Microsoft Excel never stood a chanceReyalp51 wrote:
ot excel
show more
The upside imo is that it reduces score for threads that are very divisive
average = left
deviation = right
SQRT(average*average-STDEV(...)) would work better, reduces the impact of stdev but keeps it significant for high values
Otherwise you can ask abraker, he's the expert for that kind of thing
The results are fairly nice the first way tho, will update later as I'm going to go have dinner
edit: updated
Now if the abraker's thread doesnt get a green i will literally riot
Also can you filter the leaderboard by score: highest score being at the top lowest score being at the bottom, or is it too hard?
edit: update: it's no longer a green
i gave it a 3 instead
You can't win with a meta thread like that
I will proceed now to make all the forms from the days I was out
today I learnt that revote is a word, idk it feels like it should be a word but also not?
Apart from the oh hey babe thread, that one can go.
these had atleast some effort and i gave them 8-10's, but got rated lower.
actually looking at the list again, i realize there is a lot of threads that i scored lower but got rated higher lol
I wouldn't consider these to be too low.
8 = I personally really enjoyed it
9 = Woah this shit is GOOD
10 = kino
this is the way I rate EVERYTHING
and about the threads you mentioned, I think I rated "rate movies/films" 9 or 10 because it's literally the same as a therad I did before and I'm biased torwards myself, but it seems that most people on OT dont really enjoy movies outside anime
I don't really like supporter giveaways that much, biased because I have supporter but yeah, I rated that one low
I rated I've listened to the people but I guess people just saw that as a random shitpost
I rate every bday thread a 5 with no exceptions, so sI rated that one low
Your PFP in BBCode pixel art!! (it works in your 'me!' section too)
this was my goal:
so far, the results
-overall less threads from my calculation but not by a too large of a margin
-some people are mad at the ratings of their own thread
-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens
-some threads were made explictly with this in mind (rate 1/10, rate 7/10)
-some people are mad at other peoples rating on other threads
-it also exposed what the "meta" of making a good thread really is (mention denizens in your thread or be interactive, and overall be high effort in the most unecessary way possible, don't talk about subjects that are not widely appealing to OT)
just make threads u like 👍
I guess the mentality of having a high scoring thread would be nice, but it really doesnt matter, like i dont even think Zain cares that 2 of his threads is rated low here.
plus winnyace, your daily questions thread aint here and u dont post much.
Just make whatever you want, and just for fun i guess we just see whether or not the RNG gods give your post a high or low rating
+ I say it's the same idea as the structure of the threads, even the text color is exactly the same, just replacing one weird tech with another weird tech, + this is the first time you post threads like this so close to each other in time, just after I made this thread which claimed your threads were good
I just changed my mind about posting a thread called [
box=[audio]audio[/audio]][img]gif[/img][/box], which seems to be a very easy way to sync audio to a gif, for example:
Click on the play button (you need to do this once, and the synchronization will fail, after that you have to reload the page and try again, because the gif will load automatically (probably because of the cache, idk)):
show more
Topic Starter
new threads to vote on:
I'M ROOTING FOR YOU SAD SMOKING CATERPILLAR
We are so barack
Bro
Update LB with the currently only thread that I put there as an example, however with more threads being made, this is about to get spicy pretty soon
also thx everyone for voting, first one got a lot of votes which allows for this thread to work
I'M ROOTING FOR YOU SAD SMOKING CATERPILLAR
We are so barack
Bro
Update LB with the currently only thread that I put there as an example, however with more threads being made, this is about to get spicy pretty soon
also thx everyone for voting, first one got a lot of votes which allows for this thread to work
If you can add a link back to OT after you finished the form, it would be great.
Topic Starter
Will doWinnyace wrote:
If you can add a link back to OT after you finished the form, it would be great.
