I think with threads like abraker's game thread it's being rated highly because of the potential it has. It's the only thread I've rated 10 so far as well. I think this is a problem because the rating might not be reflective of the actual thread because we all end up voting on it a day after its been created instead of voting when we've seen how the thread plays out. Same thing with sametdze's thread, right now it's literally "I'm making a collab" and a bunch of people going "/in" but it's rated a 7 even though it has no actual substance yet. I think it's more fair to vote on these threads after they've panned out, or at least have a revote with them, but idk if that's practical with how long you plan to do this. Maybe add another column saying that the thread is in it's early stages or the vote was premature or something?Patatitta wrote:
also it's interesting to see the two abraker threads so high up when the actual game itself seems to have failed, it seems that just mentioning other denizens in a post will make it seem like it's better ig
today I learnt that revote is a word, idk it feels like it should be a word but also not?
