace wrote:
Why do you need to use a VM?- Marco - wrote:
I would use GNU/Linux but my 1060 doesn't want to work using passthough![]()
![]()
The thread wasn't meant to be in GD, so I don't know why you're feeling so mad.Rizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
Oh. I see. I think there's a way to get that working under Linux natively, but I don't know.- Marco - wrote:
i have gamepass untill June 😳👉👈Winnyace wrote:
Why do you need to use a VM?- Marco - wrote:
I would use GNU/Linux but my 1060 doesn't want to work using passthough![]()
![]()
Oh don't worry, I mean to see if there's any better choice before committing to avoid distro hopping.Winnyace wrote:
The thread wasn't meant to be in GD, so I don't know why you're feeling so mad.Rizumu Tenshi wrote:
Enough of that bullshit, you guys absolutely ruined the chance this topic could be moved to General Discussion.
I should start looking into other distros as well, though, not just stick to Pop!_OS...
If Pop!_OS doesn't work for you, sure thing, look for more distros. If it does, don't distrohop just for the sake of doing that.
Linux mint "edge" edition exists. It shipped with latest kernel iircUnknown Duck wrote:
Great guide for convincing players to try Linux. Although I advise to use a more up-to-date distro like Fedora or Ubuntu since Linux Mint updates only periodically which would cause issues on people that run on more newer hardware (which is common nowadays).
I've seen countless people trying Linux for the first time through Linux Mint and almost all of them encounter issues. The main cause of their issues is mostly due to an outdated kernel out of the box and they had to research for hours when simply using a later kernel version from the Kernel Manager fixes all of their issues. A lot of first-time Linux users fail to encounter this solution and just quits overall before they can come across it.
As of now, Linux Mint uses a more up-to-date kernel that supports most hardware out right now, which makes it fine to use right now, but it'll get outdated sooner than you think and in the future, the same thing will happen again due to newer hardware coming out every year while Linux Mint updates every 2 years.
I recommend Fedora or Fedora-based distros. They're very beginner-friendly and the only hard part of using Fedora is from the installer. Once you've passed that, you'll run into little to no issues using your PC. You can stay up-to-date while being very stable with Fedora.
Either work in my eyes. I have used Linux Mint as my primary distro back when I was starting out and it worked more than okay. I have used Fedora Plasma Spin too for a little bit recently and it worked as expected.Unknown Duck wrote:
Great guide for convincing players to try Linux. Although I advise to use a more up-to-date distro like Fedora or Ubuntu since Linux Mint updates only periodically which would cause issues on people that run on more newer hardware (which is common nowadays).
I've seen countless people trying Linux for the first time through Linux Mint and almost all of them encounter issues. The main cause of their issues is mostly due to an outdated kernel out of the box and they had to research for hours when simply using a later kernel version from the Kernel Manager fixes all of their issues. A lot of first-time Linux users fail to encounter this solution and just quits overall before they can come across it.
As of now, Linux Mint uses a more up-to-date kernel that supports most hardware out right now, which makes it fine to use right now, but it'll get outdated sooner than you think and in the future, the same thing will happen again due to newer hardware coming out every year while Linux Mint updates every 2 years.
I recommend Fedora or Fedora-based distros. They're very beginner-friendly and the only hard part of using Fedora is from the installer. Once you've passed that, you'll run into little to no issues using your PC. You can stay up-to-date while being very stable with Fedora.
Great to hear that osu! stable runs under BSD. I don't think peppy will waste time making Lazer compatible on BSD, mostly because BSD isn't ran all that much as a desktop OS, like Linux. The fact Lazer even supports Linux is great though.Espionage724 wrote:
osu! (not lazer) works good on FreeBSD 14.1 through 32-bit Wine! I did winetricks mono_remove, dotnet20, dotnet40, and dotnet45, but I'm pretty sure only dotnet45 is needed.
Can't use Lazer because no native FreeBSD compatibility, it's win64-only (FreeBSD Wine is either 32 or 64, no both, I chose 32) and it won't compile (something dotnet-related iirc doesn't support FreeBSD).
