Its just difference between people who want creativity and people who want things to be straightforward[ Rynn ] wrote:
whats wrong w generations tho other than it's not clearly defined?
Plebeians just don't like changes, it upsets them when you modify something they're used to seeingPatatitta wrote:
my bad for doing the reason why people voted me and also what the parliament supported and wanted to do and also what different political contenders wanted to doYmir wrote:
Pata try not to knock off old threads just so he can put his own name on it challenge:ColdTooth wrote:
This thread should be in a hall of shame for how pathetic it is.
she’s the hardest Kaito simp to ever existhis everything wrote:
Am I the only one who has absolutely no idea who GhoulyBits is?
didnt we make something like that also?Ymir wrote:
Alibaba Express Denizen Thread. This shit looks like ass, what are these Generation Titles and Descriptions? Why are they straightforward and boring as opposed to creative and fun?
If you're going to make a bunch of shitty changes to an old thread at least make it worthwhile.
The changes itself are good, the thread would have been way more straightforward.Ymir wrote:
Alibaba Express Denizen Thread. This shit looks like ass, what are these Generation Titles and Descriptions? Why are they straightforward and boring as opposed to creative and fun?
If you're going to make a bunch of shitty changes to an old thread at least make it worthwhile.
We never made a new Denizen list what are you on about?Polyspora wrote:
didnt we make something like that also?Ymir wrote:
Alibaba Express Denizen Thread. This shit looks like ass, what are these Generation Titles and Descriptions? Why are they straightforward and boring as opposed to creative and fun?
If you're going to make a bunch of shitty changes to an old thread at least make it worthwhile.
what was the name of it... like angel? or ascended? alumni? man I only know that only shinrun was thereYmir wrote:
We never made a new Denizen list what are you on about?Polyspora wrote:
didnt we make something like that also?Ymir wrote:
Alibaba Express Denizen Thread. This shit looks like ass, what are these Generation Titles and Descriptions? Why are they straightforward and boring as opposed to creative and fun?
If you're going to make a bunch of shitty changes to an old thread at least make it worthwhile.
This thread is strange. As opposed to making it a community thing, every generation here is "[X Person]'s Age". Whilst there is a little bit of Generational lore sprinkled here and there, it puts an emphasis on the history of Denizenship as opposed to what the generation was actually like. This is what makes the old thread more interesting, this thread lacks any character and is just bland, nevermind the change in requirementsManishh wrote:
The changes itself are good, the thread would have been way more straightforward.Ymir wrote:
Alibaba Express Denizen Thread. This shit looks like ass, what are these Generation Titles and Descriptions? Why are they straightforward and boring as opposed to creative and fun?
If you're going to make a bunch of shitty changes to an old thread at least make it worthwhile.
Back to discord where you belong, e-dater.Anaxii wrote:
Plebeians just don't like changes, it upsets them when you modify something they're used to seeing
It's not really that I disagree with you but we have different views on denizen and since abraker is doing the minimum to put his thoughts on this matter, there is not much we can discuss about the purpose of the thread.Ymir wrote:
Oh yeah that was what came before Thread of the Month. That was less Denizenship, more an alternative to Echelon.This thread is strange. As opposed to making it a community thing, every generation here is "[X Person]'s Age". Whilst there is a little bit of Generational lore sprinkled here and there, it puts an emphasis on the history of Denizenship as opposed to what the generation was actually like. This is what makes the old thread more interesting, this thread lacks any character and is just bland, nevermind the change in requirementsManishh wrote:
The changes itself are good, the thread would have been way more straightforward.Ymir wrote:
Alibaba Express Denizen Thread. This shit looks like ass, what are these Generation Titles and Descriptions? Why are they straightforward and boring as opposed to creative and fun?
If you're going to make a bunch of shitty changes to an old thread at least make it worthwhile.
Also the grouping of some of the generation are also disagreeable, especially the Pre-Abraker era. Abraker separated generations like that back then for a reason, as far as I'm aware Denizenship was originally to catalogue who was who and what the posting environment was like when they were active, for example Blitzfrog lived in a different time from Strager; it makes no sense to put them in one big group.
Look, change the requirements all you want, don't try and change the past.Back to discord where you belong, e-dater.Anaxii wrote:
Plebeians just don't like changes, it upsets them when you modify something they're used to seeing
Nor do I lmao, but decision are being made by the people who got highest vote and not many people are complaining so it's not like I will go out of my to convince themYmir wrote:
Fair, look I'm not going to be completely against everything Patatitta will do because that would be miserable, but so far I don't agree with most of these changes.
that way I can reflect all the criticism I recieve to a random underage person on the internet!, oh how wonderfulsametdze wrote:
damn i wonder who gave patatitta the idea to do ages
neglected by previous gov, so adding them nowPolyspora wrote:
first denizen is a guy who doesnt post for more than a month lets go
it was first properly communicated to ot, then voted on and approved by gov, and after that, it was approved by multiple GMTs, so no, nothing of this goes against the constitutionPolyspora wrote:
isnt merging the gens against the constitution?
the constitution is not something we cant change really, its what guarantee us that the president wont become a dictatorPatatitta wrote:
it was first properly communicated to ot, then voted on and approved by gov, and after that, it was approved by multiple GMTs, so no, nothing of this goes against the constitutionPolyspora wrote:
isnt merging the gens against the constitution?
the president CAN change the constitution, every denizen rework supposed a change in the constitutionPolyspora wrote:
the constitution is not something we can change really, its what guarantee us that the president wont become a dictatorPatatitta wrote:
it was first properly communicated to ot, then voted on and approved by gov, and after that, it was approved by multiple GMTs, so no, nothing of this goes against the constitutionPolyspora wrote:
isnt merging the gens against the constitution?
not the gmt's, not the president.
I only read things about denizenship herePatatitta wrote:
the president CAN change the constitution, every denizen rework supposed a change in the constitutionPolyspora wrote:
the constitution is not something we can change really, its what guarantee us that the president wont become a dictatorPatatitta wrote:
it was first properly communicated to ot, then voted on and approved by gov, and after that, it was approved by multiple GMTs, so no, nothing of this goes against the constitutionPolyspora wrote:
isnt merging the gens against the constitution?
not the gmt's, not the president.
everyone from gen 9 knew who she was.Jangsoodlor wrote:
I think splitting denizen's generation by year is better than by... uh.... reforms imposed by various presidents. As Aireunaeus pointed out, some ppl in the GhoulyBits "era" don't even know who GhoulyBits was.
I wanted to avoid it making too similar to eras, + the name is just a whatever name, I could have put whatever there, I just thought it naming it after the people who actually reworked the system and that caused the split made sense, at the end of the day it's just a very minor thingJangsoodlor wrote:
If you think re-writing the denizen generations because the old system is too broken for reform is the way to go, I think splitting denizen's generation by year they became denizen (similar to a thread you did a while back) is better than by... uh.... reforms imposed by various presidents. As Aireunaeus pointed out, some ppl in the GhoulyBits "era" don't even know who GhoulyBits was.
Congratulations 179bpm! 🤝Kobold84 wrote:
Oh yeah, all the drama talk and no one congratulated 179bpm. Congratulations!
HaHaHaHa This Monkey Thinks He Will Be Listened To. Stupid Monkey.Manishh wrote:
All you bitches, if you wanna complain then go to that GOV thread.
monke monke monkeYmir wrote:
HaHaHaHa This Monkey Thinks He Will Be Listened To. Stupid Monkey.Manishh wrote:
All you bitches, if you wanna complain then go to that GOV thread.
you missed alotZelzatter Zero wrote:
damn what just happened over there while i wasn't looking
nothing of importanceZelzatter Zero wrote:
damn what just happened over there while i wasn't looking
Let me resume the whole situation for you:Zelzatter Zero wrote:
damn what just happened over there while i wasn't looking
Which is not really a good idea imohis everything wrote:
Let me resume the whole situation for you:Zelzatter Zero wrote:
damn what just happened over there while i wasn't looking
- Patatitta has become the president
- He wants to delete denizenship
- The majority of people are against it
- The government and the president finally found a solution for this issue
what?his everything wrote:
Let me resume the whole situation for you:Zelzatter Zero wrote:
damn what just happened over there while i wasn't looking
- Patatitta has become the president
- He wants to delete denizenship
- The majority of people are against it
- The government and the president finally found a solution for this issue
look i've just given up trying to explain thingsManishh wrote:
what?his everything wrote:
Let me resume the whole situation for you:Zelzatter Zero wrote:
damn what just happened over there while i wasn't looking
- Patatitta has become the president
- He wants to delete denizenship
- The majority of people are against it
- The government and the president finally found a solution for this issue
MULTIACCOUNT!!!!!!!!!!!!Manishh wrote:
Dont get fooled guys. The sexman is no other than PATAITTA himself
Patatitta wrote:
look i've just given up trying to explain things
I love our current president, he's so bravePatatitta wrote:
OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT:
My presidentship has been passed to sexman
you gotta be fucking kidding mePatatitta wrote:
that way I can reflect all the criticism I recieve to a random underage person on the internet!, oh how wonderfulsametdze wrote:
damn i wonder who gave patatitta the idea to do ages
nope he's taller than you and probably stronger than youYmir wrote:
I could probably kill you.
I'll call my boy, he runs noble.Polyspora wrote:
nope he's taller than you and probably stronger than youYmir wrote:
I could probably kill you.
willy wonka does NOT run noble 😭🙏Ymir wrote:
I'll call my boy, he runs noble.Polyspora wrote:
nope he's taller than you and probably stronger than youYmir wrote:
I could probably kill you.
its just denizenship 4? or is it 5?sametdze wrote:
im ngl when someone got denizen in the old thread it honestly felt like seeing someone achieve an oscar or something, here it just doesnt have that zing.
well, congrats rhythm32, well done
ehh cuz rly you gotta respect opinions from anyone even if theyre a 4yo kidsametdze wrote:
really just sounds like "meh meh meh meh meh you're a kid"
Haha. "This person has achieved fuck all but be annoying as shit, but I have to give them muh fake denizen because they meet the baseline requirement!". At least say something more interesting rather than insulting him then throwing Denizen as a bandaid.NOTICE wrote:
This individual faced challenges in OT due to their immature and sometimes foolish behavior. However, despite these obstacles, they have met the requirements for denizenship.
I let manishh write that one since he was the closest to him, I had nothing to do with thatYmir wrote:
Haha. "This person has achieved fuck all but be annoying as shit, but I have to give them muh fake denizen because they meet the baseline requirement!". At least say something more interesting rather than insulting him then throwing Denizen as a bandaid.NOTICE wrote:
This individual faced challenges in OT due to their immature and sometimes foolish behavior. However, despite these obstacles, they have met the requirements for denizenship.
Though, this would be made easier if you gave Denizen to people who mattered.
look if the 4 year old is actually saying real shit you gotta turn at least one ear to them[ Rynn ] wrote:
ehh cuz rly you gotta respect opinions from anyone even if theyre a 4yo kidsametdze wrote:
really just sounds like "meh meh meh meh meh you're a kid"
oh when I claimed it was my own idea it was satire, I thought everyone knew it was your idea lolsametdze wrote:
look if the 4 year old is actually saying real shit you gotta turn at least one ear to them[ Rynn ] wrote:
ehh cuz rly you gotta respect opinions from anyone even if theyre a 4yo kidsametdze wrote:
really just sounds like "meh meh meh meh meh you're a kid"
anyways patatitta youre still not gonna say who who gave you the idea for gens or nah?
Who let this monke in a parliament!Patatitta wrote:
I let manishh write that one since he was the closest to him, I had nothing to do with thatYmir wrote:
Haha. "This person has achieved fuck all but be annoying as shit, but I have to give them muh fake denizen because they meet the baseline requirement!". At least say something more interesting rather than insulting him then throwing Denizen as a bandaid.NOTICE wrote:
This individual faced challenges in OT due to their immature and sometimes foolish behavior. However, despite these obstacles, they have met the requirements for denizenship.
Though, this would be made easier if you gave Denizen to people who mattered.
Nothing is anything buddy it's OT, all LARP.Zain Sugieres wrote:
bros really mad someone he doesnt like got an imaginary online title that means nothing
All of those met requirements when it was your job to add them.Polyspora wrote:
leaving here all my congrats for the 1000 million denizens to come in the next week
Yes, we must add tourists who stay for 8 months and contribute jackshitKarmine wrote:
All of those met requirements when it was your job to add them.Polyspora wrote:
leaving here all my congrats for the 1000 million denizens to come in the next week
in your defense we kinda need to do that so people who don't know what they're doing don't ruin ot's cultureReyalp51 wrote:
yeah dude we gotta gatekeep harder so no one wants to join ot
🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊Polyspora wrote:
congrats!
congrats!
congrats!
congrats!
congrats!
congrats!
congrats!
congrats!
First of all doghead, Everyone matters. Second of all what do you want me to write lol, that "bro contributed to the community by being active" thats apply to everyone.Ymir wrote:
Haha. "This person has achieved fuck all but be annoying as shit, but I have to give them muh fake denizen because they meet the baseline requirement!". At least say something more interesting rather than insulting him then throwing Denizen as a bandaid.NOTICE wrote:
This individual faced challenges in OT due to their immature and sometimes foolish behavior. However, despite these obstacles, they have met the requirements for denizenship.
Though, this would be made easier if you gave Denizen to people who mattered.
Thats just literally, "Add those who i like, dont add those who I dont know or dont like".Ymir wrote:
Yes, we must add tourists who stay for 8 months and contribute jackshitKarmine wrote:
All of those met requirements when it was your job to add them.Polyspora wrote:
leaving here all my congrats for the 1000 million denizens to come in the next week
No they don't.Manishh wrote:
First of all doghead, Everyone matters.
Maybe because I was newer to OT back then? Are you mentally inept? Of course I wouldn't complain if I barely knew what OT was, you were the first Denizen I saw get nominated.Manishh wrote:
You didnt complain about it back then. Why is the speech bad now?
Fun fact, there were people I added who I didn't like much, stop intentionally missing the point and be better.Manishh wrote:
Thats just literally, "Add those who i like, dont add those who I dont know or dont like".
If you think "this guy sucked at OT" is a contribution then there's a screw loose.Manishh wrote:
Contribution is so subjective.
