missed it, my badBehrauder wrote:
I think you forgot this one:
community/forums/topics/1856703
dont take this too seriouslyWinnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
I try to. It ultimately doesn't matter as I don't know any of you and none of you know me. It still kinda hurts, but to my knowledge, only one thread was ranked that was created by me and it was a meta post.Reyalp51 wrote:
dont take this too seriouslyWinnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
I take EVERY single thread made from after I made this thread, and so far, that is the only thread you've really madeWinnyace wrote:
I try to. It ultimately doesn't matter as I don't know any of you and none of you know me. It still kinda hurts, but to my knowledge, only one thread was ranked that was created by me and it was a meta post.Reyalp51 wrote:
dont take this too seriouslyWinnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
I feel people have forgotten the point of this threadsametdze wrote:
Im just saying, i feel like this might disencourage some people from making threads in fear of making a red thread
What do you mean by the same idea? The only similarity I see is that they are all curiosities that involve the osu! forum (for some reason I'm very interested in this).Patatitta wrote:
-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens
it ok man, potato rankings dont mean much anyway ;-;Winnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
Winnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
How so? There is no punishment or prize if you get a green or red thread, the leaderboard doesnt really matter anywayssametdze wrote:
Im just saying, i feel like this might disencourage some people from making threads in fear of making a red thread
my point is, if this thread didn't exist, and you saw something like the double image thread die after a while, you probably wouldn't have thought that the thread was that good as it just died day 2, same with the abraker board gameBehrauder wrote:
What do you mean by the same idea? The only similarity I see is that they are all curiosities that involve the osu! forum (for some reason I'm very interested in this).Patatitta wrote:
-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens
Patatitta wrote:
my point is, if this thread didn't exist, and you saw something like the double image thread die after a while, you probably wouldn't have thought that the thread was that good as it just died day 2, same with the abraker board gameBehrauder wrote:
What do you mean by the same idea? The only similarity I see is that they are all curiosities that involve the osu! forum (for some reason I'm very interested in this).Patatitta wrote:
-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens
+ I say it's the same idea as the structure of the threads, even the text color is exactly the same, just replacing one weird tech with another weird tech, + this is the first time you post threads like this so close to each other in time, just after I made this thread which claimed your threads were good
There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.Anaxii wrote:
DAMN
THERE'S A LOT OF RED
could add orange for 2.5-4.99 rangeKarmine wrote:
There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.Anaxii wrote:
DAMN
THERE'S A LOT OF RED
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good
Yeah but then red would only have 1-2.5 range, would be weird too imo.z0z wrote:
could add orange for 2.5-4.99 rangeKarmine wrote:
There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.Anaxii wrote:
DAMN
THERE'S A LOT OF RED
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good
there's no 0 rating?Karmine wrote:
Yeah but then red would only have 1-2.5 range, would be weird too imo.z0z wrote:
could add orange for 2.5-4.99 rangeKarmine wrote:
There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.Anaxii wrote:
DAMN
THERE'S A LOT OF RED
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good
To keep them equal you'd need a range of 2.25, I guess it could work but it's also not very intuitive.
wont do, i'm really just basing myself on review page metrics, normally, when a movie is <5 it's just bad, doesn't matter if it's a 1 or a 3, if it's under a mid 7 then i'ts probably just alright, and for high 7 and above they're bangers, of course this is very broad, but that's the ideaz0z wrote:
could add orange for 2.5-4.99 rangeKarmine wrote:
There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.Anaxii wrote:
DAMN
THERE'S A LOT OF RED
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good
No it's 1-10.z0z wrote:
Karmine wrote:
Yeah but then red would only have 1-2.5 range, would be weird too imo.z0z wrote:
could add orange for 2.5-4.99 rangeKarmine wrote:
There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.Anaxii wrote:
DAMN
THERE'S A LOT OF RED
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good
To keep them equal you'd need a range of 2.25, I guess it could work but it's also not very intuitive.
there's no 0 rating?
