Anaxii wrote:

wait Patatitta can you change the title to ✨✨✨ 9th DECEMBER WAS A GREAT DAY ✨✨✨ pls? thanksss

UPR wrote:

Damn how did my ass end up on here? Wild (also ain't no way my thread about being sick is rated lmao how stupid)

Winnyace wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

It's not hard to make greens, just, put more than 5 minute effort into a thread

One can put a hour into making a thread, if the topic doesn't interest anyone, it won't get high up.

Kobold84 wrote:

Karmine wrote:

Hydreigon wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

what threads did you vote highly that got reated low?, most of the ones I rated high it ended up high, even if I think some threads are overrated or undearrated

here's some:



these had atleast some effort and i gave them 8-10's, but got rated lower.

actually looking at the list again, i realize there is a lot of threads that i scored lower but got rated higher lol

To me 7 is a good thread, 8 is really good and 9/10 is for absolute bangers.
I wouldn't consider these to be too low.

Pretty much, I think anything above 7 is a good thread, 9-10 is an extremely brilliant thread. Different people have different ideas about ratings, but when all of them vote together, it averages out.

Behrauder wrote:

I think you forgot this one:
community/forums/topics/1856703

Winnyace wrote:

Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.

Reyalp51 wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.

dont take this too seriously

Winnyace wrote:

Reyalp51 wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.

dont take this too seriously

I try to. It ultimately doesn't matter as I don't know any of you and none of you know me. It still kinda hurts, but to my knowledge, only one thread was ranked that was created by me and it was a meta post.

sametdze wrote:

Im just saying, i feel like this might disencourage some people from making threads in fear of making a red thread

Patatitta wrote:

-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens

Winnyace wrote:

Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.

Winnyace wrote:

Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.

sametdze wrote:

Im just saying, i feel like this might disencourage some people from making threads in fear of making a red thread

Behrauder wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens

What do you mean by the same idea? The only similarity I see is that they are all curiosities that involve the osu! forum (for some reason I'm very interested in this).

Patatitta wrote:

Behrauder wrote:

Patatitta wrote:

-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens

What do you mean by the same idea? The only similarity I see is that they are all curiosities that involve the osu! forum (for some reason I'm very interested in this).

my point is, if this thread didn't exist, and you saw something like the double image thread die after a while, you probably wouldn't have thought that the thread was that good as it just died day 2, same with the abraker board game

+ I say it's the same idea as the structure of the threads, even the text color is exactly the same, just replacing one weird tech with another weird tech, + this is the first time you post threads like this so close to each other in time, just after I made this thread which claimed your threads were good

/

/

Anaxii wrote:

DAMN

THERE'S A LOT OF RED

Karmine wrote:

Anaxii wrote:

DAMN

THERE'S A LOT OF RED

There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good

z0z wrote:

Karmine wrote:

Anaxii wrote:

DAMN

THERE'S A LOT OF RED

There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good

could add orange for 2.5-4.99 range

Karmine wrote:

z0z wrote:

Karmine wrote:

Anaxii wrote:

DAMN

THERE'S A LOT OF RED

There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good

could add orange for 2.5-4.99 range

Yeah but then red would only have 1-2.5 range, would be weird too imo.
To keep them equal you'd need a range of 2.25, I guess it could work but it's also not very intuitive.

z0z wrote:

Karmine wrote:

Anaxii wrote:

DAMN

THERE'S A LOT OF RED

There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good

could add orange for 2.5-4.99 range

z0z wrote:

Karmine wrote:

z0z wrote:

Karmine wrote:

Anaxii wrote:

DAMN

THERE'S A LOT OF RED

There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good

could add orange for 2.5-4.99 range

Yeah but then red would only have 1-2.5 range, would be weird too imo.
To keep them equal you'd need a range of 2.25, I guess it could work but it's also not very intuitive.

there's no 0 rating?

Patatitta wrote:

z0z wrote:

Karmine wrote:

Anaxii wrote:

DAMN

THERE'S A LOT OF RED

There's one color for < 5 and two for > 5 so when you take that into consideration there's not that many.
Most threads are rated > 5 meaning OT is mostly good

could add orange for 2.5-4.99 range

wont do, i'm really just basing myself on review page metrics, normally, when a movie is <5 it's just bad, doesn't matter if it's a 1 or a 3, if it's under a mid 7 then i'ts probably just alright, and for high 7 and above they're bangers, of course this is very broad, but that's the idea

eblf2013 wrote:

Saving this from page 2

Jarcrafted wrote:

I gave away supporter and y'all give it a low rating
Should of touched grass, smh

Hydreigon wrote:

Also when the leaderboard get too crowded in the future will you make a new one? maybe like one per month.

Hydreigon wrote:

at least that russian thread isn't here...


man i feel like the only one who saw the horrors before the op edited the post.

Hydreigon wrote:

Hydreigon wrote:

Also when the leaderboard get too crowded in the future will you make a new one? maybe like one per month.

looks a bit weird now that its in 3 rows

Reyalp51 wrote:

how long are you gonna keep updating this thread

Karmine wrote:

Hydreigon wrote:

at least that russian thread isn't here...


man i feel like the only one who saw the horrors before the op edited the post.

Saw it too but I'd rather forget

Hydreigon wrote:

Hydreigon wrote:

Also when the leaderboard get too crowded in the future will you make a new one? maybe like one per month.

looks a bit weird now that its in 3 rows

Giving a read only link to the sheet would be good imo

Winnyace wrote:

So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.

Winnyace wrote:

So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.

Winnyace wrote:

So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.

Patatitta wrote:

People in OT wont read more than 1 paragraph, the last time I did a thread like that I put like a image every other word to keep people attention and it still didn't work out as people didn't read the thread.

eblf2013 wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.

7 is good tho.

Winnyace wrote:

eblf2013 wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

So, I put more than 5 minutes in a thread. What happened? Higher score, still not green, though.

7 is good tho.

I guess. To be honest, I really shouldn't worry so much about this to this level. I guess what I'm looking for in this is validation, validation from people who I may never meet, who don't truly care about me below the surface level.

Patatitta wrote:

armpits




To kobold

Patatitta wrote:

my tier list thread is officially has the third highest standard deviation out of all threads, i'm proud of myself

Behrauder wrote:

How is it possible that there are threads with a rating of exactly 1? Not even my thread that literally asked for this got this achievement lol.

Patatitta wrote:

I got a cold and didn't spend much time on the computer to update this tread and now I have a lot of threads piled up and since I planned to finish this on january first I decided to save myself some work and stop it today lmao

Hydreigon wrote:

inb4 the sequel…

Hydreigon wrote:

inb4 the sequel…

Scyla wrote:

I lost against Zain

Zain Sugieres wrote:

Scyla wrote:

I lost against Zain

ur avg is still higher dw about it

1.225 vs 1.395