forum

84k people have mistaken the Dislike button as "Dis I like"

posted
Total Posts
64
show more
Railey2
Hello I'm writing this review for tampons.

Sadly I couldn't use the product because I'm a man. 0/10, just horrible, useless product with zero functionality.


and this is what happens when you don't consider a products target group while writing a review. In other words: It's stupid, and so is everyone that reviews emoji-movie using adult criteria. Missing the point.

Sure reviews of kids movies are written for adults. So they can decide whether or not their kid should watch it.


that was a nice video that you linked though. Very good
Mahogany
Adults can "use" kids movies, though, that ain't a good comparison.
And these reviews might be the deciding factor for a parent taking their kid to watch something like, say, The Lego Movie, over something like the Minions movie.

If you want a review from a kid, go find a kid who writes reviews. Your kid will enjoy the emoji movie or any other kids movie no matter what, kids will literally watch anything. Plenty of people will ignore the critical review scores or simply not know about them and take the kids to watch it anyway. The kids will probably enjoy it, too! That still doesn't mean it's a good movie, nor should it be scored highly.

And yeah ralph is awesome, that video is one of my favorite videos of anything ever.
Railey2
The point was obviously not whether or not you can USE something, but whether or not it makes sense to write a review about a product that is intended for someone else, as if it should be intended FOR YOU.

A product that is intended for only a specific group (Tampon: Women, Emoji-movie: children), that gets a review from someone that is not the target audience (Tampon: man, Emoji-movie: adult), while only considering only things that are relevant for his own group but not the target group (Tampon: "Hey, men can't use this!", Emoji-movie: "Hey, adults don't like this!")

gervisium wrote:

If you go "hur dur those two things are different", then you missed the point that analogies aren't about presenting two identical events but rather presenting two different events with relevant similarities. And the similarities are patently obvious here. Sure, there are differences, but if you want to counter the argument your job is to explain why the differences completely change the similarities in logic, rather than just point out that two things are different.

Let's try something else, this is how a kid movie should be reviewed if you want to take the adults perspective into account (very roughly).

A) Would my kids like it?
B) Would I like it too?
C) Does it have a positive message/can they learn something from it?
D) Would the movie harm them?

- Saving Private Ryan would be yes to B, possibly C, but also D. So while it is a good movie, you shouldn't let them watch it.

- Bee movie and Emoji Movie would be A and C but not B, so you can let them watch it but you'd probably want to avoid watching it yourself.

- The minions movie would probably just be A but not B, so they can watch it but you shouldn't. And apart from that.. it's pretty forgettable since its not C.

- Frozen would be A, B and C, so you can watch it with them.


Anyway. I don't think that the A & C but not B category deserves as much hate as it's getting. And it certainly doesn't deserve negative reviews. After all, it's still A & C, so there is some value there even if its not for you.

If you review a kid's movie just taking B into account and not anything else, you're a stupid moron and shouldn't write reviews. Not saying that you are one of these people, but they seem to make up a great part of the critics online.
Mahogany

Railey2 wrote:

The point was obviously not whether or not you can USE something, but whether or not it makes sense to write a review about a product that is intended for someone else, as if it should be intended FOR YOU.
It is literally film critics' jobs to watch movies and review them. This is their job. It's their job to assess whether a movie is considered good or bad.
Yes, some will just rate a movie based on "did I like it or not" without paying proper attention to the film itself, but the emoji movie is being universally panned. I haven't seen a single good word said about it. Of any movie to defend on this, I can't believe you'd choose this one.

Railey2 wrote:

Anyway. I don't think that the A & C but not B category deserves as much hate as it's getting. And it certainly doesn't deserve negative reviews. After all, it's still A & C, so there is some value there even if its not for you.
It's not about whether a movie is "for kids" or not, it's about whether it's a good movie. Kids will literally watch anything, and there are many, many other, better kids movies out there that teach positive messages without being awful pieces of film.

If you review a kid's movie just taking B into account and not anything else, you're a stupid moron and shouldn't write reviews. Not saying that you are one of these people, but they seem to make up a great part of the critics online.
Or maybe, just maybe, people seem to agree it's just a bad movie all around. Have you thought about the fact that adults will naturally enjoy any good kids movie, just because they're good movies? Of course better movies will be rated higher. Dribble like the Emoji movie shouldn't be given the same review scores as something like UP, just because kids, the target audience, enjoy them both.
Railey2

Mahogany wrote:

It's not about whether a movie is "for kids" or not, it's about whether it's a good movie. Kids will literally watch anything, and there are many, many other, better kids movies out there that teach positive messages without being awful pieces of film.
You claim that A always applies and therefore doesn't matter

That's wrong and retarded


You also say that kids shouldn't watch any A & C movies as long as there are A, B & C movies around.

