1. 00:13:441 (1,1) - minor one and even slider leniency would help avoid 100 but I still suggest you lower the spacing a bit so it doesn't look similar to previous 1/2 rhythm gaps
2. 00:48:809 (5) - divide combo maybe? you did to other similar spacing changes in this section
3. 01:45:651 (5) - consider this rhythm pattern https://puu.sh/wDxvK/d7b927a6c8.png ? it made 01:45:651 - 01:45:809 - better emphasized while playing
4. 01:47:230 (1) - maybe ctrl-g? would make flow more natural imo
5. 01:50:072 (1,2,3) - 1->2->3 movement is bit too sharp and requires a quick flow change at 01:50:546 (2,3) - , while the sound itself seems minor, so maybe you can try ctrl-g 3 so it breaks the flow at 01:51:020 (1) -
6. 01:59:546 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I somehow expect a stream with smaller spacing, why do you make it so hard here :\
7. 02:09:493 (2) - minor, make it less curved so it looks similar to 02:09:967 (5,10) - in terms of visual, like 02:05:704 (2,5,10) -
8. 02:15:178 (2) - whistle on body is intentional or a mistake? it seems the only one that has whistle in this part
9. 02:31:599 (6) - maybe move this note left so spacing from 6->1 can be larger and emphasize the vocal better
10. 02:43:441 - how you divide the drums suddenly changes here.. 02:39:335 - to 02:43:046 - is like o x x o x x o x x so 02:43:441 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this part should be redone imo
11. 04:02:704 - ^ uh it seems more disordered here, maybe just me so I'd like to hear your thoughts about them
12. 02:45:967 (1,2,3) - make it a flipping of previous combo like 04:08:388 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - so it flows differently?
13. 04:50:703 (1,3) - hey i don't usually like mentioning blanket stuff but since it's intended why not just make it perfect
14. 05:18:177 (6,7,8) - shouldn't this be a spaced triplet instead? check your similar patterns
15. 06:00:177 (1) - 06:02:703 (1) - if you focus on drums then these notes should be deleted like how 05:57:651 - is skipped
16. 06:07:756 (1) - maybe it's personal preference, I recommend you move this down to around 500,300. since music is going lower pitch i'd like to see movement suggests it too
17. 06:30:177 (3) - the section is quite calm I suggest replacing the triplet with a 1/4 slider
18. 06:36:177 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - similarly, I suggest using simple patterns instead
19. 06:45:177 (7) - move to somewhere around 80,340? 06:45:334 (8) - can be better emphasized
20. 08:50:229 (1) - stream should suggest a turn at this note like 00:26:230 (1) -
21. 09:11:545 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - since 09:09:650 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - is same, maybe they should be the same too?
22. 09:44:704 (3) - new combo for the slowdown? also cuz 09:44:230 (2) - is covering the slider tick so it's really hard to notice without actually playing but it's 9 mins now ppl would be mad if they break xD
23. 09:47:230 (3) - ^ make it consistent if you agree with me above
24. 10:00:493 (5) - hey i thought it's 1/2.. you can just make them closer it doesn't hurt visual imo
25. 10:33:651 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - great, but could use some more buildups, the stream spacing barely changes before this pattern so it came totally out of my expectation
26. 10:36:335 (5,6,7) - there can be a better alternative to simplify the rhythm, overmapping 1/6 burststream to the coming 1/3 drums is too sudden to me...
27. 10:41:862 (1) - 10% = almost no feedback just increase volume a bit and you are good
28. 10:45:966 (1) - delete nc like 10:49:756 (7) -

Garden wrote:

08:48:098 (8) - a random ghost note lol oh
10:36:335 (5) - could suggest the sudden 1/6 rhythm with a new combo here sure

rest are fine

Lasse wrote:

why are you using these clicking normal-hitnormal samples, they don't make any sense to put as custom hitsounds in song like this
your soft ones also seems rather out of place
you could probably just delete both so it uses default ones, or find better fitting custom samples

