what's the "Padoru Cold War"?
~Jan - Feb of 2023, just a roleplay thing. Was really fun, you might know of the Grass-Party which was created during it.Anaxii wrote:
what's the "Padoru Cold War"?
i knew about grass party of course but i didn't know that Pad!OT was a thingYmir wrote:
~Jan - Feb of 2023, just a roleplay thing. Was really fun, you might know of the Grass-Party which was created during it.Anaxii wrote:
what's the "Padoru Cold War"?
community/forums/topics/889610?n=226fun factIt (Grass Party and PadOT) still exists technically, despite roleplay being dead. We do Denizenship.
okayAnaxii wrote:
i knew about grass party of course but i didn't know that Pad!OT was a thingYmir wrote:
~Jan - Feb of 2023, just a roleplay thing. Was really fun, you might know of the Grass-Party which was created during it.Anaxii wrote:
what's the "Padoru Cold War"?
community/forums/topics/889610?n=226fun factIt (Grass Party and PadOT) still exists technically, despite roleplay being dead. We do Denizenship.
-
Corne2Plum3 is it possible to put my former name with an old pfp of mine in the OP?
like i used wayback machine and this is the oldest profile of mine i could find
thanks!Corne2Plum3 wrote:
okayAnaxii wrote:
i knew about grass party of course but i didn't know that Pad!OT was a thingYmir wrote:
~Jan - Feb of 2023, just a roleplay thing. Was really fun, you might know of the Grass-Party which was created during it.Anaxii wrote:
what's the "Padoru Cold War"?
community/forums/topics/889610?n=226fun factIt (Grass Party and PadOT) still exists technically, despite roleplay being dead. We do Denizenship.
-
Corne2Plum3 is it possible to put my former name with an old pfp of mine in the OP?
like i used wayback machine and this is the oldest profile of mine i could find
It was not a cold war, It was a straight up war. Blood everywhere, gun fight sword fight pure evil. The traitors we found the deaths of soo many padorus and us. Oh it was a nightmare living that timeAnaxii wrote:
what's the "Padoru Cold War"?
YOU SAVED MY LIFE RIRI 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏Rezq Gokou wrote:
coggrat IAVS
Stefan wrote:
Blushing wrote:
Gen 10 is 10/10 frfr
yes because im hereBlushing wrote:
Gen 10 is 10/10 frfr
Every gen is ass, they're just delusional.My Angel Anaxii wrote:
i feel like gen 9 was ass when u guys say that ;-;
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
now y'all can say that you're a ten 💯💯💯💯💯😋😋😋😋😋🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥- Marco - wrote:
Blushing wrote:
Gen 10 is 10/10 frfr
sametdze should have gotten it earlier 100%, and personally, I'm pretty sure they added them as denizen to support their plan to rig the elections (which is basically a confirmed fact but no one has done anything because the person who made the election thread is also on it...)B0ii wrote:
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
omg guys it finally happened 😳abraker wrote:
NOTICE
This denizen has a knack for stirring trouble, but I guess that's their way of having fun. Oh how could one forget the enragement that boiled within us all when they resurrected ye olde threads from their eternal slumber. Still their reputation in OT has only but gained momentum - for better or worse. May their lucky✰star gifs bring a slice of life to OT it has been long missing. Welcome to the denizen club, igorsprite and stay out of trouble or you will be toast.
What would you expect when half of the parliament is deadPatatitta wrote:
sametdze should have gotten it earlier 100%, and personally, I'm pretty sure they added them as denizen to support their plan to rig the elections (which is basically a confirmed fact but no one has done anything because the person who made the election thread is also on it...)B0ii wrote:
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
igorsprite wrote:
omg guys it finally happened 😳abraker wrote:
NOTICE
This denizen has a knack for stirring trouble, but I guess that's their way of having fun. Oh how could one forget the enragement that boiled within us all when they resurrected ye olde threads from their eternal slumber. Still their reputation in OT has only but gained momentum - for better or worse. May their lucky✰star gifs bring a slice of life to OT it has been long missing. Welcome to the denizen club, igorsprite and stay out of trouble or you will be toast.
igorsprite wrote:
omg guys it finally happened 😳abraker wrote:
NOTICE
This denizen has a knack for stirring trouble, but I guess that's their way of having fun. Oh how could one forget the enragement that boiled within us all when they resurrected ye olde threads from their eternal slumber. Still their reputation in OT has only but gained momentum - for better or worse. May their lucky✰star gifs bring a slice of life to OT it has been long missing. Welcome to the denizen club, igorsprite and stay out of trouble or you will be toast.
I stole itAnaxii wrote:
btw is it normal that Blushing is no longer in the original post? he was there yesterday lol
The Blushing Incident.Anaxii wrote:
btw is it normal that Blushing is no longer in the original post? he was there yesterday lol
weird, I don't remember removing Blushing...Kobold84 wrote:
The Blushing Incident.Anaxii wrote:
btw is it normal that Blushing is no longer in the original post? he was there yesterday lol
oh no-Corne2Plum3 wrote:
weird, I don't remember removing Blushing...Kobold84 wrote:
The Blushing Incident.Anaxii wrote:
btw is it normal that Blushing is no longer in the original post? he was there yesterday lol
The Blushing Incident: Corne Amnesia arcCorne2Plum3 wrote:
weird, I don't remember removing Blushing...Kobold84 wrote:
The Blushing Incident.Anaxii wrote:
btw is it normal that Blushing is no longer in the original post? he was there yesterday lol
my contributions are not schizoposting and making large amounts of threads, but making posts and being recognized as a voice of reason, trusting, having a voice when it comes to policy, rule, and other changes that impact OT.B0ii wrote:
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
FixedAnaxii wrote:
oh no-Corne2Plum3 wrote:
weird, I don't remember removing Blushing...Kobold84 wrote:
The Blushing Incident.Anaxii wrote:
btw is it normal that Blushing is no longer in the original post? he was there yesterday lol
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote:
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote:
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote:
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
yep 23 is oldkeremaru wrote:
holy fucking shit i'm old
I'm fine with anything so long as everyone is happy.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote:
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote:
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
You never know if they are happy, there is only few in OT! Who gonna show discomfort regarding a topic. One of them is patatittaYmir wrote:
I'm fine with anything so long as everyone is happy.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote:
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote:
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
I mean, my argument isManishh wrote:
You never know if they are happy, there is only few in OT! Who gonna show discomfort regarding a topic. One of them is patatittaYmir wrote:
I'm fine with anything so long as everyone is happy.Patatitta wrote:
idk, I feel that having people who just are there because of a mistake kinda damages the entire integrity of denizenship, I would vote for removing blushing and re-adding them laterYmir wrote:
You're looking way too deep into it. We usually have a planned schedule for Denizens and their requirements are checked.B0ii wrote:
agreed, i think they're just selecting random people as denizen at this point just to "save" ot from dyingPatatitta wrote:
wait, does blushing even meet the requirement for denizen?, they only have like 4 pages of post in an entire year, they don't make my OT!eras thread lmao. There are people who are WAY more active and they don't have denizen
and not to be rude, but what the fuck has blushing ever done to deserve such a title?
This time around it wasn't, which was a mistake. However I think having Blushing here isn't necessarily a bad idea, albeit inconsistent.
KatouPolyspora wrote:
is kobold the first russian?
Was?Polyspora wrote:
that was a huge gen btw
uuuh, I may have shared confidential informationKobold84 wrote:
Was?Polyspora wrote:
that was a huge gen btw
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote:
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote:
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote:
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
criticizing it in this way won't make things any better ngl.Patatitta wrote:
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote:
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote:
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
Aint no way you said this to this guy. Aint no way. Do you have any idea how long this dude have tried to make a change?Anaxii wrote:
criticizing it in this way won't make things any better ngl.Patatitta wrote:
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote:
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote:
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
idk I thought the joke was funnyAnaxii wrote:
criticizing it in this way won't make things any better ngl.Patatitta wrote:
yes, I'm actively criticizing itsametdze wrote:
dont you have beef with the denizen threadPatatitta wrote:
guys i've cracked the denizen code
we should give denizen to the people I like and not give it to the people I dislike
if only someone made a thread about that exact topicYmir wrote:
It's better he criticise it than hide his discontent, in my personal opinion.
thats how we are talking about this topic, no?Arctos Sagittario wrote:
personally I’d prefer the blushing denizenship issue should be talked as “why or why not the complaints are valid”, not “who’s having problem”
making this thing personal will not be constructive
no, corne literally asked who is against blushingManishh wrote:
thats how we are talking about this topic, no?Arctos Sagittario wrote:
personally I’d prefer the blushing denizenship issue should be talked as “why or why not the complaints are valid”, not “who’s having problem”
making this thing personal will not be constructive
i've got a problem with the whole system.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Put aside Manishh and Patatitta, who's complaining about Blushing being denizen?
basedZain Sugieres wrote:
i've got a problem with the whole system.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Put aside Manishh and Patatitta, who's complaining about Blushing being denizen?
basedPatatitta wrote:
basedZain Sugieres wrote:
i've got a problem with the whole system.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Put aside Manishh and Patatitta, who's complaining about Blushing being denizen?