This is also retarded


I don't care about the emoji movie and I will never watch it. It may or may not be a bad movie, whatever you mean by "bad" (not like I could ever expect something like mental clarity about concepts like "good and bad").
I just I just don't like stupidity.
Clearly, the majority of reviewers don't know the first thing about reviews: CONSIDER THE TARGET GROUP.


Have a good day
Mahogany
Having a certain target background doesn't automatically save something from just being a bad movie, though.

You also say that kids shouldn't watch any A & C movies as long as there are A, B & C movies around.
Not at all. I just said they should watch good movies over bad ones.
abraker
Any meme made into a money machine is instantly bad. You cannot profit from memes and have other people like it for quality. Their roots derive from either a joke or a relatable context turned into a joke, which is nothing culturally nor emotionally significant to allow quality taste.

Emojis are a meme tool used in text chat. The Emoji Movie a terrible attempt to profit off of that mobile media culture.
kai99
how 'bout a hashtag movie
Zekks

kai99 wrote:

how 'bout a hashtag movie
how 'bout minding ur own business
Buster
Blitzfrog

[ - Zekks - ] wrote:

kai99 wrote:

how 'bout a hashtag movie
how 'bout minding ur own business
how 'bout how 'bout movie
Fhaye
I am waiting for someone to pirate this movie to see if it's bad or not.
abraker

Hyerim wrote:

I am waiting for someone to pirate this movie to see if it's bad or not.
I am waiting for someone to put it on youtube, get 1 million views and 100k:1 dislike ratio before it gets taken down.
Fhaye

abraker wrote:

Hyerim wrote:

I am waiting for someone to pirate this movie to see if it's bad or not.
I am waiting for someone to put it on youtube, get 1 million views and 100k:1 dislike ratio before it gets taken down.
Red tide, this movie makes me wonder on how bad it really is
A hit or a bust
Topic Starter
Meah
50 million USD budget wasted some says, critics doesn't like it, a lot of people doesn't like it so probably this movie is a bust.
Fhaye
emoji movie best
ClevelandsMyBro
i like necro
Corne2Plum3
Why this is always noobs who doing necros?
pentaqola
oh my fucking god can i just forget this movie exist
z0z

pentaqola wrote:

oh my fucking god can i just forget this movie exist
feels like a "meme" now
Zelzatter Zero
ok
Nuuskamuikkunen
*Hits australian like*
ColdTooth
I sweaR TO FUCKING GOD
Nameless
what fucking numbnut revived this thread
Zelzatter Zero
Lin Hu best boi.

YyottaCat

Corne2Plum3 wrote:

Why this is always noobs who doing necros?
Hyerim has been here for years, but is constantly lurking.
Winnyace
Asuka Best Girl

Sugar_owo
Why did you bring this movie back.

I so ever clearly remember being forced to watch this with my sister and a hated it.
abraker
I can't believe they are going for a second movie


(this doesn't mean necros are fine, don't do it. Tho this is a good opportunity to reflect on how the movie has aged)
Winnyace
wait, really? are they really going to make a sequel?
abraker



nothing screams more "corporate" than whatever the monstrosity that trailer is
Sugar_owo
uh oh
ninore

abraker wrote:

ghoulybits
I remember I watched The Emoji Movie on a long flight to England once. I was tired and the sleeping pills weren't working. The entire time it just felt like a cruel fever dream, but there were literally no other movies offered by the airline that were remotely interesting. 3/10 horrible corporate garbage but the artists that were forced to work on it made something that was kind of nice to look at.
keremaru
I just realized that Gene is the only thing that is truly gender-neutral. He is everything, while also being nothing at the same time.
animeslayergp
i didnt watch it but man people were flaming that movie hard,tho it was something people loved to hate which is why it made a bunch of money
Nuuskamuikkunen
Are studios making bad movies on purpose to make them being talked about as terrible movies thus leading people to watch that movie because everyone is speaking about it, while at the same time looking appealing for children making the most reused and basic jokes that somehow work best on them (taking into account they don't know much either and that they hardly get tired by repetitive jokes) and making tons of merchandise around it in order to make children beg their parents to watch the movie?

idk just a midnight thought.
Sugar_owo
remember that grub hub ad?

that's what this movie reminded me of.
animeslayergp

Sugar_owo wrote:

remember that grub hub ad?

that's what this movie reminded me of.
XD,omg the cringe and dislikes is funny af
z0z

animesquadgp wrote:

Sugar_owo wrote:

remember that grub hub ad?

that's what this movie reminded me of.
XD,omg the cringe and dislikes is funny af
i mean if it took up a spot in my mind for being cringe, the ad wins but i'm still not going to use any food-delivery apps
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply