forum

ITT: I'll ask a question daily, or there abouts.

posted
Total Posts
522
show more
z0z
no serious ones
lostsilver
saving this thread from the second page
Topic Starter
Winnyace
thanks lostsilver. I will think of a question in the coming hour(s) and come back here
lostsilver

Winnyace wrote:

thanks lostsilver. I will think of a question in the coming hour(s) and come back here
alr! and np, bro! <3
lostsilver
saving this thread from the second page again
Topic Starter
Winnyace
I apologize for the lack of questions recently. I got a bit busy and to be honest I also didn't really know what to ask as well. Nevermind that, we are here today for a new one, without formatting because I am on my phone and I hate doing that on my phone.


New question:
When do you usually go to sleep (in your timezone) and how much do you sleep usually?

I personally go pretty early, around 10:30PM(22:30) and I sleep until 6:15-6:30AM
Topic Starter
Winnyace

lostsilver wrote:

saving this thread from the second page again
Lmfao I just woke up and I wanted to save my thread on my own from page two. Thanks again
lostsilver

Winnyace wrote:

I apologize for the lack of questions recently. I got a bit busy and to be honest I also didn't really know what to ask as well. Nevermind that, we are here today for a new one, without formatting because I am on my phone and I hate doing that on my phone.


New question:
When do you usually go to sleep (in your timezone) and how much do you sleep usually?

I personally go pretty early, around 10:30PM(22:30) and I sleep until 6:15-6:30AM
11:00 pm (nighttime where i'm at), and i sleep atleast 7-8 hours
Hydreigon
back then it was 10pm to 11am... yes i know...

now its either:

11pm to 8am or 3am to 8am or just do an all nighter and take a nap in the afternoon.
Patatitta
00:00
Nanofranne
Around 1 to 2 am. But I can sleep much earlier if I have to wake up early for occasion. Accounting for nap, I have around 8 to 9 hours of sleep daily
Cerno
Weekdays 00:30
Weekends are just randomized between 2~6:00
Nuuskamuikkunen
Mostly 11:30PM - 12:30AM (23:30 - 00:30) and I sleep like 9 hours.
Aireunaeus
it actually depends lol
i usually sleep at 10pm till 12pm but i mostly sleep at random times honestly
Reyalp51
23:00 - 6:30 a bit later if i have nothing to do
Corne2Plum3
Weekday: 12am - 6:15am
Weekend: 1am - 11:30am
Karmine
I try to go to sleep at 22:00 but it usually end up being 23:00 or later (rarely after 1:00 though)
z0z
yes
anaxii

Winnyace wrote:

When do you usually go to sleep (in your timezone) and how much do you sleep usually?
2:00am - 6:00am

i'm very surpised that i'm still alive to this day
Reyalp51

Anaxii wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

When do you usually go to sleep (in your timezone) and how much do you sleep usually?
2:00am - 6:00am

i'm very surpised that i'm still alive to this day
you'll die at 30
anaxii

Reyalp51 wrote:

Anaxii wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

When do you usually go to sleep (in your timezone) and how much do you sleep usually?
2:00am - 6:00am

i'm very surpised that i'm still alive to this day
you'll die at 30
oh no!

anyway

Reyalp51

Anaxii wrote:

Reyalp51 wrote:

Anaxii wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

When do you usually go to sleep (in your timezone) and how much do you sleep usually?
2:00am - 6:00am

i'm very surpised that i'm still alive to this day
you'll die at 30
oh no!

anyway

true lmao
Kobold84
No night owls in the thread? I usually sleep from 8am to 4pm, but my sleep schedule drifts frequently.
anaxii

Kobold84 wrote:

No night owls in the thread? I usually sleep from 8am to 4pm, but my sleep schedule drifts frequently.
i have fricking school, i literally can't be a night owl otherwise I'll end up unschooled
Nanofranne

Kobold84 wrote:

No night owls in the thread? I usually sleep from 8am to 4pm, but my sleep schedule drifts frequently.
I have uni and personal matter so can't really afford to be slacking all day, can I?
Nuuskamuikkunen

Kobold84 wrote:

No night owls in the thread? I usually sleep from 8am to 4pm, but my sleep schedule drifts frequently.
Well even if I could, I wouldn't have my schedule that way.
emajakolic
mehh..depends. last night I went to bed at 5 am and woke up at 6 am (I know this sounds fucked)
but I usually go to bed at 1 am or 2 am and wake up at 6 am because of school and shit
Topic Starter
Winnyace


New question:


Do you play gacha games? If so, why? If you don't, why?



