B0ii wrote:
Patatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dying
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
my contributions are not schizoposting and making large amounts of threads, but making posts and being recognized as a voice of reason, trusting, having a voice when it comes to policy, rule, and other changes that impact OT.
I may not meet the 300 (subjective) posts in OT, but my contributions are still vast and can potentially be used for other stuff going forward. I also may not meet the activity requirements but that does not mean I am not active in the subforum. I implore you to look past your bias about having "such a title". It is a title in a subforum for a game. I did not strive to have this except to not have to make a "coup" to join in the presidency elections.
I did such because anyone here is unlikely to make changes in a way that will actually matter or get done (example: the past president and parliament being lazy/inactive after they get the role).
I want to preface that the denizen acceptance was not done in an echo chamber of the #ThreadRights group but from a committee that had equal parts in the #ThreadRights group and equal parts not a part of.
If you are so inclined to see an issue about this I want you to see your local representative and... oh wait, they are inactive and wont do anything...
Regardless, because of the waves it can create I will refrain from trying for presidency, and will do the stuff I want to do despite the title/role.
If the denizen acceptance committee wish to revoke the title then do so, it matters not.