Topic Starter
Click here to set title
updated lb
updated lb
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
Topic Starter
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
Topic Starter
if you can suggest something sureeblf2013 wrote:
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
You could try average - standard deviation, may not work well if there aren't many votes thoughPatatitta wrote:
if you can suggest something sureeblf2013 wrote:
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
The upside imo is that it reduces score for threads that are very divisive
Topic Starter
How would you calculate that?, i'm not the best at mathKarmine wrote:
You could try average - standard deviation, may not work well if there aren't many votes thoughPatatitta wrote:
if you can suggest something sureeblf2013 wrote:
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
The upside imo is that it reduces score for threads that are very divisive
https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3094054?hl=enPatatitta wrote:
How would you calculate that?, i'm not the best at mathKarmine wrote:
You could try average - standard deviation, may not work well if there aren't many votes thoughPatatitta wrote:
if you can suggest something sureeblf2013 wrote:
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
The upside imo is that it reduces score for threads that are very divisive
Topic Starter
yeah but that only gives you the standard deviation, which isn't really a number from 0/10, I need to weight that into the averageCorne2Plum3 wrote:
https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3094054?hl=enPatatitta wrote:
How would you calculate that?, i'm not the best at mathKarmine wrote:
You could try average - standard deviation, may not work well if there aren't many votes thoughPatatitta wrote:
if you can suggest something sureeblf2013 wrote:
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
The upside imo is that it reduces score for threads that are very divisive
average = left
deviation = right
Considering the results just subtracting would be too muchPatatitta wrote:
yeah but that only gives you the standard deviation, which isn't really a number from 0/10, I need to weight that into the averageCorne2Plum3 wrote:
https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3094054?hl=enPatatitta wrote:
How would you calculate that?, i'm not the best at mathKarmine wrote:
You could try average - standard deviation, may not work well if there aren't many votes thoughPatatitta wrote:
if you can suggest something sureeblf2013 wrote:
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
The upside imo is that it reduces score for threads that are very divisive
average = left
deviation = right
SQRT(average*average-STDEV(...)) would work better, reduces the impact of stdev but keeps it significant for high values
Otherwise you can ask abraker, he's the expert for that kind of thing
Topic Starter
do you want to do average * average - deviation or average * (average - deviation)?Karmine wrote:
Considering the results just subtracting would be too muchPatatitta wrote:
yeah but that only gives you the standard deviation, which isn't really a number from 0/10, I need to weight that into the averageCorne2Plum3 wrote:
https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3094054?hl=enPatatitta wrote:
How would you calculate that?, i'm not the best at mathKarmine wrote:
You could try average - standard deviation, may not work well if there aren't many votes thoughPatatitta wrote:
if you can suggest something sureeblf2013 wrote:
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
The upside imo is that it reduces score for threads that are very divisive
average = left
deviation = right
SQRT(average*average-STDEV(...)) would work better, reduces the impact of stdev but keeps it significant for high values
Otherwise you can ask abraker, he's the expert for that kind of thing
The results are fairly nice the first way tho, will update later as I'm going to go have dinner
edit: updated
The former, other wouldn't make much sensePatatitta wrote:
Karmine wrote:
Considering the results just subtracting would be too muchPatatitta wrote:
yeah but that only gives you the standard deviation, which isn't really a number from 0/10, I need to weight that into the averageCorne2Plum3 wrote:
https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3094054?hl=enPatatitta wrote:
How would you calculate that?, i'm not the best at mathKarmine wrote:
You could try average - standard deviation, may not work well if there aren't many votes thoughPatatitta wrote:
if you can suggest something sureeblf2013 wrote:
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
The upside imo is that it reduces score for threads that are very divisive
average = left
deviation = right
SQRT(average*average-STDEV(...)) would work better, reduces the impact of stdev but keeps it significant for high values
Otherwise you can ask abraker, he's the expert for that kind of thing
do you want to do average * average - deviation or average * (average - deviation)?