I don't play gacha games. The reason is because to me, they feel exploitative and feature mechanics that are on purpose needlessly long and tedious and can be skipped through in-game purchases of kind.
lostsilver
do gacha club and gacha life 2 count?
they're character creators, but you get gems to get more characters
so idk if that would count
Kobold84
I play dolls frontline occasionally. The story is good, characters are good, the gacha elements are pretty mild. Would still not recommend it, all gacha games are addictive and not for a good reason.
synthwavesquid
-
ClevelandsMyBro
yep, well i used to but currently on a hiatus. after 3+ years of experience all i can say is people play gacha because they are;

1. poor(how ironic)
=> when people think of gacha they usually think of splashing huge amounts of cash just to get the character they desire but heres the catch; gacha games are free (bar a few exceptions). yes to outsiders it may seem like gambling but to gacha players its all free entertaniment.
unrelated but i find it kinda interesting aswell how the more/less you make the more fun gambling is meanwhile middle income people think its predatory. kinda like a reverse bell graph.

2. weebs

edit: forgot to mention myself. i play gacha because i like big anime tiddies and yes i do think the gambling aspect of it is predatory and a waste of time. the only time i have poured even an ounce of cash is when the game is good, the dev is good, and cosmetics. only under these three conditions where i would succumb to my desire and get some skins.
Patatitta
no: I don't see the appeal, if I want to play a rpg, I just play a single player RPG, if I want a game to farm in it constantly, I load POE or something, why would I want to play a RPG or whatever with just pure RNG and mcirotranstactions on top of it to get characters and stuff when there is an alternative where I can just farm the shit I want to farm?
Isshiki Kaname
Tbh, I don't really want to grind/gamble for pngs. I'd rather commission an actual artist and play a less scummy game.
Nuuskamuikkunen
Heck no. Not a fan of PTW.

(Hides his Yu-Gi-Oh cards)
WitherMite
tried genshin for a couple weeks at launch, was alright, but considering I got a bit bored after I hit what was then end of the main story at the time and stopped playing before the real grind started, gacha games just aren't for me. though I did get lucky and pull venti on my free banner pulls at the start, which was cool I guess.

have also played the first bit of other gachas out of curiosity, but rarely make it past the tutorial where you get all the free shit. Only lasted so long with genshin because apart from being a gacha, the story and gameplay was fun.
Hydreigon
i do play them from time, mainly Arknights or Star Rail or Reverse1999, i would say for me, a good gacha game would be one on how F2P friendly it is meaning that you dont have to pull or spend money on stuff or spend lots of time grinding the game. Another pro for gacha games is that most are already free from the start, meaning you dont have to spend money to buy the game and can play/uninstall the game anytime you want. Other pro's can be on how well the story is and the characters as well.

Yes the gambling issue can be a problem for some, but for me i dont suffer from it cause, my family would kill me if they find out im spending lots of money on these types of games and i want to challenge myself by being F2P only and try to see if i can beat the game using the characters from just pulling normally i have.

So i think its a genre that is enjoyable for some people especially for some who want to just try out a free game, but not to all.

-

lostsilver wrote:

do gacha club and gacha life 2 count?
they're character creators, but you get gems to get more characters
so idk if that would count
arent those games more on Role Playing? prob does not count since its more on Pay 2 get more character customizations like Roblox.

-

eblf2013 wrote:

(Hides his Yu-Gi-Oh cards)
Now thats the cooler gacha, albeit your prob gonna spend more money trying to collect the pokemon or yu gi oh cards you want oof.
Patatitta
tbh I feel that if you just dont have money, there are lots of alternatives to gacha. You got POE, warframe, osu!, CSGO, you can download just any emulator, games like death stranding were gifted by epic, so like playing gacha is a choice, not just because lack of options
Hydreigon
Yes i agree its a choice and the other free games can be nice, the thing is its a different genre compared to those other free games, so some might enjoy CSGO more and spend more time in it, but others might not like and want just a singleplayer rpg like Genshin.