Makes sense.Patatitta wrote:
wont do, i'm really just basing myself on review page metrics, normally, when a movie is <5 it's just bad, doesn't matter if it's a 1 or a 3, if it's under a mid 7 then i'ts probably just alright, and for high 7 and above they're bangers, of course this is very broad, but that's the ideaz0z wrote:
Karmine wrote:
There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.Anaxii wrote:
DAMN
THERE'S A LOT OF RED
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good
could add orange for 2.5-4.99 range
dont worry about that, I still have to release the new formseblf2013 wrote:
Saving this from page 2
man it should've gotten 5 starsJarcrafted wrote:
I gave away supporter and y'all give it a low rating
Should of touched grass, smh
Hydreigon wrote:
Also when the leaderboard get too crowded in the future will you make a new one? maybe like one per month.
Saw it too but I'd rather forgetHydreigon wrote:
at least that russian thread isn't here...
man i feel like the only one who saw the horrors before the op edited the post.
Giving a read only link to the sheet would be good imoHydreigon wrote:
Hydreigon wrote:
Also when the leaderboard get too crowded in the future will you make a new one? maybe like one per month.
looks a bit weird now that its in 3 rows
january 1stReyalp51 wrote:
how long are you gonna keep updating this thread
yeah may do that, I don't want scores to be leaked tho, have to check how to share only 1 sheetKarmine wrote:
Saw it too but I'd rather forgetHydreigon wrote:
at least that russian thread isn't here...
man i feel like the only one who saw the horrors before the op edited the post.Giving a read only link to the sheet would be good imoHydreigon wrote:
Hydreigon wrote:
Also when the leaderboard get too crowded in the future will you make a new one? maybe like one per month.
looks a bit weird now that its in 3 rows
people dont care about linuxWinnyace wrote:
So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.
in the example I said of abraker thread, which they're STILL trying to make it work after like the entire month which I used it as a example of something that flopped yet was green, it was visually appealing. People in OT wont read more than 1 paragraph, the last time I did a thread like that I put like a image every other word to keep people attention and it still didn't work out as people didn't read the thread. So yeah, if people dont care about the topic, and wont even read it, you cant really expect a green, you're still 0.5 away thoWinnyace wrote:
So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.
7 is good tho.Winnyace wrote:
So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.
you must pair every image with a subway surfers gifPatatitta wrote:
People in OT wont read more than 1 paragraph, the last time I did a thread like that I put like a image every other word to keep people attention and it still didn't work out as people didn't read the thread.
I guess. To be honest, I really shouldn't worry so much about this to this level. I guess what I'm looking for in this is validation, validation from people who I may never meet, who don't truly care about me below the surface level.eblf2013 wrote:
7 is good tho.Winnyace wrote:
So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.
Honestly, probably not the best move with this current time period of OT. To little attention spans from most of the usersWinnyace wrote:
I guess. To be honest, I really shouldn't worry so much about this to this level. I guess what I'm looking for in this is validation, validation from people who I may never meet, who don't truly care about me below the surface level.eblf2013 wrote:
7 is good tho.Winnyace wrote:
So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.
bro, how does those 2 threads count xdPatatitta wrote:
armpits
To kobold
Because you asked for it people voted stuff like 3 or 4, but some threads are so shit literally everyone will vote 1.Behrauder wrote:
How is it possible that there are threads with a rating of exactly 1? Not even my thread that literally asked for this got this achievement lol.
This was a fun experience while it lasted, thank you.Patatitta wrote:
I got a cold and didn't spend much time on the computer to update this tread and now I have a lot of threads piled up and since I planned to finish this on january first I decided to save myself some work and stop it today lmao
if someone makes this thread 2 it won't be meHydreigon wrote:
inb4 the sequel…
ur avg is still higher dw about itScyla wrote:
I lost against Zain
That's why I lost, I want the lowest of allZain Sugieres wrote:
ur avg is still higher dw about itScyla wrote:
I lost against Zain
1.225 vs 1.395