The results are fairly nice the first way tho, will update later as I'm going to go have dinner
edit: updated
Topic Starter
okay, just making sure, ranking was updated with your formulaKarmine wrote:
The former, other wouldn't make much sensePatatitta wrote:
Karmine wrote:
Considering the results just subtracting would be too muchPatatitta wrote:
yeah but that only gives you the standard deviation, which isn't really a number from 0/10, I need to weight that into the averageCorne2Plum3 wrote:
https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3094054?hl=enPatatitta wrote:
How would you calculate that?, i'm not the best at mathKarmine wrote:
You could try average - standard deviation, may not work well if there aren't many votes thoughPatatitta wrote:
if you can suggest something sureeblf2013 wrote:
What about a scoring formula?Patatitta wrote:
after I posted the first form and saw people rating 10 as a joke, I decided to change it, median works better when there is trollingCorne2Plum3 wrote:
You should use the average instead of the median value for the leaderboard
The upside imo is that it reduces score for threads that are very divisive
average = left
deviation = right
SQRT(average*average-STDEV(...)) would work better, reduces the impact of stdev but keeps it significant for high values
Otherwise you can ask abraker, he's the expert for that kind of thing
do you want to do average * average - deviation or average * (average - deviation)?
The results are fairly nice the first way tho, will update later as I'm going to go have dinner
edit: updated
Topic Starter
happy (late) bday to steven and mike <3
2 years
nope
2 years
nope
Topic Starter
I've listened the people
I'm bored
---
Update on the thread: seems that what winnyace was pretty spot on, the average thread on OT per day has reduced drastically, we could easily expect 5-7 daily threads before the AMA meta but now we're at half of that, not only that, but for two pretty identical threads, one has considerably higher ratings. I wouldn't call it favoritism mroe than people feel bad rating one certain thread, which is completely fair. TBF I didn't think of those type of threads when making this thread. It's also interesting to see that most threads currently are from the shitpost people who doesn't care if their thread gets locked or not. I don't see anyone else posting.
There are a lot of people posting a thread like 30 minutes after it gets made but almost no new threads, honestly I feel this is the first time i've seen something like this happen on OT
It's only been 2 days but tbf half of you guys don't even put 10 minutes of thought into any thread so I think these are fair observations
also updated the ratings
I'm bored
---
Update on the thread: seems that what winnyace was pretty spot on, the average thread on OT per day has reduced drastically, we could easily expect 5-7 daily threads before the AMA meta but now we're at half of that, not only that, but for two pretty identical threads, one has considerably higher ratings. I wouldn't call it favoritism mroe than people feel bad rating one certain thread, which is completely fair. TBF I didn't think of those type of threads when making this thread. It's also interesting to see that most threads currently are from the shitpost people who doesn't care if their thread gets locked or not. I don't see anyone else posting.
There are a lot of people posting a thread like 30 minutes after it gets made but almost no new threads, honestly I feel this is the first time i've seen something like this happen on OT
It's only been 2 days but tbf half of you guys don't even put 10 minutes of thought into any thread so I think these are fair observations
also updated the ratings
Topic Starter
ITT we show our reddit recap
hiReyalp51 wrote:
hi
Topic Starter
Appease the gamemaster
oh no!
Another observation, given the unusually high ammount of ratings, it's safe to assume that there were more lurkers on here that I imagined
also, we got our first certified green thread, nice
oh no!
Another observation, given the unusually high ammount of ratings, it's safe to assume that there were more lurkers on here that I imagined
also, we got our first certified green thread, nice
he did make the effort on actually touching grass and revealing his hand so props to him, lostsilver's thread also got close too green tooPatatitta wrote:
also, we got our first certified green thread, nice
Now if the abraker's thread doesnt get a green i will literally riot
Also can you filter the leaderboard by score: highest score being at the top lowest score being at the bottom, or is it too hard?
What's the cut off for colors? 1-5, 5-7, 7-10?Patatitta wrote:
Another observation, given the unusually high ammount of ratings, it's safe to assume that there were more lurkers on here that I imagined
also, we got our first certified green thread, nice
Topic Starter
it's not hard but I had it just in order of when threads were made, will update if that is what you wishHydreigon wrote:
he did make the effort on actually touching grass and revealing his hand so props to him, lostsilver's thread also got close too green tooPatatitta wrote:
also, we got our first certified green thread, nice
Now if the abraker's thread doesnt get a green i will literally riot
Also can you filter the leaderboard by score: highest score being at the top lowest score being at the bottom, or is it too hard?
edit: update: it's no longer a green
It looks much neater and more like a leaderboard, also maybe include the name of the person who made the thread next to the title? so people dont get confused with the titles.