Looks like you.burgernfat wrote:
KatouMegumi wrote:
Looks like you.burgernfat wrote:
russian secret service agent doxxed my ass ...KatouMegumi wrote:
Looks like you.burgernfat wrote:
Your first mistake: trying Manjaro.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
Sadly I decided once to try Manjaro on a VM, it was laggy as heck even if it was i3, couldn't even install.
Not first, my ACTUAL first was breaking Arch. Like 5 times.Winnyace wrote:
Your first mistake: trying Manjaro.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
Sadly I decided once to try Manjaro on a VM, it was laggy as heck even if it was i3, couldn't even install.
That isn't a mistake, that's the indented learning curve. I'm only half joking here, to be honest.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
Not first, my ACTUAL first was breaking Arch. Like 5 times.Winnyace wrote:
Your first mistake: trying Manjaro.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
Sadly I decided once to try Manjaro on a VM, it was laggy as heck even if it was i3, couldn't even install.
would imagine its worth it just to become familiar with unix, since most servers aren't going to be running a full on windows OS.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
If you're gonna use your pc for studies don't use Linux, you'll 100% have to use stuff that's only on Windows.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
I'm a student in a CS major and most students use Windows. At the labs, it is a mixture of Windows and Linux. Some teachers have expressed directly that they don't really like Linux. Ultimately, many of the things you will learn during your time there will be on Windows, with Linux supported. If you want to use Linux, go ahead and install it. Linux Mint is honestly fine. Linux is, in my opinion, better for a developer, but it depends a lot on what you're also programming.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
I was forced during the two years out of three of college here to use Windows once because the library I used was from the DOS era and it was only ported over to Windows. Yes, you hear that right, WinBGI was something I """learnt""". WSL or a VM also works, however, if you don't want to bother with the full thing.Karmine wrote:
If you're gonna use your pc for studies don't use Linux, you'll 100% have to use stuff that's only on Windows.
You'll also most likely have to use Linux too for basic programming and stuff but WSL or a vm are more than enough for that.
I agree with this. I honestly believe that, for basic things, Linux has a better desktop experience than Windows or MacOS. There are caveats, obviously, but seriously, for someone who does basic office work and multimedia, Linux works just as well as Windows, if not better.Isshiki Kaname wrote:
I don't know why people have this disposition that you have to be a programmer to use or need to use linux to program. Like, that makes no sense.
I mean, sure. Most Linux distributions have it easier when you want to install a dependency library or something, but like, on windows you could just download visual studio and start coding.
This disposition of "hacking" just to have a usable operating system makes no sense, too. People, we don't use Spectrums or C64's anymore. Even then, you usually just use a load command on such computers to run software.
If anything, I think TempleOS fits this false Linux disposition a lot more, because you could actually edit the OS code on runtime.
Okay, apparently using Linux is completely optional.Winnyace wrote:
I'm a student in a CS major and most students use Windows. At the labs, it is a mixture of Windows and Linux. Some teachers have expressed directly that they don't really like Linux. Ultimately, many of the things you will learn during your time there will be on Windows, with Linux supported. If you want to use Linux, go ahead and install it. Linux Mint is honestly fine. Linux is, in my opinion, better for a developer, but it depends a lot on what you're also programming.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?I was forced during the two years out of three of college here to use Windows once because the library I used was from the DOS era and it was only ported over to Windows. Yes, you hear that right, WinBGI was something I """learnt""". WSL or a VM also works, however, if you don't want to bother with the full thing.Karmine wrote:
If you're gonna use your pc for studies don't use Linux, you'll 100% have to use stuff that's only on Windows.
You'll also most likely have to use Linux too for basic programming and stuff but WSL or a vm are more than enough for that.I agree with this. I honestly believe that, for basic things, Linux has a better desktop experience than Windows or MacOS. There are caveats, obviously, but seriously, for someone who does basic office work and multimedia, Linux works just as well as Windows, if not better.Isshiki Kaname wrote:
I don't know why people have this disposition that you have to be a programmer to use or need to use linux to program. Like, that makes no sense.
I mean, sure. Most Linux distributions have it easier when you want to install a dependency library or something, but like, on windows you could just download visual studio and start coding.
This disposition of "hacking" just to have a usable operating system makes no sense, too. People, we don't use Spectrums or C64's anymore. Even then, you usually just use a load command on such computers to run software.
If anything, I think TempleOS fits this false Linux disposition a lot more, because you could actually edit the OS code on runtime.
Try to get a dual boot, with both Linux and Windows. If you do advanced stuff with computer you will most likely need Linux, and imo it's better having a dual boot than WSL or a virtual machine.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
Yea, it is better to just start dual booting at first, so when you get the Linux vibes, you can choose if you keep dual booting (if you need something that Linux doesn't support), or switch to Linux altogether.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Try to get a dual boot, with both Linux and Windows. If you do advanced stuff with computer you will most likely need Linux, and imo it's better having a dual boot than WSL or a virtual machine.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?
And it's possible in lab to still have Windows only stuff, such as Matlab.
Honestly yeah, this is extremely useful for cases like mine for example, where I'm just fully chosing to move over to linux, however any normal/casual or even competitive players with normal pc's and needs pretty much shouldnt lol,Polyspora wrote:
just use windows
this one I heard its pretty much recommended a lot for gaming on linux overall, although these days Nobara seems to be the most and best popular optionCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Try KDE plasma as desktop environmentPolyspora wrote:
gnome lmaoKarmine wrote:
Legit the best advice for people who want to get to know Linux is using Windows and WSL.Polyspora wrote:
just use windows
I wish I had that as my first Linux experience instead of a shitty live usb with a gnome 🤢 interface.
if upgrading to win11 isnt an option for you (same case for me since my computer doesnt supported, why I hopped to linux in the first place) I'd tell ya to do your research on linux, watch videos and wait for Windows 10 Support (the security one it is I think) to end in 2025, then maybe think or try to hop over to linux and try it outBehrauder wrote:
Okay, apparently using Linux is completely optional.Winnyace wrote:
I'm a student in a CS major and most students use Windows. At the labs, it is a mixture of Windows and Linux. Some teachers have expressed directly that they don't really like Linux. Ultimately, many of the things you will learn during your time there will be on Windows, with Linux supported. If you want to use Linux, go ahead and install it. Linux Mint is honestly fine. Linux is, in my opinion, better for a developer, but it depends a lot on what you're also programming.Behrauder wrote:
I'm probably going to study Information Systems starting next year. Do you think I should start using Linux? ChatGPT recommended Linux Mint, but I read some people online saying it's not really necessary, and now I'm confused. For programming and things like that, is Linux so superior to Windows?I was forced during the two years out of three of college here to use Windows once because the library I used was from the DOS era and it was only ported over to Windows. Yes, you hear that right, WinBGI was something I """learnt""". WSL or a VM also works, however, if you don't want to bother with the full thing.Karmine wrote:
If you're gonna use your pc for studies don't use Linux, you'll 100% have to use stuff that's only on Windows.
You'll also most likely have to use Linux too for basic programming and stuff but WSL or a vm are more than enough for that.I agree with this. I honestly believe that, for basic things, Linux has a better desktop experience than Windows or MacOS. There are caveats, obviously, but seriously, for someone who does basic office work and multimedia, Linux works just as well as Windows, if not better.Isshiki Kaname wrote:
I don't know why people have this disposition that you have to be a programmer to use or need to use linux to program. Like, that makes no sense.
I mean, sure. Most Linux distributions have it easier when you want to install a dependency library or something, but like, on windows you could just download visual studio and start coding.
This disposition of "hacking" just to have a usable operating system makes no sense, too. People, we don't use Spectrums or C64's anymore. Even then, you usually just use a load command on such computers to run software.
If anything, I think TempleOS fits this false Linux disposition a lot more, because you could actually edit the OS code on runtime.