Emulating is nice, but i guess the con is that you can only play old games, and man i barely use the Epic games store, only just play Fortnite there and just deleted it once i was done with the game, other subscription service like PS Plus and Xbox game pass offer lots of nice games for free, but it cost monthly.
Karmine
My answer is the same as OP, fuck these games
Corne2Plum3
I don't play Gacha Games

Nanofranne
I'm not anymore. But I used to play arknights and it's not the among the best gacha games, It's among the best games.

It's the only game alongside with girls frontline, as far as I know to put your brain into good use to progress, not blindly swiping your dad's card. If you don't have the big brain or time to grind, you can simply enjoy the deep lore of arknights too! And of course, the music. It's not fire, It's straight up the sun

Among other gacha games, I think arknights have the most chance to appeal to normies too
z0z
yes, miku though i do agree that the monetization kinda sucks
Patatitta

Hydreigon wrote:

Yes i agree its a choice and the other free games can be nice, the thing is its a different genre compared to those other free games, so some might enjoy CSGO more and spend more time in it, but others might not like and want just a singleplayer rpg like Genshin.

Emulating is nice, but i guess the con is that you can only play old games, and man i barely use the Epic games store, only just play Fortnite there and just deleted it once i was done with the game, other subscription service like PS Plus and Xbox game pass offer lots of nice games for free, but it cost monthly.
there is always another option but



tbf that option is better than supporting the gacha industry
Reyalp51
dont like games with excesive microtransactions and bs but ive played some gacha, never spent money on those thank god
Topic Starter
Winnyace


New question



How would you define/describe Off-Topic?



My answer
I'm personally kind of unsure how I would define/describe OT. I see it as a shitposting sub-forum mainly, but really anything goes here. There aren't any strict rules here about content, so people just do whatever, so I guess it would be more accurate to say that it is a sub-forum of random topics and most happen to be shitposts.
Nuuskamuikkunen
A unusual place on the internet compared to what you'd find in a social media.
Behrauder
Off-Topic is the best place ever! :) :) :)
lostsilver
it's really chaotic, but it can be chill at times
i think i fit in here, but i fit more in the art forum
i still love all of ya'll in ot tho
ClevelandsMyBro
a cesspool
Hydreigon
better than other sub forums
Topic Starter
Winnyace

Hydreigon wrote:

better than other sub forums
I agree. Fuck GD lmao
Karmine
For the not-so-logical discussions.

It has the worst and best threads at the same time, I love it
z0z
screwaround
Topic Starter
Winnyace

New question



What's your opinion on the vintage computer hardware? Do you think there's still a benefit to talking about/repairing such machines? (The question can apply to anything old, really. I just chose computers since that's one of my main interests.)


My answer
I find these machines really nice and fun to play around with and learn about how they work. I do see a benefit, besides personal enjoyment: preservation and history. It's just nice learning about how the things we have now came to be. I personally plan to repair these machines too and restore them. I think it would be really neat and a fun hobby, if really expensive.
lostsilver
my friend really likes vintage hardware, but i think the os of them just looks cool :3
(also good morning ot)
Aireunaeus
well theyre quite outdated to use it for everyday stuff but i would keep them for nostalgia sake if im honest. very old computers for example from the 70s is honestly not for me.
Hydreigon
I think for most people, they would definitely move on to the more modern hardware as it offers better stuff and removes the hassle of repairing the hardware.

But for the more dedicated, like collectors, they would definitely keep them and try to repair them, as its there hobby and they like old hardware (Think this answer can sorta apply to other stuff as well)
Topic Starter
Winnyace

My Angel Anaxii wrote:

well theyre quite outdated to use it for everyday stuff but i would keep them for nostalgia sake if im honest. very old computers for example from the 70s is honestly not for me.
yeah, no, those are really rare and also really hard to fix usually iirc


Hydreigon wrote:

I think for most people, they would definitely move on to the more modern hardware as it offers better stuff and removes the hassle of repairing the hardware.