Also when the leaderboard get too crowded in the future will you make a new one? maybe like one per month.
Also when the leaderboard get too crowded in the future will you make a new one? maybe like one per month.
Who is Christmas is just a throwback and me saying I've been on OT for a year
It stood no chance lmfao XD 😭
It stood no chance lmfao XD 😭
Topic Starter
sure, will do the first, idk for how long do I plan for this thread to go so idk about the secondHydreigon wrote:
It looks much neater and more like a leaderboard, also maybe include the name of the person who made the thread next to the title? so people dont get confused with the titles.
Also when the leaderboard get too crowded in the future will you make a new one? maybe like one per month.
Topic Starter
A question to lurkers
AMA, but...
Graduating tomorrow
AMA, but...
Graduating tomorrow
Another AMA because everyone is doing it.(1) by ClevelandsMyBro next please
if abraker posted anything, I quite literally mean anything, even a photo of a turd and the thread was called "poop", it would still be a top rated thread.
if i speak i would be silenced for 2 days
Topic Starter
December 7th, 1941
Rate this thread with 1
Rate this thread with 1
Patatitta wrote:
Rate this thread with 1
i gave it a 3 instead
Was my plan all alongHydreigon wrote:
Patatitta wrote:
Rate this thread with 1
i gave it a 3 instead
You can't win with a meta thread like that
Can you put this thread which is spreading misinformation so I can put 1?
Topic Starter
wont rate old threads sorryCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Can you put this thread which is spreading misinformation so I can put 1?
Topic Starter
Rate my thread 7/10
Rate movies/films
Rate movies/films
Would be interesting if you display in the leaderboards the amount of votes too
abraker with a capital A is truly the most disturbing thing i have seen today
I love how Behrauder went from making one of the shittest threads to an actual genius thread
There's a lot of new threads to vote for today for some reason
There's a lot of new threads to vote for today for some reason
It was kind of on purpose lol.Karmine wrote:
I love how Behrauder went from making one of the shittest threads to an actual genius thread
There's a lot of new threads to vote for today for some reason
i have an idea: you can recycle the screenshots by making an OT arcive featuring all of the threads made in a month
Topic Starter
neat ideasametdze wrote:
i have an idea: you can recycle the screenshots by making an OT arcive featuring all of the threads made in a month
I will proceed now to make all the forms from the days I was out
Topic Starter
4RCH4NG3L - 8/12 (12/8 🌎)
Aren't Meaningless Answers quite banal?
ITT: Hilarious super funy
I LOVE WORKING ON PAIR !!!!!
birrhyday inm 3 days
Jangsoodlor's Data Harvesting Questionnaire [Part 2]
Syns
OT POWER LEVELS
I'm literally hitori "bocchi" gotoh
EVERYONE CAN EASILY EDIT THIS POST!!! [postimg.cc works!]
I'M GIVING AWAY FREE osu! SUPPORTER
EVERYONE NEW FORUM UPDATE
I will be slow posting
Wait, it makes sense now
？？
✨✨✨ YESTERDAY WAS A GREAT DAY ✨✨✨
Call for Off-topic the Board Game
sametdze's christmas collab (OPEN)
Aren't Meaningless Answers quite banal?
ITT: Hilarious super funy
I LOVE WORKING ON PAIR !!!!!
birrhyday inm 3 days
Jangsoodlor's Data Harvesting Questionnaire [Part 2]
Syns
OT POWER LEVELS
I'm literally hitori "bocchi" gotoh
EVERYONE CAN EASILY EDIT THIS POST!!! [postimg.cc works!]