From what I understand, I can program perfectly well on Windows, and there are even specific cases of things that cannot be done on Linux, not to mention that I'm already used to Windows 10, so I should stick with windows, and maybe consider using a VM or WSL.
Yes.Shinku wrote:
Hi, I have a simple question, is mapping in stable possible without any problems?
I have been using ubuntu server for about 6 years, so I am not afraid of using the terminal and doing troubleshooting, but I have no experience with the desktop.
If possible, I am considering switching to Linux as there is no reason for me to continue using windows.
Thank you, I will try it when I'm ready to completely move to Linuxgreat_elmo wrote:
Yes.
Use it if you need.Shinku wrote:
Hi, I have a simple question, is mapping in stable possible without any problems?
I have been using ubuntu server for about 6 years, so I am not afraid of using the terminal and doing troubleshooting, but I have no experience with the desktop.
If possible, I am considering switching to Linux as there is no reason for me to continue using windows.
Unless you're using Arch, Ubuntu, or Mint, you'll have to get actively involved in patent games with codecs. In Fedora's case, they use RPM Fusion, which had the fun ordeal of mesa-freeworld (AMDGPU video accel) causing broken graphcis stacks when their package clashed with Fedora's package on genuine updates. openSUSE seems lucky, but Pacman still exists.Winnyace wrote:
I agree with this. I honestly believe that, for basic things, Linux has a better desktop experience than Windows or MacOS. There are caveats, obviously, but seriously, for someone who does basic office work and multimedia, Linux works just as well as Windows, if not better.
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
Some people prefer to tweak things endlessly. You might see them as tools, some might see them as toys. If the guy likes to spend his time this way, there is nothing wrong.Patatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
That's what I do, I seek better performance wherever possible :pPatatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
fair, I guess my problem with this and the reason why I pointed it out it's because it feels insincere?, it's fine to say you're doing it for fun, but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when that really isn't the case felt bad to meWinnyace wrote:
Some people prefer to tweak things endlessly. You might see them as tools, some might see them as toys. If the guy likes to spend his time this way, there is nothing wrong.Patatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
FreeBSD is faster and more optimal to me than Linux, and is faster to me than Windows. Technically Linux and FreeBSD is more optimal than Windows on my server, but I like consistency. I generally know what I'm doing :pPatatitta wrote:
fair, I guess my problem with this and the reason why I pointed it out it's because it feels insincere?, it's fine to say you're doing it for fun, but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when that really isn't the case felt bad to meWinnyace wrote:
Some people prefer to tweak things endlessly. You might see them as tools, some might see them as toys. If the guy likes to spend his time this way, there is nothing wrong.Patatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.
with the line "but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when that really isn't the case felt bad to me" I meant "but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when you're actually just doing it for fun and that isn't really your highest priority feels bad to me"Espionage724 wrote:
FreeBSD is faster and more optimal to me than Linux, and is faster to me than Windows. Technically Linux and FreeBSD is more optimal than Windows on my server, but I like consistency. I generally know what I'm doing :pPatatitta wrote:
fair, I guess my problem with this and the reason why I pointed it out it's because it feels insincere?, it's fine to say you're doing it for fun, but saying you're trying x doing y because it's faster or more optimal when that really isn't the case felt bad to meWinnyace wrote:
Some people prefer to tweak things endlessly. You might see them as tools, some might see them as toys. If the guy likes to spend his time this way, there is nothing wrong.Patatitta wrote:
I mean, why do you want performance if the moment you get good performance you're going to switch and try again, OS are tools, you're supposed to do things on themEspionage724 wrote:
I tweak things for performance, and I got Windows down the best my hardware can do. All my software works with it well. It's boringly perfect :pPatatitta wrote:
... how do you find an OS boring?Espionage724 wrote:
I got tired of Linux games a few months ago, found Windows boring, and now I'm on FreeBSD :p
FreeBSD is offering me better performance (30min vs 40min compile) and I'm liking how it does things the deeper I look into stuff.