Lasse wrote:

why are you using these clicking normal-hitnormal samples, they don't make any sense to put as custom hitsounds in song like this
your soft ones also seems rather out of place
you could probably just delete both so it uses default ones, or find better fitting custom samples

Mir wrote:

try this: https://mir.s-ul.eu/WuXgr4eA it fits more with your "you feel like the drummer" concept I feel, plus it's not as annoying as CLACK CLACK CLACK because i really don't feel like a drummer when i hear CLACK CLACK CLACK


CLACK CLACK CLACK

1. 00:16:283 (6,7) - i kinda dislike the normal-hitnormal for those, it sounds as if there was a snare, but there isn't any snare in the music (this repeats in a lot of instances throughout the whole map, the ones i'd like to "fix" though, would be those that are in the calm parts such as 00:45:651 - or 03:17:230 - , for example
2. 02:39:651 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - about these streams... the flow feels inconsistent, i mean i get the idea behind the spacing decrease on stuff like 02:41:230 (1,2,3,4) - what isn't really clear for me, though, are those angle changes 02:40:204 (8,1,2) - 02:40:520 (4,1,2) - etc... i think they're meant to emphasize the guitar? thing is that its usage looks a bit inconsistent, like 02:44:703 (5) - is not emphasized at all despite it being strong enough to do so
3. 04:02:388 (5,6,7,8) - this being visually less spaced than stuff like 04:02:704 (1,2,3,4) - doesn't make much sense imo, mainly because these snares are representing a change in the music. i think it would be better to space them out more, or simply replace it for 1/4 sliders, as jumps are also a valid way to emphasize those sounds
4. 04:04:283 (5) - vs 04:08:071 (5) - more or less the same thing as previous point. it feels inconsistent
5. 04:17:230 (2,3,1,2) - i'd rather change the spacing for the claps instead, also i think the nc should be on 04:17:546 (3) -
6. 04:49:440 - the normal-hitnormal sounds out of place on this section as well, especially those that land on red ticks such as 04:49:598 -
7. 06:56:808 (2) - could use a 1/3 slider as a filler, the rhythm would be more intuitive to read by doing so
8. 07:33:019 (1) - this shape looks kinda random compared to the rest of the map, as if there wasn't too much care on making something interesting. it might be just me, though
9. 08:18:492 (1,1) - this was a bit confusing to read at first sight, i think it's because they're spaced instead of overlapped, i think you could try something like this in order to make it more readable
10. 08:27:019 (1,2,3,1,2) - suddenly changing the snapping between 1/3 and 1/2 isn't too much of a good idea, i think it's better to use a slider for stuff like 08:27:650 (1,2) -
11. 10:29:230 - this whole section feels a bit overdone compared to what is in the map. i think there were other instances where the music was equally (if not stronger) than this one and the spacing wasn't as exaggerated as this (this section would be a good example of what i'm saying 05:07:124 - )
12. i don't really like how the map suddenly increases its difficulty on the last 10 seconds of it, not because i'm against jumps or high spacing, but rather because it feels unbalanced. sudden 1/4 10:33:651 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - and 1/3 10:38:704 (4,5,6,1) - spaced streams goes against the map concept in my opinion

Kagetsu wrote:

some opinions

[Tragedy]