I'M GIVING AWAY FREE osu! SUPPORTER
EVERYONE NEW FORUM UPDATE
I will be slow posting
Wait, it makes sense now
？？
✨✨✨ YESTERDAY WAS A GREAT DAY ✨✨✨
Call for Off-topic the Board Game
sametdze's christmas collab (OPEN)
What the hell is this thread again 💀
Topic Starter
The study of yandere
it's fun to see how there isn't mucch deviation between the score of 2 threads made by the same person, you can clearly see who shitposts and who doesn't
also it's interesting to see the two abraker threads so high up when the actual game itself seems to have failed, it seems that just mentioning other denizens in a post will make it seem like it's better ig
it's fun to see how there isn't mucch deviation between the score of 2 threads made by the same person, you can clearly see who shitposts and who doesn't
also it's interesting to see the two abraker threads so high up when the actual game itself seems to have failed, it seems that just mentioning other denizens in a post will make it seem like it's better ig
I think with threads like abraker's game thread it's being rated highly because of the potential it has. It's the only thread I've rated 10 so far as well. I think this is a problem because the rating might not be reflective of the actual thread because we all end up voting on it a day after its been created instead of voting when we've seen how the thread plays out. Same thing with sametdze's thread, right now it's literally "I'm making a collab" and a bunch of people going "/in" but it's rated a 7 even though it has no actual substance yet. I think it's more fair to vote on these threads after they've panned out, or at least have a revote with them, but idk if that's practical with how long you plan to do this. Maybe add another column saying that the thread is in it's early stages or the vote was premature or something?Patatitta wrote:
also it's interesting to see the two abraker threads so high up when the actual game itself seems to have failed, it seems that just mentioning other denizens in a post will make it seem like it's better ig
today I learnt that revote is a word, idk it feels like it should be a word but also not?
I have a thread with 0.53 deviation, being the best rated, and another with 2.84 deviation, being rated as the third worst, and with the second highest deviation (if I saw it right).Patatitta wrote:
it's fun to see how there isn't mucch deviation between the score of 2 threads made by the same person, you can clearly see who shitposts and who doesn't
Topic Starter
yeah but you quite literally asked for itBehrauder wrote:
I have a thread with 0.53 deviation, being the best rated, and another with 2.84 deviation, being rated as the third worst, and with the second highest deviation (if I saw it right).Patatitta wrote:
it's fun to see how there isn't mucch deviation between the score of 2 threads made by the same person, you can clearly see who shitposts and who doesn't
Topic Starter
Episode 8 or 9 or 10
Bendy rulers
Bendy rulers
Topic Starter
🎵All the things I hate about ppy～🎵
Huge news
UWU Union 1-year anniversary
OH HEY BABE
Huge news
UWU Union 1-year anniversary
OH HEY BABE
Fix the Episode 8 or 9 or 10, it was made by scyla, not zain
Topic Starter
sorry copy pasted and didn't change the nameeblf2013 wrote:
Fix the Episode 8 or 9 or 10, it was made by scyla, not zain
click on the imagesz0z wrote:
where are people rating these
Topic Starter
gonna take midterms tommorow to friday
I have gotten sick
Which Osu Beatmap Is the Best? (Tournament)
sametdze vs fnaf (FNAF 1, night 1)
I have gotten sick
Which Osu Beatmap Is the Best? (Tournament)
sametdze vs fnaf (FNAF 1, night 1)
bro why are all my threads RED HERE I firetrucking CAN'T!!!!
It's fine. Don't worry too much about the scores. Really, just post whatever you want and not worry.- Marco - wrote:
bro why are all my threads RED HERE I firetrucking CAN'T!!!!
i have the glory of having the worst rated thread and the glory of having the top 8 thread
Topic Starter
oh wait i'm fucking stupid the bottom 5 threads aren't being updated properly my bad let me fix itReyalp51 wrote:
i have the glory of having the worst rated thread and the glory of having the top 8 thread
- Marco - wrote:
bro why are all my threads RED HERE I firetrucking CAN'T!!!!
