It's not really that I disagree with you but we have different views on denizen and since abraker is doing the minimum to put his thoughts on this matter, there is not much we can discuss about the purpose of the thread.Ymir wrote:
Oh yeah that was what came before Thread of the Month. That was less Denizenship, more an alternative to Echelon.This thread is strange. As opposed to making it a community thing, every generation here is "[X Person]'s Age". Whilst there is a little bit of Generational lore sprinkled here and there, it puts an emphasis on the history of Denizenship as opposed to what the generation was actually like. This is what makes the old thread more interesting, this thread lacks any character and is just bland, nevermind the change in requirementsManishh wrote:
The changes itself are good, the thread would have been way more straightforward.Ymir wrote:
Alibaba Express Denizen Thread. This shit looks like ass, what are these Generation Titles and Descriptions? Why are they straightforward and boring as opposed to creative and fun?
If you're going to make a bunch of shitty changes to an old thread at least make it worthwhile.
Also the grouping of some of the generation are also disagreeable, especially the Pre-Abraker era. Abraker separated generations like that back then for a reason, as far as I'm aware Denizenship was originally to catalogue who was who and what the posting environment was like when they were active, for example Blitzfrog lived in a different time from Strager; it makes no sense to put them in one big group.
Look, change the requirements all you want, don't try and change the past.Back to discord where you belong, e-dater.Anaxii wrote:
Plebeians just don't like changes, it upsets them when you modify something they're used to seeing
That's why it was end up deciding that the purpose of the thread is to mention recognised member of the community