1. 00:16:283 (6,7) - i kinda dislike the normal-hitnormal for those, it sounds as if there was a snare, but there isn't any snare in the music (this repeats in a lot of instances throughout the whole map, the ones i'd like to "fix" though, would be those that are in the calm parts such as 00:45:651 - or 03:17:230 - , for example fixed the hitsounding
2. 02:39:651 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - about these streams... the flow feels inconsistent, i mean i get the idea behind the spacing decrease on stuff like 02:41:230 (1,2,3,4) - what isn't really clear for me, though, are those angle changes 02:40:204 (8,1,2) - 02:40:520 (4,1,2) - etc... i think they're meant to emphasize the guitar? thing is that its usage looks a bit inconsistent, like 02:44:703 (5) - is not emphasized at all despite it being strong enough to do so remapped streams
3. 04:02:388 (5,6,7,8) - this being visually less spaced than stuff like 04:02:704 (1,2,3,4) - doesn't make much sense imo, mainly because these snares are representing a change in the music. i think it would be better to space them out more, or simply replace it for 1/4 sliders, as jumps are also a valid way to emphasize those sounds i don't feel like increasing the spacing there, i think it creates a better buildup for the stream section ahead
4. 04:04:283 (5) - vs 04:08:071 (5) - more or less the same thing as previous point. it feels inconsistent
5. 04:17:230 (2,3,1,2) - i'd rather change the spacing for the claps instead, also i think the nc should be on 04:17:546 (3) - sure
6. 04:49:440 - the normal-hitnormal sounds out of place on this section as well, especially those that land on red ticks such as 04:49:598 -
7. 06:56:808 (2) - could use a 1/3 slider as a filler, the rhythm would be more intuitive to read by doing so i don't think a filler fits there. though i changed the spacing on the last double to match the previous spacing
8. 07:33:019 (1) - this shape looks kinda random compared to the rest of the map, as if there wasn't too much care on making something interesting. it might be just me, though thanks for calling my sliderart which i polished for 15 minutes uninteresting
9. 08:18:492 (1,1) - this was a bit confusing to read at first sight, i think it's because they're spaced instead of overlapped, i think you could try something like this in order to make it more readable i think the nc should make it clear enough that something's different there
10. 08:27:019 (1,2,3,1,2) - suddenly changing the snapping between 1/3 and 1/2 isn't too much of a good idea, i think it's better to use a slider for stuff like 08:27:650 (1,2) - 08:27:650 (1,2) needs to be emphasized so i'd rather use a jump here than put a slider. also it's quite well readable that it won't be a 1/3
11. 10:29:230 - this whole section feels a bit overdone compared to what is in the map. i think there were other instances where the music was equally (if not stronger) than this one and the spacing wasn't as exaggerated as this (this section would be a good example of what i'm saying 05:07:124 - ) this section is the most intense drum fill in the entire song, which also culminates the whole thing.
12. i don't really like how the map suddenly increases its difficulty on the last 10 seconds of it, not because i'm against jumps or high spacing, but rather because it feels unbalanced. sudden 1/4 10:33:651 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - and 1/3 10:38:704 (4,5,6,1) - spaced streams goes against the map concept in my opinion again, it's culminating the entire song.

Garden wrote:

uh default normal hitnormals are providing really weird feedback in some parts (like 00:15:335 - section) I suggest you gather some other opinions.. not sure if it's just me.

1. Now by looking at this triplet and the circle, 05:03:966 (1,2,3,4) - it has some weird 1/8 gimmick and imo the 2, 3 and 4 should be a repeat slider just then.
   Just my idea to avoid the 1/8 confusing sounds at the background. (I mean that it has 1/8 sounds so with the repeatslider it wont be so confusing as with circles)
2. 06:49:440 (1,2,3) - What about equaling the spacing here between these notes? 1,3x for example, very minor.
3. 07:25:124 (6) - What about CTRL+G to this slider due to the vocal? You emphasis every slider at that combo so emphasizing it also would be logical. You can then move 07:25:440 (1) - this circle to where 07:24:966 (5) - is so it's basically the same spacing between these notes as it was previously.
4. 07:46:756 (2,3) - CTRL+G maybe these circles too? (swap positions) As 2 has actually a sound, but 3 has nothing. With this change the 2 and 3 have basically the same spacing, but this way it's more logical as 2 with a sound is emphasized too.

-Kanzaki wrote:

10:33:651 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - After 10 minutes of play, this is so unexpected and will probably make lots of players rage quit. I would still keep the same spacing with 10:33:019 (1,2,3,4,5) - this or use 1.4 - 1.5 Distance snapping. Even this part is more intense still i don't believe it is not this much intense.

Kagetsu wrote:

can you confirm whether this finish 01:15:809 (2) - intended, that's what the drummer does there

and those whistles 01:30:967 - 03:09:493 - are intentional? intended, the snare gets a bit more quiet there, went for a whistle instead of claps

that's all

AzureDoctor wrote:

Grats!

Also, Drummer do you play the drums?