- Marco - wrote:
bro why are all my threads RED HERE I firetrucking CAN'T!!!!
Without all the red threads OT would be boring! OT would be empty! Never stop.- Marco - wrote:
bro why are all my threads RED HERE I firetrucking CAN'T!!!!
Apart from the oh hey babe thread, that one can go.
I'm sure some people here would want them to go completely, for one reason or another. I don't know, really. I just honestly have no idea how you would even make a green thread and I doubt I have what it takes, so I just gave up on that idea.Kobold84 wrote:
Without all the red threads OT would be boring! OT would be empty! Never stop.- Marco - wrote:
bro why are all my threads RED HERE I firetrucking CAN'T!!!!
Apart from the oh hey babe thread, that one can go.
Topic Starter
It's not hard to make greens, just, put more than 5 minute effort into a threadWinnyace wrote:
I'm sure some people here would want them to go completely, for one reason or another. I don't know, really. I just honestly have no idea how you would even make a green thread and I doubt I have what it takes, so I just gave up on that idea.Kobold84 wrote:
Without all the red threads OT would be boring! OT would be empty! Never stop.- Marco - wrote:
bro why are all my threads RED HERE I firetrucking CAN'T!!!!
Apart from the oh hey babe thread, that one can go.
but you still gotta win the RNG of the voting, like the threads that i thought would be green ended up getting 6's or 5'sPatatitta wrote:
It's not hard to make greens, just, put more than 5 minute effort into a thread
Topic Starter
what threads did you vote highly that got reated low?, most of the ones I rated high it ended up high, even if I think some threads are overrated or undearratedHydreigon wrote:
but you still gotta win the RNG of the voting, like the threads that i thought would be green ended up getting 6's or 5'sPatatitta wrote:
It's not hard to make greens, just, put more than 5 minute effort into a thread
One can put a hour into making a thread, if the topic doesn't interest anyone, it won't get high up.Patatitta wrote:
It's not hard to make greens, just, put more than 5 minute effort into a thread
Damn how did my ass end up on here? Wild (also ain't no way my thread about being sick is rated lmao how stupid)
here's some:Patatitta wrote:
what threads did you vote highly that got reated low?, most of the ones I rated high it ended up high, even if I think some threads are overrated or undearrated
these had atleast some effort and i gave them 8-10's, but got rated lower.
actually looking at the list again, i realize there is a lot of threads that i scored lower but got rated higher lol
Seem like the quality required to get good rating really increased recentlyHydreigon wrote:
here's some:Patatitta wrote:
what threads did you vote highly that got reated low?, most of the ones I rated high it ended up high, even if I think some threads are overrated or undearrated
these had atleast some effort and i gave them 8-10's, but got rated lower.
actually looking at the list again, i realize there is a lot of threads that i scored lower but got rated higher lol
To me 7 is a good thread, 8 is really good and 9/10 is for absolute bangers.Hydreigon wrote:
here's some:Patatitta wrote:
what threads did you vote highly that got reated low?, most of the ones I rated high it ended up high, even if I think some threads are overrated or undearrated
these had atleast some effort and i gave them 8-10's, but got rated lower.
actually looking at the list again, i realize there is a lot of threads that i scored lower but got rated higher lol
I wouldn't consider these to be too low.
Pretty much, I think anything above 7 is a good thread, 9-10 is an extremely brilliant thread. Different people have different ideas about ratings, but when all of them vote together, it averages out.Karmine wrote:
To me 7 is a good thread, 8 is really good and 9/10 is for absolute bangers.Hydreigon wrote:
here's some:Patatitta wrote:
what threads did you vote highly that got reated low?, most of the ones I rated high it ended up high, even if I think some threads are overrated or undearrated
these had atleast some effort and i gave them 8-10's, but got rated lower.
actually looking at the list again, i realize there is a lot of threads that i scored lower but got rated higher lol
I wouldn't consider these to be too low.
wait Patatitta can you change the title to
✨✨✨ 9th DECEMBER WAS A GREAT DAY ✨✨✨ pls? thanksss
Topic Starter
I don't want to put emojis in my excelAnaxii wrote:
wait Patatitta can you change the title to✨✨✨ 9th DECEMBER WAS A GREAT DAY ✨✨✨pls? thanksss
EVERY thread is includedUPR wrote:
Damn how did my ass end up on here? Wild (also ain't no way my thread about being sick is rated lmao how stupid)
abraker thread flopped but people were amazed at "woah denizen pngs" and got rated greenWinnyace wrote:
One can put a hour into making a thread, if the topic doesn't interest anyone, it won't get high up.Patatitta wrote:
It's not hard to make greens, just, put more than 5 minute effort into a thread
for me: 7 = good but didn't quite resonate with meKobold84 wrote:
Pretty much, I think anything above 7 is a good thread, 9-10 is an extremely brilliant thread. Different people have different ideas about ratings, but when all of them vote together, it averages out.Karmine wrote:
To me 7 is a good thread, 8 is really good and 9/10 is for absolute bangers.Hydreigon wrote:
here's some:Patatitta wrote:
what threads did you vote highly that got reated low?, most of the ones I rated high it ended up high, even if I think some threads are overrated or undearrated
these had atleast some effort and i gave them 8-10's, but got rated lower.
actually looking at the list again, i realize there is a lot of threads that i scored lower but got rated higher lol
I wouldn't consider these to be too low.
8 = I personally really enjoyed it
9 = Woah this shit is GOOD
10 = kino
this is the way I rate EVERYTHING
and about the threads you mentioned, I think I rated "rate movies/films" 9 or 10 because it's literally the same as a therad I did before and I'm biased torwards myself, but it seems that most people on OT dont really enjoy movies outside anime
I don't really like supporter giveaways that much, biased because I have supporter but yeah, I rated that one low
I rated I've listened to the people but I guess people just saw that as a random shitpost
I rate every bday thread a 5 with no exceptions, so sI rated that one low
Topic Starter
ELEVEN WORDS OF WISDOM
One Year of The Grass Party
HELP I THINK I FELL INTO THE AI IMAGE TRAP! I WANT TO HATE AI ART AGAIN!!!
🖌️ I just realized...
One Year of The Grass Party
HELP I THINK I FELL INTO THE AI IMAGE TRAP! I WANT TO HATE AI ART AGAIN!!!
🖌️ I just realized...
Topic Starter
HALF OF THIS POST EXISTS!!
[PART 1/3] Roster Shenanigans!
[PART 1/3] Roster Shenanigans!
Kinda hard to rate Roster Shenanigans since we don't really know what it's about yet but it's probably gonna be good
Topic Starter
total vtuber domination
unhinged post
----
Green posters:
Behrauder
Abraker
Patatitta
Kobold84
Anaxii
Yellow Posters:
Reyalp51 (1 green, 1 yellow, 2 read lmao)
Corne2plum3
Dementedjet
[ Sebastian ]
DM FOR MUTUAL
Lostsilver
MrMcMikey22
Nanofranne
My angel anaxii
KatouMegumi
Sametdze
MizuIro_H
NotRaffi
Red posters:
179BPM
Jangsoodlor
Jarcrafted
- Marco -
Winnyace
UPR
Miyodied
Scyla
Vaemaer
Zain Sugieres
unhinged post
----
Green posters:
Behrauder
Abraker
Patatitta
Kobold84
Anaxii
Yellow Posters:
Reyalp51 (1 green, 1 yellow, 2 read lmao)
Corne2plum3
Dementedjet
[ Sebastian ]
DM FOR MUTUAL
Lostsilver
MrMcMikey22
Nanofranne
My angel anaxii
KatouMegumi
Sametdze
MizuIro_H
NotRaffi
Red posters:
179BPM
Jangsoodlor
Jarcrafted
- Marco -
Winnyace
UPR
Miyodied
Scyla
Vaemaer
Zain Sugieres
I think you forgot this one:
community/forums/topics/1856703
community/forums/topics/1856703
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
Topic Starter
missed it, my badBehrauder wrote:
I think you forgot this one:
community/forums/topics/1856703
Your PFP in BBCode pixel art!! (it works in your 'me!' section too)
dont take this too seriouslyWinnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
Im just saying, i feel like this might disencourage some people from making threads in fear of making a red thread
I try to. It ultimately doesn't matter as I don't know any of you and none of you know me. It still kinda hurts, but to my knowledge, only one thread was ranked that was created by me and it was a meta post.Reyalp51 wrote:
dont take this too seriouslyWinnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
100th post
Topic Starter
I take EVERY single thread made from after I made this thread, and so far, that is the only thread you've really madeWinnyace wrote:
I try to. It ultimately doesn't matter as I don't know any of you and none of you know me. It still kinda hurts, but to my knowledge, only one thread was ranked that was created by me and it was a meta post.Reyalp51 wrote:
dont take this too seriouslyWinnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
I feel people have forgotten the point of this threadsametdze wrote:
Im just saying, i feel like this might disencourage some people from making threads in fear of making a red thread
this was my goal:
so far, the results
-overall less threads from my calculation but not by a too large of a margin
-some people are mad at the ratings of their own thread
-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens
-some threads were made explictly with this in mind (rate 1/10, rate 7/10)
-some people are mad at other peoples rating on other threads
-it also exposed what the "meta" of making a good thread really is (mention denizens in your thread or be interactive, and overall be high effort in the most unecessary way possible, don't talk about subjects that are not widely appealing to OT)
What do you mean by the same idea? The only similarity I see is that they are all curiosities that involve the osu! forum (for some reason I'm very interested in this).Patatitta wrote:
-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens
it ok man, potato rankings dont mean much anyway ;-;Winnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
just make threads u like 👍
Winnyace wrote:
Man, sure feels weird knowing you're considered one of the worst thread posters on a forum.
How so? There is no punishment or prize if you get a green or red thread, the leaderboard doesnt really matter anywayssametdze wrote:
Im just saying, i feel like this might disencourage some people from making threads in fear of making a red thread
I guess the mentality of having a high scoring thread would be nice, but it really doesnt matter, like i dont even think Zain cares that 2 of his threads is rated low here.
plus winnyace, your daily questions thread aint here and u dont post much.
Just make whatever you want, and just for fun i guess we just see whether or not the RNG gods give your post a high or low rating
Damn Im Red... lol. Doesn't really mean anything in the end, though it is funny people would rate my talking about being sick thread as red, hehe bastards lmao
Topic Starter
my point is, if this thread didn't exist, and you saw something like the double image thread die after a while, you probably wouldn't have thought that the thread was that good as it just died day 2, same with the abraker board gameBehrauder wrote:
What do you mean by the same idea? The only similarity I see is that they are all curiosities that involve the osu! forum (for some reason I'm very interested in this).Patatitta wrote:
-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens
+ I say it's the same idea as the structure of the threads, even the text color is exactly the same, just replacing one weird tech with another weird tech, + this is the first time you post threads like this so close to each other in time, just after I made this thread which claimed your threads were good
Patatitta wrote:
my point is, if this thread didn't exist, and you saw something like the double image thread die after a while, you probably wouldn't have thought that the thread was that good as it just died day 2, same with the abraker board gameBehrauder wrote:
What do you mean by the same idea? The only similarity I see is that they are all curiosities that involve the osu! forum (for some reason I'm very interested in this).Patatitta wrote:
-behraudder started farming the same idea in multiple threads to get more greens
+ I say it's the same idea as the structure of the threads, even the text color is exactly the same, just replacing one weird tech with another weird tech, + this is the first time you post threads like this so close to each other in time, just after I made this thread which claimed your threads were good
I just changed my mind about posting a thread called [
Click on the play button (you need to do this once, and the synchronization will fail, after that you have to reload the page and try again, because the gif will load automatically (probably because of the cache, idk)):
Topic Starter
It's almost Christmas time! (The Prologue)
USACO 727?
USACO 727?