But for the more dedicated, like collectors, they would definitely keep them and try to repair them, as its there hobby and they like old hardware (Think this answer can sorta apply to other stuff as well)
I wouldn't really use them either often either. Rather, I would keep them for history sake.
ClevelandsMyBro
the future is now old man
Fat Fish Pete
Use it as a really big calculator during class
Nanofranne
Of course. While Apple and other similar companies in vein are going crazy for their anti-repair and profiteering stance, older hardware still have its place. It may not be the fastest and the most efficient, but hey it works! if it broke, there's good chance someone I know can fix it and keep it running again
Topic Starter
Winnyace

Nanofranne wrote:

Of course. While Apple and other similar companies in vein are going crazy for their anti-repair and profiteering stance, older hardware still have its place. It may not be the fastest and the most efficient, but hey it works! if it broke, there's good chance someone I know can fix it and keep it running again
Well I was talking about more computers like the Commodore 64, the Amiga, super old Macintosh computers, etc, things with historical value, not really things that are 5-10 years old. Though your reply gave me an idea for another question, so thank you!
z0z
many businesses and government services run on old machines
Nanofranne

Winnyace wrote:

Nanofranne wrote:

Of course. While Apple and other similar companies in vein are going crazy for their anti-repair and profiteering stance, older hardware still have its place. It may not be the fastest and the most efficient, but hey it works! if it broke, there's good chance someone I know can fix it and keep it running again
Well I was talking about more computers like the Commodore 64, the Amiga, super old Macintosh computers, etc, things with historical value, not really things that are 5-10 years old. Though your reply gave me an idea for another question, so thank you!
When I think of tech product, I already consider 5 years or more to be old because tech moves crazy fast. Not to mention the general trend of consoomerism that people replace their phone like within two years. But yeah, anything that old still have its value amongst hobbyist, a good thing!
Topic Starter
Winnyace


New question


What's your opinion on right to repair?



My answer
It's really beneficial. It should be obvious why:
  1. Using an expensive, repairable piece of tech even years down the line is better financially for the end user
  2. Less wasteful, which is better for all of us.
To be honest, I heard that there are some people who disagree with this and I kinda wanna see if there are any here and why they think what they think.
Karmine
Just like you said there's not a single downside to things being easier to repair, only upsides
I've never seen someone who's against it but I've never talked to a billionaire so that must be why
lostsilver
it's nice
Nuuskamuikkunen
Right to not repair is one of the worst forms of greed. Also, it would be one of the highest forms of hipocrisy if a company states that they're ecological/sustainable while making their products impossible to repair. I don't buy that badly made greenwashing.
synthwavesquid
-
Corne2Plum3
Should be yes now to decrease the amount of wastes and reduce the amount of materials used. In the context of the world currently this should be something to have, if not a must.
z0z
right to repair should be a right, the consumer should be able to handle their personal equipment the way they want
Nanofranne
It is a universal right.

Companies that violating such right must be held accountable. Earth resource and human labour is finite and by making stuff unrepairable is evil. Hopefully more and more government around the world start to follow EU's path for breaking up anti-repair and fake 'go green' stance
Patatitta
How would you define/describe Off-Topic?

anythin goes subforum



What's your opinion on the vintage computer hardware? Do you think there's still a benefit to talking about/repairing such machines? (The question can apply to anything old, really. I just chose computers since that's one of my main
interests.)

idk shouldn't be a priority but it's nice I guess


What's your opinion on right to repair?

this question is like, do you believe murder is bad?????????????????, come on, ask some spicier things
Corne2Plum3

Winnyace wrote:



New question



How would you define/describe Off-Topic?



My answer
I'm personally kind of unsure how I would define/describe OT. I see it as a shitposting sub-forum mainly, but really anything goes here. There aren't any strict rules here about content, so people just do whatever, so I guess it would be more accurate to say that it is a sub-forum of random topics and most happen to be shitposts.
Isshiki Kaname
OT is basically lobotomized 4chan
Patatitta

KatouMegumi wrote:

OT is basically lobotomized 4chan
nah forums and image boards are very different
Kobold84

KatouMegumi wrote:

OT is basically lobotomized 4chan
Not even close.
Corne2Plum3

KatouMegumi wrote:

OT is basically lobotomized 4chan
nah OT is wayyyyyyyyy more safe
Nuuskamuikkunen

KatouMegumi wrote:

OT is basically lobotomized 4chan
That's reddit.
ClevelandsMyBro

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

KatouMegumi wrote:

OT is basically lobotomized 4chan
nah OT is wayyyyyyyyy more safe
not happening if im still alive

Topic Starter
Winnyace

eblf2013 wrote:

Right to not repair is one of the worst forms of greed. Also, it would be one of the highest forms of hipocrisy if a company states that they're ecological/sustainable while making their products impossible to repair. I don't buy that badly made greenwashing.
cough cough Apple cough cough
Reyalp51

Winnyace wrote:

eblf2013 wrote:

Right to not repair is one of the worst forms of greed. Also, it would be one of the highest forms of hipocrisy if a company states that they're ecological/sustainable while making their products impossible to repair. I don't buy that badly made greenwashing.
cough cough Apple cough cough
all my homies hate apple
lostsilver

Reyalp51 wrote:

Winnyace wrote:

eblf2013 wrote:

Right to not repair is one of the worst forms of greed. Also, it would be one of the highest forms of hipocrisy if a company states that they're ecological/sustainable while making their products impossible to repair. I don't buy that badly made greenwashing.
cough cough Apple cough cough
all my homies hate apple
i like android
Topic Starter
Winnyace


New question



What's your opinion on post farming?



My answer
TBH, I'm kinda off indifferent towards it. It annoys me, especially when I scroll through GD, but to some degree, I don't know if other forums weren't/aren't similarly "spammed" with replies.
lostsilver
i don't really have an opinion on it
Patatitta
I think everyone knows
[ Rynn ]
ehh, i dont have much opinion abt it tbh... i just leave the post spammers alone
Nanofranne
I'm also indifferent with it. At least people who do that have some insightful reply sometimes
Karmine
It's useless and makes everyone who wants to read through threads waste their time
Also when 90% of posts on a forum are pointless replies to farm post count people just stop checking there and the forum dies

I've never seen that on any other forum
Just checked one of them which was pretty active (I had 50+ notifications every day), I am still the 2nd member with most posts (it's dead now) with less than 5k posts in 5 years, the most active had ~8k posts in 7 years
Don't know if count is accurate since most of the forum has been deleted and I can't check my full history, but I remember spending about the same time on there as I do now on OT when I was most active so same post count in twice the time seems plausible
Here I have ~6k in ~2 years (counting OT/FG, where the vast majority lies), yet we have people with 10k+ (not counting OT) in less than a year
It sucks
Kobold84
Quality over quantity.
synthwavesquid
-
Corne2Plum3

Winnyace wrote:



New question



What's your opinion on post farming?



My answer
TBH, I'm kinda off indifferent towards it. It annoys me, especially when I scroll through GD, but to some degree, I don't know if other forums weren't/aren't similarly "spammed" with replies.
Useless
Hydreigon
its just a number.
Reyalp51
Analxii
Aireunaeus
as a former post farmer, I didn't really think much about postfarming. I just focused on quantity and not on quality. I eventually stopped postfarming as soon when I noticed that subforums stopped getting new responses and thought that postfarming just ruins the forums altogether. Not only that, but I also have seen others ranting about it, which made me change my mind about postfarming. Nowadays, I just post when I feel like it
Karmine

My Angel Anaxii wrote:

as a former post farmer, I didn't really think much about postfarming. I just focused on quantity and not on quality. I eventually stopped postfarming as soon when I noticed that subforums stopped getting new responses and thought that postfarming just ruins the forums altogether. Not only that, but I also have seen others ranting about it, which made me change my mind about postfarming. Nowadays, I just post when I feel like it
Based redemption arc
Cerno

Karmine wrote:

My Angel Anaxii wrote:

as a former post farmer, I didn't really think much about postfarming. I just focused on quantity and not on quality. I eventually stopped postfarming as soon when I noticed that subforums stopped getting new responses and thought that postfarming just ruins the forums altogether. Not only that, but I also have seen others ranting about it, which made me change my mind about postfarming. Nowadays, I just post when I feel like it
Based redemption arc
Top 10 character development
Corne2Plum3

My Angel Anaxii wrote:

as a former post farmer, I didn't really think much about postfarming. I just focused on quantity and not on quality. I eventually stopped postfarming as soon when I noticed that subforums stopped getting new responses and thought that postfarming just ruins the forums altogether. Not only that, but I also have seen others ranting about it, which made me change my mind about postfarming. Nowadays, I just post when I feel like it
based
DM FOR MUTUAL
Anaxii where u at 🎤
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply